247
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Supplying the supply curve: an ethnography of environmental reverse auctions

Pages 20-35 | Received 18 May 2017, Accepted 08 Oct 2017, Published online: 14 Nov 2017

References

  • Ajayi, O.C., Jack, B.K., and Leimona, B., 2012. Auction design for the private provision of public goods in developing countries: lessons from payments for environmental services in Malawi and Indonesia. World Development, 40, 1213–1223. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.12.007
  • Arrow, K.J., 2012. Social choice and individual values. London: Yale University Press.
  • Barry, A., 2002. The anti-political economy. Economy and Society, 31, 268–284. doi:10.1080/03085140220123162.
  • Beunza, D. and Stark, D., 2004. Tools of the trade: the socio-technology of arbitrage in a wall street trading room. Industrial and Corporate Change, 13, 369–400. doi:10.1093/icc/dth015.
  • Bittner, E. and Garfinkel, H., 1967. “Good” organizational reasons for ‘bad’ clinical records, in: studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Boisvert, V., Méral, P., and Froger, G., 2013. Market-based instruments for ecosystem services: institutional innovation or renovation? Society & Natural Resources, 26, 1122–1136. doi:10.1080/08941920.2013.820815.
  • Brenner, N., Peck, J., and Theodore, N., 2010. Variegated neoliberalization: geographies, modalities, pathways. Global Networks, 10, 182–222. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0374.2009.00277.x.
  • Budhi, G.S., Kuswanto, S.A., and Muhammad, I., 2008. Concept and implementation of PES program in the Cidanau watershed: a lesson learned for future environmental policy. Analisis Kebijakan Pertanian Journal of Agricultural Policy, 6, 37–55.
  • Büscher, B., 2012. Payments for ecosystem services as neoliberal conservation: (Reinterpreting) evidence from the Maloti-Drakensberg, South Africa. Conservation and Society, 10, 29. doi:10.4103/0972-4923.92190.
  • Büscher, B. and Fletcher, R., 2015. Accumulation by conservation. New Political Economy 20, 273–298. doi:10.1080/13563467.2014.923824.
  • Çalışkan, K. and Callon, M., 2009. Economization, part 1: shifting attention from the economy towards processes of economization. Economy and Society, 38, 369–398. doi:10.1080/03085140903020580.
  • Callon, M., 1998a. An essay on framing and overflowing: economic externalities revisited by sociology, in: the laws of the markets. Oxford: Blackwell, 244.
  • Callon, M., 1998b. Laws of the markets. Oxford: Wiley.
  • Callon, M., 2009. Civilizing markets: carbon trading between in vitro and in vivo experiments. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34, 535–548. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2008.04.003
  • Callon, M., 2010. Performativity, misfires and politics. Journal of Cultural Economy, 3, 163–169. doi:10.1080/17530350.2010.494119.
  • Callon, M., Méadel, C., and Rabeharisoa, V., 2002. The economy of qualities. Economy and Society, 31, 194–217. doi:10.1080/03085140220123126.
  • Cardwell, E., 2015. Power and performativity in the creation of the UK fishing-rights market. Journal of Cultural Economy, 8, 705–720. doi:10.1080/17530350.2015.1050441.
  • Cetina, K.K. and Bruegger, U., 2002. Traders’ engagement with markets a postsocial relationship. Theory, Culture & Society, 19, 161–185. doi: 10.1177/026327602761899200
  • Clark, C. and Pinch, T., 1995. The hard sell: the language and lessons of street-wise marketing. London: HarperCollins.
  • Coase, R.H., 1960. The problem of social cost. The Journal of Law and Economics, 3, 1–44. doi: 10.1086/466560
  • Cochoy, F., Giraudeau, M., and McFall, L., 2010. Performativity, economics and politics. Journal of Cultural Economy, 3, 139–146. doi:10.1080/17530350.2010.494116.
  • Corbera, E., Soberanis, C.G., and Brown, K., 2009. Institutional dimensions of payments for ecosystem services: an analysis of Mexico’s carbon forestry programme. Ecological Economics, 68, 743–761. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.06.008.
  • Crabtree, A. and Chamberlain, A., 2014. Making it “pay a bit better”: design challenges for micro rural enterprise. In: Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work & social computing, CSCW ‘14. New York: ACM, 687–696. doi:10.1145/2531602.2531618.
  • Davies, W., 2010. Economics and the “nonsense” of law: the case of the Chicago antitrust revolution. Economy and Society, 39, 64–83. doi:10.1080/03085140903020655.
  • Engel, S., Pagiola, S., and Wunder, S., 2008. Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: an overview of the issues. Ecological Economics, 65, 663–674. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.011.
  • Ezzine-de-Blas, D., et al., 2016. Global patterns in the implementation of payments for environmental services. PLOS ONE, 11, e0149847. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0149847.
  • Farley, J. and Costanza, R., 2010. Payments for ecosystem services: from local to global. Ecological Economics, 69, 2060–2068. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.06.010.
  • Ferraro, P.J., 2008. Asymmetric information and contract design for payments for environmental services. Ecological Economics, 65, 810–821. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.029.
  • Fletcher, R., 2010. Neoliberal environmentality: towards a poststructuralist political ecology of the conservation debate. Conservation and Society, 8, 171. doi:10.4103/0972-4923.73806.
  • Garfinkel, H., 1991. Studies in ethnomethodology. 1st ed. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Gómez-Baggethun, E. and Ruiz-Pérez, M., 2011. Economic valuation and the commodification of ecosystem services. Progress in Physical Geography, 35, 613–628. doi:10.1177/0309133311421708.
  • Guala, F., 2007. How to do things with experimental economics. In: D. MacKenzie, F. Muniesa, and L. Siu, eds. Do economists make markets. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 163–189.
  • Harper, R., 1998. Inside the IMF: an ethnography of documents, technology and organisational action. New York: Routledge.
  • Harper, R., Randall, D., and Sharrock, W., 2016. Choice. Cambridge: Wiley.
  • Harvey, D., 2005. A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Hayek, F.A., 2006. The road to serfdom. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Heath, C., 2013. The dynamics of auction: social interaction and the sale of fine art and antiques. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Heath, C. and Luff, P., 2007. Ordering competition: the interactional accomplishment of the sale of art and antiques at auction. The British Journal of Sociology, 58, 63–85. doi:10.1111/j.1468-4446.2007.00139.x.
  • Herrero, M., 2010. Performing calculation in the art market. Journal of Cultural Economy, 3, 19–34. doi:10.1080/17530351003617552.
  • Heynen, N., et al., 2007. Introduction: false promises, in: neoliberal environments: false promises and unnatural consequences. London: Routledge, 1–22.
  • Kirwan, B., Lubowski, R.N., and Roberts, M.J., 2005. How cost-effective are land retirement auctions? Estimating the difference between payments and willingness to accept in the conservation reserve program. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 87, 1239–1247. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8276.2005.00813.x.
  • Kosoy, N. and Corbera, E., 2010. Payments for ecosystem services as commodity fetishism. Ecol. Econ., Special Section – Payments for Environmental Services: Reconciling Theory and Practice, 69, 1228–1236. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.002.
  • Lansing, D.M., 2010. Carbon’s calculatory spaces: the emergence of carbon offsets in Costa Rica. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 28, 710–725. doi:10.1068/d13208.
  • Lansing, D.M., 2011. Realizing Carbon’s value: discourse and calculation in the production of carbon forestry offsets in Costa Rica. Antipode, 43, 731–753. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8330.2011.00886.x.
  • Lapeyre, R., Pirard, R., and Leimona, B., 2015. Payments for environmental services in Indonesia: what if economic signals were lost in translation? Land Use Policy, 46, 283–291. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.03.004.
  • Latacz-Lohmann, U. and Van der Hamsvoort, C.P.C.M., 1998. Auctions as a means of creating a market for public goods from agriculture. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 49, 334–345. doi:10.1111/j.1477-9552.1998.tb01276.x.
  • Lave, R., 2012. Fields and streams: stream restoration, neoliberalism, and the future of environmental science. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
  • Leimona, B., et al., 2010. Designing a procurement auction for reducing sedimentation: a field experiment in Indonesia (EEPSEA Research Report No. rr2010042). Economy and Environment Program for Southeast Asia (EEPSEA).
  • Lohmann, L., 2009. Neoliberalism and the calculable world: the rise of carbon trading. In: S. Bohm and S. Dahbi, eds. Upsetting the offset: the political economy of carbon markets. London: Mayfly books, 25–40.
  • Lohmann, L., 2012. Financialization, commodification and carbon: the contradictions of neoliberal climate policy. Social Register, 48, 85–107.
  • Lovell, H. and Liverman, D., 2010. Understanding carbon offset technologies. New Political Economy, 15, 255–273. doi:10.1080/13563460903548699.
  • Lynch, M., 1997. Scientific practice and ordinary action: ethnomethodology and social studies of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • MacKenzie, D., 2007. Is economics performative? Option theory and the construction of derivatives markets, in: do economists make markets. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • McAfee, K., 1999. Selling nature to save it? Biodiversity and green developmentalism. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 17, 133–154. doi:10.1068/d170133.
  • Messer, K.D., et al., 2017. When does public information undermine the efficiency of reverse auctions for the purchase of ecosystem services? Ecological Economics, 134, 212–226. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.12.004.
  • Milne, S. and Adams, B., 2012. Market masquerades: uncovering the politics of community-level payments for environmental services in Cambodia. Development and Change, 43, 133–158. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7660.2011.01748.x.
  • Mirowski, P. and Nik-Khah, P., 2008. Command performance: exploring what STS thinks it takes to build a market. In: T. Pinch and R. Swedberg, eds. Living in a material world, inside technology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Moore, J.W., 2011. Transcending the metabolic rift: a theory of crises in the capitalist world-ecology. Journal of Peasant Studies, 38, 1–46. doi:10.1080/03066150.2010.538579.
  • Muniesa, F., Millo, Y., and Callon, M., 2007. An introduction to market devices. The Sociological Review, 55, 1–12. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.2007.00727.x.
  • Muradian, R., et al., 2013. Payments for ecosystem services and the fatal attraction of win-win solutions. Conservation Letters, 6, 274–279. doi:10.1111/j.1755-263X.2012.00309.x.
  • Polanyi, K., 1944. The great transformation: the political and economic origins of our time. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
  • Pollock, N. and D’Adderio, L., 2012. Give me a two-by-two matrix and I will create the market: rankings, graphic visualisations and sociomateriality. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 37, 565–586. doi:10.1016/j.aos.2012.06.004.
  • Potter, C. and Wolf, S., 2014. Payments for ecosystem services in relation to US and UK agri-environmental policy: disruptive neoliberal innovation or hybrid policy adaptation? Agriculture and Human Values, 31, 397–408. doi:10.1007/s10460-014-9518-2.
  • Primmer, E., 2017. Institutional constraints on conservation auction: organizational mandate, competencies and practices. Land Use Policy, 63, 621–631. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.05.011.
  • Robertson, M., 2006. The nature that capital can see: science, state, and market in the commodification of ecosystem services. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 24, 367–387. doi:10.1068/d3304.
  • Robertson, M., 2012. Measurement and alienation: making a world of ecosystem services. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 37, 386–401. doi:10.1111/j.1475-5661.2011.00476.x.
  • Robertson, M. and Wainwright, J.D., 2013. The value of nature to the state. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 103, 890–905. doi:10.1080/00045608.2013.765772.
  • Smith, C.W., 1989. Auctions: the social construction of value. New York: The Free Press.
  • Smith, C.W. and Swedberg, R., 1993. Auctions: from Walras to the real world. Exploration Economic Sociol, 176–192.
  • Stoneham, G., et al., 2003. Auctions for conservation contracts: an empirical examination of Victoria’s BushTender trial. The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 47, 477–500. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8489.2003.t01-1-00224.x.
  • van Noordwijk, M. and Leimona, B., 2010. Principles for fairness and efficiency in enhancing environmental services in Asia: payments, compensation, or co-investment? Ecology and Society, 15, 17. doi: 10.5751/ES-03664-150417
  • Whitten, S.M., et al., 2013. Designing conservation tenders to support landholder participation: a framework and case study assessment. Ecosystems Service, Payments for Ecosystem Services and Their Institutional Dimensions: Analyzing the Diversity of Existing PES Approaches in Developing and Industrialized Countries, 6, 82–92. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.11.001.
  • Wunder, S., 2015. Revisiting the concept of payments for environmental services. Ecological Economics, 117, 234–243. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.08.016.
  • Yoshino, K., Ishikawa, M., and Setiawan, B.I., 2003. Socio-economic causes of recent environmental changes in Cidanau Watershed, West Java, Indonesia: effects of the 1997–1998 Southeast Asia economic crisis on the regional environment. Rural and Environmental Engineering, 44, 27–41.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.