Rousseau’s Crusoe myth: the unlikely provenance of the neoclassical homo economicus

References

• Baggerman, A. & Dekker, R. (2009) Child of the Enlightenment: Revolutionary Europe Reflected in a Boyhood Diary, translated by D. Webb, Brill, Leiden.
   Google Scholar
• Banerjee, A. (1977) ‘Rousseau’s concept of theatre’, British Journal of Aesthetics, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 171–177. doi: 10.1093/bjaesthetics/17.2.171
   Google Scholar
• Barber, B. (1978) ‘Rousseau and the paradoxes of the dramatic imagination’, Daedalus, vol. 107, no. 3, pp. 79–92.
   Google Scholar
• Billig, V. (2014) ‘“I”-lands: the construction and shipwreck of an insular figure in modern discourse’, in Shipwreck and Island Motifs in Literature and the Arts, eds B. Le Juez & O. Springer, Brill, Leiden, pp. 17–32.
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, J. (1981) A History of Western Education, Volume III: The Modern West Europe and the New World, Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• Campe, J. H. (1788) The New Robinson Crusoe, Stockdale, London.
   Google Scholar
• Charvet, J. (1974) The Social Problem in the Philosophy of Rousseau, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Curkpatrick, S. (2002) ‘The Footprint in the Sand: providence, invention, and alterity in Robinson Crusoe’, Pacifica, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 247–265.
   Google Scholar
• Damrosch, L. (1985) God’s Plot and Man’s Stories: Studies in the Fictional Imagination from Milton to Fielding, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Defoe, D. ([1719] 1985) Robinson Crusoe, edited by A. Ross, Penguin, London.
   Google Scholar
• Engélibert, J.-P. (1996) ‘Daniel Defoe as character: subversion of the myths of Robinson Crusoe and of the author’, in Robinson Crusoe: Myths and Metamorphoses, ed. L. Spaas and B. Stimpson, Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp. 267–281.
   Google Scholar
• Fishelov, D. (2010) Dialogues with/and Great Books: The Dynamics of Canon Formation, Sussex Academic Press, Brighton.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, E. (2004) ‘Nature and Bildung: pedagogical naturalism in nineteenth-century Germany’, in The Moral Authority of Nature, eds L. Daston and F. Vidal, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, pp. 155–181.
   Google Scholar
• Gossen, H. H. ([1854] 1983) The Laws of Human Relations and the Rules of Human Action Derived Therefrom, translated by R. Blitz, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Grapard, U. (1995) ‘Robinson Crusoe: the quintessential economic man?’, Feminist Economics, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 33–52. doi: 10.1080/714042213
   Google Scholar
• Green, M. (1991) Seven Types of Adventure Tale: An Etiology of a Major Genre, Penn State Press, University Park, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Hammond, J. R. (2001) A Defoe Companion, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
   Google Scholar
• Harari, J. (1987) Scenarios of the Imaginary: Theorizing the French Enlightenment, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Hewitson, G. (1999) ‘Robinson Crusoe: the paradigmatic “rational economic man”’, in Robinson Crusoe’s Economic Man: A Construction and Deconstruction, eds U. Grapard and G. Hewitson, Routledge, London, pp. 111–132.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, J. P. (1966) The Reluctant Pilgrim: Defoe’s Emblematic Method and Quest for Form in Robinson Crusoe, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Hymer, S. (1971) ‘Robinson Crusoe and the secret of primitive accumulation’, Monthly Review, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 11–36. doi: 10.14452/MR-023-04-1971-08_2
   Google Scholar
• Idelson-Shein, I. (2014) Difference of a Different Kind: Jewish Constructions of Race during the Long Eighteenth Century, University of Philadelphia Press, Philadelphia, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Jevons, W. S. ([1871/1911] 2013) The Theory of Political Economy, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, B. (2006) ‘“A chain of marvels”: botany and autobiography in Rousseau’, European Romantic Review, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1–20. doi: 10.1080/10509580500520792
   Google Scholar
• Louden, R. (2011) Kant’s Human Being: Essays on his Theory of Human Nature, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• McGrath, B. (2010) ‘Rousseau’s Crusoe: or, on learning to read as not myself’, Eighteenth-Century Fiction, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 119–139.
   Google Scholar
• McLendon, M. L. (2003) ‘The overvaluation of talent: an interpretation and application of Rousseau’s amour-propre’, Polity, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 115–138. doi: 10.1086/POLv36n1ms3235426
   Google Scholar
• Menger, C. ([1871] 1950) Principles of Economics, translated by J. Dingwall and B. Hoselitz, Ludwig von Mises Institute, Auburn, AL.
   Google Scholar
• Nechyba, T. (2011) Microeconomics: An Intuitive Approach with Calculus, international edition, Cengage, Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Novak, M. (1962) Economics and the Fiction of Daniel Defoe, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Richetti, J. (2001) ‘Introduction’, in Robinson Crusoe, by D. Defoe, Penguin, London, pp. ix–xxviii.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, P. (1979) Robinson Crusoe, George Allen and Unwin, London.
   Google Scholar
• Rousseau, J.-J. ([1782] 1953) The Confessions of Jean-Jacques Rousseau, translated by J.M. Cohen, Penguin, London.
   Google Scholar
• Rousseau, J.-J. ([1758] 1968) Politics and the Arts: Letter to M. d’Alembert on the Theater, translated by A. Bloom, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Rousseau, J.-J. ([1782] 1990) Rousseau, Judge of Jean-Jacques, Dialogues, translated by R. Masters, C. Kelly and J. Bush, University Press of New England, Dartmouth, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Rousseau, J.-J. ([1750] 1993) ‘A discourse on the moral effects of the arts and sciences’, in The Social Contract and Discourses, ed. J.-J. Rousseau, translated by G.D.H. Cole, Everyman, London, pp. 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Rousseau, J.-J. ([1754] 1993) ‘A discourse on the origin of inequality’, in The Social Contract and Discourses, ed. J.-J. Rousseau, translated by G.D.H. Cole, Everyman, London, pp. 31–126.
   Google Scholar
• Rousseau, J.-J. ([1762] 2003) Émile, or Treatise on Education, translated by W. H. Payne, Prometheus Books, Amherst, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Ryn, C. (1997) ‘Imaginative origins of modernity: life as daydream and nightmare’, Humanitas, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 41–60.
   Google Scholar
• Schonhorn, M. (1991) Defoe’s Politics: Parliament, Power, Kingship, and Robinson Crusoe, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. (1992) ‘The theodicy of the Second Discourse: the “pure state of nature” and Rousseau’s political thought’, American Political Science Review, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 696–711. doi: 10.2307/1964132
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, P. (2007) Education Administration, A.P.H. Publishing, New Delhi.
   Google Scholar
• Shinagel, M. (1968) Daniel Defoe and Middle-Class Gentility, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Sill, G. (1983) Defoe and the Idea of Fiction, 1713–1719, Associated University Presses, London.
   Google Scholar
• Starr, G. (1976) ‘Robinson Crusoe’s conversion’, in Daniel Defoe: A Collection of Critical Essays, ed. M. Byrd, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp. 78–91.
   Google Scholar
• Vanpée, J. (1990) ‘Lessons in Rousseau’s Emile ou de l’education’, Modern Language Studies, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 40–49. doi: 10.2307/3195233
   Google Scholar
• Watt, I. (1951) ‘Robinson Crusoe as a myth’, Essays in Criticism, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 95–119. doi: 10.1093/eic/I.2.95
   Google Scholar
• Watt, I. (1974) The Rise of the Novel: Studies in Defoe, Richardson and Fielding, Chatto and Windus, London.
   Google Scholar
• White, M. (1982) ‘Reading and rewriting: the production of an economic Robinson Crusoe’, in Robinson Crusoe’s Economic Man: A Construction and Deconstruction, eds U. Grapard and G. Hewitson, Routledge, London, pp. 15–41.
   Google Scholar
• White, M. (1998) ‘Robinson Crusoe’, in The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, Volume 4, eds J. Eatwell, M. Milgate and P. Newman, Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp. 217–218.
   Google Scholar
• Yousef, N. (2001) ‘Savage or solitary? The wild child and Rousseau’s man of nature’, Journal of the History of Ideas, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 245–263. doi: 10.1353/jhi.2001.0021
   Google Scholar