When watchdogs fight back: resisting state surveillance in everyday investigative reporting practices among Zimbabwean journalists

Bibliography

• Abramowicz, David. “Calculating the Public Interest in Protecting Journalists’ Confidential Sources.” Columbia Law Review 108 (2008): 1949.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agamben, Giorgio. “State of Exception.” Nova Srpska Politička Misao 12, no. 1-4 (2005): 135–145.
   Google Scholar
• Amoore, Louise, and Marieke De Goede. “Governance, Risk and Dataveillance in the War on Terror.” Crime, Law and Social Change 43, no. 2-3 (2005): 149–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagdikian, Ben H. “When the Post Banned Anonymous Sources.” American Journalism Review 27, no. 4 (2005): 33–34.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, Kirstie, David Lyon, and Kevin D. Haggerty, eds. Routledge Handbook of Surveillance Studies. London: Routledge, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, Colin J. “Privacy Advocates, Privacy Advocacy and the Surveillance Society.” In Routledge Handbook of Surveillance Studies, edited by Kirstie Ball, David Lyon, and Kevin D. Haggerty, 412–419. London: Routledge, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Bentham, Jeremy. “The Panopticon.” In Offenders or Citizens? Readings in Rehabilitation, edited by Philip Priestley and Maurice Vanstone, 28–30. Furculae, Devon: Willan Publishing, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Berkowitz, Daniel A. “Reporters and Their Sources.” In Routledge Handbook of Surveillance Studies, edited by Kirstie Ball, David Lyon, and Kevin D. Haggerty, 122–135. London: Routledge, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Caluya, Gilbert. “The Post-Panoptic Society? Reassessing Foucault in Surveillance Studies.” Social Identities 16, no. 5 (2010): 621–633.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, Matt. On the Condition of Anonymity: Unnamed Sources and the Battle for Journalism. Illinois: University of Illinois Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Christofoletti, Rogério. “Perceptions of Brazilian Journalists on Privacy.” Matrizes 13, no. 2 (2019): 179–202.
   Google Scholar
• Chuma, Wallace. “Mediating the Transition: The Press, State and Capital in a Changing Zimbabwe, 1980–2004.” Doctoral diss., University of the Witwatersrand. http://hdl.handle.net/10539/5844.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, Aeron. “Journalist–Source Relations, Mediated Reflexivity and the Politics of Politics.” Journalism Studies 10, no. 2 (2009): 204–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Burgh, Hugo. Investigative Journalism. London: Routledge, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Dencik, Lina, and Jonathan Cable. “The Advent of Surveillance Realism: Public Opinion and Activist Responses to the Snowden Leaks.” International Journal of Communication 11 (2017): 763–781.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Salvo, Phillip. Digital Whistleblowing Platforms in Journalism: Encrypting Leaks. London: Springer Nature, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Domke, David Scott. God Willing? Political Fundamentalism in the White House, the ‘War on Terror,’ and the Echoing Press. London: Pluto Press, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, Jane. “Is South Africa Reverting to a Repressive State?” In Under Pressure, Shrinking Space for Civil Society in Africa, edited by Jochen Luckscheiter and Layla Al-Zubaidi, 18. Johannesburg: Heinrich Böll Stiftung, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, Jane. “Taking the Spy Machine South: Communications Surveillance in Sub-Saharan Africa.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Media and Communication Research in Africa, edited by Bruce Mutsvairo, 153–176. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Elmer, Greg. “A Diagram of Panoptic Surveillance.” New Media & Society 5, no. 2 (2008): 231–249.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez, Luis A., and Laura Huey. “Is Resistance Futile? Thoughts on Resisting Surveillance.” Surveillance & Society 6, no. 3 (2009): 199–202.
   Google Scholar
• Flaherty, David H. Protecting Privacy in Surveillance Societies. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage Books, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Gillon, John. Overseers of the Poor: Surveillance, Resistance, and the Limits of Privacy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Gilliam, Keisha. “Resisting Surveillance.” Social Text 23, no. 2 (2011): 71–83.
   Google Scholar
• Gilliom, John, and Torin Monahan. “Everyday Resistance.” In Routledge Handbook of Surveillance Studies, edited by Kirstie Ball, David Lyon, and Kevin D. Haggerty, 405–412. London: Routledge, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Haggerty, Kirstie. “Tear Down the Walls: On Demolishing the Panopticon.” In Theorising Surveillance: The Panopticon and Beyond, edited by David Lyon, 189–209. Furculae, Devon: Willan Publishing, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, Anne. “Beijing’s Big Brother Tech Needs African Faces: Zimbabwe is Signing Up for China’s Surveillance State, but Its Citizens Will Pay the Price.” Foreign Policy, 24 July 2018. https://foreignpolicy.com/2018/07/24/beijings-big-brother-tech-needs-african-faces/.
   Google Scholar
• Higgs, Edward. The Information State in England: The Central Collection of Information on Citizens Since 1500. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Hollander, Jocelyn A., and Rachel L. Einwohner. “Conceptualizing Resistance.” Sociological Forum 19, no. 4 (2004): 533–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Human Rights Watch. With Liberty to Monitor All: How Large-Scale US Surveillance is Harming Journalism, Law and American Democracy. Washington, DC: Human Rights Watch, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Interception of Communication Act, Zimbabwe. Harare: Government Printers, 2007. http://track.unodc.org/LegalLibrary/LegalResources.
   Google Scholar
• Lashmar, Paul. “No More Sources? The Impact of Snowden’s Revelations on Journalists and Their Confidential Sources.” Journalism Practice 11, no. 6 (2016): 665–688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindberg, Johan, and Denis Muller, eds. In the Name of Security Secrecy, Surveillance and Journalism. Sydney: Anthem Press, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Lowenthal, Torin. “Surveillance Forces Journalists to Think and Act Like Spies.” Committee to Protect Journalists. 27 April 2015. https://cpj.org/2015/04/attacks-on-the-press-surveillance-forces-journalists-to-think-act-like-spies/.
   Google Scholar
• Lyon, David. Surveillance Society: Monitoring Everyday Life. London: McGraw-Hill Education, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Mano, Winston. “Press Freedom, Professionalism and Proprietorship: Behind the Zimbabwean Media Divide.” Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture 2 (2005): 56–70.
   Google Scholar
• Mare, Admire. “A Qualitative Analysis of How Investigative Journalists, Civic Activists, Lawyers and Academics Are Adapting to and Resisting Communications Surveillance in South Africa.” Johannesburg: Media Policy and Democracy Project (MPDP) Report, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, Aaron K., Rosamunde E. Van Brakel, and Daniel J. Bernhard. “Understanding Resistance to Digital Surveillance: Towards a Multi-Disciplinary, Multi-Actor Framework.” Surveillance & Society 6, no. 3 (2009): 213–232.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, Gary T. “What’s New About the ‘New Surveillance’? Classifying for Change and Continuity.” Surveillance & Society 1, no. 1 (2002): 9–29.
   Google Scholar
• Masunungure, Eldred V. “Zimbabwe’s Militarized, Electoral Authoritarianism.” Journal of International Affairs 65, no. 1 (2011): 47–64.
   Google Scholar
• MISA Zimbabwe. “Reflections on the United Nations Human Rights Council.” In Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Promotion and Protection of the Right to Freedom of Opinion and Expression, edited by David Kaye, 77–99. New York: United Nations, 2018. https://daccess-ods.un.org/TMP/7816334.3667984.html.
   Google Scholar
• Monahan, Torin, and David Murakami Wood, eds. Surveillance Studies: A Reader. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Munoriyarwa, Allen. “Have They Got News for Us? The Decline of Investigative Reporting in Zimbabwe’s Print Media.” Communicatio 44, no. 1 (2018): 71–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munoriyarwa, Allen, and Sarah H. Chiumbu. “Big Brother is Watching: Surveillance Regulation and its Effects on Journalistic Practices in Zimbabwe.” African Journalism Studies 40, no. 3 (2020): 26–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, Pat. Spies in the Sky: Surveillance Satellites in War and Peace. London: Springer Science & Business Media, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Paterson, Moira. “The Public Privacy Conundrum–Anonymity and the Law in an Era of Mass Surveillance.” In In the Name of Security–Secrecy, Surveillance and Journalism, edited by Johan Lindberg and Denis Muller, 15–32. Sydney: Anthem Press, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Centre. “Investigative Journalists and Digital Security Perceptions of Vulnerability and Changes in Behavior”, 2014. https://www.journalism.org/2015/02/05/investigative-journalists-perceptions-about-the-surveillance-climate/.
   Google Scholar
• Possetti, Julie. Protecting Journalism Sources in the Digital Age, 2014. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0024/002480/248054E.pdf.22`22.
   Google Scholar
• Privacy International. “Drifting Towards Darkness: An Exploratory Study of State Surveillance in Post-2000 Zimbabwe” Johannesburg: Media Policy and Democracy Project (MPDP) Report, 2019. https://www.mediaanddemocracy.com/uploads/1/6/5/7/16577624/zimbabwe_report_2nd_pages.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Rantanen, Terhi. “The Globalization of Electronic News in the 19th Century Media.” Culture & Society 19, no. 4 (1997): 605–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, Neil M. “The Dangers of Surveillance.” Harvard. Law Review 126 (2012): 1934–1953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sachikonye, Lloyd. When a State Turns on its Citizens: 60 Years of Institutionalised Violence in Zimbabwe. Harare: African Books Collective, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Schivelbusch, Wolfgang. “The Policing of Street Lighting.” Yale French Studies 73 (1978): 61–74.
   Google Scholar
• Schudson, Michael. “The Politics of Narrative Form: The Emergence of News Conventions in Print and Television.” Daedalus 111, no. 4 (1982): 97–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulhofer, Stephen J. The Enemy Within: Intelligence Gathering, Law Enforcement, and Civil Liberties in the Wake of September 11. New York: Century Foundation, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Sternadori, Miglena Mantcheva, and Esther Thorson. “Anonymous Sources Harm Credibility of All Stories.” Newspaper Research Journal 30, no. 4 (2009): 54–66.
   Google Scholar
• Tuchman, Gey. Making News: A Study in the Construction of Reality. Vol. 256. New York: Free Press, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Veritas. “Assignment of Functions Minister of Information Communication Technology: A Legal Perspective.” Veritas Report, 10 May 2017. http://www.veritaszim.net/node/1267.
   Google Scholar
• Waters, Stephenson. “The Effects of Mass Surveillance on Journalists’ Relations with Confidential Sources: A Constant Comparative Study.” Digital Journalism 6, no. 10 (2018): 1294–1313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zelizer, Barbie. The Changing Faces of Journalism: Tabloidization, Technology and Truthiness. London: Routledge, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Zuboff, Shoshana. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for the Future at the New Frontier of Power. London: Profile Books, 2018.
   Google Scholar