Towards a deeper understanding of the social architecture of co-housing: evidence from the UK, USA and Australia

References

• Ahrentzen, S. 1996. “Housing Alternatives for New Forms of Households.” In Under One Roof: Issues and Innovations in Shared Housing, edited by G. C. Hemmens, C. J. Hoch, and J. Carp, 49–63. New York: State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• BBC. 2013. Mark Haywood on You and Yours, Radio 4, 28.03.13.
   Google Scholar
• Booth, C., and R. Gilroy. 1999. “Building an Infrastructure for Everyday Lives.” European Planning Studies 7 (3): 307–324. doi:10.1080/09654319908720520.
   Google Scholar
• Bourne, P. 2010. Bindarri – Phil Bourne – Cohousing Australia. Accessed September 20. http://www.bindarri.com.au/phil-bourne-cohousing-australia/
   Google Scholar
• Buck, J., and S. Villines. 2007. We the People: Consenting to a Deeper Democracy. A Guide to Sociocratic Principles and Methods. Washington, DC. www.sociocracy.info
   Google Scholar
• Buur, J., and H. Larsen. 2010. “The Quality of Conversations in Participatory Innovation.” CoDesign 6 (3): 121–138. doi:10.1080/15710882.2010.533185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterton, P. 2013. “Towards an Agenda for Post-Carbon Cities: Lessons from Lilac, the Uk’s First Ecological, Affordable Cohousing Community.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 37: 1654–1674. (on-line first). doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiodelli, F., and V. Baglione. 2013. “Living Together Privately: For a Cautious Reading of Cohousing.” Urban Research and Practice. doi:10.1080/17535069.2013.827905.
   Google Scholar
• Christian, D. L. 2003. Creating a Life Together: Practical Tools to Grow Ecovillages and Intentional Communities. British Columbia: New Society Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Co-housing Association of the United States. 2010. http://www.co-housing.org/
   Google Scholar
• Co-housing Australia. 2012. http://www.communities.org.au/
   Google Scholar
• Crabtree, L. 2006. “Disintegrated Houses: Exploring Ecofeminist Housing and Urban Design Options.” Antipode 38.4: 711–734. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8330.2006.00473.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, M. 2004. Thinking About Cohousing. London: Diggers and Dreamers.
   Google Scholar
• Fromm, D. 1991. Collaborative Communities: Co-Housing, Central Living and Other New Forms of Housing with Shared Facilities. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
   Google Scholar
• Fromm, D. 2000. “American Cohousing: The First Five Years.” Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 17 (2): 94–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilroy, R. 2008. “Places that Support Human Flourishing: Lessons from Later Life.” Planning Theory and Practice 9 (2): 145–163. doi:10.1080/14649350802041548.
   Google Scholar
• Hayden, A. 1999. Sharing the Work, Sparing the Planet: Work, Time, Consumption and Ecology. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvis, H. 2011. “Saving Space, Sharing Time: Integrated Infrastructures of Daily Life in Co-Housing.” Environment and Planning A 43 (3): 560–577. doi:10.1068/a43296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvis, H., and A. Bonnett. 2013. “Progressive Nostalgia in Novel Living Arrangements: A Counterpoint to Neo-Traditional New Urbanism?” Urban Studies 50 (11): 2349–2370. doi:10.1177/0042098013478235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvis, H., P. Kantor, and J. Cloke. 2009. Cities and Gender. Houndmills: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Korpela, S. 2012. “Casa Malta: A Case Study of a Contemporary Co-Housing Project in Helsinki.” Built Environment 38 (3): 336–344. doi:10.2148/benv.38.3.336.
   Google Scholar
• Margolis, D., and D. Entin. 2011. Report on Survey of Co-Housing Communities, sponsored by the Co-housing Association of the United States, Coho/US.
   Google Scholar
• McCamant, K., and C. Durrett. 1994. Co-housing: A Contemporary Approach to Housing Ourselves. 2nd ed. Berkeley, CA: Ten Speed Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meltzer, G. 2000. “Co-Housing: Verifying the Importance of Community in the Application of Environmentalism.” Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 17 (2): 110–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meltzer, G. 2005. Sustainable Community: Learning From the Cohousing Model. Victoria, BC: Trafford.
   Google Scholar
• Metcalf, W. J. 1984. “A Classification of Alternative Lifestyle Groups.” Australian and New Zealand Journal of Sociology 20 (1): 66–80. doi:10.1177/144078338402000105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. 2003. “Capabilities as Fundamental Entitlements: Sen and Social Justice.” Feminist Economics 9 (2–3): 33–59. doi:10.1080/1354570022000077926.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reintjas, C. 2003. “What Is a Solidarity Economy?” Life after Capitalism Talks, World Social Forum III, Porto Alegre, Brazil. www.zmag.org/carolase.htm
   Google Scholar
• Renz, M. A. 2006. “The Meaning of Consensus and Blocking for Cohousing Groups.” Small Group Research 37 (4): 351–376. doi:10.1177/1046496406291184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sargisson, L. 2010. “Friends Have All Things in Common: Utopian Property Relations.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 12 (1): 22–36. doi:10.1111/j.1467-856X.2009.00391.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scotthanson, C., and K. Scotthanson. 2005. The Cohousing Handbook: Building a Place for Community. British Columbia: New Society Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Sennett, R. 2012. Togetherness. London: Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar
• Seyfang, G. 2010. “Community Action for Sustainable Housing: Building a Low-Carbon Future.” Energy Policy 38: 7624–7633. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2009.10.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonson, K. 2007. “Practice, Spatiality and Embodied Emotions: An Outline of a Geography of Practice.” Human Affairs 17: 168–181.
   Google Scholar
• Speak, S. 2012. “Planning for the Needs of Urban Poor in the Global South: The Value of a Feminist Approach.” Planning Theory 11.4: 343–360. doi:10.1177/1473095212440424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson, N. 2006. “European Cosmopolitan Solidarity: Questions of Citizenship, Difference and Post-Materialism.” European Journal of Social Theory 9: 485–500. doi:10.1177/1368431006071998.
   Google Scholar
• Toker, Z. 2010. “New Housing for New Households: Comparing Cohousing and New Urbanist Developments with Women in Mind.” Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 27 (4): 325–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torres-Antonini, M. 2001. “Our Common House: Using the Built Environment to Develop Supportive Communities.” Unpublished PhD thesis, Graduate School, University of Florida.
   Google Scholar
• UKCN. 2013. “The UK Co-housing Network.” http://www.co-housing.org.uk/
   Google Scholar
• Vestbro, D. U., and L. Horelli. 2012. “Design for Gender Equality: The History of Co-Housing Ideas and Realities.” Built Environment 38 (3): 315–335. doi:10.2148/benv.38.3.315.
   Google Scholar
• Wann, D., ed. 2005. Reinventing Community: Stories from the Walkways of Cohousing. Golden, CO: Fulcrum Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J. 2005. “Designing Neighbourhoods for Social Interaction: The Case of Cohousing.” Journal of Urban Design 10 (2): 195–227. doi:10.1080/13574800500086998.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J. 2008. “Predicting an American Future for Co-Housing.” Futures 40: 268–286. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2007.08.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar