Open Letters and Climate Communication: The Professional Roles and Identities of Researchers in Times of Crisis

References

• Berlinske. (2018). Forskeres klimaopråb er politisk debat - ikke forskning. Berlinske Editorial, accessed 10th June 2019 at: https://www.berlingske.dk/ledere/forskeres-klimaopraab-er-politisk-debat-ikke-forskning.
   Google Scholar
• Besley, J. C., & Nisbet, M. C. (2013). How scientists view the public, the media and the political process. Public Understanding of Science, 22(6), 644–659. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662511418743
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boykoff, M. (2019). Creative (climate) communications: Productive pathways for science, policy and society. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, C., Lee, H. Y., Anderson, C. B., Trachtenberg, J., & Chang, S. (2020). The role of scientific communication in predicting science identity and research career intention. PLoS ONE, 15(2), e0228197–18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228197
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cann, C., & De Meuleneaure, E. (2020). The activist academic: Engaged scholarship for resistance, hope and social change. Myres Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho, A., van Wessel, M., & Maeseele, P. (2017). Communication practices and political engagement with climate change: A research agenda. Environmental Communication, 11(1), 122–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2016.1241815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins. (2019). Open letter. Collins Dictionary, accessed 4th August, 2022, at: https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/open-letter.
   Google Scholar
• Cologna, V., Knutti, R., Oreskes, N., & Siegrist, M. (2021). Majority of German citizens, US citizens and climate scientists support policy advocacy by climate researchers and expect greater political engagement. Environmental Research Letters, 16(2), 024011. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abd4ac
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, S. R., & Horst, M. (2016). Science communication – Culture, identity and citizenship. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, L., Fähnrich, B., Nepote, A. C., Riedlinger, M., & Trench, B. (2018). Environmental communication and science communication—Conversations, connections and collaborations. Environmental Communication, 12(4), 431–437. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2018.1436082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EC. (2016). Open innovation, open science, open to the world: a vision for Europe. Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, European Commission, accessed 15th March, 2022, at: https://openall.info/open-innovation-open-science-open-to-the-world-a-vision-for-europe/.
   Google Scholar
• Felt, U., & Davies, S. R. (2020). Exploring science communication: A science and technology studies approach. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• French, A. (2020). Academic writing as identity-work in higher education: forming a ‘professional writing in higher education habitus. Studies in Higher Education, 45(8), 1605–1617. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1572735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frey, L., Carragee, K., Crabtree, R., & Ford, L. (2006). Communication activism: Communication for social change. Hampton.
   Google Scholar
• Gabriel, Y. (1991). Turning facts into stories and stories into facts: A hermeneutic exploration of organizational folklore. Human Relations, 44(8), 857–875. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679104400806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilgartner, S. (1990). The dominant view of popularization: Conceptual problems, political uses. Social Studies of Science, 20(3), 519–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631290020003006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. (2004). States of knowledge: The co-production of science and the social order. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Joosse, S., Powell, S., Bergeå, H., Böhm, S., Calderón, C., Caselunghe, E., Fischer, A., Grubbström, A., Hallgren, L., Holmgren, S., Löf, A., Nordström Källström, H., Raitio, K., Senecah, S., Söderlund Kanarp, C., von Essen, E., Westberg, L., & Westin, M. (2020). Critical, engaged and change-oriented scholarship in environmental communication. Six methodological dilemmas to think with. Environmental Communication, 14(6), 758–771. doi:10.1080/17524032.2020.1725588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knorr-Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laing, M., Cook, I., Baker, T., & Calder-Dawe, O. (2022). Maybe I’m a quiet activist: Sex work scholars and negotiations of ‘minor’ academic-activism. Sexualities, 0(0), 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Lamb, R., & Davidson, E. (2005). Information and communication technology challenges to scientific professional identity. The Information Society, 21(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240590895883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lea, M., & Stierer, B. (2011). Changing academic identities in changing academic workplaces: Learning from academics’ everyday professional writing practices. Teaching in Higher Education, 16(6), 605–616. doi:10.1080/13562517.2011.560380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maeseele, P., & Pepermans, Y. (2017). Ideology in climate change communication. Oxford Research Encyclopedias, Climate Science, 1), https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2011.560380
   Google Scholar
• Neeley, L., Barker, E., Bayer, S., Maktoufi, R., Wu, K. J., & Zaringhalam, M. (2020). Linking scholarship and practice: Narrative and identity in science. Frontiers in Communication, 5(35), 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Nørgård, R. T., & Bengtsen, S. E. (2021). The activist university and university activism – An editorial. Policy Futures in Education, 19(5), 507–512. https://doi.org/10.1177/14782103211026584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Post, S. (2016). Communicating science in public controversies: Strategic considerations of the German climate scientists. Public Understanding of Science, 25(1), 61–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662514521542
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reckwitz, A. (2012). Affective spaces: A praxeological outlook. Rethinking History, 16(2), 241–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642529.2012.681193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozance, M. A., Krosby, M., Meadow, A., Snover, A., Ferguson, D., & Owen, G. (2020). Building capacity for societally engaged climate science by transforming science training. Environmental Research Letters, 15(12), 125008–13. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abc27a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. (2001). Introduction: practice theory. In T. Schatzki, K. Knorr-Cetina, & E. von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 10–23). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shapin, S. (1994). A social history of truth: Civility and science in seventeenth century England. The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sharman, A., & Howarth, C. (2017). Climate stories: Why do climate scientists and sceptical voices participate in the climate debate? Public Understanding of Science, 26(7), 826–842. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662516632453
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanley, L. (2004). The epistolarium: On theorizing letters and correspondences. Auto/Biography, 12(3), 201–235. https://doi.org/10.1191/0967550704ab014oa
   Google Scholar
• Stranzl, E. (2019). Für die Fakten auf die Barrikaden. Weiner Zeitung, accessed 14th June, 2019 at: https://www.wienerzeitung.at/nachrichten/wissen/klima/2001434-Fuer-die-Fakten-auf-die-Barrikaden.html.
   Google Scholar
• Tøsse, S. E. (2013). Aiming for social or political robustness? Media strategies among climate scientists. Science Communication, 35(1), 32–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547012438465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weathrall, R. (2022). Reimagining academic activism: Learning from feminist anti-violence activists. Bristol University Press.
   Google Scholar