509
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

More Than Just an Audience: The New Approach to Public Engagement with Climate Change Communication on Chinese Knowledge-Sharing Networks

Pages 757-772 | Received 30 Jul 2021, Accepted 21 Jul 2022, Published online: 26 Aug 2022

References

  • Andaloro, F., Castriota, L., Falautano, M., Azzurro, E., Deidun, A., & Fenech-Farrugia, A. (2016). Public feedback on early warning initiatives undertaken for hazardous non-indigenous species: The case of lagocephalus sceleratus from Italian and Maltese waters. Management, 7(4), 313–319. http://dx.doi.org/10.3391/mbi.2016.7.4.01
  • Arlt, D., Hoppe, I., Schmitt, J. B., De Silva-Schmidt, F., & Brüggemann, M. (2018). Climate engagement in a digital age: Exploring the drivers of participation in climate discourse online in the context of COP21. Environmental Communication, 12, 84–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2017.1394892
  • Barry, M., & Doherty, G. (2017). What we talk about when we talk about interactivity: Empowerment in public discourse. New Media & Society, 19(7), 1052–1071. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815625944
  • Cao, Y. C. (2014). The influence of the social function of the popular science website on the spread of science and technology – taking zhihu as an example. Science and Technology Communication, 20(1), 129–131. http://doi.org/10.12173/j.issn.1004-5511.202111004
  • Carvalho, A., van Wessel, M., & Maeseele, P. (2017). Communication practices and political engagement with climate change: A research agenda. Environmental Communication, 11(1), 122–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2016.1241815
  • Chilvers, J., Bellamy, R., Pallett, H., & Hargreaves, T. (2021). A systemic approach to mapping participation with low-carbon energy transitions. Nature Energy, 6(3), 250–259. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-020-00762-w
  • Cook, G., Pieri, E., & Robbins, P. T. (2004). ‘The scientists think and the public feels’: Expert perceptions of the discourse of GM food. Discourse & Society, 15(4), 433–449. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926504043708
  • Copsey, T., Hoijtink, L., Shi, X., & Whitehead, S. (2013). In S. Whitehead, & D. Wilson (Eds.), How the people of China live with climate change and what communication can do (pp. 1–61). London W1A 1AA, UK: BBC Media Action Broadcasting House, Portland Place.
  • Corner, A., Markowitz, E., & Pidgeon, N. (2014). Public engagement with climate change: The role of human values. WIRES Climate Change, 5(3), 411–422. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.269
  • Davies, S. R., & Horst, M. (2016). Science communication: Culture, identity and citizenship. Springer.
  • Deng, X. (1994). Science and technology constitute a primary productive force. Works of Deng Xiaoping, 1(1), 1–10. http://doi.org/10.12173/j.issn.1004-5511.2020.05.02
  • Ding, Y. H. (2006). National assessment report of climate change (I): climate change in China and its future trend. Advances in Climate Change Research, 2((01|1)), 3-8+50. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-1719.2007.z1.001.
  • Dong, T., Liang, C., & He, X. (2017). Social media and internet public events. Telematics and Informatics, 34(3), 726–739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2016.05.024
  • Duan, R., & Miller, S. (2019). Climate change in China: A study of news diversity in party-sponsored and market-oriented newspapers. Journalism, 22(10), 2493–2510. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884919873173.
  • Dujardin, S., Hermesse, J., & Dendoncker, N. (2018). Making space for experiential knowledge in climate change adaptation? Insights from municipal planning officers in bohol, Philippines. Jàmbá: Journal of Disaster Risk Studies, 10(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4102/jamba.v10i1.433
  • Fan, F. T. (2014). The controversy over spontaneous generation in republican China: Science, authority, and the public. In Jing Tsu and Benjamin A. Elman (Eds.), Science and technology in modern China, 1880s-1940s (pp. 209–244). Brill.
  • Gao, H., He, W., Zhang, C., & Ren, L. (2016). Building scientific literacy in China: Achievements and prospects. Science Bulletin, 61(11), 871–874. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-016-1076-0
  • Gieryn, T. F. (1983). Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 7(6), 781–795. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095325
  • Gieryn, T. F. (1999). Cultural boundaries of science: Credibility on the line. University of Chicago Press.
  • Guo, Y., & Ren, T. (2017). When it is unfamiliar to me: Local acceptance of planned nuclear power plants in China in the post-fukushima era. Energy Policy, 100, 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.10.002
  • Han, J., Sun, S., & Lu, Y. (2017). Framing climate change: A content analysis of Chinese mainstream newspapers from 2005 to 2015. International Journal of Communication, 11(1), 2889–2911. http://doi.org/10.12173/j.issn.1932-8036/20170005
  • Head, L., Gibson, C., Gill, N., Carr, C., & Waitt, G. (2016). A meta-ethnography to synthesise household cultural research for climate change response. Local Environment, 21(12), 1467–1481. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2016.1139560
  • Hine, C. (2000). Virtual ethnography. Sage.
  • Huckin, T. (2002). Critical discourse analysis and the discourse of condescension. Discourse Studies in Composition, 155(7), 176–191. http://doi.org/10.12173/j.issn.13:9781572733275
  • Irwin, A. (2014). From deficit to democracy (re-visited). Public Understanding of Science, 23(1), 71–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662513510646
  • Jenkins, H. (2009). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century (p. 145). The MIT Press.
  • Jenkins, H., & Ito, M. (2015). Participatory culture in a networked era: A conversation on youth, learning, commerce, and politics. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Jia, H. (2007). Global warming, science communication and public engagement – analysis of S&T communication of climate change in China. Science Popularization, 12(03), 39–45. https://doi.org/10.19293/j.cnki.1673-8357.2007.03.009
  • Jin, Y., Huang, J., & Wang, X. (2017). What influences content popularity? An empirical investigation of voting in social Q&A communities. In Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS). Association For Information Systems.
  • Jones, K. E., Irwin, A., Farrelly, M., & Stilgoe, J. (2008). Understanding lay membership and scientific governance. Science, 12(1), 1–54. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.292.5519.1021
  • Ju, Y. H. (2019). An analysis of the characteristics of popular science communication in the social question-answer community – taking zhihu as an example. Audiovisual, 10(4), 45–51. https://doi.org/10.19395/j.cnki.1674-246x.2019.10.131
  • Li, Y., & Jin, J. B. (2019). Polarization of online public opinion and scientific researchers’ participation in science communication activities. Modern Communication, 41((03|3)), 32–37+42. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-8770.2019.03.007.
  • Markham, A. N. (2005). The methods, politics, and ethics of representation in online ethnography. In Norman K. Denzin and Yvonna S. Lincoln (Eds.), The sage handbook of qualitative research, 793–820. SAGE.
  • Meyer, C. F. (1987). Language, context and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective: MAK halliday and ruqaiya hasan. TESOL Quarterly, 21(2), 353–359. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586740
  • Mueller-Herbst, J. M., Xenos, M. A., Scheufele, D. A., & Brossard, D. (2020). Saw it on Facebook: The role of social media in facilitating science issue awareness. Social Media+ Society, 6(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120930412
  • Munshi, D., Kurian, P., Cretney, R., Morrison, S. L., & Kathlene, L. (2020). Centering culture in public engagement on climate change. Environmental Communication, 12(5), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2020.1746680
  • Naess, L. O. (2013). The role of local knowledge in adaptation to climate change. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 4(2), 99–106. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.204
  • Nerlich, B., Koteyko, N., & Brown, B. (2010). Theory and language of climate change communication. WIRES Climate Change, 1(1), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.2
  • Nisbet, M. C., & Scheufele, D. A. (2009). What's next for science communication? Promising directions and lingering distractions. American Journal of Botany, 96(10), 1767–1778. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.0900041
  • Pearce, W., Grundmann, R., Hulme, M., Raman, S., Hadley Kershaw, E., & Tsouvalis, J. (2017). Beyond counting climate consensus. Environmental Communication, 11(6), 723–730. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2017.1333965
  • Pearce, W., Mahony, M. and Raman, S., 2018. Science advice for global challenges: Learning from trade-offs in the IPCC. Environmental Science & Policy, 80, 125–131.
  • Petersen, A. M., Vincent, E. M., & Westerling, A. L. (2019). Discrepancy in scientific authority and media visibility of climate change scientists and contrarians. Nature Communications, 10(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07882-8
  • Pu, X. (2017). Controversial identity of a rising China. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 10(2), 131–149. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/pox004
  • Reyes-García, V., Fernández-Llamazares, Á, Guèze, M., Garcés, A., Mallo, M., Vila-Gómez, M., & Vilaseca, M. (2016). Local indicators of climate change: The potential contribution of local knowledge to climate research. WIRES Climate Change, 7(1), 109–124. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.374
  • Rice, J. L., Burke, B. J., & Heynen, N. (2015). Knowing climate change, embodying climate praxis: Experiential knowledge in southern appalachia. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 105(2), 253–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2014.985628
  • Skågeby, J. (2011). Online ethnographic methods: Towards a qualitative understanding of virtual community practices. In Ben Kei Daniel (Eds.), Handbook of research on methods and techniques for studying virtual communities: Paradigms and phenomena (pp. 410–428). IGI Global.
  • Sleeth-Keppler, D., Perkowitz, R., & Speiser, M. (2017). It's a matter of trust: American judgments of the credibility of informal communicators on solutions to climate change. Environmental Communication, 11(1), 17–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2015.1062790
  • Stadelmann-Steffen, I. (2011). Citizens as veto players: Climate change policy and the constraints of direct democracy. Environmental Politics, 20(4), 485–507. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2011.589577
  • Suldovsky, B. (2017). The information deficit model and climate change communication. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Climate Science.
  • Vicari, S. (2020). Is it all about storytelling? Living and learning hereditary cancer on twitter. New Media & Society, 23(8), 2385–2408. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820926632
  • von Seggern, J. (2021). Understandings, practices and human-environment relationships—A meta-ethnographic analysis of local and indigenous climate change adaptation and mitigation strategies in selected pacific island states. Sustainability, 13(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010011
  • Wang, D. P., Jia, H. P., Wu, O., & Zhong, Q. (2018). The new momentum of science communication in the Age of internet self-media—taking the “internet Red” scientist as an example. Journalists, 10(6), 47–56. https://doi.org/10.16057/j.cnki.31-1171/g2.2018.10.010
  • Wang, Z., & Zhang, P. (2016). Examining user roles in social Q&A: The case of health topics in zhihu. Com. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 53(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.2016.14505301103
  • Westman, L., & Broto, V. C. (2018). Climate governance through partnerships: A study of 150 urban initiatives in China. Global Environmental Change, 50, 212–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.04.008
  • Wu, Q. L., & Luo, C. (2019). On the science communication model of social science issues in China – taking the “PX project” event as an example. Science & Society, 9(2), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.19524/j.cnki.10-1009/g3.2019.02.092
  • Wynne, B. (1996). A reflexive view of the expert-lay knowledge divide. Risk, Environment and Modernity: Towards a New Ecology, 40(2), 44–60. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446221983.n3
  • Xue, W., Hine, D. W., Marks, A. D., Phillips, W. J., Nunn, P., & Zhao, S. (2016). Combining threat and efficacy messaging to increase public engagement with climate change in Beijing, China. Climatic Change, 137(1-2), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1678-1
  • Yang, Z. (2021). Deconstruction of the discourse authority of scientists in Chinese online science communication: Investigation of CSCs on Chinese knowledge sharing networks. Public Understanding of Science, 30(8), 993–1007. https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625211005106
  • Yang, Z., Zhao, L. Y., & Xiao, T. H. (2015). Research on serious political affairs program with science popularity – taking “interview with truth” as an example. Today’s Massmedia, 23((06|6)), 90–92. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-8122.2015.06.040
  • Ye, Y., Xu, P., & Zhang, M. (2017). Social media, public discourse and civic engagement in modern China. Telematics and Informatics, 34(3), 705–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2016.05.021
  • Yu, H., Wang, B., & Wei, Y. M. (2013). Survey and analysis of Chinese public attitudes towards climate change. In 2012 China Sustainable Development Forum 2012 Special Issue 7, pp.13-33.
  • Zhan, Z. M., Jin, Y., & Chen, X. Q. (2011). China science communication report. 2010-2011. Social Science Literature Press.
  • Zhang, Z. Y. (2007). Image creation of scientists in science education. Modern Primary and Secondary Education, 06(3), 36–38. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-1477.2007.06.012

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.