321
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Defining e-research in social work: a review of strategies and challenges

, , , &

References

  • Altmann, A., B. Ebersberger, C. Mössenlechner, and D. Wieser. 2018. “Introduction: The Disruptive Power of Online Education: Challenges, Opportunities, Responses.” In The Disruptive Power of Online Education: Challenges, Opportunities, Responses, edited by A. Altmann, B. Ebersberger, C. Mössenlechner, and D. Wieser, 1–4. Bingley: ‎Emerald UK. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78754-325-620181001.
  • Anderson, T., and H. Kanuka. 2003. e-Research: Methods, Strategies, and Issues. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Baethge, C., S. Goldbeck-Wood, and S. Mertens. 2019. “SANRA-A Scale for the Quality Assessment of Narrative Review Articles.” Research Integrity and Peer Review 4 (1): 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-019-0064-8.
  • Baker, E., and A. Jenney. 2023. “Virtual Simulations to Train Social Workers for Competency-Based Learning: A Scoping Review.” Journal of Social Work Education 59 (1): 8–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2022.2039819.
  • Bansal, S., S. Mahendiratta, S. Kumar, P. Sarma, A. Prakash, and B. Medhi. 2019. “Collaborative Research in Modern Era: Need and Challenges.” Indian Journal of Pharmacology 51 (3): 137–139. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijp.IJP_394_19.
  • Beuthner, C., B. Weiβ, H. Silber, F. Keusch, and J. Schröder. 2023. “Consent to Data Linkage for Different Data Domains–The Role of Question Order, Question-Wording, and Incentives.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology. Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2023.2173847.
  • Bloomberg-Fretter, P. 1998. “Research Findings Can Be Misunderstood - A Clarification.” Behaviour Online. https://www.behavior.net/forums/caseconference/1998/kathy/2_5-47.htm.
  • British Association of Social Workers. 2021. “Code of Ethics.” https://www.basw.co.uk/about-basw/code-ethics?msclkid=943d86d5c47f11ecac6628d59b2ee15e.
  • Buchanan, E. A. 2020. “Ethics in Digital Research.” In Handbuch Soziale Praktiken und Digitale Alltagswelten [Handbook social practices and digital everyday world], edited by H. Friese, M. Nolden, G. Rebane, M. Schreiter, 375–384. Germany: Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-08357-1_47.
  • Burton, O. V., and S. Appleford. 2009. “Cyberinfrastructure for the Humanities, Arts, and Social Sciences.” EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research - Research Bulletin 2009 (1). https://library.educause.edu/-/media/files/library/2009/1/erb0901-pdf.pdf.
  • Canadian Association of Social Workers. n.d. “What Is Social Work?” https://www.casw-acts.ca/en/what-social-work.
  • Carnochan, S., E. Weissinger, C. Henry, N. Liner-Jigamian, and M. J. Austin. 2019. “Using Qualitative Data-Mining to Identify Skillful Practice in Child Welfare Case Records.” Journal of Public Child Welfare 13 (4): 419–440. https://doi.org/10.1080/15548732.2018.1509040.
  • Central Queensland University. n.d. “E-Research.” https://www.cqu.edu.au/eresearch?msclkid=e88e7b0eb63011ecb091300eb869ecd6.
  • Chan, C. 2022. “Digital Technologies and Evolving Narrative Practice: An Autoethnographic Study.” China Journal of Social Work 16 (1): 83–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/17525098.2022.2123762.
  • De Roure, D., and J. Frey. 2007. “Three Perspectives on Collaborative Knowledge Acquisition in E-Science.” Paper presented at the Workshop on Semantic Web for Collaborative Knowledge Acquisition (SWeCKa) 2007, Hyderabad. https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/263997/1/chemknowledge5.pdf.
  • Doss, B. D., and S. G. Hatch. 2022. “Harnessing Technology to Provide Online Couple Interventions.” Current Opinion in Psychology 43:114–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.06.014.
  • Fiesler, C., P. Wisniewski, J. Peter, and N. Andalibi. 2016. “Exploring Ethics and Obligations for Studying Digital Communities.” Paper presented at the International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work, Sanibel Island, FL, 13-16 November. https://doi.org/10.1145/2957276.2996293.
  • Fink, J. L., S. Kushch, P. R. Williams, and P. E. Bourne. 2008. “Biolit: Integrating Biological Literature with Databases.” Nucleic Acids Research 36 (suppl_2): W385–W389. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkn317.
  • Fuchs, C. 2019. “What is Critical Digital Social Research? Five Reflections on the Study of Digital Society.” Journal of Digital Social Research 1 (1): 10–16. https://doi.org/10.33621/JDSR.V1I1.7.
  • Gasparyan, A. Y., B. Nurmashev, M. Yessirkepov, D. A. Endovitskiy, A. A. Voronov, and G. D. Kitas. 2017. “Researchers and Author Profiles: Opportunities, Advantages and Limitations.” Journal of Korean Medical Science 32 (11): 1749–1756. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2017.32.11.1749.
  • Gesualdo, F., M. Daverio, L. Palazzani, D. Dimitriou, J. Diez-Domingo, J. Fons-Martinez, S. Jackson, P. Vignally, C. Rizzo, and A. E. Tozzi. 2021. “Digital Tools in the Informed Consent Process: A Systematic Review.” BMC Medical Ethics 22 (1): 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-021-00585-8.
  • Gibson, K. 2020. “Bridging the Digital Divide: Reflections on Using Whatsapp Instant Messenger Interviews in Youth Research.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 19 (3): 611–631. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1751902.
  • Gilles, B. 2014. “Taxonomies for Categorization and Research: Is a Mining Analogy Valid?” Bulletin of the Association for Information Science and Technology 40 (4): 34–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/bult.2014.1720400413.
  • Gillingham, P. 2019. Transforming Information Systems Design and Use in Social Welfare Agencies. Powerpoint presentation, Queensland: Brisbane University. https://policy-futures.centre.uq.edu.au/files/3788/Gillingham.pdf.
  • GlobalSCAPE. n.d. “Our Mission.” https://global-scape.eu/.
  • Goldkind, L., and L. Wolf. 2015. “A Digital Environment Approach: Four Technologies that Will Disrupt Social Work Practice.” Social Work 60 (1): 85–87. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/swu045.
  • Goldkind, L., L. Wolf, and P. P. Freddolino, eds. 2019. Digital Social Work: Tools for Practice with Individuals, Organizations, and Communities. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Graham, J. R., and K. Barter. 1999. “Collaboration: A Social Work Practice Method.” Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services 80 (1): 6–13. https://doi.org/10.1606/1044-3894.634.
  • Hennink, M. M., I. Hutter, and A. Bailey. 2020. Qualitative Research Methods. 2nd ed. London: Sage.
  • Hewson, C. 2014. “Qualitative Approaches in Internet-Mediated Research.” Chap. 21 in The Oxford Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by P. Leavy, 423–452. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199811755.013.020.
  • Hey, T., S. Tansley, and K. Tolle, eds. 2009. The Fourth Paradigm: Data-Intensive Scientific Discovery. Redmond, WA: Microsoft Research. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/publication/fourth-paradigm-data-intensive-scientific-discovery/?msclkid=a05d0627c47b11ec957a04f1ed8adece.
  • Hine, C. 2005. “Internet Research and the Sociology of Cyber-Social-Scientific Knowledge.” The Information Society 21 (4): 239–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240591007553.
  • Holmes, A. D. G. 2020. “Researcher Positionality-A Consideration of Its Influence and Place in Qualitative Research-A New Researcher Guide.” Shanlax International Journal of Education 8 (4): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v8i4.3232.
  • Hung, S.-L., and K.-K. Fung. 2021. “Venturing into the Unknown with the Use of ICTs in Social Work Education during COVID-19.” China Journal of Social Work 14 (2): 172–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/17525098.2021.1923545.
  • Kaur-Gill, S., and M. J. Dutta. 2017. “Digital Ethnography.” In The International Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods, edited by J. Matthes, C. S. Davis, and R. F. Potter, 141–147, 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley . https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118901731.iecrm0271.
  • Kim, J. H., and H. Park. 2019. “Effects of Smartphone-Based Mobile Learning in Nursing Education: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” Asian Nursing Research 13 (1): 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anr.2019.01.005.
  • King, E. L., C. M. Spencer, and C. A. Meeks. 2022. “How the COVID-19 Pandemic Can and Must Expand Social Worker E-Interventions for Mental Health, Family Wellness, and Beyond.” Social Work 67 (1): 69–78. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/swab043.
  • Knight, S. A. 2016. “Social Services Software: Integrating GIS Software with Social Work Practice.” Social Work Today 16 (1): 8. https://www.socialworktoday.com/archive/011716p8.shtml?msclkid=9bba8541c47d11ecaf4da0230bbe36b2.
  • Kvale, S. 2007. “Analysing Interviews.” In Doing Interviews, edited by S. Kvale, 101–117. London: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208963.
  • Latkovikj, M. T., and M. B. Popovska. 2020. “Online Research about Online Research: Advantages and Disadvantages.” E-Methodology 6 (6): 44–56. https://doi.org/10.15503/emet2019.44.56.
  • Lougheed, T. 2019. “How ‘Digital Therapeutics’ Differ from Traditional Health and Wellness Apps.” Canadian Medical Association Journal 191 (43): E1200–E1201. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.1095801.
  • Ma, F., and X. Lyu. 2021. “China National Report on COVID-19 Pandemic and the Role of Social Work.” China Journal of Social Work 14 (2): 80–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/17525098.2021.1872840.
  • Madhusudhan, M. 2012. “Use of Social Networking Sites by Research Scholars of the University of Delhi: A Study.” International Information and Library Review 44 (2): 100–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iilr.2012.04.006.
  • Markauskaite, L., M. A. Kennan, J. Rischardson, A. Aditomo, and L. Hellmers. 2012. “Investigating eResearch: Collaboration Practices and Future Challenges.” Chap. 1 in Collaborative and Distributed E-Research: Innovations in Technologies, Strategies and Applications, edited by A. A. Juan, T. Daradoumis, M. Roca, S. E. Grasman, and J. Fauli, 1–33. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-0125-3.ch001.
  • Markham, A., and E. Buchanan. 2012. Ethical Decision-Making and Internet Research: Recommendations from the Aoir Ethics Working Committee (Version 2.0). https://aoir.org/reports/ethics2.pdf.
  • Mathieson, C. 2019. “Creating an Online Identity as a Researcher.” NU Women. https://blogs.ncl.ac.uk/nuwomen/2019/09/25/creating-an-online-identity-as-a-researcher/.
  • Miles, M. B., and A. M. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Mois, G., and K. L. Fortuna. 2020. “Visioning the Future of Gerontological Digital Social Work.” Journal of Gerontological Social Work 63 (5): 412–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/01634372.2020.1772436.
  • National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering and Institute of Medicine. 2009. Ensuring the Integrity, Accessibility, and Stewardship of Research Data in the Digital Age. Washington, D. C: National Academies.
  • Nind, M., A. Coverdale, and R. Meckin. 2023. “Research Practices for a Pandemic and an Uncertain Future: Synthesis of the Learning among the Social Research Community 2020–2022.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology. Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2023.2173842.
  • Nordesjö, K., G. Scaramuzzino, and R. Ulmestig. 2021. “The Social Worker-Client Relationship in the Digital Era: A Configurative Literature Review.” European Journal of Social Work 25 (2): 303–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2021.1964445.
  • Nosek, B. A., M. R. Banaji, and A. G. Greenwald. 2002. “E-Research: Ethics, Security, Design, and Control in Psychological Research on the Internet.” Journal of Social Issues 58 (1): 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.00254.
  • Olson, G. M., N. Bos, and A. Zimmerman. 2008. “Introduction.” In Scientific Collaboration on the Internet, edited by G. M. Olson, A. Zimmerman, and N. Bos, 1–12. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262151207.003.0001.
  • Ortega, J. L. 2015. “Disciplinary Differences in the Use of Academic Social Networking Sites.” Online Information Review 39 (4): 520–536. https://doi.org/10.1108/oir-03-2015-0093.
  • Peláez, A. L., and C. Marcuello-Servós. 2018. “E-Social Work and Digital Society: Re-Conceptualizing Approaches, Practices and Technologies.” European Journal of Social Work 21 (6): 801–803. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2018.1520475.
  • Pink, S. 2019. “Digital Social Futures Research.” Journal of Digital Social Research 1 (1): 41–48. https://doi.org/10.33621/jdsr.v1i1.13.
  • Pink, S., H. Ferguson, and L. Kelly. 2021. “Digital Social Work: Conceptualising a Hybrid Anticipatory Practice.” Qualitative Social Work 21 (2): 413–430. https://doi.org/10.1177/14733250211003647.
  • Pink, S., H. Horst, J. Postill, L. Hjorth, T. Lewis, and J. Tacchi. 2016. Digital Ethnography: Principles and Practices. London: Sage.
  • Quinton, S., and N. Reynolds. 2017. “The Changing Roles of Researchers and Participants in Digital and Social Media Research: Ethics Challenges and Forward Directions.” Chap. 3 in The Ethics of Online Research, edited by K. Woodfield, 53–78. Vol. 2. India: Emerald. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820180000002003.
  • Quinton, S., and N. Reynolds. 2018. “The Practicalities of Doing Digital Research.” Chap. 7 in Understanding Research in the Digital Age, edited by S. Quinton and N. Reynolds, 189–214. London: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529716573.
  • Ramsey, A. T., and K. Montgomery. 2014. “Technology-Based Interventions in Social Work Practice: A Systematic Review of Mental Health Interventions.” Social Work in Health Care 53 (9): 883–899. https://doi.org/10.1080/00981389.2014.925531.
  • Reamer, F. G. 2013. “Social Work in a Digital Age: Ethical and Risk Management Challenges.” Social Work 58 (2): 163–172. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/swt003.
  • Ruddock, U. 2015. “E-Interviews. A Review of Janet Salmons’ Qualitative Online Interviews (2nd ed.).” The Qualitative Report 20 (3): 356–358. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol20/iss3/15.
  • Salmons, J. 2010. Online Interviews in Real Time. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Salmons, J. 2012. “Designing and Conducting Research with Online Interviews.” Chap. 1 in Cases in Online Interview Research, edited by J. Salmons, 1–30. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506335155.
  • Salmons, J. 2014a. Qualitative Online Interviews: Strategies, Design, and Skills. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071878880.
  • Salmons, J. 2014b. “Visual Methods in Online Interviews.” In Sage Research Methods Cases Part 1. London: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/978144627305014527692.
  • Salmons, J. 2016a. Doing Qualitative Research Online. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Salmons, J. 2016b. “e-Research”. Podcast of the Ecampus Research Unit. Oregon State University. http://ecampus.oregonstate.edu/research/podcast/e23/.
  • Salmons, J. 2017a. “Janet Salmons Discusses Online Research [Video].” Sage Research Methods. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473989733.
  • Salmons, J. 2017b. “Using Social Media in Data Collection: Designing Studies with the Qualitative E-Research Framework.” Chap. 12 in The Sage Handbook of Social Media Research Methods, edited by L. Sloan and A. Quan-Haase, 177–196. London: Sage.
  • Salmons, J. 2017c. “Getting to Yes: Informed Consent in Qualitative Social Media Research.” Chap. 5 in The Ethics of Online Research, edited by K. Woodfield, 109–134. India: Emerald. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820180000002005.
  • Salmons, J. 2019a. “Graphical and Video Abstracts: An Interview with Tullio Rossi.” Social Science Space. https://www.socialsciencespace.com/2019/07/graphical-video-abstracts-an-interview-with-tullio-rossi/?msclkid=11a4bee2c5df11ecbac5c5103e0eb3a5.
  • Salmons, J. 2019b. Quick Fix : Gather Your Data Online. London: Sage.
  • Salmons, J. 2022. “Qualitative Approaches for Research in a Data-Intensive World.” Chap. 1 in Doing Qualitative Research Online, 2–14. 2nd ed. London: Sage.
  • Schiffhauer, B., and U. Seelmeyer. 2021. “Responsible Digital Transformation of Social Welfare Organizations.” Chap. 8 in Digital Transformation of Learning Organizations, edited by D. Ifenthaler, S. Hofhues, M. Egloffstein, and C. Helbig, 131–144. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55878-9_8.
  • Sedysheva, A. 2020. “Doing Qualitative Research during the COVID-19 Pandemic of 2020.” Ask: Research and Methods 29 (1): 75–88. https://doi.org/10.18061/ask.v29i1.0005.
  • Seringhaus, M. R., and M. B. Gerstein. 2007. “Publishing Perishing? Towards Tomorrow’s Information Architecture.” BMC Bioinformatics 8 (1): 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-8-17.
  • Shaw, I., and S. Holland. 2014. Doing Qualitative Research in Social Work. London: Sage.
  • Steiner, O. 2021. “Social Work in the Digital Era: Theoretical, Ethical and Practical Considerations.” British Journal of Social Work 51 (8): 3358–3374. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcaa160.
  • Teti, M., E. Schatz, and L. Liebenberg. 2020. “Methods in the Time of COVID-19: The Vital Role of Qualitative Inquiries.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 19:160940692092096. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920920962.
  • Thelwall, M., and K. Kousha. 2015. “Researchgate: Disseminating, Communicating, and Measuring Scholarship?” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 66 (5): 876–889. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23236.
  • Thunberg, S., and L. Arnell. 2021. “Pioneering the Use of Technologies in Qualitative Research–A Research Review of the Use of Digital Interviews.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 25 (6): 757–768. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2021.1935565.
  • Tiidenberg, K. 2018. “Ethics in Digital Research.” Chap. 30 in The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Collection, edited by U. Flick, 466–479. London: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526416070.
  • Tsatsou, P. 2017. “Literacy and Training in Digital Research: Researchers’ Views in Five Social Science and Humanities Disciplines.” New Media and Society 20 (3): 1240–1259. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816688274.
  • Victor, B. G., B. E. Perron, R. L. Sokol, L. Fedina, and J. P. Ryan. 2021. “Automated Identification of Domestic Violence in Written Child Welfare Records: Leveraging Text Mining and Machine Learning to Enhance Social Work Research and Evaluation.” Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research 12 (4): 631–655. https://doi.org/10.1086/712734.
  • Wang, J., I. Katz, J. Li, Q. Wu, and C. Dai. 2021. “Mobile Digital Divide and Older People’s Access to ‘Internet Plus Social Work’: Implications from the COVID-19 Help-Seeking Cases.” Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development 31 (1–2): 52–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/02185385.2020.1850332.
  • Williams, A. E., and M. A. Woodacre. 2016. “The Possibilities and Perils of Academic Social Networking Sites.” Online Information Review 40 (2): 282–294. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-10-2015-0327.
  • Wolski, M., and J. Richardson. 2010. “Moving Researchers across the Eresearch Chasm.” Ariadne 65:1–10.
  • Yadav, R. 2021. “Conversation with the Twenty-First Century Social Work: Some ‘Post(S)’ Perspectives.” British Journal of Social Work 52 (5): 2966–2983. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcab212.
  • Zhao, K., W. Tan, and A. K. T. Tsang. 2022. “Online Mental Health Resources in Wuhan amid the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Role of Social Workers.” China Journal of Social Work 15 (1): 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/17525098.2021.2006899.
  • Zimmer, M. 2010. ‘But the Data Is Already Public’: On the Ethics of Research in Facebook.” Ethics and Information Technology 12 (4): 313–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-010-9227-5.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.