Deleuze in the wild: making philosophy matter for fintech

References

• Appadurai, A., 1990. Disjuncture and difference in the global cultural economy. Theory, Culture & Society, 7 (2–3), 295–310.
   Google Scholar
• Appadurai, A., 1996. Modernity al large: cultural dimensions of globalization (Vol. 1). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barry, A., 2001. Political machines: governing a technological society. London: The Athlone Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boldyrev, I., and Svetlova, E. eds., 2016. Enacting dismal science: new perspectives on the performativity of economics. Boulder: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bowker, G. C., and Star, S. L., 2000. Sorting things out: classification and its consequences. Cambridge: MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J., 1990. Gender trouble: feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J., 2010. Performative agency. Journal of Cultural Economy, 3 (2), 147–161.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M, 1998. The laws of the markets. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M., and Rabeharisoa, V., 2003. Research “in the wild” and the shaping of new social identities. Technology in Society, 25 (2), 193–204.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., 2004. Desert islands and other texts, ed. David Lapoujade, trans. Michael Taormina. New York: Semiotexte.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., and Guattari, F., 1972. L’Anti-Oedipe. Capitalisme et schizophrénie. Paris: Minuit.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., and Guattari, F., 1987. A thousand plateaus: capitalism and schizophrenia. Trans. Brian Massumi. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., and Guattari, F., 1994. What is philosophy?. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Didier, E., 2007. Do statistics ‘perform’ the economy? In: D. MacKenzie, F. Muniesa, and L. Siu, eds. Do economists make markets? On the performativity of economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 276–310.
   Google Scholar
• Dillet, B., 2015. We haven’t seen anything yet … accelerationism and decelerationism under austerity. Cultural Politics, 11 (2), 296–300.
   Google Scholar
• DuPont, Q., 2017. Experiments in algorithmic governance: a history and ethnography of “The DAO,” a failed decentralized autonomous organization. In: M Campbell-Verduyn, ed. Bitcoin and beyond. London: Routledge, 157–177.
   Google Scholar
• Eco, U., 1986. Semiotics and the philosophy of language. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Faustino, S., 2019. How metaphors matter: an ethnography of blockchain-based re-descriptions of the world. Journal of Cultural Economy, 12 (6), 478–490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goertzel, B., Goertzel, T., and Goertzel, Z., 2017. The global brain and the emerging economy of abundance: mutualism, open collaboration, exchange networks and the automated commons. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114, 65–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes, D. R., 2009. Economy of words. Cultural Anthropology, 24 (3), 381–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knorr-Cetina, K., 1981. The manufacture of knowledge. An essay on the constructivist and contextual nature of science. Oxford: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Kozinets, R. V., 2010. Netnography: doing ethnographic research online. London: Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kurzweil, R., 2005. The singularity is near: when humans transcend biology. New York: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B., 1987. Science in action: how to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B., and Lépinay, V. A., 2009. The science of passionate interests: an introduction to gabriel tarde's economic anthropology. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, D, 2006. Is economics performative? option theory and the construction of derivatives markets. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 28 (1), 29–55.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, R., 2002. Financialization of daily life. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Massumi, B., 2018. 99 theses on the revaluation of value: a postcapitalist manifesto. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meissner, M., 2017. Narrating the global financial crisis: urban imaginaries and the politics of myth. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Muniesa, F., 2016. The problem with economics: naturalism, critique and performativity. In: I. Boldyrev and E. Svetlova, eds. Enacting dismal science. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 109–129.
   Google Scholar
• Noumena, F., 2011. Collected Writings 1987–2007, ed. by R. Mackay and R. Brassier, Falmouth, Urbanomic.
   Google Scholar
• Noys, B., 2014. Malign velocities: accelerationism and capitalism. Alresford: John Hunt Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• O’Dwyer, R., 2015. The revolution will (not) be decentralised: blockchains. P2P Foundation (blog). Available at: https://blog.p2pfoundation.net/the-revolution-will-not-be-decentralised/2015/03/23 [Accessed 4 October 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Piironen, P., 2015. Democratizing the power of finance: a discussion about Robin Hood asset management cooperative with founder Akseli Virtanen. MoneyLab Reader: An Intervention in Digital Economy. Amsterdam: Institute of Networked Cultures.
   Google Scholar
• Propp, V., 1968 [1928]. The morphology of the folktale. Austin, TX: University of Texas press.
   Google Scholar
• Quattrone, P, 2009. Books to be practiced: memory, the power of the visual, and the success of accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34 (1), 85–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricoeur, P., 2003 [1975]. The rule of metaphor: the creation of meaning in language. Routledge Classics.
   Google Scholar
• Ricoeur, P., 1988. Time and narrative: volume 3. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, R., 1989. Contingency, irony, and solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roscoe, P., 2016. Performativity matters: economic description as a moral problem. In: I. Boldyrev and E. Svetlova, eds. Enacting dismal science. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 131–150.
   Google Scholar
• Seabra Lopes, D., 2011. Making oneself at home with numbers: financial reporting from an ethnographic perspective. Social Anthropology, 19 (4), 463–476.
   Google Scholar
• Serres, M., 1982. The parasite. Trans. Lawrence R. Schehr, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins UP.
   Google Scholar
• Svetlova, E., 2018. Financial models and society: villains or scapegoats? Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Swartz, L., 2020. New money: how payment became social media. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tapscott, D., and Tapscott, A., 2016. Blockchain revolution: how the technology behind bitcoin is changing money, business, and the world. New York: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, A., and Srnicek, N., 2016. # ACCELERATE MANIFESTO for an Accelerationist Politics. Available at: https://syntheticedifice.files.wordpress.com/2013/06/accelerate.pdf [Accessed 4 October 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Wilkie, A., Savransky, M., and Rosengarten, M., 2017. Speculative research: the lure of possible futures. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zelizer, V, 1997. The social meaning of money. Princeton: Princeton University.
   Google Scholar