Residential intensification through a new statutory plan in Auckland: outcome evaluation and stakeholders’ experience

References

• Adams, D., R. Croudace, and S. Tiesdell. 2012. “Exploring the ‘Notional Property Developer’ as a Policy Construct.” Urban Studies 49 (12): 2577–2596. doi:10.1177/0042098011431283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L. 2004. “Strategic (Spatial) Planning Reexamined.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 31 (5): 743–758. doi:10.1068/b3065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, N., Haarhoff, E., and Beattie, L. 2018. “Enhancing liveability through urban intensification: The idea and role of neighbourhood.” Cogent Social Sciences 4, no.1: 1442117.
   Google Scholar
• Auckland Council. 2012. Auckland Plan. Auckland: Auckland Council. http://theplan.theaucklandplan.govt.nz/
   Google Scholar
• Auckland Council. 2013a. Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan (Notified Version). Auckland: Auckland Council. https://unitaryplan.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/
   Google Scholar
• Auckland Council, 2013. Auckland Census Data, Auckland Council, Auckland, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Auckland Council. 2016. Auckland Unitary Plan– Auckland Council Decisions. Auckland: Auckland Council.
   Google Scholar
• Auckland Council. 2018a. Panmure Town Centre Regeneration. Auckland: Auckland Council.
   Google Scholar
• Auckland Council 2018b. “Auckland Plan 2050 Evidence Report: Demographics.”
   Google Scholar
• Baer, W. C. 1997. “General Plan Evaluation Criteria: An Approach to Making Better Plans.” Journal of the American Planning Association 63 (3): 329–344. doi:10.1080/01944369708975926.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balderston, K., and C. Fredrickson. 2014. “Capacity for Growth Study 2013 (Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan): Methodology and Assumptions.” Auckland Council.
   Google Scholar
• Beattie, L. G. (2013). “Evaluating District Plans in Auckland, New Zealand: Do They Deliver Their Intended Outcomes?” PhD Thesis, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Beattie, L. G., and E. Haarhoff. 2018. “Urban Growth, Liveability and Quality Urban Design: Questions about the Efficacy of Urban Planning Systems in Auckland, New Zealand.” International Journal of Contemporary Urban Affairs 2 (2): 12–23. doi:10.25034/ijcua.2018.3667.
   Google Scholar
• Berke, P., and D. Godschalk. 2009. “Searching for the Good Plan: A Meta-analysis of Plan Quality Studies.” Journal of Planning Literature 23 (3): 227–240. doi:10.1177/0885412208327014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berke, P., G. Smith, and W. Lyles. 2012. “Planning for Resiliency: Evaluation of State Hazard Mitigation Plans under the Disaster Mitigation Act.” Natural Hazards Review 13 (2): 139–149. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berke, P., M. Backhurst, M. Day, N. Ericksen, L. Laurian, J. Crawford, and J. Dixon. 2006. “What Makes Plan Implementation Successful? An Evaluation of Local Plans and Implementation Practices in New Zealand.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 33 (4): 581. doi:10.1068/b31166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berke, P. R., Y. Song, and M. Stevens. 2009. “Integrating Hazard Mitigation into New Urban and Conventional Developments.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 28 (4): 441–455. doi:10.1177/0739456X09331550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brody, S. D., V. Carrasco, and W. E. Highfield. 2006. “Measuring the Adoption of Local Sprawl: Reduction Planning Policies in Florida.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 25 (3): 294–310. doi:10.1177/0739456X05280546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connell, J., S. J. Page, and T. Bentley. 2009. “Towards Sustainable Tourism Planning in New Zealand: Monitoring Local Government Planning under the Resource Management Act.” Tourism Management 30 (6): 867–877. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2008.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, I. C. 1999. “Evaluation and Performance Management in Government.” Evaluation 5 (2): 150–159. doi:10.1177/13563899922208896.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, J., and A. Dupuis. 2003. “Urban Intensification in Auckland, New Zealand: A Challenge for New Urbanism.” Housing Studies 18 (3): 353–368. doi:10.1080/02673030304239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frew, T., D. Baker, and P. Donehue. 2016. “Performance Based Planning in Queensland: A Case of Unintended Plan-making Outcomes.” Land Use Policy 50: 239–251. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.10.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunder, M., and J. Hillier. 2009. Planning in Ten Words or Less: A Lacanian Entanglement with Spatial Planning. Farnham, United Kingdom: Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Gurran, N., C. Gilbert, and P. Phibbs. 2015. “Sustainable Development Control? Zoning and Land Use Regulations for Urban Form, Biodiversity Conservation and Green Design in Australia.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 58 (11): 1877–1902. doi:10.1080/09640568.2014.967386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurran, N., and K. Ruming. 2016. “Less Planning, More Development? Housing and Urban Reform Discourses in Australia.” Journal of Economic Policy Reform 19 (3): 262–280. doi:10.1080/17487870.2015.1065184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyadeen, D. (2016). “The Propagation and Management of Some Tropical Grass and Legume Forages.” Doctoral dissertation, University of the West Indies.
   Google Scholar
• Guyadeen, D. 2018. “Do Practicing Planners Value Plan Quality? Insights from a Survey of Planning Professionals in Ontario, Canada.” Journal of the American Planning Association 84 (1): 21–32. doi:10.1080/01944363.2017.1404486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyadeen, D. 2019. “Evaluating the Quality of Municipal Official Plans in the Ontario-Greater Golden Horseshoe Region, Canada.” Journal of Planning Education and Research,(July 2019),1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X19859648.
   Google Scholar
• Guyadeen, D., J. Thistlethwaite, and D. Henstra. 2019. “Evaluating the Quality of Municipal Climate Change Plans in Canada.” Climatic Change 152 (1): 121–143. doi:10.1007/s10584-018-2312-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyadeen, D., and M. Seasons. 2016. “Plan Evaluation: Challenges and Directions for Future Research.” Planning Practice & Research 31 (2): 215–228. doi:10.1080/02697459.2015.1081335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haarhoff, E., L. Beattie, J. Dixon, A. Dupuis, P. Lysnar, L. Murphy, and R. Solomon. 2012. Future Intensive: Insights for Auckland’s Housing. Transforming Cities: University of Auckland.
   Google Scholar
• Hoch, C. 2007. “How Plan Mandates Work: Affordable Housing in Illinois.” Journal of the American Planning Association 73 (1): 86–99. doi:10.1080/01944360708976138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovacs, J. 2010. “Cultural Plan Implementation and Outcomes in Ontario, Canada.” Cultural Trends 19 (3): 209–224. doi:10.1080/09548963.2010.495273.
   Google Scholar
• Laurian, L., J. Crawford, M. Day, P. Kouwenhoven, G. Mason, N. Ericksen, and L. Beattie. 2010. “Evaluating the Outcomes of Plans: Theory, Practice, and Methodology.” Environment and Planning. B, Planning & Design 37 (4): 740. doi:10.1068/b35051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurian, L., M. Day, M. Backhurst, P. Berke, N. Ericksen, J. Crawford, J. Dixon, and S. Chapman. 2004a. “What Drives Plan Implementation? Plans, Planning Agencies and Developers.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 47 (4): 555–577. doi:10.1080/0964056042000243230.
   Google Scholar
• Laurian, L., M. Day, P. Berke, N. Ericksen, M. Backhurst, J. Crawford, J. Dixon, et al. 2004b. “Evaluating Plan Implementation: A Conformance-Based Methodology.” Journal of the American Planning Association 70 (4): 471–480. DOI:10.1080/01944360408976395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, J. J., and A. T. Yang. 2006. “Does the Compact-city Paradigm Foster Sustainability? An Empirical Study in Taiwan.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 33 (3): 365–380. doi:10.1068/b31174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyles, W., and M. Stevens. 2014. “Plan Quality Evaluation 1994–2012: Growth and Contributions, Limitations, and New Directions.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 34 (4): 433–450. doi:10.1177/0739456X14549752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyles, W., P. Berke, and G. Smith. 2016. “Local Plan Implementation: Assessing Conformance and Influence of Local Plans in the United States.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 43 (2): 381–400. doi:10.1177/0265813515604071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minnery, J. R. 1992. “Urban Form and Development Strategies: Equity, Environmental and Economic Implications (No. 7).” Australian Government Pub. Service.
   Google Scholar
• New Zealand Housing Cooperation. 2004. “Best Practice in Medium Density Housing Design.”
   Google Scholar
• Norton, R. K. 2005. “More and Better Local Planning: State-mandated Local Planning in Coastal North Carolina.” Journal of the American Planning Association 71 (1): 55–71. doi:10.1080/01944360508976405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira, V., and P. Pinho. 2010. “Measuring Success in Planning: Developing and Testing a Methodology for Planning Evaluation.” Town Planning Review 81 (3): 307–332. doi:10.3828/tpr.2010.7.
   Google Scholar
• Opit, S., P. Carroll, and K. Witten. 2020. Community Acceptance of Medium Density Housing Development. Porirua, New Zealand: BRANZ.
   Google Scholar
• Padeiro, M. 2016. “Conformance in Land-use Planning: The Determinants of Decision, Conversion and Transgression.” Land Use Policy 55: 285–299. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.04.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pendall, R. 1999. “Do Land-use Controls Cause Sprawl?” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 26 (4): 555–571. doi:10.1068/b260555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian, Q., K. Fan, and E. Chan. 2016. “Regulatory Incentives for Green Buildings: Gross Floor Area Concessions.” Building Research & Information 44 (5–6): 675–693. doi:10.1080/09613218.2016.1181874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. 2011. “The Social Landscape of Planning: Integrating Social and Perceptual Research with Spatial Planning Information.” Landscape and Urban Planning 100 (4): 361–363. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.01.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seasons, M. 2003. “Monitoring and Evaluation in Municipal Planning: Considering the Realities.” Journal of the American Planning Association 69 (4): 430–440. doi:10.1080/01944360308976329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segura, S., and B. Pedregal. 2017. “Monitoring and Evaluation Framework for Spatial Plans: A Spanish Case Study.” Sustainability 9 (10): 1706. doi:10.3390/su9101706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistics New Zealand. (2015). “Statistics New Zealand”. Accessed 11 September 2019. http://www.stats.govt.nz/
   Google Scholar
• Statistics New Zealand. 2017. “Statistics New Zealand.” Accessed 15 September 2019
   Google Scholar
• Stelzenmüller, V., R. Cormier, K. Gee, R. Shucksmith, M. Gubbins, K. L. Yates, … S. A. Clarke. 2020. “Evaluation of Marine Spatial Planning Requires Fit for Purpose Monitoring Strategies.” Journal of Environmental Management 278: 111545. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, M. 2013. “Evaluating the Quality of Official Community Plans in Southern British Columbia.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 33 (4): 471–490. doi:10.1177/0739456X13505649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, M. R., and J. Shoubridge. 2015. “Municipal Hazard Mitigation Planning: A Comparison of Plans in British Columbia and the United States.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 58 (11): 1988–2014. doi:10.1080/09640568.2014.973479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, M. R., and M. Senbel. 2017. “Are Municipal Land Use Plans Keeping Pace with Global Climate Change?” Land Use Policy 68: 1–14. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.07.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talen, E. 1996. “After the Plans: Methods to Evaluate the Implementation Success of Plans.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 16 (2): 79–91. doi:10.1177/0739456X9601600201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talen, E. 2013. “Zoning for and against Sprawl: The Case for Form-based Codes.” Journal of Urban Design 18 (2): 175–200. doi:10.1080/13574809.2013.772883.
   Google Scholar
• Talen, E, and Knaap, G. 2003. “Legalizing smart growth: An empirical study of land use regulation in Illinois.„ Journal of Planning Education and Research 22(4): 345–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tashakkori, A., and C. Teddlie. 2008. “Quality of Inferences in Mixed Methods Research: Calling for an Integrative Framework.” Advances in Mixed Methods Research53 (7): 101–119.
   Google Scholar
• Van Draanen, J. 2017. “Introducing Reflexivity to Evaluation Practice: An In-depth Case Study.” American Journal of Evaluation 38 (3): 360–375. doi:10.1177/1098214016668401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, C., and C. Watkins. 2009. “Conceptualising Spatial Planning Outcomes: Towards an Integrative Measurement Framework.” Town Planning Review 80 (4–5): 481–517. doi:10.3828/tpr.2009.8.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, C., M. Baker, and S. Kidd. 2006. “Monitoring Spatial Strategies: The Case of Local Development Documents in England.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 24 (4): 533–552. doi:10.1068/c0553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 2013. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. California, United States: Sage publications.
   Google Scholar