Pardoning Kaçak: politics of building amnesties and the making of the (im)moral urban economy in Istanbul

References

• Adanalı, Y. A. 2020. Gecekondu Conversations: Achieve, Memory, Imaginary, Space, Architecture. Istanbul: Center for Spatial Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Akçalı, E., and U. Korkut. 2015. “Urban Transformation in Istanbul and Budapest: Neoliberal Governmentality in the EU's Semi-Periphery and its Limits.” Political Geography 46: 76–88. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2014.12.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AlSayyad, N. 2003. “Urbanism as a “new” way of Life.” In Urban Informality: Transnational Perspectives from the Middle East, South Asia and Latin America, edited by A. Roy, and N. AlSayyad, 7–30. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• AlSayyad, N., and A. Roy., eds. 2003. Urban Informality: Transnational Perspectives from the Middle East, Latin America, and South Asia. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Angell, E. 2014. “Assembling Disaster: Earthquakes and Urban Politics in Istanbul.” City 18 (6): 667–678. doi:10.1080/13604813.2014.962881.
   Google Scholar
• Ay, D., and B. Demires Ozkul. 2021. “The Strange Case of Earthquake Risk Mitigation in Istanbul.” City 25 (1-2): 67–87. doi:10.1080/13604813.2021.1885917.
   Google Scholar
• Baharoglu, D., and J. Leitmann. 1998. “Coping Strategies for Infrastructure: How Turkey's Spontaneous Settlements Operate in the Absence of Formal Rules.” Habitat International 22 (2): 115–135. doi:10.1016/S0197-3975(97)00313-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banks, N., M. Lombard, and D. Mitlin. 2020. “Urban Informality as a Site of Critical Analysis.” The Journal of Development Studies 56 (2): 223–238. doi:10.1080/00220388.2019.1577384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartu Candan, A., and B. Kolluoğlu. 2008. “Emerging Spaces of Neoliberalism: A Gated Town and a Public Housing Project in Istanbul.” New Perspectives on Turkey 39: 5–46. doi:10.1017/S0896634600005057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayat, A. 2013. Life as Politics: How Ordinary People Change the Middle East. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boz, Y., and T. Çay. 2020. “New Regulation to Register the Anomalous Constructions and Finance Urban Regeneration Projects in Turkey: Development Peace.” Turkish Journal of Engineering 4 (1): 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Buğra, A. 1998. “The Immoral Economy of Housing in Turkey.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 22 (2): 303–307. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.00141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess, E. W. 1925. “The Growth of the City: An Introduction to a Research Project.” In The City, edited by R. E. Park, and E. W. Burgess, 47–62. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. 1983. The City and the Grassroots: A Cross-Cultural Theory of Urban Social Movements. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chiodelli, F. 2019. “The Dark Side of Urban Informality in the Global North: Housing Illegality and Organized Crime in Northern Italy.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 43 (3): 497–516. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12745.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clough Marinaro, I. 2021. “Living the Liminal Life: Informalities in a Utopian Housing Project.” International Journal of Housing Policy 21 (2): 196–219. doi:10.1080/19491247.2020.1803532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cumhuriyet. 2018. Yarısı kaçak rezidansa imar affı piyangosu. Cumhuriyet 14 Sep. [online]. Accessed December 1, 2021. https://www.cumhuriyet.com.tr/haber/yarisi-kacak-rezidansa-imar-affi-piyangosu-1082319.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, M. 2006. Planet of Slums. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• De Soto, H. 2000. The Mystery of Capital: Why Capitalism Triumphs in the West and Fails Everywhere Else. London: Bentham Press.
   Google Scholar
• Demiralp, S. 2018. “Making Winners: Urban Transformation and Neoliberal Populism in Turkey.” The Middle East Journal 72 (1): 89–108. doi:10.3751/72.1.15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diken. 2019. İmar affı öncesi ‘kaçak’ kamu binası sayısı 298 bin. Diken [online] 16 Dec. Accessed December 1, 2021. https://www.diken.com.tr/imar-affi-oncesi-kacak-kamu-binasi-sayisi-298-bin/.
   Google Scholar
• Durand-Lasserve, A., and H. Selod. 2009. “The Formalization of Urban Land Tenure in Developing Countries.” In Urban Land Markets, edited by S. V. Lall, M. Freire, B. Yuen, R. Rajack, and J. J. Helluin, 101–132. New York: Springer / World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Erbaş, İ. 2018. “Kimleri için bir fırsat, kimileri için ise bir tehdit: İmar Barışı.” Mimarlık 403: 27–30.
   Google Scholar
• Erensü, S., and Y. M. Madra. 2022. Neoliberal Politics in Turkey. The Oxford Handbook of Turkish Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Erman, T. 1997. “Squatter (Gecekondu) Housing Versus Apartment Housing: Turkish Rural-to-Urban Migrant Residents’ Perspectives.” Habitat International 21 (1): 91–106. doi:10.1016/S0197-3975(96)00048-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erman, T. 2001. “The Politics of Squatter (Gecekondu) Studies in Turkey: The Changing Representations of Rural Migrants in the Academic Discourse.” Urban Studies 38 (7): 983–1002. doi:10.1080/00420980120080131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erman, T. 2012. “Urbanization and Urbanism.” In The Routledge Handbook of Modern Turkey, edited by M. Heper and S. Sayarı, 293–302. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Erman, T. 2016. “Formalization by the State, re-Informalization by the People: A Gecekondu Transformation Housing Estate as Site of Multiple Discrepancies.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 40 (2): 425–440. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genç, F. N. 2014. “Gecekonduyla mücadeleden kentsel dönüşüme Türkiye’de kentleşme politikaları.” Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 1 (1): 15–30. doi:10.30803/adusobed.188800.
   Google Scholar
• Giritlioğlu, P., and P. P. Özden. 2020. “Kentsel adalet ekseninde imar afları: “İmar barışı” üzerine bir değerlendirme.” In Prof. Dr. Necla Giritlioğlu’na Armağan, edited by Hasan Eman, Tufan Öğüz, Şükran Şıpka, Emrehan İnal, and Başak Baysal, 191–218. İstanbul: Onikilevha.
   Google Scholar
• Gül, M. 2009. The Emergence of Modern Istanbul: Transformation and Modernisation of a City. London: I.B. Tauris.
   Google Scholar
• Gülhan, S. T. 2022. “Neoliberalism and neo-Dirigisme in Action: The State–Corporate Alliance and the Great Housing Rush of the 2000s in Istanbul, Turkey.” Urban Studies 59 (7): 1443–1458. doi:10.1177/00420980211012618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gündoğmuş, Y. N. 2020. İmar barışı'nda 30 bini aşkın yapı kayıt belgesi iptal edildi. Anadolu Ajansı [Online]. Accessed December 1, 2021. https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/turkiye/imar-barisinda-30-bini-askin-yapi-kayit-belgesi-iptal-edildi/1735457.
   Google Scholar
• Gürkaynak, G., et al. 2018. Turkey: Some developments on Zoning Peace. Mondaq. [Online]. Accessed December 1, 2021. https://www.mondaq.com/turkey/real-estate/737712/recent-developments-on-zoning-peace.
   Google Scholar
• Güzey, Ö. 2016. “The Last Round in Restructuring the City: Urban Regeneration Becomes a State Policy of Disaster Prevention in Turkey.” Cities 50: 40–53. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2015.08.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habertürk. 2018. 2018 İmar barışı nedir, İmar barışıdan kimler nasıl yararlanır? İşte cevabı. Habertürk 04 June. Available at https://www.haberturk.com/imar-barisi-ile-ilgili-tum-sorular-imar-barisi-basvurusu-nasil-yapilir-hts-1999156-ekonomi [Accessed 1 Dec 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Holston, J. 2008. Insurgent Citizenship: Disjunctions of Democracy and Modernity in Brazil. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• International Labour Organisation (ILO). 1972. Employment, Incomes and Equality: A Strategy for Increasing Productive Employment in Kenya. Geneva: ILO.
   Google Scholar
• Karaman, O. 2013a. “Urban Renewal in Istanbul: Reconfigured Spaces, Robotic Lives.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 37 (2): 715–733. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01163.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karaman, O. 2013b. “Urban Neoliberalism with Islamic Characteristics.” Urban Studies 50 (16): 3412–3427. doi:10.1177/0042098013482505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karatepe, İD. 2016. “The State, Islamists, Discourses, and Bourgeoisie: The Construction Industry in Turkey.” Research and Policy on Turkey 1 (1): 46–62. doi:10.1080/23760818.2015.1099781.
   Google Scholar
• Karpat, K. 1976. The Gecekondu: Rural Migration and Urbanization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuyucu, T. 2014. “Law, Property and Ambiguity: The Uses and Abuses of Legal Ambiguity in Remaking I Stanbul's Informal Settlements.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 38 (2): 609–627. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuyucu, T. 2022. “The Great Failure: The Roles of Institutional Conflict and Social Movements in the Failure of Regeneration Initiatives in Istanbul.” Urban Affairs Review 58 (1): 129–163. doi:10.1177/1078087420957736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuyucu, T., and Ö Ünsal. 2010. “‘Urban Transformation’s State-led Property Transfer: An Analysis of two Cases of Urban Renewal in Istanbul.” Urban Studies 47 (7): 1479–1499. doi:10.1177/0042098009353629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leitmann, J., and D. Baharoglu. 1998. “Informal Rules! Using Institutional Economics to Understand Service Provision in Turkey's Spontaneous Settlements.” Journal of Development Studies 34 (5): 98–122. doi:10.1080/00220389808422538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovering, J., and H. Türkmen. 2011. “Bulldozer neo-Liberalism in Istanbul: The State-led Construction of Property Markets, and the Displacement of the Urban Poor.” International Planning Studies 16 (1): 73–96. doi:10.1080/13563475.2011.552477.
   Google Scholar
• Mahmud, S., and U. Duyar-Kienast. 2001. “Spontaneous Settlements in Turkey and Bangladesh: Preconditions of Emergence and Environmental Quality of Gecekondu Settlements and Bustees.” Cities 18 (4): 271–280. doi:10.1016/S0264-2751(01)00019-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazumdar, D. 1976. “The Urban Informal Sector.” World Development 4 (8): 655–679. doi:10.1016/0305-750X(76)90047-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFarlane, C. 2012. “Rethinking Informality: Politics, Crisis, and the City.” Planning Theory & Practice 13 (1): 89–108. doi:10.1080/14649357.2012.649951.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, A. 2010. Streets of Memory: Landscape, Tolerance, and National Identity in Istanbul. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nehir, E. 2019. İşte imar barışı bilançosu. Haberturk 12 June. Available at https://www.haberturk.com/iste-imar-barisi-nin-bilancosu-2489947-ekonomi [Accessed 1 Dec 2021]
   Google Scholar
• Öncü, A. 1988. “The Politics of the Urban Land Market in Turkey: 1950–1980.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 12 (1): 38–64. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.1988.tb00073.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özdemir, D. 2011. “The Role of the Public Sector in the Provision of Housing Supply in Turkey, 1950–2009.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 35 (6): 1099–1117. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.00974.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özhaseki, M. 2018. [Twitter] 21 June. Accessed December 1, 2021. https://twitter.com/mehmetozhaseki/status/1009871720113672192.
   Google Scholar
• Özler, Şİ. 2000. “Politics of the Gecekondu in Turkey: The Political Choices of Urban Squatters in National Elections.” Turkish Studies 1 (2): 39–58. doi:10.1080/14683840008721233.
   Google Scholar
• Özlüer, IÖ. 2018. “Imar barişi düzenlemesine hukuki bir yaklaşim.” İnönü Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 9 (2): 313–340. doi:10.21492/inuhfd.467904.
   Google Scholar
• Öztürk, M. 2004, "İstanbul 'kaçak' şehir." Milliyet, 5 December.
   Google Scholar
• Pamuk, A. 1997. “Convergence Trends in Formal and Informal Housing Markets: The Case of Turkey.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 16 (2): 103–113. doi:10.1177/0739456X9601600203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pamuk, Ş. 2018. Uneven Centuries. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pérouse, J. F. 2012. Mülk Allah’ındır (‘This House is God’s Property’): Legitimizing Land Ownership in the Suburbs of Istanbul. Popular Housing and Urban Land Tenure in the Middle East: Case Studies from Egypt, Syria, Jordan, Lebanon, and Turkey, p. 283.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, K. 1944. The Great Transformations. Boston: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, L., et al. 2011. “Informality, the Commons and the Paradoxes for Planning: Concepts and Debates for Informality and Planning Self-Made Cities.” Planning Theory & Practice 12 (1): 115–153. doi:10.1080/14649357.2011.545626.
   Google Scholar
• Rakowski, C. A. 1994. Contrapunto: The Informal Sector Debate in Latin America. Albany: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, A. 2005. “Urban Informality: Toward an Epistemology of Planning.” Journal of the American Planning Association 71 (2): 147–158. doi:10.1080/01944360508976689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, A. 2009. “Why India Cannot Plan its Cities: Informality, Insurgence, and the Idiom of Urbanization.” Planning Theory 8 (1): 76–87. doi:10.1177/1473095208099299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, A. 2011. “Slumdog Cities: Rethinking Subaltern Urbanism.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 35 (2): 223–238. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2011.01051.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahlins, M. 1972. Stone age Economics. Chicago: Aldine Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Sanyal, B. 1991. "Organizing the Self-Employed: The Politics of the Urban Informal Sector." International Labor Review 130 (1): 39-56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Şengül, H. T. 2009. Kentsel çelişki ve siyaset: Kapitalist kentleşme süreçlerinin eleştirisi. Ankara: İmge.
   Google Scholar
• Tas, H. I., and D. R. Lightfoot. 2005. “Gecekondu Settlements in Turkey: Rural—Urban Migration in the Developing European Periphery.” Journal of Geography 104 (6): 263–271. doi:10.1080/00221340508978648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tercan, B. 2018. “1948’den bugüne imar afları.” Mimarlık 403: 20–26.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, E. P. 1971. “The Moral Economy of the English Crowd in the Eighteenth Century.” Past & Present 50 (1): 76–136. doi:10.1093/past/50.1.76.
   Google Scholar
• TOKI 2022. "Background" [online]. Accessed December 1, https://a.toki.gov.tr/en/background.html.
   Google Scholar
• Türker-Devecigil, P. 2005. “Urban Transformation Projects as a Model to Transform Gecekondu Areas in Turkey: The Example of Dikmen Valley–Ankara.” European Journal of Housing Policy 5 (2): 211–229. doi:10.1080/14616710500163390.
   Google Scholar
• TURKSTAT. 2022. State Statistics Institute,Population and demography database 2011 – 2021. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Kategori/GetKategori?p=nufus-ve-demografi-109&dil=2
   Google Scholar
• Türkmen, H. 2019. [Twitter] 27 Feb. Accessed December 1,2021. https://twitter.com/hilmiturkmen34/status/1100821546132738048/photo/1.
   Google Scholar
• Uzun, N. 2020. “Residential Transformation Leading to Gentrification: Cases from Istanbul.” In Gentrification Around the World. I vol, edited by J. Krase and J. N. DeSena, 223–243. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Uzun, B., and N.C. Şimşek. 2015. “Upgrading of Illegal Settlements in Turkey; The case of North Ankara Entrance Urban Regeneration Project.” Habitat International 49: 157–164. doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.05.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varley, A. 2002. “Private or Public: Debating the Meaning of Tenure Legalization.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 26 (3): 449–461. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.00392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varley, A. 2013. “Postcolonialising Informality?” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 31 (1): 4–22. doi:10.1068/d14410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wirth, L. 1938. “Urbanism as a Way of Life.” American Journal of Sociology 44 (1): 1–24. doi:10.1086/217913.
   Google Scholar
• Yalcintan, M. C., and A. E. Erbas. 2003. “Impacts of “Gecekondu” on the Electoral Geography of Istanbul.” International Labor and Working-Class History 64: 91–111. doi:10.1017/S0147547903000218.
   Google Scholar