1,843
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Framing Messages on the Economic Impact of Climate Change Policies: Effects on Climate Believers and Climate Skeptics

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 715-730 | Received 11 Aug 2020, Accepted 09 Feb 2021, Published online: 06 Apr 2021

References

  • Akerlof, K., Maibach, E. W., Fitzgerald, D., Cedeno, A. Y., & Neuman, A. (2013). Do people “personally experience” global warming, and if so how, and does it matter?. Global Environmental Change, 23(1), 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.07.006
  • Baek, J. (2015). A panel cointegration analysis of CO2 emissions, nuclear energy and income in major nuclear generating countries. Applied Energy, 145, 133–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.074
  • Bain, P. G., Hornsey, M. J., Bongiorno, R., & Jeffries, C. (2012). Promoting pro-environmental action in climate change deniers. Nature Climate Change, 2(8), 603–603. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1636
  • Ballew, M. T., Leiserowitz, A., Roser-Renouf, C., Rosenthal, S. A., Kotcher, J. E., Marlon, J. R., … Maibach, E. W. (2019). Climate change in the American mind: Data, tools, and trends. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 61(3), 4–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00139157.2019.1589300
  • Bertolotti, M., & Catellani, P. (2014). Effects of message framing in policy communication on climate change. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(5), 474–486. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2033
  • Bertolotti, M., & Catellani, P. (2015). Agreement with climate change policies: Framing the future and national versus supra-national identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45(7), 847–857. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2166
  • Bliuc, A.-M., McGarty, C., Thomas, E. F., Lala, G., Berndsen, M., & Misajon, R. (2015). Public division about climate change rooted in conflicting socio-political identities. Nature Climate Change, 5(3), 226–229. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2507
  • Boykoff, M. T. (2008). The cultural politics of climate change discourse in UK tabloids. Political Geography, 27(5), 549–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2008.05.002
  • Broadbent, J., Sonnett, J., Botetzagias, I., Carson, M., Carvalho, A., Chien, Y. J., Edling, C., Fisher, D., Giouzepas, G., Haluza-DeLay, R., & Hasegawa, K. (2016). Conflicting climate change frames in a global field of media discourse. Socius, 2, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023116670660
  • Brügger, A., Dessai, S., Devine-Wright, P., Morton, T. A., & Pidgeon, N. F. (2015). Psychological responses to the proximity of climate change. Nature Climate Change, 5(12), 1031–1037. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2760
  • Campbell, T. H., & Kay, A. C. (2014). Solution aversion: On the relation between ideology and motivated disbelief. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(5), 809–824. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037963
  • Carmichael, J. T., & Brulle, R. J. (2016). Elite cues, media coverage, and public concern: An integrated path analysis of public opinion on climate change, 2001–2013. Environmental Politics, 26(2), 232–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2016.1263433
  • Carmichael, J. T., Brulle, R. J., & Huxster, J. K. (2017). The great divide: Understanding the role of media and other drivers of the partisan divide in public concern over climate change in the USA, 2001–2014. Climatic Change, 141(4), 599–612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-017-1908-1
  • Cesario, J., Corker, K. S., & Jelinek, S. (2013). A self–regulatory framework for message framing. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 238–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.10.014
  • Cook, J., Oreskes, N., Doran, P. T., Anderegg, W. R., Verheggen, B., Maibach, E. W., Carlton, J. S., Lewandowsky, S., Skuce, A. G., Green, S. A., & Nuccitelli, D. (2016). Consensus on consensus: A synthesis of consensus estimates on human-caused global warming. Environmental Research Letters, 11(4), 048002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/4/048002
  • Cox, J. R. (2010). Beyond frames: Recovering the strategic in climate communication. Environmental Communication, 4(1), 122–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524030903516555
  • Davis, J. J. (1995). The effects of message framing on response to environmental communications. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 72(2), 285–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909507200203
  • DeGolia, A. H., Hiroyasu, E. H. T., & Anderson, S. E. (2019). Economic losses or environmental gains? Framing effects on public support for environmental management. PLOS ONE, 14(7), e0220320. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220320
  • Dunlap, R. E., Xiao, C., & McCright, A. M. (2001). Politics and environment in America: Partisan and ideological cleavages in public support for environmentalism. Environmental Politics, 10(4), 23–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/714000580
  • ESS. (2016). Public attitudes to climate change (ESS8 2016). https://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/data/themes.html?t=climatech
  • Farrell, J. (2015). Corporate funding and ideological polarization about climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(1), 92–97. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1509433112
  • Floyd, R. (2015). Global climate security governance: A case of institutional and ideational fragmentation. Conflict, Security & Development, 15(2), 119–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/14678802.2015.1034452
  • Gifford, R., & Comeau, L. A. (2011). Message framing influences perceived climate change competence, engagement, and behavioral intentions. Global Environmental Change, 21(4), 1301–1307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.06.004
  • Gifford, R., & Nilsson, A. (2014). Personal and social factors that influence pro-environmental concern and behaviour: A review. International Journal of Psychology, https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12034
  • Hardisty, D. J., & Weber, E. U. (2009). Discounting future green: Money versus the environment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(3), 329–340. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016433
  • Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press.
  • Higgins, E.T., (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52(12), 1280–1300. https://doi.org10.1037/0003-066X.52.12.1280
  • Hornsey, M. J., Harris, E. A., Bain, P. G., & Fielding, K. S. (2016). Meta-analyses of the determinants and outcomes of belief in climate change. Nature Climate Change, 6(6), 622–626. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2943
  • Huddy, L. (2001). From social to political identity: A critical examination of social identity theory. Political Psychology, 22(1), 127–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895x.00230
  • Hulme, M. (2008). The conquering of climate: Discourses of fear and their dissolution. The Geographical Journal, 174(1), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4959.2008.00266.x
  • IPCC. (2014). Climate change 2014: Synthesis report. IPCC.
  • Jacques, P. J., Dunlap, R. E., & Freeman, M. (2008). The organisation of denial: Conservative think tanks and environmental scepticism. Environmental Politics, 17(3), 349–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010802055576
  • Kachi, A., Bernauer, T., & Gampfer, R. (2015). Climate policy in hard times: Are the pessimists right? Ecological Economics, 114, 227–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.03.002
  • Kahan, D. M. (2015). Climate science communication and the measurement problem. Advances in Political Psychology, 36, 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12244
  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185
  • Kidwell, B., Farmer, A., & Hardesty, D. M. (2013). Getting liberals and conservatives to go green: Political ideology and congruent appeals. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(2), 350–367. https://doi.org/10.1086/670610
  • Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E. W., Roser-Renouf, C., Smith, N., & Dawson, E. (2010). Climategate, public opinion, and the loss of trust. SSRN Electronic Journal, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1633932
  • Leviston, Z., & Walker, I. (2011). Second annual survey of Australian attitudes to climate change: Interim report. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation.
  • Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., & Cook, J. (2017). Beyond misinformation: Understanding and coping with the “post-truth” Era. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6(4), 353–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.07.008
  • Mannetti, L., Brizi, A., Giacomantonio, M., & Higgins, E. T. (2013). Framing political messages to fit the audience’s regulatory orientation: How to improve the efficacy of the same message content. PLoS ONE, 8(10), e77040. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077040
  • Maslow, A. (1954). Motivation and personality. Harper.
  • McCright, A. M. (2007). Dealing with climate change contrarians. Creating a Climate for Change, 200–212. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511535871.015
  • McDonald, M. (2013). Discourses of climate security. Political Geography, 33, 42–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2013.01.002
  • Meyerowitz, B. E., & Chaiken, S. (1987). The effect of message framing on breast self-examination attitudes, intentions, and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 500–510. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.500
  • Mildenberger, M., & Leiserowitz, A. (2017). Public opinion on climate change: Is there an economy–environment tradeoff? Environmental Politics, 26(5), 801–824. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2017.1322275
  • Moser, S. C., & Dilling, L. (Eds.). (2007). Creating a climate for change. Communicating climate change and facilitating Social change. Cambridge University Press.
  • Nelson, T. E., & Garst, J. (2005). Values-based political messages and persuasion: Relationships among speaker, recipient, and evoked values. Political Psychology, 26(4), 489–516. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00428.x
  • Nisbet, M. C. (2009). Communicating climate change: Why frames matter for public engagement. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 51(2), 12–23. https://doi.org/10.3200/ENVT.51.2.12–23
  • O’Neill, S. J., & Boykoff, M. (2010). Climate denier, skeptic, or contrarian? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(39), E151–E151. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1010507107
  • Oreskes, N. (2004). The scientific consensus on climate change. Science, 306(5702), 1686–1686. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1103618
  • Poortinga, W., Whitmarsh, L., Steg, L., Böhm, G., & Fisher, S. (2019). Climate change perceptions and their individual-level determinants: A cross-European analysis. Global Environmental Change, 55, 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.01.007
  • Reber, B. H., & Berger, B. K. (2005). Framing analysis of activist rhetoric: How the sierra club succeeds or fails at creating salient messages. Public Relations Review, 31(2), 185–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2005.02.020
  • Rudman, L. A., McLean, M. C., & Bunzl, M. (2013). When Truth Is personally inconvenient, attitudes change. Psychological Science, 24(11), 2290–2296. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613492775
  • Scrase, J. I., & Ockwell, D. G. (2010). The role of discourse and linguistic framing effects in sustaining high carbon energy policy—An accessible introduction. Energy Policy, 38(5), 2225–2233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.12.010
  • Scruggs, L., & Benegal, S. (2012). Declining public concern about climate change: Can we blame the great recession? Global Environmental Change, 22(2), 505–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.01.002
  • Spence, A., & Pidgeon, N. (2010). Framing and communicating climate change: The effects of distance and outcome frame manipulations. Global Environmental Change, 20(4), 656–667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.002
  • Spence, A., Poortinga, W., & Pidgeon, N. (2011). The Psychological distance of climate change. Risk Analysis, 32(6), 957–972. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01695.x
  • Stern, P. C., Kalof, L., Dietz, T., & Guagnano, G. A. (1995). Values, beliefs, and proenvironmental action: Attitude formation toward emergent attitude objects1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25(18), 1611–1636. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1995.tb02636.x
  • Taber, C. S., Cann, D., & Kucsova, S. (2008). The motivated processing of political arguments. Political Behavior, 31(2), 137–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-008-9075-8
  • Tannenbaum, M. B., Hepler, J., Zimmerman, R. S., Saul, L., Jacobs, S., Wilson, K., & Albarracín, D. (2015). Appealing to fear: A meta-analysis of fear appeal effectiveness and theories. Psychological Bulletin, 141(6), 1178–1204. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039729
  • Tobler, C., Visschers, V. H. M., & Siegrist, M. (2012). Consumers’ knowledge about climate change. Climatic Change, 114(2), 189–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0393-1
  • Tranter, B., & Booth, K. (2015). Scepticism in a changing climate: A cross-national study. Global Environmental Change, 33, 154–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.05.003
  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7455683
  • Van der Linden, S., Leiserowitz, A., Rosenthal, S., & Maibach, E. (2017). Inoculating the public against misinformation about climate change. Global Challenges, 1(2), 1600008. https://doi.org/10.1002/gch2.201600008
  • Van de Velde, L., Verbeke, W., Popp, M., & Van Huylenbroeck, G. (2010). The importance of message framing for providing information about sustainability and environmental aspects of energy. Energy Policy, 38(10), 5541–5549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.04.053
  • Whitmarsh, L. (2011). Scepticism and uncertainty about climate change: Dimensions, determinants and change over time. Global Environmental Change, 21(2), 690–700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.016
  • Wolsko, C., Ariceaga, H., & Seiden, J. (2016). Red, white, and blue enough to be green: Effects of moral framing on climate change attitudes and conservation behaviors. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 65, 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.02.005
  • Zehr, S. C. (2009). An environmentalist/economic hybrid frame in US Press coverage of climate change, 2000–2008. In T. Boyce, & J. Lewis (Eds.), Climate change and the media (pp. 80–91). Peter Lang.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.