Changing the World One Meme at a Time: The Effects of Climate Change Memes on Civic Engagement Intentions

References

• Bartsch, A., & Schneider, F. M. (2014). Entertainment and politics revisited: How non-escapist forms of entertainment can stimulate political interest and information seeking. Journal of Communication, 64(3), 369–396. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batson, C. D., Polycarpou, M. P., Harmon-Jones, E., Imhoff, H. J., Mitchener, E. C., Bednar, L. L., Klein, T. R., & Highberger, L. (1997). Empathy and attitudes: Can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group improve feelings toward the group? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(1), 105. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, A., & Anderson, A. A. (2019). Using humor to engage the public on climate change: The effect of exposure to one-sided vs. Two-sided satire on message discounting, elaboration and counterarguing. Journal of Science Communication, 18((04)), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.18040207
   Google Scholar
• Bore, I. L. K., & Reid, G. (2014). Laughing in the face of climate change? Satire as a device for engaging audiences in public debate. Science Communication, 36(4), 454–478. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547014534076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boukes, M., Boomgaarden, H. G., Moorman, M., & De Vreese, C. H. (2015). At odds: Laughing and thinking? The appreciation, processing, and persuasiveness of political satire. Journal of Communication, 65(5), 721–744. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Börzsei, L. K. (2013). Makes a meme instead: A concise history of internet memes. New Media Studies Magazine, 7, 152–189.
   Google Scholar
• Bratich, J. (2014). Occupy all the dispositifs: Memes, media ecologies, and emergent bodies politic. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 11(1), 64–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/14791420.2013.827351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Champ, P. A., Donovan, G. H., & Barth, C. M. (2013). Living in a tinderbox: Wildfire risk perceptions and mitigating behaviours. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 22(6), 832–840. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF12093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dancygier, B., & Vandelanotte, L. (2017). Internet memes as multimodal constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, 28(3), 565–598. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2017-0074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, C. B., Glantz, M., & Novak, D. R. (2016). “You can't run your SUV on cute. Let's go!”: Internet memes as delegitimizing discourse. Environmental Communication, 10(1), 62–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2014.991411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davison, P. (2012). The language of internet memes. In M. Mandiberg (Ed.), The social media reader (pp. 120–134). NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• DeLaure, M. (2011). Environmental comedy: No impact man and the performance of green identity. Environmental Communication, 5(4), 447–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2011.614952
   Google Scholar
• Dynel, M. (2016). “I has seen image macros!” advice animals memes as visual-verbal jokes. International Journal of Communication, 10, 660–688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Friedlander, J., & Riedy, C. (2019). The meme is the message: Engaging the social media audience in a meat reduction advocacy campaign. IECA. Retrieved from March 17, from https://theieca.org/sites/default/files/conference-presentations/coce_2015_boulder/friedlander_judith_riedy_chris-1657077321.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Gal, N., Shifman, L., & Kampf, Z. (2016). “It gets better”: Internet memes and the construction of collective identity. New Media & Society, 18(8), 1698–1714. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814568784
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hmielowski, J. D., Holbert, R. L., & Lee, J. (2011). Predicting the consumption of political TV satire: Affinity for political humor, The Daily Show, and The Colbert report. Communication Monographs, 78(1), 96–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2010.542579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, A. J. (2011). Talking past each other? Cultural framing of skeptical and convinced logics in the climate change debate. Organization & Environment, 24(1), 3–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026611404336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, L. H. (2012). Participation or communication? An explication of political activity in the Internet Age. Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 9(3), 217–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2011.650929
   Google Scholar
• Joosse, S., & Brydges, T. (2018). Blogging for sustainability: The intermediary role of personal green blogs in promoting sustainability. Environmental Communication, 12(5), 686–700. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2018.1474783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jurgenson, N. (2012, October 24). Speaking in memes. http://thenewinquiry.com/essays/speaking-in-memes/.
   Google Scholar
• Kahan, D. M., Jenkins-Smith, H., Tarantola, T., Silva, C. L., & Braman, D. (2015). Geoengineering and climate change polarization: Testing a two-channel model of science communication. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 658(1), 192–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716214559002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaltenbacher, M., & Drews, S. (2020). An inconvenient joke? A review of humor in climate change communication Environmental Communication, 14, 717–729. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2020.1756888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. M., & Vishak, J. (2008). Just laugh! You don’t need to remember: The effects of entertainment media on political information acquisition and information processing in political judgment. Journal of Communication, 58(2), 338–360. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00388.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knobel, M., & Lankshear, C. (2007). Online memes, affinities, and cultural production. In M. Knobel & C. Lankshear (Eds.), A new literacies sampler (pp. 199–227). Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Laineste, L., & Voolaid, P. (2017). Laughing across borders: Intertextuality of internet memes. The European Journal of Humour Research, 4(4), 26–49. https://doi.org/10.7592/EJHR2016.4.4.laineste
   Google Scholar
• Landreville, K. D., & LaMarre, H. L. (2011). Working through political entertainment: How negative emotion and narrative engagement encourage political discussion intent in young Americans. Communication Quarterly, 59(2), 200–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2011.563441
   Google Scholar
• Leiserowitz, A. (2006). Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: The role of affect, imagery, and values. Climatic Change, 77(1–2), 45–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9059-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milner, R. M. (2013). Pop polyvocality: Internet memes, public participation, and the Occupy Wall Street movement. International Journal of Communication, 7(2013), 2357–2390.
   Google Scholar
• Miltner, K. M. (2014). “There's no place for lulz on LOLCats”: The role of genre, gender, and group identity in the interpretation and enjoyment of an Internet meme. First Monday, 19(8). https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/5391/4103
   Google Scholar
• Miltner, K. M. (2018). Internet memes. In J. Burgess, A. Marwick, & T. Poell (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social media (pp. 412–428). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Mina, A. X. (2014). Batman, pandaman and the blind man: A case study in social change memes and internet censorship in China. Journal of Visual Culture, 13(3), 359–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470412914546576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mörner, C., & Olausson, U. (2017). Hunting the beast on YouTube: The framing of nature in social media. Nordicom Review, 38(1), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2016-0038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill, S. J., Boykoff, M., Niemeyer, S., & Day, S. A. (2013). On the use of imagery for climate change engagement. Global Environmental Change, 23(2), 413–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill, S. J., & Hulme, M. (2009). An iconic approach for representing climate change. Global Environmental Change, 19(4), 402–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill, S., & Nicholson-Cole, S. (2009). Fear won’t do it": promoting positive engagement with climate change through visual and iconic representations. Science Communication, 30(3), 355–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547008329201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piata, A. (2016). When metaphor becomes a joke: Metaphor journeys from political ads to internet memes. Journal of Pragmatics, 106, 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, A. S., & Rivers, D. J. (2019). Internet memes, media frames, and the conflicting logics of climate change discourse. Environmental Communication, 13(7), 975–994. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2018.1560347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, C. R. (2019). Scapegoat ecology: Blame, exoneration, and an emergent genre in environmentalist discourse. Environmental Communication, 13(2), 152–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2018.1500386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, E. (2019, August 15). Meet the teens making climate change memes to deal with ecoanxiety. https://metro.co.uk/2019/08/15/meet-teens-making-climate-change-memes-deal-ecoanxiety-10570574/.
   Google Scholar
• Segerberg, A. (2017, June 28). Online and social media campaigns for climate change engagement. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Climate Science. https://oxfordre.com/climatescience/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228620-e-398
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, M. A., & Park, H. W. (2018). Climate change and YouTube: Deliberation potential in post-video discussions. Environmental Communication, 12(1), 115–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2017.1289108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharag-Eldin, A., Ye, X., & Spitzberg, B. (2018). Multilevel model of meme diffusion of fracking through Twitter. Chinese Sociological Dialogue, 3(1), 17–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/2397200917752646
   Google Scholar
• Shields, F. (2019, October 18). Why we’re rethinking the images we use for our climate journalism. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/oct/18/guardian-climate-pledge-2019-images-pictures-guidelines.
   Google Scholar
• Shifman, L. (2012). An anatomy of a YouTube meme. New Media & Society, 14(2), 187–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444811412160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shifman, L. (2013). Memes in a digital world: Reconciling with a conceptual troublemaker. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18(3), 362–377. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shifman, L. (2014). Memes in digital culture. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skurka, C., Niederdeppe, J., & Nabi, R. (2019). Kimmel on climate: Disentangling the emotional ingredients of a satirical monologue. Science Communication, 41(4), 394–421. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547019853837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skurka, C., Niederdeppe, J., Romero-Canyas, R., & Acup, D. (2018). Pathways of influence in emotional appeals: Benefits and tradeoffs of using fear or humor to promote climate change-related intentions and risk perceptions. Journal of Communication, 68(1), 169–193. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swim, J. K., & Bloodhart, B. (2015). Portraying the perils to polar bears: The role of empathic and objective perspective-taking toward animals in climate change communication. Environmental Communication, 9(4), 446–468. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2014.987304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorsen, E. (2013). Blogging on the ice: Connecting audiences with climate-change sciences. International Journal of Media & Cultural Politics, 9(1), 87–101. https://doi.org/10.1386/macp.9.1.87_1
   Google Scholar
• Webb, T. L., & Sheeran, P. (2006). Does changing behavioral intentions engender behavior change? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 132(2), 249–268. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, E. U., & Stern, P. C. (2011). Public understanding of climate change in the United States. American Psychologist, 66(4), 315–328. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023253
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weder, F. (2020). Sparking an interest in local water issues: Social media as an enabler for (hyper) local community engagement in environmental issues and the role of solution journalism. In J. Díaz-Pont, P. Maeseele, A. E. Sjolander, M. Mishra, & K. Foxwell-Norton (Eds.), The local and the digital in environmental communication (pp. 223–245). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Young, D. G. (2013). Laughter, learning, or enlightenment? Viewing and avoidance motivations behind The Daily Show and The Colbert report. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 57(2), 153–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2013.787080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, D. G. (2017). Theories and effects of political humor: Discounting cues, gateways, and the impact of incongruities. In K. H. Jamieson & K. Kenski (Eds.), Oxford handbook of political communication (pp. 1–17). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar