“They tried to make me go to rehab. I said, no, no, no”. Representations of ‘deprived’ urban spaces and urban regeneration in Turin, Italy

References

• Albrow, M. 1997. “Travelling beyond Local Cultures. Socioscapes in a Global City.” In Living the Global City. Globalization as a Local Process, edited by J. Eade, 35–52. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Amin, A. 2005. “Local Community on Trial.” Economy and Society 34 (4): 612–633. doi:10.1080/03085140500277211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amin, A. 2012. Land of Strangers. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baeten, G. 2010. “Inner-City Misery.” City 8 (2): 235–241. doi:10.1080/1360481042000242184.
   Google Scholar
• Bagnasco, A. 1980. Torino. Un profilo sociologico. Torino: Einaudi.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, C., S. Miles, and P. Stark. 2004. “Culture‐Led Urban Regeneration and the Revitalisation of Identities in Newcastle, Gateshead and the North East of England.” International Journal of Cultural Policy 10 (1): 47–65. doi:10.1080/1028663042000212328.
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, Z. 2001. Community: Seeking Safety in an Insecure World. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Belfiore, E., and O. Bennett. 2007. “Rethinking the Social Impact of the Arts.” International Journal of Cultural Policy 13 (2): 135–151. doi:10.1080/10286630701342741.
   Google Scholar
• Bertacchini, E., and G. Pazzola. 2015. Torino creativa. Torino: Edizioni GAI.
   Google Scholar
• Bighi, S. 2017. “Le aree dismesse nella riqualificazione e nella rigenerazione urbana a Torino (1990–2015).” In Postfordismo e trasformazione urbana. Casi di recupero dei vuoti industriali e indicazioni per le politiche nel territorio torinese, edited by E. Armano, C. A. Dondona, and F. Ferlaino, 107–140. Torino: IRES-Piemonte.
   Google Scholar
• Blackshaw, T. 2010. Key Concepts in Community Studies. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N., P. Marcuse, and M. Mayer, eds. 2012. Cities for People Not for Profit. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N., and N. Theodore. 2002. “Cities and the Geographies of ‘Actually Existing Neoliberalism’.” Antipode 34 (3): 349–379. doi:10.1111/anti.2002.34.issue-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridge, G. 2006. “Perspectives on Cultural Capital and the Neighbourhood.” Urban Studies 43 (4): 719–730. doi:10.1080/00420980600597392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caldeira, T. 2009. “Marginality, Again?!” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 33 (3): 848–853. doi:10.1111/ijur.2009.33.issue-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardone, I., 2018. “Vuoti industriali in Barriera di Milano. Storia, percezione, scenari.” Master Thesis, Economics of the Environment, Culture and Territory. Università di Torino (unpbublished).
   Google Scholar
• Caritas. 2007. Barriera fragile, a cura di Tiziana Ciampolini. Milano: IDOS.
   Google Scholar
• Carmon, N. 1999. “Three Generations of Urban Renewal Policies: Analysis and Policy Implications.” Geoforum 30: 145–158. doi:10.1016/S0016-7185(99)00012-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castronovo, V. 1975. “Il Miracolo economico.” Storia d’Italia4 (1): 465–510Torino: Einaudi.
   Google Scholar
• Cianfriglia and Giannini. 2017. “Due esperienze di rigenerazione urbana sul territorio torinese: Il Comitato Parco Dora sulla Spina 3 e il Comitato Urban in Barriera di Milano, a Torino.” In Postfordismo e trasformazione urbana. Casi di recupero dei vuoti industriali e indicazioni per le politiche nel territorio torinese, edited by E. Armano, C. A. Dondona, and F. Ferlaino, 163–186. Torino: IRES-Piemonte.
   Google Scholar
• Cingolani, P. 2012. “Dentro la Barriera. Vivere e raccontare la diversità nel quartiere.” In Concordia discors, edited by F. Pastore and I. Ponzo, 53–83. Roma: Carocci.
   Google Scholar
• Città di Torino. 2013. “Servizio di Statistica e Toponomastica, Ufficio Pubblicazioni, La popolazione straniera nel 2013.” Dati generali - I movimenti intramigratori dei cittadini stranieri. ( a cura di M. Casale e S. Fantini). Accessed June 18 2017. http://www.comune.torino.it/statistica/osservatorio/stranieri/2013/pdf/07.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cochrane, A. 2007. Understanding Urban Policy: A Critical Approach. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Crang, M. 2005. “Qualitative Methods: There Is Nothing outside the Text?” Progress in Human Geography 29 (2): 225–233. doi:10.1191/0309132505ph541pr.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crang, M., and I. Cook. 2007. Doing Ethnographies. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dossier Programma Integrato di Sviluppo Urbano - PISU Barriera di Milano. 2010. Accessed June 18 2017. http://www.comune.torino.it/geoportale/prg/cms/media/files/ALBO_PRETORIO/VARIANTI/20 0_preliminare/51_dossier_pisu.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dowling, R., K. Lloyd, and S. Suchet-Pearson. 2016. “Qualitative Methods I: Enriching the Interview.” Progress in Human Geography 40 (5): 679–686. doi:10.1177/0309132515596880.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esposito, R. 1998. Communitas: Origine e destino della comunità. Vol. 58. Torino: Einaudi (IT).
   Google Scholar
• Florida, R. 2002. “Bohemia and Economic Geography.” Journal of Economic Geography 2 (1): 55–71. doi:10.1093/jeg/2.1.55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson-Graham, J. K. 2008. “Diverse Economies: Performative Practices for ‘Other Worlds’.” Progress in Human Geography 32 (5): 613–632. doi:10.1177/0309132508090821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Governa, F. 2016. “Ordinary Places in Ordinary Cities: Exploring Urban Margins in Torino and Marseille.” Méditerranée - Revue Géographique des pays méditerranéens - Journal of Mediterranean Geography 127: 101–108.
   Google Scholar
• Governa, F., P. Mendez, and F. Quintero. 2015. “Esplorare Barriera di Milano. Pratiche economiche interstiziali e potenziali di sviluppo ‘oltre la crisi.” In Potenziali di Città Torino oltre la crisi, Various Authors, 149–216. Torino: Eu Polis/Compagnia di San Paolo.
   Google Scholar
• Governa, F., and S. Saccomani. 2004. “From Urban Renewal to Local Development. 10 New Conceptions and Governance Practices in the Italian Peripheries.” Planning Theory and Practice 3: 328–348.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, T., and I. Robertson. 2001. “Public Art and Urban Regeneration: Advocacy, Claims and Critical Debates.” Landscape Research 26 (1): 5–26. doi:10.1080/01426390120024457.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, L. 2013. “Archaeologies and Geographies of the Post-Industrial Past: Landscape, Memory and the Spectral.” Cultural Geographies 20 (3): 379–396. doi:10.1177/1474474013480121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imrie, R., and M. Raco, eds. 2003. Urban Renaissance?: New Labour, Community and Urban Policy. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kramer, K., and J. R. Short. 2011. “Flâneries and the Globalizing City.” City 15 (3–4): 322–342. doi:10.1080/13604813.2011.595100.
   Google Scholar
• Lancione, M. 2016. “The Assemblage of Life at the Margins.” In Re-Thinking Life at the Margins. The Assemblage of Contexts, Subjects and Politics, edited by M. Lancione, 3–26. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Landry, C. 2000. The Creative City: A Toolkit for Urban Innovators. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Leary, M. E., and J. McCarthy, eds. 2013a. The Routledge Companion to Urban Regeneration. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Leary, M. E., and J. McCarthy. 2013b. “Introduction. Urban Regeneration, a Global Phenomenon.” In The Routledge Companion to Urban Regeneration, edited by M. E. Leary and J. McCarthy, 1–14. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lovering, J. 2007. “The Relationship between Urban Regeneration and Neoliberalism: Two Presumptions Theories and a Research Agenda.” International Planning Studies 12 (4): 343–366. doi:10.1080/13563470701745504.
   Google Scholar
• Magatti, M. 2007. La città abbandonata. Come sono e come cambiano le periferie italiana. Roma: il Mulino.
   Google Scholar
• Maloutas, T. 2012. “The Broadening and Mystified Margins of Urban Deprivation.” European Journal of Homeless 6 (1): 13–29.
   Google Scholar
• Marcuse, P. 2005. “‘The City’as Perverse Metaphor.” City 9 (2): 247–254. doi:10.1080/13604810500197038.
   Google Scholar
• Musterd, S., and W. Ostendorf, eds. 1998. Urban Segregation and the Welfare State: Inequality and Exclusion in Western Cities. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nigrelli, F. 2005. Il senso del vuoto. Demolizioni nella città contemporanea. Roma: Manifestolibri.
   Google Scholar
• Obeng-Odoom, F. 2013. “Regeneration for Some, Degeneration for Others.” In The Routledge Companion to Urban Regeneration, edited by M. E. Leary and J. McCarthy, 189–198. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Piedmont Region. 2013. Accessed June 18 2016. http://www.regione.piemonte.it/commercio/tavole2013.htm
   Google Scholar
• Pogliano, A. 2016. “News Media and Immigration in the EU.” In Inter-Group Relations and Migrant Integration in European Cities, edited by F. Pastore and I. Ponzo, 151–176. Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London: Springer Open.
   Google Scholar
• Ponzo, I. 2012. “Barriera di Milano e Borgo San Paolo. Una storia (operaia) e due destini.” In Concordia discors, Ponzo F. Pastore and I. Ponzo edited by, 33–52. Roma: Carocci.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, L. 2009. “Whose Urban Renaissance?” In Whose Urban Renaissance? an International Comparison of Urban Regeneration Strategies, edited by L. Porter and K. Shaw, 241–252. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Raco, M. 2018. “Critical Urban Cosmopolitanism and the Governance of Urban Diversity in European Cities.” European Planning Studies 25 (1): 8–23.
   Google Scholar
• Remotti, F. 2010. L’ossessione identitaria. Laterza: Roma-Bari.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, U., and A. Vanolo. 2013. “Regeneration What? the Politics and Geographies of Actually Existing Regeneration.” In The Routledge Companion to Urban Regeneration, edited by M. E. Leary and J. McCarthy, 159–167. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Said, E. 2007. Umanesimo e critica democratica. Milano: Il Saggiatore.
   Google Scholar
• Salone, C., S. Bonini Baraldi, and G. Pazzola. 2015. “Pratiche di produzione e consumo culturale a Barriera di Milano.” In Potenziali di Città Torino oltre la crisi, Various Authors, 149–216. Torino: Eu Polis/Compagnia di San Paolo.
   Google Scholar
• Salone, C., S. Bonini Baraldi, and G. Pazzola. 2017. “Cultural Production in Peripheral Urban Spaces: Lessons from Barriera, Turin (Italy).” European Planning Studies 25 (12): 2117–2137. doi:10.1080/09654313.2017.1327033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santagata, W. 2002. “Cultural Districts, Property Rights and Sustainable Economic Growth.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 26 (1): 9–23. doi:10.1111/ijur.2002.26.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, A. J. 1997. “The Cultural Economy of Cities.” International Journal Ofjurban and Regional Research 21 (2): 323–339. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.00075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, A. J. 2000. The Cultural Economy of Cities: Essays on the Geography of Image-Producing Industries. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sharp, J., V. Pollock, and R. Paddison. 2005. “Just Art for a Just City: Public Art and Social Inclusion in Urban Regeneration.” Urban Studies 42 (5–6): 1001–1023. doi:10.1080/00420980500106963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, T. 2009. “Anti-Urbanism.” In International Encyclopedia of Human Geography, edited by R. Kitchin and N. Thrift, 159–166. Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Spriano, P. 1972. Storia di Torino operaia e socialista. Torino: Einaudi.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, M. J., and S. C. Seifert. 2007. Culture and Urban Revitalization: A Harvest Document. University of Pennsylvania. https://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1005&=&context=siap_revitalization&=&sei-redir=1&referer=https%253A%252F%252Fscholar.google.it%252Fscholar%253Fhl%253Dit%2526as_sdt%253D0%25252C5%2526q%253DStern%25252C%252BM.%252BJ.%25252C%252B%252526%252BSeifert%25252C%252BS.%252BC.%252B%2525282007%252529.%252BCulture%252Band%252Burban%252Brevitalization%25253A%252BA%252Bharvest%252Bdocument%25252C%252BUniversity%252Bof%252BPennsylvania.%2526btnG%253D#search=%22Stern%2C%20M.%20J.%2C%20%26%20Seifert%2C%20S.%20C.%20%282007%29.%20Culture%20urban%20revitalization%3A%20harvest%20document%2C%20University%20Pennsylvania.%22
   Google Scholar
• Tallon, A., ed. 2010. Urban Regeneration and Renewal. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Thrift, N. 1996. “New Urban Eras and Old Technological Fears: Reconfiguring the Goodwill of Electronic Things.” Urban Studies 33 (8): 1463–1493. doi:10.1080/0042098966754.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker, V. 1996. “A Cultural Perspective on Development.” The European Journal of Development Research 8 (2): 1–21. doi:10.1080/09578819608426662.
   Google Scholar
• Uitermark, J. 2014. “Integration and Control: The Governing of Urban Marginality in Western Europe.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 38 (4): 1418–1436. doi:10.1111/ijur.2014.38.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vicari Haddock, S., and F. Moulaert. 2009. Rigenerare la città, pratiche di innovazione sociale nelle città europee. Bologna: il Mulino.
   Google Scholar
• Vuyk, K. 2010. “The Arts as an Instrument? Notes on the Controversy Surrounding the Value of Art.” International Journal of Cultural Policy 16 (2): 173–183. doi:10.1080/10286630903029641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wacquant, L. 2008. Urban Outcasts. A Comparative Sociology of Advanced Marginality. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waldinger, R. 1996. “Ethnicity and Opportunity in the Plural City.” In Ethnic Los Angeles, 445–470.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, K. 2009. “Participant Observation.” In International Encyclopedia of Human Geography, edited by R. Kitchin and N. Thrift, 77–81. Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Wylie, J. 2007. “The Spectral Geographies of WG Sebald.” Cultural Geographies 14 (2): 171–188. doi:10.1177/1474474007075353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar