The Communication of Value Judgements and its Effects on Climate Scientists’ Perceived Trustworthiness

References

• Almassi, B. (2012). Climate change, epistemic trust, and expert trustworthiness. Ethics and the Environment, 17(2), 29. https://doi.org/10.2979/ethicsenviro.17.2.29
   Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01lme4
   Google Scholar
• Beall, L., Myers, T. A., Kotcher, J., Vraga, E. K., & Maibach, E. W. (2017). Controversy matters: Impacts of topic and solution controversy on the perceived credibility of a scientist who advocates. PLOS ONE, 12(11), e0187511. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187511
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besley, J. C., Lee, N. M., & Pressgrove, G. (2021). Reassessing the variables used to measure public perceptions of scientists. Science Communication, 43(1), 3–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547020949547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betz, G. (2013). In defence of the value free ideal. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 3(2), 207–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-012-0062-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BFS. (2020). Durchschnittsalter der ständigen Wohnbevölkerung nach Staatsangehörigkeitskategorie, Geschlecht und Kanton, 2010-2019—2010-2019 | Tabelle. Bundesamt für Statistik. /content/bfs/de/home/statistiken/bevoelkerung/stand-entwicklung/alter-zivilstand-staatsangehoerigkeit.assetdetail.14387009.html.
   Google Scholar
• Brysse, K., Oreskes, N., O’Reilly, J., & Oppenheimer, M. (2013). Climate change prediction: Erring on the side of least drama? Global Environmental Change, 23(1), 327–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2002). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203774441.
   Google Scholar
• Cologna, V., Berthold, A., & Siegrist, M. (2022). Knowledge, perceived potential and trust as determinants of low- and high-impact pro-environmental behaviours. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 79, 101741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cologna, V., Knutti, R., Oreskes, N., & Siegrist, M. (2021). Majority of German citizens, US citizens and climate scientists support policy advocacy by climate researchers and expect greater political engagement. Environmental Research Letters, 16(2), 024011. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abd4ac
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cologna, V., & Siegrist, M. (2020). The role of trust for climate change mitigation and adaptation behaviour: A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 69, 101428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, H. (2000). Inductive risk and values in science. Philosophy of Science, 67(4), 559–579. https://doi.org/10.1086/392855
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, H. (2009). Science, policy, and the value-free ideal. University of Pittsburgh Press; JSTOR. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt6wrc78.
   Google Scholar
• Earle, T. C., Siegrist, M., & Gutscher, H. (2007). Trust, risk perception and the TCC model of cooperation. In M. Siegrist, T. C. Earle, & H. Gutscher (Eds.), Trust in cooperative risk management: Uncertainty and scepticism in the public mind (pp. 1–49). Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, K. C. (2017). A tapestry of values: An introduction to values in science. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, K. C., McCright, A. M., Allen, S., & Dietz, T. (2017). Values in environmental research: Citizens’ views of scientists who acknowledge values. PLOS ONE, 12(10), e0186049. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, K. C., & Resnik, D. B. (2014). Science, policy, and the transparency of values. Environmental Health Perspectives, 122(7), 647–650. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1408107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiske, S. T., & Dupree, C. (2014). Gaining trust as well as respect in communicating to motivated audiences about science topics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(Supplement 4), 13593–13597. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1317505111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, M. (2019, October 13). Nearly 400 scientists support extinction rebellion’s civil disobedience campaign. Independent. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/extinction-rebellion-protests-scientists-climate-change-london-amsterdam-a9154336.html.
   Google Scholar
• Gundersen, T. (2020). Value-free yet policy-relevant? The normative views of climate scientists and their bearing on philosophy. Perspectives on Science, 89–118. https://doi.org/10.1162/posc_a_00334
   Google Scholar
• Hagedorn, G., Loew, T., Seneviratne, S. I., Lucht, W., Beck, M. L., Hesse, J., & Zens, J. (2019). The concerns of the young protesters are justified: A statement by Scientists for Future concerning the protests for more climate protection. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 28(2), 79–87. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.28.2.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hempel, C. G. (1965). Science and human values. In C.G. Hempel (Ed.), Aspects of scientific explanation and other essays in the philosophy of science (pp. 81–96). Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hendriks, F., Kienhues, D., & Bromme, R. (2015). Measuring laypeople’s trust in experts in a digital age: The Muenster epistemic trustworthiness inventory (METI). PLOS ONE, 10(10), e0139309. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139309
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornsey, M. J., Harris, E. A., Bain, P. G., & Fielding, K. S. (2016). Meta-analyses of the determinants and outcomes of belief in climate change. Nature Climate Change, 6(6), 622–626. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. (1990). The Fifth branch: Science advisers as policymakers. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kahan, D. M., Braman, D., Cohen, G. L., Gastil, J., & Slovic, P. (2010). Who fears the HPV vaccine, Who Doesn’t, and Why? An experimental study of the mechanisms of cultural cognition. Law and Human Behavior, 34(6), 501–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-009-9201-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahan, D. M., Slovic, P., Braman, D., Gastil, J., Cohen, G. L., & Kysar, D. A. (2008). Biased assimilation, polarization, and cultural credibility: An experimental study of nanotechnology risk perceptions (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 1090044). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1090044
   Google Scholar
• Kitcher, P. (2011). Science in a democratic society. Prometheus Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kotcher, J., Myers, T. A., Vraga, E. K., Stenhouse, N., & Maibach, E. W. (2017). Does engagement in advocacy hurt the credibility of scientists? Results from a randomized national survey experiment. Environmental Communication, 11(3), 415–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2016.1275736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kourany, J. A. (2008). Replacing the ideal of value-free science. In M. Carrier, D. Howard, & J. A. Kourany (Eds.), The challenge of the social and the pressure of practice: Science and values revisited (pp. 87–111). University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., Rosenthal, S., Kotcher, J., Bergquist, P., Ballew, M., Goldberg, M., & Gustafson, A. (2019). Climate change in the American mind: November 2019. Yale Program on Climate Change Communication.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, E. A. (2015). Adaptationism and the logic of research questions: How to think clearly about evolutionary causes. Biological Theory, 10(4), 343–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-015-0214-2
   Google Scholar
• Lombardi, D., Seyranian, V., & Sinatra, G. M. (2014). Source effects and plausibility judgments when reading about climate change. Discourse Processes, 51(1–2), 75–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2013.855049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longino, H. E. (1990). Science as social knowledge: Values and objectivity in scientific inquiry. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Malka, A., Krosnick, J. A., & Langer, G. (2009). The association of knowledge with concern about global warming: Trusted information sources shape public thinking. Risk Analysis, 29(5), 633–647. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01220.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oppenheimer, M., Oreskes, N., Jamieson, D., Brysse, K., O’Reilly, J., Shindell, M., & Wazeck, M. (2019). Discerning experts: The practices of scientific assessment for environmental policy. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oreskes, N. (2019). Why trust science? Princeton University Press. https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691179001/why-trust-science.
   Google Scholar
• Palm, R., Bolsen, T., & Kingsland, J. T. (2020). ‘Don’t Tell Me What to Do’: Resistance to climate change messages suggesting behavior changes. Weather, Climate, and Society, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-19-0141.1
   Google Scholar
• Pielke, R. A. (2007). The honest broker: Making sense of science in policy and politics. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Poortinga, W., & Pidgeon, N. F. (2006). Prior attitudes, salient value similarity, and dimensionality: toward an integrative model of trust in risk regulation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(7), 1674–1700. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00076.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proctor, R. N. (1991). Value-free Science?: Purity and power in modern knowledge. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raman, S. (1993). Proctor’s value-free science? Social Epistemology, 7(3), 313–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691729308578713
   Google Scholar
• Renn, O., & Levine, D. (1991). Credibility and trust in risk communication. In R. E. Kasperson, & P. J. M. Stallen (Eds.), Communicating risks to the public: International perspectives (pp. 175–217). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1952-5_10.
   Google Scholar
• Reuters. (2019, October 13). Scientists endorse mass civil disobedience to force climate action. Reuters. https://uk.reuters.com/article/us-climate-change-scientists-idUKKBN1WS01K.
   Google Scholar
• Ripple, W. J., Wolf, C., Newsome, T. M., Barnard, P., & Moomaw, W. R. (2020). World scientists’ warning of a climate emergency. BioScience, 70(1), 8–12. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biz088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not So Different After All: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393–404. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.926617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharrer, L., Stadtler, M., & Bromme, R. (2019). Judging scientific information: Does source evaluation prevent the seductive effect of text easiness? Learning and Instruction, 63, 101215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder, S. A. (2019). Democratic values: A better foundation for public trust in science. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axz023
   Google Scholar
• Schurz, G. (2013). Wertneutralität und Hypothetische Werturteile in den Wissenschaften. In G. Schurz, & M. Carrier (Eds.), Werte in den Wissenschaften. Neue Ansätze zum Werturteilsstreit (pp. 305–336). Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Shi, J., Visschers, V. H. M., Siegrist, M., & Arvai, J. (2016). Knowledge as a driver of public perceptions about climate change reassessed. Nature Climate Change, 6(8), 759–762. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegrist, M., Cvetkovich, G., & Roth, C. (2000). Salient value similarity, social trust, and risk/benefit perception. Risk Analysis, 20(3), 353–362. https://doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.203034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steele, K. (2012). The Scientist qua policy advisor makes value judgments. Philosophy of Science, 79(5), 893–904. https://doi.org/10.1086/667842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Guardian. (2019, February 13). School climate strike children’s brave stand has our support | Letter. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/feb/13/school-climate-strike-childrens-brave-stand-has-our-support.
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. (1992). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/conveng.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Vimentis. (2019). Sehen Sie politischen Handlungsbedarf aufgrund des Klimawandels? – Ergebnisse Vimentis Umfrage. Vimentis. https://www.vimentis.ch/d/umfrage/ergebnisse/74/12557/Sehen+Sie+politischen+Handlungsbedarf+aufgrund+des+Klimawandels%2B.html.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, M. (2019). Thousands of scientists are backing the kids striking for climate change. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-00861-z.
   Google Scholar
• Winsberg, E., Oreskes, N., & Lloyd, E. (2020). Severe weather event attribution: Why values won’t go away. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 84, 142–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2020.09.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar