References
- Carmi, N., & Arnon, S. (2014). The role of future orientation in environmental behavior: Analyzing the relationship on the individual and cultural levels. Society & Natural Resources, 27(12), 1304–1320. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2014.928393
- Chan, K. (1998). Mass communication and pro-environmental behaviour: Waste recycling in Hong Kong. Journal of Environmental Management, 52(4), 317–325. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.1998.0189
- Chen, L., & Yang, X. (2019). Using EPPM to evaluate the effectiveness of fear appeal messages across different media outlets to increase the intention of breast self-examination among Chinese women. Health Communication, 34(11), 1369–1376. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2018.1493416
- Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007). Framing theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 10(1), 103–126. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.072805.103054
- Davis, J. J. (1995). The effects of message framing on response to environmental communications. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 72(2), 285–299. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909507200203
- DeGolia, A. H., Hiroyasu, E. H. T., & Anderson, S. E. (2019). Economic losses or environmental gains? Framing effects on public support for environmental management. PLoS ONE, 14(7), e0220320. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220320
- Dotson, D. M., Jacobson, S. K., Kaid, L. L., & Carlton, J. S. (2012). Media coverage of climate change in Chile: A content analysis of conservative and liberal newspapers. Environmental Communication, 6(1), 64–81. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2011.642078
- Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
- Enzler, H. B. (2015). Consideration of future consequences as a predictor of environmentally responsible behavior: Evidence from a general population study. Environment and Behavior, 47(6), 618–643. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916513512204
- Eyal, T., Liberman, N., Trope, Y., & Walther, E. (2004). The pros and cons of temporally near and distant action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(6), 781–795. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.6.781
- Feldman, L., & Hart, P. S. (2016). Using political efficacy messages to increase climate activism: The mediating role of emotions. Science Communication, 38(1), 99–127. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547015617941
- Gallagher, K. M., & Updegraff, J. A. (2012). Health message framing effects on attitudes, intentions, and behavior: A meta-analytic review. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 43(1), 101–116. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-011-9308-7
- Iyengar, S. (1991). Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. University of Chicago Press.
- Joireman, J., & King, S. (2016). Individual differences in the consideration of future and (more) immediate consequences: A review and directions for future research. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10(5), 313–326. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12252
- Joireman, J., Shaffer, M. J., Balliet, D., & Strathman, A. (2012). Promotion orientation explains why future-oriented people exercise and eat healthy: Evidence from the two-factor consideration of future consequences-14 scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(10), 1272–1287. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212449362
- Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–292. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185
- Kaza, S., Yao, L., Bhada-Tata, P., & Van Woerden, F. (2018). What a waste 2.0: A global snapshot of solid waste Management to 2050. World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/30317
- Kim, H. K., & Lee, T. K. (2018). Combining two outcome frames to promote support for obesity-related policies. Journal of Health Communication, 23(8), 751–760. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2018.1523261
- Larson, L. R., Stedman, R. C., Cooper, C. B., & Decker, D. J. (2015). Understanding the multi-dimensional structure of pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 43, 112–124. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.06.004
- Li, Y., Zhao, X., Li, Y., & Li, X. (2015). Waste incineration industry and development policies in China. Waste Management, 46, 234–241. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2015.08.008
- Lu, H. (2016). The effects of emotional appeals and gain versus loss framing in communicating sea star wasting disease. Science Communication, 38(2), 143–169. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547015619173
- Maio, G. R., & Haddock, G. (2007). Attitude change. In A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 565–586). Guilford.
- Martinez, M. D., & Scicchitano, M. J. (1998). Who listens to trash talk?: Education and public media effects on recycling behavior. Social Science Quarterly, 79(2), 287–300. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42863790
- Meinhold, J. L., & Malkus, A. J. (2005). Adolescent environmental behaviors: Can knowledge, attitudes, and self-efficacy make a difference? Environment and Behavior, 37(4), 511–532. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916504269665
- Meng, X., Tan, X., Wang, Y., Wen, Z., Tao, Y., & Qian, Y. (2019). Investigation on decision-making mechanism of residents’ household solid waste classification and recycling behaviors. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 140, 224–234. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.09.021
- Milfont, T. L., Wilson, J., & Diniz, P. (2012). Time perspective and environmental engagement: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Psychology, 47(5), 325–334. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2011.647029
- Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People’s Republic of China. (2019). Annual report on the prevention and control of environmental pollution produced by solid waste of large and medium cities in 2019. http://www.mee.gov.cn/ywgz/gtfwyhxpgl/gtfw/201912/P020191231360445518365.pdf
- Nan, X. (2007). Social distance, framing, and judgment: A construal level perspective. Human Communication Research, 33(4), 489–514. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00309.x
- Nan, X. (2012). Relative persuasiveness of gain-versus loss-framed human papillomavirus vaccination messages for the present-and future-minded. Human Communication Research, 38(1), 72–94. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2011.01419.x
- Nan, X., Daily, K., Richards, A., & Holt, C. (2019). Parental support for HPV vaccination mandates Among african Americans: The impact of message framing and consideration of future consequences. Health Communication, 34(12), 1404–1412. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2018.1493419
- Newman, C. L., Howlett, E., Burton, S., Kozup, J. C., & Heintz Tangari, A. (2012). The influence of consumer concern about global climate change on framing effects for environmental sustainability messages. International Journal of Advertising, 31(3), 511–527. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2501/IJA-31-3-511-527
- Nisbet, M. C. (2009). Communicating climate change: Why frames matter for public engagement. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 51(2), 12–23. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3200/ENVT.51.2.12-23
- Obermiller, C. (1995). The baby is sick/the baby is well: A test of environmental communication appeals. Journal of Advertising, 24(2), 55–70. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1995.10673476
- O’Connor, D. B., Warttig, S., Conner, M., & Lawton, R. (2009). Raising awareness of hypertension risk through a web-based framing intervention: Does consideration of future consequences make a difference? Psychology, Health & Medicine, 14(2), 213–219. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13548500802291618
- O’Keefe, D. J., & Jensen, J. D. (2007). The relative persuasiveness of gain-framed loss-framed messages for encouraging disease prevention behaviors: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Health Communication, 12(7), 623–644. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730701615198
- O’Keefe, D. J., & Jensen, J. D. (2009). The relative persuasiveness of gain-framed and loss-framed messages for encouraging disease detection behaviors: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Communication, 59(2), 296–316. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01417.x
- Olausson, U. (2009). Global warming—global responsibility? Media frames of collective action and scientific certainty. Public Understanding of Science, 18(4), 421–436. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662507081242
- O’Neill, S., Williams, H. T., Kurz, T., Wiersma, B., & Boykoff, M. (2015). Dominant frames in legacy and social media coverage of the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report. Nature Climate Change, 5(4), 380–385. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2535
- Östman, J. (2014). The influence of media use on environmental engagement: A political socialization approach. Environmental Communication, 8(1), 92–109. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2013.846271
- Rothman, A. J., Bartels, R. D., Wlaschin, J., & Salovey, P. (2006). The strategic use of gain and loss-framed messages to promote healthy behavior: How theory can inform practice. Journal of Communication, 56(suppl_1), S202–S220. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00290.x
- Scannell, L., & Gifford, R. (2013). Personally relevant climate change: The role of place attachment and local versus global message framing in engagement. Environment and Behavior, 45(1), 60–85. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916511421196
- Scheufele, D. A. (1999). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication, 49(1), 103–122. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02784.x
- Shah, D. V., Kwak, N., Schmierbach, M., & Zubric, J. (2004). The interplay of news frames on cognitive complexity. Human Communication Research, 30(1), 102–120. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2004.tb00726.x
- Spence, A., & Pidgeon, N. (2010). Framing and communicating climate change: The effects of distance and outcome frame manipulations. Global Environmental Change, 20(4), 656–667. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.002
- Stern, P. C. (2000). New environmental theories: Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407–424. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00175
- Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, G. A., & Kalof, L. (1999). A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Human Ecology Review, 6(2), 81–97. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24707060
- Strathman, A., Gleicher, F., Boninger, D. S., & Edwards, C. S. (1994). The consideration of future consequences: Weighing immediate and distant outcomes of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(4), 742–752. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.4.742
- Takahashi, B., Tandoc Jr, E. C., Duan, R., & Van Witsen, A. (2017). Revisiting environmental citizenship: The role of information capital and media use. Environment and Behavior, 49(2), 111–135. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916515620892
- Tranter, B. (2020). Does public knowledge of climate change really matter in Australia? Environmental Communication, 14(4), 537–554. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2019.1696853
- Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2003). Temporal construal. Psychological Review, 110(3), 403–421. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.110.3.403
- Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440–463. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018963
- Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7455683
- Vainio, A., Pulkka, A., Paloniemi, R., Varho, V., & Tapio, P. (2020). Citizens’ sustainable, future-oriented energy behaviours in energy transition. Journal of Cleaner Production, 245, 118801. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118801
- Wen, X., Luo, Q., Hu, H., Wang, N., Chen, Y., Jin, J., Hao, Y., Xu, G., Li, F., & Fang, W. (2014). Comparison research on waste classification between China and the EU, Japan, and the USA. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 16(2), 321–334. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-013-0190-1
- White, K., MacDonnell, R., & Dahl, D. W. (2011). It’s the mind-set that matters: The role of construal level and message framing in influencing consumer efficacy and conservation behaviors. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(3), 472–485. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.48.3.472
- Xu, X., Arpan, L. M., & Chen, C. F. (2015). The moderating role of individual differences in responses to benefit and temporal framing of messages promoting residential energy saving. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 44, 95–108. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.09.004
- Zhang, B., Lai, K. H., Wang, B., & Wang, Z. (2019). From intention to action: How do personal attitudes, facilities accessibility, and government stimulus matter for household waste sorting? Journal of Environmental Management, 233, 447–458. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.12.059
- Zhao, X., Villagran, M. M., Kreps, G. L., & McHorney, C. (2012). Gain versus loss framing in adherence-promoting communication targeting patients with chronic diseases: The moderating effect of individual time perspective. Health Communication, 27(1), 75–85. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2011.569002
- Zhou, M. H., Shen, S. L., Xu, Y. S., & Zhou, A. N. (2019). New policy and implementation of municipal solid waste classification in Shanghai, China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(17), 3099. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16173099