Unused, underused, and misused: an examination of theories on urban void spaces

References

• Accordino, J., and G. T. Johnson. 2000. “Addressing the Vacant and Abandoned Property Problem.” Journal of Urban Affairs 22 (3): 301–315. doi:10.1111/0735-2166.00058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akkerman, A., and A. F. Cornfeld. 2010. “Greening as an Urban Design Metaphor: Looking for the City’s Soul in Leftover Spaces.” The Structurist 49 (50): 30–35.
   Google Scholar
• An, H., and H.-Y. Park. 2013. “Flexible Urban Regeneration: Creative Use of Empty Houses and Vacant Plots- Focused on Temporary Uses and Tactical Urbanism. (In Korean).” Journal of Korea Planning Association 48 (6): 347–366.
   Google Scholar
• Andres, L., and B. Grésillon. 2013. “Cultural Brownfields in European Cities: A New Mainstream Object for Cultural and Urban Policies.” International Journal of Cultural Policy 19 (1): 40–62. doi:10.1080/10286632.2011.625416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, H. 2006a. “Post-Urban/Suburban Landscapes: Design and Planning the Centre, Edge and In-Between.” In Paper Read at after Sprawl: Post-Suburban Sydney, E-Proceedings of the ‘Post-Suburban Sydney: The City in Transformation’conference, edited by K. Anderson, R. Dobson, F. Allon, and B. Neilson. NSW: Centre for Cultural Research, University of Western Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, H. 2006b. “Time, Dereliction and Beauty: An Argument for ‘Landscapes of Contempt’.” In Paper Read at the Landscape Architect, IFLA Conference Papers.
   Google Scholar
• Aruninta, A. 2004. Controversies in Public Land Management Decision-Makings: Case Study of Land Utilization in Bangkok, Thailand. Bangkok, Thailand: Chulalongkorn University.
   Google Scholar
• Aruninta, A. 2009. “WiMBY: A Comparative Interests Analysis of the Heterogeneity of Redevelopment of Publicly Owned Vacant Land.” Landscape and Urban Planning 93 (1): 38–45. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.06.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, A. 2007. Drosscape: Wasting Land Urban America. New York, NY: Princeton Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bowman, A. O. M., and M. A. Pagano. 2000. “Transforming America’s Cities Policies and Conditions of Vacant Land.” Urban Affairs Review 35 (4): 559–581. doi:10.1177/10780870022184534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowman, A. and M. Pagano. 2004. Terra Incognita: Vacant Land and Urban Strategies. Washington, D.C: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brophy, P. C., and J. S. Vey. 2002. Seizing City Assets: Ten Steps to Urban Land Reform. Citeseer. Brooking Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Colomb, C. 2012. “Pushing the Urban Frontier: Temporary Uses of Space, City Marketing, and the Creative City Discourse in 2000s Berlin.” Journal of Urban Affairs 34 (2): 131–152. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9906.2012.00607.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cupers, K., and M. Miessen. 2002. Spaces of Uncertainty. Müller+ Busmann, Wuppertal.
   Google Scholar
• Cybriwsky, R. 1999. “Changing Patterns of Urban Public Space: Observations and Assessments from the Tokyo and New York Metropolitan Areas.” Cities 16 (4): 223–231. doi:10.1016/S0264-2751(99)00021-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Solà-Morales, I. 2013. Terrain Vague Terrain Vague, In nterstices at the Edge of the Pale, edited by Patrick Barron and Manuela Mariani, 38–44. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Doron, G. M. 2000. “The Dead Zone and the Architecture of Transgression.” City 4 (2): 247–263. doi:10.1080/13604810050147857.
   Google Scholar
• Eisinger, A., and J. Seifert. 2012 (Eds.,). urbanRESET: Freilegen Immanenter Potenziale Städtischer Räume/How to Activate Immanent Potentials of Urban Spaces. Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, M., K. Lowrie, L. Solitare, and L. Duncan. 2000. “Brownfields, Toads, and the Struggle for Neighborhood Redevelopment A Case Study of the State of New Jersey.” Urban Affairs Review 35 (5): 717–733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg, M. R., F. J. Popper, and B. M. West. 1990. “The TOADS A New American Urban Epidemic.” Urban Affairs Review 25 (3): 435–454. doi:10.1177/004208169002500306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groth, J., and E. Corijn. 2005. “Reclaiming Urbanity: Indeterminate Spaces, Informal Actors and Urban Agenda Setting.” Urban Studies 42 (3): 503–526. doi:10.1080/00420980500035436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hentilä, H.-L., and T. Lindborg. 2003. “Central Micro-Peripheries: Temporary Uses of Central Residual Spaces as Urban Development Catalysts (?).” In Paper Read at ERSA Conference Papers, Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Hollander, J. B., K. Pallagst, T. Schwarz, and F. J. Popper. 2009. “Planning Shrinking Cities.” Progress in Planning 72 (4): 223–232.
   Google Scholar
• Hormigo, P., and T. Morita. 2004. “Urban Gapscapes: Problems and Opportunities in Urban Design Analysis of Gapspaces Originated by Elevated Railways.” Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering 3 (1): 181–188. doi:10.3130/jaabe.3.181.
   Google Scholar
• Hou, J. 2010. Insurgent Public Space: Guerrilla Urbanism and the Remaking of Contemporary Cities. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, J., and P. Shaw. 2011. “As Found: Contested Uses within the ‘Left-Over’spaces of the City.” In Paper Read at Conference Paper, Research Group for Landscape Architecture and Urbanism. Copenhagen University, Copenhagen.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. P., J. Hollander, and A. Hallulli. 2014. “Maintain, Demolish, Re-Purpose: Policy Design for Vacant Land Management Using Decision Models.” Cities 40: 151–162. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2013.05.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorgensen, A., and M. Tylecote. 2007. “Ambivalent Landscapes—Wilderness in the Urban Interstices.” Landscape Research 32 (4): 443–462. doi:10.1080/01426390701449802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, G. 2016. “The Public Value of Urban Vacant Land: Social Responses and Ecological Value.” Sustainability 8 (5): 486. doi:10.3390/su8050486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kremer, P., Z. A. Hamstead, and T. McPhearson. 2013. “A Social–Ecological Assessment of Vacant Lots in New York City.” Landscape and Urban Planning 120: 218–233. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.05.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, K. 1990. “The Waste of Place.” Places 6 (2): 9–23.
   Google Scholar
• Mallach, A. 2012. “Depopulation, Market Collapse and Property Abandonment: Surplus Land and Buildings in Legacy Cities.” In Rebuilding America’s Legacy Cities: New Directions for the Industrial Heartland, edited by A. Mallach, 85–109. New York, NY: American Assembly.
   Google Scholar
• Maruani, T., and I. Amit-Cohen. 2007. “Open Space Planning Models: A Review of Approaches and Methods.” Landscape and Urban Planning 81 (1–2): 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConnell, V., and K. Wiley. 2010. “Infill Development: Perspectives and Evidence from Economics and Planning.” Resources for the Future 10: 13.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, D., and P. Wyatt. 2004. “Rethinking Urban Capacity: Identifying and Appraising Vacant Buildings.” Building Research & Information 32 (4): 285–292. doi:10.1080/0961321042000221061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Vacant Properties Campaign. 2005. “Vacant Properties: The True Costs to Communities.”
   Google Scholar
• Németh, J., and J. Langhorst. 2014. “Rethinking Urban Transformation: Temporary Uses for Vacant Land.” Cities 40: 143–150. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2013.04.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Northam, R. M. 1971. “Vacant Urban Land in the American City.” Land Economics 47 (4): 345–355. doi:10.2307/3145071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pagano, M. A., and A. O. M. Bowman. 2000. Vacant Land in Cities: An Urban Resource. Washington DC: Brookings Institution, Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Pearsall, H., and S. Lucas. 2014. “Vacant Land: The New Urban Green?” Cities 40 (40): 121–123. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2013.10.001.
   Google Scholar
• Pearsall, H., S. Lucas, and J. Lenhardt. 2014. “The Contested Nature of Vacant Land in Philadelphia and Approaches for Resolving Competing Objectives for Redevelopment.” Cities 40: 163–174. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2013.04.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popper, D.E., and F. Popper. 2002. “Small Can Be Beautiful.” Planning 68 (7): 20–23.
   Google Scholar
• Rahmann, H., and M. Jonas. 2011. “Urban Voids: The Hidden Dimension of Temporary Vacant Spaces in Rapidly Growing Cities.” In State of Australian Cities National Conference, Australian Sustainable Cities and Regions Network (ASCRN)+ the University of Melbourne: 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Schilling, J., and J. Logan. 2008. “Greening the Rust Belt: A Green Infrastructure Model for Right Sizing America’s Shrinking Cities.” Journal of the American Planning Association 74 (4): 451–466. doi:10.1080/01944360802354956.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, T. 2012. “Re-Thinking the Places in Between: Stabilization, Regeneration, and Reuse.” In Rebuilding America’s legacy cities: New Directions for the Industrial Heartland, edited by A. Mallach, 167–184. New York, NY: American Assembly:.
   Google Scholar
• Trancik, R. 1986. Finding Lost Space: Theories of Urban Design. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar