231
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Computing trust: on writing ‘good’ code in computer science education

ORCID Icon
Received 23 Jan 2022, Accepted 18 Aug 2023, Published online: 14 Oct 2023

References

  • Abbate, Janet. 2017. “From Handmaiden to ‘Proper Intellectual Discipline’: Creating a Scientific Identity for Computer Science in 1960s America.” In Communities of Computing: Computer Science and Society in the ACM, edited by Thomas J Misa, 25–48. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery and Morgan & Claypool Publishers.
  • Allen, Ben. 2021. “Source Code Isn’t.” In Your Computer Is on Fire, edited by Thomas S Mullaney, Benjamin Peters, Mar Hicks, and Kavita Philip, 273–295. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Amrute, Sareeta. 2014. “Proprietary Freedoms in an IT Office: How Indian IT Workers Negotiate Code and Cultural Branding.” Social Anthropology 22 (1): 101–117. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8676.12064
  • Amrute, Sareeta. 2016. Encoding Race, Encoding Class: Indian IT Workers in Berlin. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Apple, Michael W. 2004. Ideology and Curriculum. New York and London: RoutledgeFalmer.
  • Apple, Michael W, and Nancy R King. 1977. “What Do Schools Teach?” Curriculum Inquiry 6 (4): 341–358. https://doi.org/10.2307/1179656.
  • Barad, Karen. 2003. “Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter.” Signs 28 (3): 801–831. https://doi.org/10.1086/345321
  • Benjamin, Ruha. 2019. Race After Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
  • Berry, David M. 2011. The Philosophy of Software: Code and Mediation in the Digital Age. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.
  • Bialski, Paula, Finn Brunton, and Mercedes Bunz. 2019. Communication: In Search of Media. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Biao, Xiang. 2006. Global “Body Shopping”: An Indian Labor System in the Information Technology Industry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Breslin, Samantha. 2013. “01010000 01001100 01000001 01011001: Play Elements in Computer Programming.” American Journal of Play 5 (3): 357–382.
  • Breslin, Samantha. 2018. “The Making of Computer Scientists: Rendering Technical Knowledge, Gender, and Entrepreneurialism in Singapore.” PhD Dissertation, St. John’s, NL: Memorial University of Newfoundland.
  • Bruun, Maja Hojer, Astrid Oberborbeck Andersen, and Adrienne Mannov. 2020. “Infrastructures of Trust and Distrust: The Politics and Ethics of Emerging Cryptographic Technologies.” Anthropology Today 36 (2): 13–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8322.12562.
  • Bryant, Rebecca. 2005. “The Soul Danced Into the Body: Nation and Improvisation in Istanbul.” American Ethnologist 32 (2): 222–238. https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.2005.32.2.222
  • Butler, Judith. 1999. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. 10th Anniv. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Carey, Matthew. 2017. Mistrust: An Ethnographic Theory. Malinowski Monographs, v. 3. Chicago, IL: Hau Books.
  • Carver, Terrell. 2010. “Materializing the Metaphors of Global Cities: Singapore and Silicon Valley.” Globalizations 7 (3): 383–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731003669768.
  • Cockburn, Cynthia, and Susan Ormrod. 1993. Gender and Technology in the Making. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Cohn, Marisa Leavitt. 2021. “Unruly Bodies of Code in Time.” In Media Infrastructures and the Politics of Digital Time, edited by Axel Volmar, and Kyle Stine, 191–204. Amsterdam, NL: Amsterdam University Press.
  • Coleman, Gabriella. 2013. Coding Freedom: The Ethics and Aesthetics of Hacking. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Coleman, Gabriella, and Alex Golub. 2008. “Hacker Practice: Moral Genres and Cultural Articulations of Liberalism.” Anthropological Theory 8 (3): 255–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499608093814
  • Cormen, Thomas H., Ronald L. Rivest, Clifford Stein, and Charles E Leiserson. 2009. Introduction to Algorithms, 3rd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Corsín Jiménez, Alberto. 2011. “Trust in Anthropology.” Anthropological Theory 11 (2): 177–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499611407392.
  • Faria, Inês. 2019. “Trust, Reputation and Ambiguous Freedoms: Financial Institutions and Subversive Libertarians Navigating Blockchain, Markets, and Regulation.” Journal of Cultural Economy 12 (2): 119–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2018.1547986.
  • Faria, Inês. 2022. “When Tales of Money Fail: The Importance of Price, Trust, and Sociality for Cryptocurrency Users.” Journal of Cultural Economy 15 (1): 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2021.1974070.
  • Fiesler, Casey. 2018. “Tech Ethics Curricula: A Collection of Syllabi.” Medium. 2018. https://cfiesler.medium.com/tech-ethics-curricula-a-collection-of-syllabi-3eedfb76be18.
  • Fiesler, Casey, Mikhaila Friske, Natalie Garrett, Felix Muzny, Jessie J. Smith, and Jason Zietz. 2021. “Integrating Ethics into Introductory Programming Classes.” In Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 1027–33. Virtual Event USA: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3408877.3432510
  • Fife, Wayne. 2005. Doing Fieldwork: Ethnographic Methods for Research in Developing Countries and Beyond. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Forsythe, Diana. 2001. Studying Those Who Study Us: An Anthropologist in the World of Artificial Intelligence. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Grommé, Francisca, Evelyn Ruppert, and Baki Cakici. 2018. “Data Scientists: A New Faction of the Transnational Field of Statistics.” In Ethnography for a Data-Saturated World, edited by Hannah Knox, and Dawn Nafus, 33–61. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
  • Hacking, Ian. 1990. The Taming of Chance: Ideas in Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Haraway, Donna Jeanne. 1988. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” Feminist Studies 14 (3): 575–599. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066
  • Haraway, Donna Jeanne. 1991. “A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century.” In Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature, 149–182. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Haraway, Donna Jeanne. 1997. Modest_Witness@Second_Millenium.FemaleMan(C)_Meets_OncoMouse(TM): Feminism and Technoscience. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Harding, Sandra. 1998. Is Science Multicultural? Poscolonisms, Feminisms, and Epistemologies. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
  • Hicks, Mar. 2017. Programmed Inequality: How Britain Discarded Women Technologists and Lost Its Edge in Computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Irani, Lilly. 2015. “Hackathons and the Making of Entrepreneurial Citizenship.” Science Technology and Human Values 40 (5): 799–824. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243915578486.
  • Keller, Evelyn Fox. 1985. Reflections on Gender and Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Kelty, Christopher M. 2008. Two Bits: The Cultural Significance of Free Software. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Kho, Ee Moi. 2013. Construction of Femininity in a Postcolonial State: Girls’ Education in Singapore. Amherst, NY: Cambria Press.
  • Kitchin, Rob. 2017. “Thinking Critically About and Researching Algorithms.” Information, Communication & Society 20 (1): 14–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1154087.
  • Knuth, Donald E. 1974. “Computer Programming as an Art.” Communications of the ACM 17 (12): 667–673. https://doi.org/10.1145/361604.361612
  • Koh, Aaron. 2004. “Singapore Education in ‘New Times’: Global/Local Imperatives.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 25 (3): 335–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/0159630042000247917.
  • Kuo, Eddie C.Y., and Linda Low. 2001. “Information Economy and Changing Occupational Structure in Singapore.” Information Society 17 (4): 281–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/019722401753330878.
  • Latour, Bruno. 1987. “Centres of Calculation.” In Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society, 215–257. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Latour, Bruno. 1993. We Have Never Been Modern. Translated by Catherine Porter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Latour, Bruno. 2004. “Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? from Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern.” Critical Inquiry 30 (2): 225–248. https://doi.org/10.1086/421123
  • Levinson, Bradley A, and Dorothy Holland. 1996. “The Cultural Production of the Educated Person: An Introduction.” In The Cultural Production of the Educated Person: Critical Ethnographies of Schooling and Local Practice, edited by Bradley A Levinson, Douglas E Foley, and Dorothy Holland, 1–54. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
  • Luhmann, Niklas. 2017. Trust and Power. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
  • Mackenzie, Adrian. 2006. Cutting Code: Software and Sociality. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
  • Mahmood, Saba. 2005. Politics of Piety: The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Malazita, James W, and Korryn Resetar. 2019. “Infrastructures of Abstraction: How Computer Science Education Produces Anti-Political Subjects.” Digital Creativity 30 (4): 300–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2019.1682616.
  • Margolis, Jane, Rachel Estrella, Joanna Goode, Jennifer Jellison Holme, and Kimberly Nao. 2008. Stuck in the Shallow End: Education, Race, and Computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Mayhew, Eric J., and Elizabeth Patitsas. 2021. “Materiality Matters in Computing Education: A Duoethnography of Two Digital Logic Educators.” LIMITS Workshop on Computing within Limits, June. https://doi.org/10.21428/bf6fb269.19c98f37.
  • McRobbie, Angela. 1978. “Working Class Girls and the Culture of Femininity.” In Women Take Issue, Edited by Women’s Studies Group, 96–108. London: Hutchinson.
  • Mullaney, Thomas S, Benjamin Peters, Mar Hicks, and Kavita Philip, eds. 2021. Your Computer Is on Fire. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Nelms, Taylor C., Bill Maurer, Lana Swartz, and Scott Mainwaring. 2018. “Social Payments: Innovation, Trust, Bitcoin, and the Sharing Economy.” Theory, Culture & Society 35 (3): 13–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276417746466.
  • Nespor, Jan. 1994. Knowledge in Motion: Space, Time, and Curriculum in Undergraduate Physics and Management. London, UK: Falmer Press.
  • Noble, Safiya Umoja. 2018. Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. New York, NY: NYU Press.
  • O’Connor, Kevin, Frederick A. Peck, and Julie Cafarella. 2015. “Struggling for Legitimacy: Trajectories of Membership and Naturalization in the Sorting out of Engineering Students.” Mind, Culture, and Activity 22 (2): 168–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2015.1025146.
  • O’Donnell, Casey. 2014. Developer’s Dilemma: The Secret World of Videogame Creators. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Ong, Aihwa. 2005. “Ecologies of Expertise: Assembling Flows, Managing Citizenship.” In Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics, and Ethics as Anthropological Problems, edited by Aihwa Ong, and Stephen J Collier, 337–353. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  • Ong, Aihwa, and Stephen J. Collier. 2005. Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics, and Ethics as Anthropological Problems. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
  • Ratner, Helene, and Evelyn Ruppert. 2019. “Producing and Projecting Data: Aesthetic Practices of Government Data Portals.” Big Data and Society 6 (2): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951719853316.
  • Riles, Annelise. 2006. “Introduction: In Response.” In Documents: Artifacts of Modern Knowledge, edited by Annelise Riles, 1–38. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
  • Seaver, Nick. 2018. “What Should an Anthropology of Algorithms Do?” Cultural Anthropology 33 (3): 375–385. https://doi.org/10.14506/ca33.3.04.
  • Shore, Cris, and Susan Wright. 2015. “Governing by Numbers: Audit Culture, Rankings and the New World Order.” Social Anthropology 23 (1): 22–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8676.12098.
  • Soon, Winnie, and Geoff Cox. 2020. Aesthetic Programming: A Handbook of Software Studies. Open Humanities Press. https://aesthetic-programming.net/
  • Stambach, Amy. 2017. “Student Futures and the Politics of Possibility: An Introduction.” In Anthropological Perspectives on Student Futures: Youth and the Politics of Possibility, edited by Amy Stambach, and Kathleen D. Hall, 1–16. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Strathern, Marilyn. 2000. Audit Cultures: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics and the Academy. London, UK: Routledge.
  • Suchman, Lucy. 2002. “Located Accountabilities in Technology Production.” Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 14 (2): 91–105.
  • Suchman, Lucy. 2007. Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Takhteyev, Yuri. 2012. Coding Places: Software Practice in a South American City. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Washington, Alicia Nicki. 2020. “When Twice as Good Isn’t Enough: The Case for Cultural Competence in Computing.” In Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 213–219. Portland, OR: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3328778.3366792
  • Werbach, Kevin. 2018. The Blockchain and the New Architecture of Trust. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Willis, Paul. 1981. Learning to Labor: How Working Class Kids Get Working Class Jobs. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
  • Yon, Daniel A. 2000. Elusive Culture: Schooling, Race and Identity in Global Times. Albany: SUNY Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.