275
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Green Criminology and Rhetoric of Public Opinion: Online Commenting on Gas Rigs Near Israel's Coast

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Agnew, R. (2013). The ordinary acts that contribute to ecocide: A criminological analysis. In A. Brisman, & N. South (Eds.), Routledge international handbook of Green criminology (Second edition, pp. 58–72). Routledge.
  • Amossy, R. (2001). Ethos at the crossroads of disciplines: Rhetoric, pragmatics, sociology. Poetics Today, 22(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-22-1-1
  • Armah, F. A., Luginaah, I., & Odoi, J. (2013). Artisanal small-scale mining and mercury pollution in Ghana: A critical examination of a messy minerals and gold mining policy. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 3(4), 381–390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-013-0147-7
  • Berenson, A. (2015). “Painting with words”: “social justice” protest’s narrative in the Israeli’s news. Journalism and Mass Communication, 5(8), 373–387. https://doi.org/10.17265/2160-6579/2015.08.001
  • Berenson, A. (2018). Journalism and social media frame social movements: The transition to media matrix. In J. Višňovský, & J. Radošinská (Eds.), Social media and journalism—trends, connections, implications (pp. 67–84). InTech. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.78290.
  • Best, J. (1987). Rhetoric in claims-making: Constructing the missing children problem. Social Problems, 34(2), 101–121. https://doi.org/10.2307/800710
  • Best, J. (Ed.). (1995). Images of issues: Typifying contemporary social problems (2nd ed). A. De Gruyter.
  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. SAGE.
  • Brennan, N. M., & Merkl-Davies, D. M. (2014). Rhetoric and argument in social and environmental reporting: The dirty laundry case. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(4), 602–633. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-04-2013-1333
  • Brisman, A. (2008). Crime-environment relationships and environmental justice. Seattle J. Soc. Just, 6(2), 727–817.
  • Brisman, A., & South, N. (2013). A Green-cultural criminology: An exploratory outline. Crime, Media, Culture: An International Journal, 9(2), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741659012467026
  • Brisman, A., & South, N. (2014). Green cultural criminology: Constructions of environmental harm, consumerism, and resistance to ecocide. Routledge.
  • Brisman, A., & South, N. (2018). Green criminology and environmental crimes and harms. Sociology Compass, 13(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12650
  • Broday, D., Dayan, U., Aharonov, E., Laufer, D., & Adel, M. (2020). Emissions from gas processing platforms to the atmosphere-case studies versus benchmarks. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 80(106313), 106313–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2019.106313
  • Castells, M. (2000). The rise of the network society (2nd ed). Blackwell Publishers.
  • Cheney, G., Christensen, L., Conrad, C., & Lair, D. (2004). Corporate rhetoric as organizational discourse. In D. Grant (Ed.), Sage handbook of organizational discourse (pp. 79–103). SAGE Publications.
  • Cochran, J. C., Lynch, M. J., Toman, E. L., & Shields, R. T. (2018). Court sentencing patterns for environmental crimes: Is there a “Green” gap in punishment? Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 34(1), 37–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-016-9322-9
  • Cohen-Louck, K., & Levy, I. (2020). Risk perception of a chronic threat of terrorism: Differences based on coping types, gender and exposure. International Journal of Psychology, 55(1), 115–122. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12552
  • Conrad, P., & Schneider, J. W. (1992). Deviance and medicalization: From badness to sickness. Temple University Press.
  • Copeland, L. (2014). Value change and political action: Postmaterialism, political consumerism, and political participation. American Politics Research, 42(2), 257–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X13494235
  • Di Ronco, A., Allen-Robertson, J., & South, N. (2019). Representing environmental harm and resistance on twitter: The case of the TAP pipeline in Italy. Crime, Media, Culture: An International Journal, 15(1), 143–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741659018760106
  • Drew, P. (2011). Recalling someone from the past. In D. Roger, & P. Bull (Eds.), Conversation: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 96–115). Multilingual Matters.
  • Duit, A., Feindt, P. H., & Meadowcroft, J. (2016). Greening leviathan: The rise of the environmental state? Environmental Politics, 25(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2015.1085218
  • Emmer, M., Vowe, G., & Wolling, J. (2011). Bürger online, Die entwicklung der politischen online-kommunikation in deutschland [citizens online, the development of the political online communication in Germany]. UVK.
  • Ferrell, J., Hayward, K., Morrison, W., & Presdee, M. (Eds.) (2016). Cultural criminology unleashed. Routledge.
  • France 24: International News. (2010, December 29). Israel has enough gas “to become exporter.” France 24: International News. http://www.france24.com/en/20101229-israel-has-enough-gas-become-exporter.
  • GALLUP. (2020, October 14). Business and industry sector ratings. GALLUP. https://news.gallup.com/poll/12748/business-industry-sector-ratings.aspx.
  • Gergen, K. J. (2001). Social construction in context. SAGE.
  • Giacalone, R. A., Jurkiewicz, C. L., & Deckop, J. R. (2008). On ethics and social responsibility: The impact of materialism, postmaterialism, and hope. Human Relations, 61(4), 483–514. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726708091019
  • Green, J., & Thorogood, N. (2018). Qualitative methods for health research (4th edition). SAGE.
  • Greife, M. J., & Maume, M. O. (2020). Stealing like artists: Using court records to conduct quantitative research on corporate environmental crimes. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 36(3), 451–469. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986220931631
  • Hannigan, J. A. (2014). Environmental sociology (third edition). Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
  • Hayes, A. F., & Krippendorff, K. (2007). Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication Methods and Measures, 1(1), 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312450709336664
  • Hayward, K. J. (2012). Five spaces of cultural criminology. British Journal of Criminology, 52(3), 441–462. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azs008
  • Heydon, J. (2020). Indigenous environmental victimisation in the Canadian oil sands. In A. Brisman, & N. South (Eds.), Routledge international handbook of Green criminology (Second edition), pp. 333–347. Routledge.
  • Hilgartner, S., & Bosk, C. L. (1988). The rise and fall of social problems: A public arenas model. American Journal of Sociology, 94(1), 53–78. https://doi.org/10.1086/228951
  • Hmielowski, J. D., Feldman, L., Myers, T. A., Leiserowitz, A., & Maibach, E. (2014). An attack on science? Media use, trust in scientists, and perceptions of global warming. Public Understanding of Science, 23(7), 866–883. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662513480091
  • Howarth, R. W., Ingraffea, A., & Engelder, T. (2011). Should fracking stop? Nature, 477(7364), 271–275. https://doi.org/10.1038/477271a
  • Israel has a gas conundrum. (2017, August 19). https://www.economist.com/middle-east-and-africa/2017/08/19/israel-has-a-gas-conundrum.
  • Jaspal, R., & Nerlich, B. (2014). Fracking in the UK press: Threat dynamics in an unfolding debate. Public Understanding of Science, 23(3), 348–363. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662513498835
  • Kaplan-Zantopp, M. (2020, February 17). Leviathan: A risk worth taking? Zavit: Science & Evironment in Israel. https://www.zavit.org.il/intl/en/health-nutrition/leviathan-a-risk-worth-taking/.
  • Lachapelle, E. (2017). The great divide: Public perceptions of shale gas extraction and hydraulic fracturing in pennsylvania and New York. Commonwealth, 19(1), 48–68. https://doi.org/10.15367/com.v19i1.133
  • Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
  • Lee, E.-J., & Jang, Y. J. (2010). What do others’ reactions to news on internet portal sites tell us? Effects of presentation format and readers’ need for cognition on reality perception. Communication Research, 37(6), 825–846. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650210376189
  • Levy, I., & Adam, K.-M. (2018). Online commenting about a victim of female-on-male rape: The case of shia LaBeouf’s sexual victimization. Sex Roles, 79(9–10), 578–593. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0893-9
  • Liamputtong, P., & Ezzy, D. (1999). Qualitative research methods: A health focus. Oxford University Press.
  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.
  • Loseke, D. R. (2003). Thinking about social problems: An introduction to constructionist perspectives (2nd ed). Aldine de Gruyter.
  • Lynch, J. M. (2017). The Greening of criminology: A perspective on the 1990s. In N. South & P. Beime (Eds.), Green Criminology (1st ed., pp. 165–170). Routledge.
  • Lynch, J. M., & Stretesky, P. (2014). Toward a Green criminological revolution. In Exploring Green criminology: Toward a Green criminological revolution (pp. 3–14). Ashgate.
  • Lynch, J. M., & Stretsky, P. B. (2003). The meaning of green: Contrasting criminological perspectives. Theoretical Criminology, 7(2), 217–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480603007002414
  • Lynch, M. J., Fegadel, A., & Long, M. A. (2021). Green criminology and state-corporate crime: The ecocide-genocide nexus with examples from Nigeria. Journal of Genocide Research, 23(2), 236–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623528.2020.1771998
  • McClanahan, B. (2014). Green and grey: Water justice, criminalization, and resistance. Critical Criminology, 22(3), 403–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-014-9241-8
  • McClanahan, B., & Brisman, A. (2020). Green criminology for social sciences: Introduction to the special issue. Social Sciences, 9(10), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci9100170
  • McCluskey, M., & Hmielowski, J. (2012). Opinion expression during social conflict: Comparing online reader comments and letters to the editor. Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism, 13(3), 303–319. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884911421696
  • Metaphor. (2021). In Merriam-Webster. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/metaphor.
  • Mostafa, M. M. (2013). Wealth, post-materialism and consumers’ pro-environmental intentions: A multilevel analysis across 25 nations: Wealth, post-materialism and consumers’ pro-environmental intentions. Sustainable Development, 21(6), 385–399. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.517
  • Mukherjee, D., & Rahman, M. A. (2016). To drill or not to drill? An econometric analysis of US public opinion. Energy Policy, 91, 341–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.11.023
  • Nielsen, C. E. (2014). Coproduction or cohabitation: Are anonymous online comments on newspaper websites shaping news content? New Media & Society, 16(3), 470–487. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813487958
  • Nobel Energy, Inc. (2010, November 29). Noble energy announces operational update at Leviathan offshore Israel. Nobel Energy. http://investors.nblenergy.com/news-releases/news-release-details/noble-energy-announces-operational-update-leviathan-offshore.
  • Ozymy, J., Jarrell, M. L., & Bradshaw, E. (2020). How criminologists can help victims of Green crimes through scholarship and activism. In A. Brisman, & N. South (Eds.), Routledge international handbook of Green criminology (Second edition, pp. 150–164). Routledge.
  • Patten, D. (2019). Motivations, opportunities, and controls of environmental crime: An empirical test of kramer and michalowski’s integrated theoretical model of state-corporate crime. Crime, Law and Social Change, 72(2), 195–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-019-09811-2
  • Porten-Cheé, P., & Eilders, C. (2015). Spiral of silence online: How online communication affects opinion climate perception and opinion expression regarding the climate change debate. Studies in Communication Sciences, 15(1), 143–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scoms.2015.03.002
  • Potter, J. (1996). Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction. Sage.
  • Raviv, E. (2018, August 3). Mi heziz et ha asda sheli? [Who moved my rig?]. Davar. https://www.davar1.co.il/141819/.
  • Reisigl, M. (2008). Analyzing political rhetoric. In R. Wodak, & M. Krzyżanowski (Eds.), Qualitative discourse analysis in the social sciences (pp. 96–120). Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Roberts, J. V., & Stalans, L. J. (2018). Public opinion, crime, and criminal justice (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429497971.
  • Rosman-Stollman, E., & Israeli, Z. (2015). Our forces” become alexei, yuval and liran: The transition of the Israeli soldier’s media image from the collective to an individual. Res Militaris, 5(2), 1–18.
  • Salonen, A. O., & Åhlberg, M. (2013). Towards sustainable society: From materialism to post-materialism. International Journal of Sustainable Society, 5(4), 374. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSOC.2013.056846
  • Santana, A. D. (2014). Virtuous or vitriolic: The effect of anonymity on civility in online newspaper reader comment boards. Journalism Practice, 8(1), 18–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2013.813194
  • Shefer, G., Barak, O., & Oren, I. (Eds.) (2008). Zava she esh lo medina? Mabat mehudash al yahasey ha thum ha bithony ve ha ezrahi be Israel. [An army that has a state? A fresh look at the security and civilian relations in Israel]. Carmel.
  • Shoham, E. (2016). “Like a mosquito attacking an elephant”: Perceptions among Israeli talkbackers regarding female violence. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 3(2), 116–131. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.32.1859
  • Siddiqi, T. A. (2002). Natural gas reserves/total energy consumption: A useful new ratio for addressing global climate change concerns. Energy Policy, 30(13), 1145–1149. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00010-1
  • Snider, L. (2010). Framing e-waste regulation: The obfuscating role of power. Criminology & Public Policy, 9(3), 569–577. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9133.2010.00651.x
  • Soffer, O. (2019). Assessing the climate of public opinion in the user comments era: A new epistemology. Journalism, 20(6), 772–787. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884917714938
  • South, N. (1998). A green field for criminology?: A proposal for a perspective. Theoretical Criminology, 2(2), 211–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480698002002004
  • South, N., Brisman, A., & Beirne, P. (2013). A guide to a Green criminology. In N. South, & A. Brisman (Eds.), Routledge international handbook of Green criminology (pp. 27–43). Routledge.
  • Stratton, G., Powell, A., & Cameron, R. (2017). Crime and justice in digital society: Towards a ‘digital criminology’? International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 6(2), 17–33. https://doi.org/10.5204/ijcjsd.v6i2.355
  • Stretesky, P., Long, M., & Lynch, M. (2013). The treadmill of crime. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203077092.
  • Theodori, G. L. (2012). Public perception of the natural Gas industry: Data from the barnett shale. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 7(3), 275–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567240903030562
  • Van de Graaf, T., Haesebrouck, T., & Debaere, P. (2018). Fractured politics? The comparative regulation of shale gas in Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(9), 1276–1293. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1301985
  • Walter, S., Brüggemann, M., & Engesser, S. (2018). Echo chambers of denial: Explaining user comments on climate change. Environmental Communication, 12(2), 204–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2017.1394893
  • White, R. (2010). Globalisation and environmental harm. In R. White (Ed.), Global environmental harm: Criminological perspectives (pp. 3–19). Willan.
  • White, R. D. (2011). Transnational environmental crime: Toward an eco-global criminology. Routledge.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.