Storylines of Geoengineering in the Australian Media: An Analysis of Online Coverage 2006–2018

References

• Anderson, D., Chubb, P., & Djerf-Pierre, M. (2018). Fanning the blame: Media accountability, climate and crisis on the Australian “fire continent”. Environmental Communication, 12(7), 928–941. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2018.1424008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anshelm, J., & Hansson, A. (2014a). Battling Promethean dreams and Trojan horses: Revealing the critical discourses of geoengineering. Energy Research & Social Science, 2, 135–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2014.04.001
   Google Scholar
• Anshelm, J., & Hansson, A. (2014b). The last chance to save the planet? An analysis of the geoengineering advocacy discourse in the public debate. Environmental Humanities, 5(1), 101–123. https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-3615433
   Google Scholar
• Anshelm, J., & Hansson, A. (2016). Has the grand idea of geoengineering as plan B run out of steam? The Anthropocene Review, 3(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053019615614592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baer, H. A. (2016). The nexus of the coal industry and the state in Australia: Historical dimensions and contemporary challenges. Energy Policy, 99, 194–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.05.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beiser-McGrath, L. F., & Bernauer, T. (2019). Commitment failures are unlikely to undermine public support for the Paris agreement. Nature Climate Change, 9(3), 248–252. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0414-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellamy, R., & Healey, P. (2018). Slippery slope’ or ‘uphill struggle’? Broadening out expert scenarios of climate engineering research and development. Environmental Science & Policy, 83, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.01.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blees, T. (2011). Prescription for the planet. The painless remedy for our energy and environmental crises. Center for the Promotion of Social and Environmental Initiatives of the Nuclear Industry.
   Google Scholar
• Boykoff, M. T., Katzung, J., & Nacu-Schmidt, M. (2018). Media and climate change observatory monthly summary – October 2018. Media and Climate Change Observatory Monthly Summaries, 22, 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Buck, H. J. (2013). Climate engineering: Spectacle, tragedy or solution? A content analysis of news media framing. In C. Methmann, D. Rothe, & B. Stephan (Eds.), De-Constructing the greenhouse: Interpretative approaches to global climate governance (pp. 166–180). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Colvin, R. M., & Jotzo, F. (2021). Australian voters’ attitudes to climate action and their social-political determinants. PLoS ONE, 16(3), e0248268. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248268
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colvin, R. M., Kemp, L., Talberg, A., De Castella, C., Downie, C., Friel, S., Grant, W. J., Howden, M., Jotzo, F., Markham, F., & Platow, M. J. (2020). Learning from the climate change debate to avoid polarisation on negative emissions. Environmental Communication, 14(1), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2019.1630463
   Google Scholar
• Corner, A., Pidgeon, N., & Parkhill, K. (2012). Perceptions of geoengineering: Public attitudes, stakeholder perspectives, and the challenge of ‘upstream’ engagement. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 3(5), 451–466. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crow, D. A., & Lawlor, A. (2016). Media in the policy process: Using framing and narratives to understand policy influences. Review of Policy Research, 33(5), 472–491. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowley, K. (2017). Up and down with climate politics 2013–2016: The repeal of carbon pricing in Australia. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 8(3), e458. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummings, C. L., Lin, S. H., & Trump, B. D. (2017). Public perceptions of climate geoengineering: A systematic review of the literature. Climate Research, 73(3), 247–264. https://doi.org/10.3354/cr01475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, T. (2015). Contested science in the media: Linguistic traces of news writers’ framing activity. Written Communication, 32(1), 39–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088314557623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Industry, Science, Energy, and Resources. (2020). Technology investment roadmap: First low emissions technology statement. https://www.industry.gov.au/data-and-publications/technology-investment-roadmap-first-low-emissions-technology-statement-2020.
   Google Scholar
• Edenhofer, O., Pichs-Madruga, R., Sokona, Y., Field, C., Barros, V., & Stocker, T. F. (2011). IPCC expert meeting on geoengineering. meeting report. 20–22.
   Google Scholar
• Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, M. C. (2018). Effective incentives for reforestation: Lessons from Australia's carbon farming policies. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 32, 38–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2018.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuss, S., Lamb, W. F., Callaghan, M. W., Hilaire, J., Creutzig, F., Amann, T., Beringer, T., de Oliveira Garcia, W., Hartmann, J., Khanna, T., & Luderer, G. (2018). Negative emissions – part 2: Costs, potentials and side effects. Environmental Research Letters, 13(6), 063002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aabf9f
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunderson, R., Stuart, D., & Petersen, B. (2018). The political economy of geoengineering as plan B: Technological rationality, moral hazard, and new technology. New Political Economy, 24(5), 696–715. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2018.1501356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurwitt, S., Malkki, K., & Mitra, M. (2017). Global issue, developed country bias: The Paris climate conference as covered by daily print news organizations in 13 nations. Climatic Change, 143(3-4), 281–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-017-2004-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Happer, C., & Philo, G. (2013). The role of the media in the construction of public belief and social change. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 1(1), 321–336. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v1i1.96
   Google Scholar
• Heyward, C. (2013). Situating and abandoning geoengineering: A typology of five responses to dangerous climate change. PS: Political Science & Politics, 46(1), 23–27. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096512001436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoegh-Guldberg, O., Jacob, D., Taylor, M., Bindi, M., Brown, S., Camilloni, I., ... Hijioka, Y. (2018). Impacts of 1.5°C global warming on natural and human systems. In V. Masson-Delmotte, P. Zhai, H.-O. Pörtner, D. Roberts, J. Skea, P. R. Shukla, A. Pirani, W. Moufouma-Okia, C. Péan, R. Pidcock, S. Connors, J. B. R. Matthews, Y. Chen, X. Zhou, M. I. Gomis, E. Lonnoy, T. Maycock, M. Tignor, & T. Waterfield (Eds.), Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty (pp. 175–312). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157940.005.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, M. (2019). A form of madness’: Australian climate and energy policies 2009–2018. Environmental Politics, 28(3), 583–589. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2019.1573522
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huynh, K. (2009). Don't lose heart, technology can still save the day. https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/dont-lose-heart-technology-can-still-save-the-day-20091203-k8pf.html.
   Google Scholar
• Keith, D. W. (2017). Towards a responsible solar geoengineering research project. Issues in Science and Technology, 33(3), 71–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, J., Mackey, B., Chiew, F., Costello, M. J., Hennessy, K., Lansbury, N., … Wreford, A. (2022). Australasia. In H.-O. Pörtner, D. C. Roberts, M. Tignor, E. S. Poloczanska, K. Mintenbeck, A. Alegría, M. Craig, S. Langsdorf, S. Löschke, V. Möller, A. Okem, & B. Rama (Eds.), Climate change 2022: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability: Contribution of working group II to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (pp. 1581–1688). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009325844.013.
   Google Scholar
• Le Quéré, C., Andrew, R. M., Friedlingstein, P., Sitch, S., Hauck, J., Pongratz, J., Pickers, P. A., Korsbakken, J. I., Peters, G. P., Canadell, J. G., & Arneth, A. (2018). Global carbon budget 2018. Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 10(4), 2141–2194. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-2141-2018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas, A. (2021). Investigating networks of corporate influence on government decision-making: The case of Australia’s climate change and energy policies. Energy Research & Social Science, 81, 102271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luokkanen, M., Huttunen, S., & Hildén, M. (2014). Geoengineering, news media and metaphors: Framing the controversial. Public Understanding of Science, 23(8), 966–981. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662513475966
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markusson, N., Venturini, T., Laniado, D., & Kaltenbrunner, A. (2016). Contrasting medium and genre on Wikipedia to open up the dominating definition and classification of geoengineering. Big Data & Society, 3(2), 2053951716666102. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716666102
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, J. P. (2016). Disordering fantasies of coal and technology: Carbon capture and storage in Australia. Energy Policy, 99, 288–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.05.044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, J., McGee, J., Brent, K., & Burns, W. (2019). Governing geoengineering research for the great barrier reef. Climate Policy, 19(7), 801–811. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2019.1592742
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKnight, D., & Hobbs, M. (2017). Fighting for coal: Public relations and the campaigns against lower carbon pollution policies in Australia. In B. Brevini & G. Murdock (Eds.), Carbon capitalism and communication: Confronting climate crisis (pp. 115–129). Springer International Publishing: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, & Medicine. (2019). A research review of interventions to increase the persistence and resilience of coral reefs. The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nemet, G. F., Callaghan, M. W., Creutzig, F., Fuss, S., Hartmann, J., Hilaire, J., Lamb, W. F., Minx, J. C., Rogers, S., & Smith, P. (2018). Negative emissions – part 3: Innovation and upscaling. Environmental Research Letters, 13(6), 063003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aabff4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nerlich, B., & Jaspal, R. (2012). Metaphors We Die By? Geoengineering, metaphors, and the argument from catastrophe. Metaphor and Symbol, 27(2), 131–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2012.665795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen Digital Content Ratings. (2019). May 2019 digital news rankings. Current Events and Global News Sub-Category. https://www.nielsen.com/au/en/press-releases/2019/nielsen-digital-content-ratings-may-2019-tagged-rankings/.
   Google Scholar
• Park, S., Fisher, C., Fuller, G., & Lee, J. Y. (2018). Digital news report: Australia 2018, News and Media Research Centre (UC). Available at https://apo.org.au/node/174861.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, A., & Geden, O. (2016). No fudging on geoengineering. Nature Geoscience, 9(12), 859. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2851
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson, T. E. (2008). The news as a reflection of public opinion. In W. Donsbach & M. W. Traugott (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of public opinion research (pp. 34–40). SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, K. E., & Hulme, M. (2013). The emergence of the geoengineering debate in the UK print media: A frame analysis. The Geographical Journal, 179(4), 342–355. https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prime Minister of Australia. (2022). Stronger action on climate change. https://www.pm.gov.au/media/stronger-action-climate-change.
   Google Scholar
• Scheer, D., & Renn, O. (2014). Public perception of geoengineering and its consequences for public debate. Climatic Change, 125(3), 305–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1177-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schenuit, F., Colvin, R., Fridahl, M., McMullin, B., Reisinger, A., Sanchez, D. L., Smith, S. M., Torvanger, A., Wreford, A., & Geden, O. (2021). Carbon dioxide removal policy in the making: Assessing developments in 9 OECD cases. Frontiers in Climate, 3(7), 638805. https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2021.638805
   Google Scholar
• Scholte, S., Vasileiadou, E., & Petersen, A. C. (2013). Opening up the societal debate on climate engineering: How newspaper frames are changing. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences, 10(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/1943815x.2012.759593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugiyama, M., Kosugi, T., Ishii, A., & Asayama, S. (2016). Public attitudes to climate engineering research and field experiments: Preliminary results of a web survey on students’ perception in six Asia-pacific countries. PARI-WP No, 24(2), 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Sydney Morning Herald. (2007). Tinkering with Earth's climate to stop global warming raises new risks, warn scientists. https://www.smh.com.au/national/tinkering-with-earths-climate-to-stop-global-warming-raises-new-risks-warn-scientists-20070319-gdppi6.html.
   Google Scholar
• Sydney Morning Herald. (2011). Engineering the Earth: forum's big ideas. https://www.smh.com.au/national/act/engineering-the-earth-forums-big-ideas-20110925-1wrnu.html.
   Google Scholar
• Sydney Morning Herald. (2012). Fake plastic trees and a volcanic push to keep the globe cool. https://www.smh.com.au/environment/climate-change/fake-plastic-trees-and-a-volcanic-push-to-keep-the-globe-cool-20121208-2b24u.html.
   Google Scholar
• Sydney Morning Herald. (2019). Tory Maguire. https://www.smh.com.au/by/tory-maguire-h0yjtc.
   Google Scholar
• Talberg, A., Thomas, S., Christoff, P., & Karoly, D. (2018). How geoengineering scenarios frame assumptions and create expectations. Sustainability Science, 13(4), 1093–1104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0527-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talberg, A., Thomas, S., & Wiseman, J. (2018). A scenario process to inform Australian geoengineering policy. Futures, 101, 67–79. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2018.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, A., & Kemp, L. (2021). A fate worse than warming? Stratospheric aerosol injection and global catastrophic risk. Frontiers in Climate, 3(144), https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2021.720312
   Google Scholar
• The Clean Energy Regulator. (2021). Carbon capture and storage. http://www.cleanenergyregulator.gov.au/ERF/Pages/Method%20development%20tracker/Carbon-capture-and-storage.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• The Royal Society. (2009). Geoengineering the climate: Science, governance and uncertainty. https://royalsociety.org/~/media/Royal_Society_Content/policy/publications/2009/8693.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Tranter, B. (2011). Political divisions over climate change and environmental issues in Australia. Environmental Politics, 20(1), 78–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2011.538167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Rensburg, W., & Head, B. W. (2017). Climate change sceptical frames: The case of seven Australian sceptics. Australian Journal of Politics & History, 63(1), 112–128. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajph.12318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wetter, K. J., Ribeiro, S., Group, E. T. C., & George, S. (2016). The fix is in: (Geo) engineering our way out of the climate crisis? In N. Buxton & B. Hayes (Eds.), The secure and the dispossessed (pp. 133–151). Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Woodly, D. (2015). The politics of common sense: How social movements use public discourse to change politics and win acceptance. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar