The Characteristics, Activities and Goals of Environmental Organizations Engaged in Advocacy Within the Australian Environmental Movement

References

• ABS. (2016). Household use of information technology. Canberra: Australian Government.
   Google Scholar
• Ackland, R., & O'Neil, M. (2011). Online collective identity: The case of the environmental movement. Social Networks, 33(3), 177–190. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2011.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal, N., Lim, M., & Wigand, R. T. (2011). Collective action theory meets the blogosphere: A new methodology. Paper presented at the International Conference on Networked digital technologies.
   Google Scholar
• Agnone, J. (2007). Amplifying public opinion: The policy impact of the U.S. environmental movement. Social Forces, 85(4), 1593–1620. doi: 10.1353/sof.2007.0059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almog-Bar, M., & Schmid, H. (2014). Advocacy activities of nonprofit human service organizations: A critical review. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(1), 11–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, K., & Caren, N. (2010). Making the news: Movement organizations, media attention, and the public agenda. American Sociological Review, 75(6), 841–866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, K., Edwards, B., Al-Turk, A., & Hunter, A. K. (2016). Sampling social movement organizations. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 21(2), 231–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Government. (2012). Australian charities and not-for-profits commission website. Retrieved from http://www.acnc.gov.au/ACNC/Reg/Charities_elections_and_advocacy_.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Government. (2016). Inquiry into the register of environmental organisations. Retrieved from http://apo.org.au/node/63915/cite.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Government. (2018). Register of environmental organisations. Retrieved from http://www.environment.gov.au/.
   Google Scholar
• Bak, H. J. (2001). Education and public attitudes toward science: Implications for the “deficit model” of education and support for science and technology. Social Science Quarterly, 82(4), 779–795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, S., & Pollard, J. (2017). Geographies of transition: Narrating environmental activism in an age of climate change and ‘peak Oil’. Environment and Planning A, 49(1), 47–64. doi: 10.1177/0308518X16663205
   Google Scholar
• Bimber, B., Flanagin, A. J., & Stohl, C. (2005). Reconceptualizing collective action in the contemporary media environment. Communication Theory, 15(4), 365–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloomfield, M. J. (2014). Shame campaigns and environmental justice: Corporate shaming as activist strategy. Environmental Politics, 23(2), 263–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond, M. (2012). Grassroots climate action in Australia: Visions, practices and innovation. Griffith University, Retrieved from https://www120.secure.griffith.edu.au/rch/items/e654230b-e590-4854-8079-618ebd4a8629/1/.
   Google Scholar
• Bond, M., & Froome, C. (2010). Localizing climate change: Stepping up local climate action. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 21(2), 214–225. doi: 10.1108/14777831011025553
   Google Scholar
• Bratman, E., Brunette, K., Shelly, D. C., & Nicholson, S. (2016). Justice is the goal: Divestment as climate change resistance. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 6(4), 677–690. doi: 10.1007/s13412-016-0377-6
   Google Scholar
• Brulle, R. (2010). From environmental campaigns to advancing the public dialog: Environmental communication for civic engagement. Environmental Communication, 4(1), 82–98. doi: 10.1080/17524030903522397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brulle, R., & Rootes, C. (2015). Environmental movements. In James D. Wright (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of the social & behavioral Sciences (2nd ed., pp. 763–768). Burlington: Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.91016-X
   Google Scholar
• Brulle, R., Turner, L., Carmichael, J., & Jenkins, J. (2007). Measuring social movement organization populations: A comprehensive census of US environmental movement organizations. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 12(3), 255–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Büchs, M. (2014). The role of environmental organisations in supporting carbon reduction: Comparing direct and indirect involvement. Environmental Politics, 23(6), 1003–1022. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2014.921456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cammaerts, B. (2012). Protest logics and the mediation opportunity structure. European Journal of Communication, 27(2), 117–134. doi: 10.1177/0267323112441007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmin, J., & Balser, D. B. (2002). Selecting repertoires of action in environmental movement organizations: An interpretive approach. Organization and Environment, 15(4), 365–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, M. (2017). Media use and the social identity model of collective action: Examining the roles of online alternative news and social media news. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 94(3), 663–681. doi: 10.1177/1077699016638837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman, J., Parvazian, S., & Skinner, N. (2017). How do Australians rate as environmental citizens? An international comparative analysis of environmental concern and action. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management, 24(2), 117–132. doi: 10.1080/14486563.2017.1310674
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Child, C. D., & Grønbjerg, K. A. (2007). Nonprofit advocacy organizations: Their characteristics and activities. Social Science Quarterly, 88(1), 259–281. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2007.00457.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, J. R., & Pezzullo, P. C. (2016). Environmental communication and the public sphere (4th ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, R. (2015). Waxing or waning? The changing patterns of environmental activism. Environmental Politics, 24(4), 530–552. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2015.1023576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, R., Recchia, S., & Rohrschneider, R. (2003). The environmental movement and the modes of political action. Comparative Political Studies, 36(7), 743–771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diani, M. (1992). The concept of social movement. The Sociological Review, 40(1), 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downie, C. (2017). Fighting for King coal’s crown: Business actors in the US coal and utility industries. Global Environmental Politics, 17(1), 21–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feola, G., & Nunes, R. (2014). Success and failure of grassroots innovations for addressing climate change: The case of the transition movement. Global Environmental Change, 24, 232–250. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.11.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giugni, M., & Grasso, M. T. (2015). Environmental movements in advanced industrial democracies: Heterogeneity, transformation, and institutionalization. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 40(1), 337–361. doi: 10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gritten, D., González-Olabarría, J., Mola-Yudego, B., & Domínguez, G. (2012). Environmental campaigns against forest companies: What are the campaigns trying to achieve? Forest Systems, 21(2), 247–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grønbjerg, K., & Clerkin, R. (2005). Examining the landscape of Indiana’s nonprofit sector: Does what you know depend on where you look? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 34(2), 232–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, C., & Saxton, G. D. (2014). Tweeting social change: How social media are changing nonprofit advocacy. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(1), 57–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadden, J., & Jasny, L. (2017). The power of peers: How transnational advocacy networks shape NGO strategies on climate change. British Journal of Political Science, 49(2), 637–659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F., & Krippendorff, K. (2007). Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication Methods and Measures, 1(1), 77–89.
   Google Scholar
• Hisschemöller, M., & Sioziou, I. (2013). Boundary organisations for resource mobilisation: Enhancing citizens’ involvement in the Dutch energy transition. Environmental Politics, 22(5), 792–810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, E., & Prakash, A. (2007). NGO research program: A collective action perspective. Policy Sciences, 40(3), 221–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, E., Saito, Y., & Nishikido, M. (2009). The organizational demography of Japanese environmentalism. Sociological Inquiry, 79(4), 481–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joyce, M. (2018). Picking the best intercoder reliability statistic for your digital activism content analysis. Digital Activism Research Project. Retrieved from http://digital-activism.org/2013/05/picking-the-best-intercoder-reliability-statistic-for-your-digital-activism-content-analysis/.
   Google Scholar
• Jugert, P., Greenaway, K. H., Barth, M., Büchner, R., Eisentraut, S., & Fritsche, I. (2016). Collective efficacy increases pro-environmental intentions through increasing self-efficacy. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 48, 12–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz-Kimchi, M., & Manosevitch, I. (2015). Mobilizing Facebook users against Facebook's energy policy: The case of Greenpeace unfriend coal campaign. Environmental Communication, 9(2), 248–267. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2014.993413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laestadius, L. I., Neff, R. A., Barry, C. L., & Frattaroli, S. (2014). “We don’t tell people what to do”: An examination of the factors influencing NGO decisions to campaign for reduced meat consumption in light of climate change. Global Environmental Change, 29, 32–40. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lester, L., & Hutchins, B. (2012). The power of the unseen: Environmental conflict, the media and invisibility. Media, Culture and Society, 34(7), 847–863. doi: 10.1177/0163443712452772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, R., O’Donovan, G., & Willett, R. (2017). The effect of environmental activism on the long-run market value of a company: A case study. Journal of Business Ethics, 140(3), 455–476. doi: 10.1007/s10551-015-2686-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombard, M., Snyder-Duch, J., & Bracken, C. C. (2002). Content analysis in mass communication: Assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability. Human Communication Research, 28(4), 587–604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louis, W. (2009). Collective action-and then what? Journal of Social Issues, 65(4), 727–748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J. D., & Zald, M. N. (1977). Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. American Journal of Sociology, 82(6), 1212–1241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, M. (2016). Bourdieu, environmental NGOs, and Australian climate politics. Environmental Politics, 25(6), 1058–1078. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2016.1196968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, D. S. (2004). Protest and political opportunities. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 125–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Middlemiss, L., & Parrish, B. D. (2010). Building capacity for low-carbon communities: The role of grassroots initiatives. Energy Policy, 38(12), 7559–7566. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mihaylov, N. L., & Perkins, D. D. (2015). Local environmental grassroots activism: Contributions from environmental psychology, sociology and politics. Behavioral Sciences, 5(1), 121–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moser, S. C., & Dilling, L. (2011). Communicating climate change: Closing the science-action gap. In John S. Dryzek, Richard B. Norgaard, & David Schlosberg (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society. New York: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199566600.003.0011
   Google Scholar
• Obar, J. A., Zube, P., & Lampe, C. (2012). Advocacy 2.0: An analysis of how advocacy groups in the United States perceive and use social media as tools for facilitating civic engagement and collective action. Journal of Information Policy, 2, 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• O'Brien, T. (2012). Environmental protest in New Zealand (1997–2010). The British Journal of Sociology, 63(4), 641–661.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Brien, T. (2013). Fragmentation or evolution? Understanding change within the New Zealand environmental movement. Journal of Civil Society, 9, 287–299. doi: 10.1080/17448689.2013.818267
   Google Scholar
• Porta, D., & Rucht, D. (2002). The dynamics of environmental campaigns. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 7(1), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, J., & Heard, J. (2005). European environmental NGOs: Issues, resources and strategies in marine campaigns. Environmental Politics, 14(1), 23–41. doi: 10.1080/0964401042000310169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ripple, W., Wolf, C., Newsome, T., Galetti, M., Alamgir, M., Crist, E., … Laurance, W. (2017). World scientists’ warning to humanity: A second notice. BioScience, 67(12), 1026–1028. doi: 10.1093/biosci/bix125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rootes, C. (1999). Environmental movements: From the local to the global. Environmental Politics, 8(1), 1–12. doi: 10.1080/09644019908414435
   Google Scholar
• Rootes, C. (2007). Acting locally: The character, contexts and significance of local environmental mobilisations. Environmental Politics, 16(5), 722–741. doi: 10.1080/09644010701640460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rucht, D. (1990). The strategies and action repertoires of new movements. In R. J. Dalton & M. Kuechler (Eds.), Challenging the political order: New social and political movements in western Democracies (pp. 156–175). Cambridge: Cambridge Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schäfer, M. S. (2012). Online communication on climate change and climate politics: A literature review. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 3(6), 527–543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schock, K. (2003). Nonviolent action and its misconceptions: Insights for social scientists. Political Science and Politics, 36(4), 705–712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein, L. (2009). Social movement web use in theory and practice: A content analysis of US movement websites. New Media and Society, 11(5), 749–771. doi: 10.1177/1461444809105350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stolle, D., Hooghe, M., & Micheletti, M. (2005). Politics in the supermarket: Political consumerism as a form of political participation. International Political Science Review, 26(3), 245–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturgis, P., & Allum, N. (2004). Science in society: Re-evaluating the deficit model of public attitudes. Public Understanding of Science, 13(1), 55–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takahashi, B., Edwards, G., Roberts, J. T., & Duan, R. (2015). Exploring the use of online platforms for climate change policy and public engagement by NGOs in Latin America. Environmental Communication, 9, 228–247. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2014.1001764
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarrow, S. G. (2011). Power in movement: Social movements and contentious politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511973529
   Google Scholar
• Thøgersen, J., & Crompton, T. (2009). Simple and painless? The limitations of spillover in environmental campaigning. Journal of Consumer Policy, 32(2), 141–163.
   Google Scholar
• Thörn, H., & Svenberg, S. (2016). ‘We feel the responsibility that you shirk’: Movement institutionalization, the politics of responsibility and the case of the Swedish environmental movement. Social Movement Studies, 15(6), 593–609. doi: 10.1080/14742837.2016.1213162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilly, C. (1978). From mobilization to revolution. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Tranter, B. (2009). Leadership and change in the Tasmanian environment movement. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(5), 708–724. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.06.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, R. L., & Killian, L. (1987). Collective behavior (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Van Laer, J., & Van Aelst, P. (2010). Internet and social movement action repertoires: Opportunities and limitations. Information, Communication & Society, 13(8), 1146–1171. doi: 10.1080/13691181003628307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, S. C., Taylor, D. M., & Moghaddam, F. M. (1990). Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group: From acceptance to collective protest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(6), 994–1003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yasseri, T., Hale, S. A., & Margetts, H. (2013). Modeling the rise in internet-based petitions. arXiv preprint arXiv:1308.0239.
   Google Scholar
• Zhan, X., & Tang, S.-Y. (2013). Political opportunities, resource constraints and policy advocacy of environmental NGOs in China. Public Administration, 91(2), 381–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., & Zhao, D. (2018). The ecological and spatial contexts of social movements. In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to social movements (pp. 98–114). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. doi:10.1002/9781119168577.ch5
   Google Scholar