The influence of EU policy on local policy-making, governance and urban change. Evidence from Porto, Portugal

References

• Allegra, M., S. Tulumello, A. Colombo, and J. Ferrão. 2020. “The (Hidden) Role of the EU in Housing Policy: The Portuguese Case in Multi-scalar Perspective.” European Planning Studies 28 (12): 2307–2329. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2020.1719474.
   Google Scholar
• Alves, S. 2008. “A diferença que a participação faz em iniciativas de regeneração urbana.” Sociedade e Território, no. 41: 8–18.
   Google Scholar
• Alves, S. 2013. “Evaluation and Evaluating the Community Initiative URBAN.” In 2nd International Scientific Conference, Regional Development, Spatial Planning and Strategic Governance (RESPAG), 22–25 May, 1–18. Belgrade: Institute of Architecture and Urban & Spatial Planning of Serbia.
   Google Scholar
• Alves, S. 2017. “Assessing the Impact of Area-based Initiatives in Deprived Neighborhoods: The Example of S. João de Deus in Porto, Portugal.” Journal of Urban Affairs 39 (3): 381–399. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2016.1245081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alves, S., and R. Branco. 2018. “With or without You: Models of Urban Requalification under Neoliberalism in Portugal.” In Changing Societies: Legacies and Challenges. Vol. I. Ambiguous Inclusions: Inside Out, outside In, edited by S. Aboim, P. Granjo, and A. Ramos, 457–479. Lisboa: Imprensa de Ciências Sociais.
   Google Scholar
• Antalovsky, E., J. S. Dangschat, and M. Parkinson, eds. 2005. European Metropolitan Governance Cities in Europe – Europe in the Cities. Final Report. Vienna and Liverpool: Europaforum Wien, EFW, EIUA and ISRA.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, H. 1995. “The Role and Evolution of European Community Regional Policy.” In Jones, Barry and Keating, Michael(Eds.,)The European Union and the Regions, 23–64. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Athanassiou, E. 2020. “Transferring Sustainability: Imaginaries and Processes in EU Funded Projects in Thessaloniki.” Urban Research & Practice 1–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2020.1783351.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, R. 2001. “The Emerging ‘Urban Agenda’ and the European Spatial Development Perspective: Towards an EU Urban Policy?” European Planning Studies 9 (3): 385–406. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310120037630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, R., and C. Rossignolo. 2010. “Cities and the ‘Soft Side’ of Europeanization: The Role of Urban Networks.” In The Europeanization of Cities. Policies, Urban Change & Urban Networks, edited by A. Hamedinger and A. Wolffhardt, 193–206. Amsterdam: Techne Press.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, R. 2015. “The Urban Dimension in Cohesion Policy: Past Developments and Future Prospects.” European Structural and Investment Funds Journal 3 (1): 21–31.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, R., and K. Zimmermann. 2016. “Cohesion Policy and Cities: An Ambivalent Relationship.” In Handbook on Cohesion Policy in the EU, edited by S. Piattoni and L. Polverari, 413–426. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Bachtler, J., and C. Mendez. 2007. “Who Governs EU Cohesion Policy? Deconstructing the Reforms of the Structural Funds.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 45 (3): 535–564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachtler, J., C. Mendez, and F. Wishlade. 2013. EU Cohesion Policy and European Integration. The Dynamics of EU Budget and Regional Policy Reform. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bachtler, J., M. Ferry, C. Méndez, and I. McMaster. 2006. “The 2007-13 Operational Programmes: A Preliminary Assessment.” In IQ-Net, Improving the Quality of Structural Funds Programming through Exchange of Experience, 15–17 January. Antwerp: European Policies Research Centre, University of Strathclyde.
   Google Scholar
• Balsas, C. J. L. 2004. “City Centre Regeneration in the Context of the 2001 European Capital of Culture in Porto, Portugal.” Local Economy: The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit 19 (4): 396–410. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0269094042000286873.
   Google Scholar
• Balsas, C. J. L. 2007. “City Centre Revitalization in Portugal: A Study of Lisbon and Porto.” Journal of Urban Design 12 (2): 231–259. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13574800701306328.
   Google Scholar
• Bandeirinha, J. A. 2007. O Processo SAAL E a Arquitectura No 25 De Abril De 1974. Coimbra: Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra.
   Google Scholar
• Börzel, T. A., and T. Risse. 2000. “When Europe Hits Home: Europeanization and Domestic Change.” European Integration Online Papers 4 (15): 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Branco, R., and S. Alves. 2018. “Urban Rehabilitation, Governance, and Housing Affordability: Lessons from Portugal.” Urban Research & Practice 13 (2): 157–179. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2018.1510540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branco, R., and S. Alves. 2020. “Outcomes of Urban Requalification under Neoliberalism: A Critical Appraisal of the SRU Model.” In Smagacz-Poziemska, MartaGómez, M. VictoriaPereira, PatríciaGuarino, LauraKurtenbach, SebastianVillalón, Juan JoséNot Started(Eds.,) Inequality and Uncertainty, 139–158. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Breda-Vázquez, I., P. Conceição, and R. Fernandes. 2009. “Partnership Diversity and Governance Culture: Evidence from Urban Regeneration Policies in Portugal.” Urban Studies 46 (10): 2213–2238. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009339433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breda-Vázquez, I., and S. Alves. 2004. “The Critical Role of Governance Structures in Oporto City-centre Renewal Projects.” In City Futures - International Conference in Globalization and Urban Change, EURA-UAA, 8-10 July. Chicago: University of Illinois.
   Google Scholar
• Câmara Municipal do Porto. 1998. Relatório Final Projecto Piloto Urbano da Sé, Porto. Porto: Câmara Municipal do Porto.
   Google Scholar
• Câmara Municipal do Porto. 2015. Plano Estrategico de Desenvolvimento Urbano do Porto. Versão da Candidatura Submetida ao Programa Operacional Regional Norte 2020. Setembro. Porto: Câmara Municipal do Porto.
   Google Scholar
• Câmara Municipal do Porto and PortoVivo. 2010. Management Plan. Historic Centre of Porto World Heritage. Porto: Câmara Municipal do Porto e Porto Vivo, SRU.
   Google Scholar
• Campos, V., and J. Ferrão. 2015. “Ordenamento do Território em Portugal: Uma Perspectiva Genealógica.” ICS Working Papers, no. 1.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, J. 2006. “Addressing Europe’s URBAN Challenges: Lessons from the EU URBAN Community Initiative.” Urban Studies 43 (12): 2145–2162. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980600990456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, J. 2010. “Integrated Urban Regeneration and Sustainability: Approaches from the European Union.” In Urban Regeneration and Social Sustainability: Best Practice from European Cities, edited by A. Colantonio and T. Dixon, 83–101. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, J. 2013. “Sustainable Urban Regeneration within the European Union: A Case of ‘Europeanization’?” The Routledge Companion to Urban Regeneration 138–147.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, J., M. G. Medina, M. Á. Huete García, and S. De Gregorio Hurtado. 2020. “Variegated Europeanization and Urban Policy: Dynamics of Policy Transfer in France, Italy, Spain and the UK.” European Urban and Regional Studies 27 (3): 227–245. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776419898508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho, L., P. Chamusca, J. Rio Fernandes, and J. Pinto. 2019. “Gentrification in Porto: Floating City Users and Internationally-driven Urban Change.” Urban Geography 40 (4): 565–572. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2019.1585139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavaco, C., R. Florentino, and A. Pagliuso. 2020. “Urban Policies in Portugal.” In Foregrounding Urban Agendas. The New Urban Issue in European Experiences of Policy-Making, edited by S. Armondi and S. De Gregorio Hurtado, 49–72. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Chamusca, P. 2011. “Polis XXI, governância e planemanento urbano no norte de Portugal: Impactos do programa de Regeneração Urbana.” In Trunfos de uma Geografia Activa: Desenvolvimento Local, Ambiente, Ordenamento e Tecnologia, edited by N. Santos and L. Cunha, 453–460. Coimbra: Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, C., 2015. Quando nos (des) Envolvemos em Projetos de Desenvolvimento Local… Análise Crítica da Prática Profissional. Instituto Superior de Serviço Social do Porto
   Google Scholar
• Costa, J. P. 2011. “Urban Rehabilitation Societies: The Oporto Case as a Reference in the Portuguese Practice.” In Bauhaus and the City: A Contested Heritage for A Challenging Future, edited by L. Colini and F. Eckardt, 88–112. Wurzburg: Verlag Königshausen & Neumann.
   Google Scholar
• Cotella, G. 2019. “The Urban Dimension of EU Cohesion Policy.” In Territorial Cohesion. The Urban Dimension, edited by E. Medeiros, 133–151. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• De Gregorio Hurtado, S. 2018. “The EU Urban Policy in the Period 2007–13: Lessons from the Spanish Experience.” Regional Studies, Regional Science 5 (1): 212–230. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2018.1480903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Gregorio Hurtado, S. 2019. “Understanding the Influence of EU Urban Policy in Spanish Cities: The Case of Málaga.” Urban Research & Practice 1–26. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2019.1690672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domingues, Á., N. Portas, and T. Sá Marques. 2007. “Portugal: Urban Policies or Policies with an Urban Incidence?” In National Policy Responses to Urban Challenges in Europe, edited by L. van den Berg, E. Braun, and J. van der Meer, 311–332. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Dossi, S. 2017. Cities and the European Union: Mechanisms and Modes of Europeanisation. Colchester: ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dukes, T. 2008. “The URBAN Programme and the European URBAN Policy Discourse: Successful Instruments to Europeanize the URBAN Level?” GeoJournal 72 (1–2): 105–119. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-008-9168-2.
   Google Scholar
• ECOTEC. 2010. URBAN II Evaluation. Case Study: Porto–Gondomar. An Isolated Success Story? Birmingham.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2003. Ex-post Evaluation. Urban Community Initiative (1994–1999). Final Report. Brussels. GHK on behalf of European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2008. Fostering the Urban Dimension: Analysis of the Operational Programmes Co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund (2007-2013). Working Document of the DG for Regional Policy. Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2010. Ex Post Evaluation of URBAN II. Case Study: Porto – Gondomar. An Isolated Success Story? Ex-Post Evaluation of Cohesion Policy Programmes 2000–2006: The URBAN Community Initiative. Brussels: Evaluation report.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2011. Desenvolvimento Urbano Sustentável em Portugal: Uma Abordagem Integrada. Brussels: DG Regio.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. 2014. The Role of Cities in Cohesion Policy 2014-2020. Brussels: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. 2014. “EUropeanisation or Europeanisation of Spatial Planning?” Planning Theory and Practice 15 (2): 155–169. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2014.902095.
   Google Scholar
• FDVC. 2001. Urban do Vale de Campanhã. Relatório Final. Porto: Fundação para o Desenvolvimento do Vale de Campanhã.
   Google Scholar
• Featherstone, K., and C. M. Radaelli, eds. 2003. The Politics of Europeanization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, V. M., and F. Indovina, eds. 1999. A cidade da EXPO’98: uma reconversão na frente ribeirinha de lisboa? Lisboa: Bizâncio.
   Google Scholar
• Green Cowles, M., J. A. Caporaso, and T. Risse, eds. 2001. Transforming Europe: Europeanization and Domestic Change. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gros, M. 1993. “Luta Contra a Exclusao Social: Assistencialismo Ou Desenvolvimento Local?” In Estruturas Sociais e Desenvolvimento – Actas do II Congresso de Socologia. Lisboa: Fragmentos.
   Google Scholar
• Guerra, P. 2004. “O Bairro do Cerco do Porto: Cenários de Pertenças, de Afectividades e de Simbologias.” In V Congresso Português de Sociologia. Sociedades Contemporâneas: Reflexividade e Acção, 12-15 Maio. Braga: Universidade do Minho, 51–56.
   Google Scholar
• Hamedinger, A., and A. Wolffhardt, eds. 2010. The Europeanization of Cities. Policies, Urban Change & Urban Networks. Amsterdam: Techne Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., ed. 1996. Cohesion Policy and European Integration: Building Multi-Level Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• John, P. 2001. Local Governance in Western Europe. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Le Galès, P. 2002. European Cities. Social Conflicts and Governance. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leonardi, R. 2005. “Cohesion Policy in the European Union: The Building of Europe.” In Cohesion Policy in the European Union. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Leonardi, R. 2006. “Cohesion in the European Union.” Regional Studies 40 (2): 155–166. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400600600462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liesbet, H., and G. Marks. 2001. Multi-Level Governance and European Integration. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Lobato, I. R., and S. Alves. 2012. “Urban Decay in Porto – Strengths and Weaknesses of Portuguese Regeneration Programmes.” In ENHR 2012 Conference: Housing: Local Welfare and Local Markets in a Globalised World. 24 to 27 June. Lillehammer: European Network on Housing Research.
   Google Scholar
• Magone, J. 2006. “The Europeanization of Portugal (1986–2006). A Critical View.” Nação E Defesa 115 (3a Série): 9–28.
   Google Scholar
• Mamede, L., and A. F. Tavares. 2010. “O Programa POLIS no processo de Governação Urbana.” In 4° Congresso Luso-Brasileiro Para o Planejamento Urbano, Regional, Integrado, Sustentável (PLURIS): The Challenges of Planning in a Web Wide World, 6–8 Outubro. Faro: Universidade do Algarve.
   Google Scholar
• Marques, T. S., M. Saraiva, G. Santinha, and P. Guerra. 2018. “Re-Thinking Territorial Cohesion in the European Planning Context.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 42 (4): 547–572. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, A. 2005. “Europeanization at the Urban Level: Local Actors, Institutions and the Dynamics of Multi-level Interaction.” Journal of European Public Policy 12 (4): 668–686. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760500160292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medeiros, E. 2014. “The ‘Europeanization of Spatial Planning Processes in Portugal within the EU Cohesion Policy Strategies (1989-2013).” Geography and Spatial Planning Journal, no. 6: 201–222. doi:https://doi.org/10.17127/got/2014.6.012.
   Google Scholar
• Medeiros, E., and A. van der Zwet. 2019. “Evaluating Integrated Sustainable Urban Development Strategies: A Methodological Framework Applied in Portugal.” European Planning Studies 4313: 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Medina, M. G., and V. Fedeli. 2015. “Exploring European Urban Policy: Towards an EU-national Urban Agenda?” Gestión Y Análisis De Políticas Públicas, no. 14: 8–22.
   Google Scholar
• Molle, W. 2007. European Cohesion Policy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mourão, J. 2019. “Regeneração urbana integrada, proteção do património cultural e eficiência ambiental como objetivos divergentes nas políticas urbanas em Portugal (2000–2020).” Cidades, Comunidades e Territórios, no. 38: 79–95.
   Google Scholar
• Neto, L., N. Pinto, and M. Burns. 2014. “Evaluating the Impacts of Urban Regeneration Companies in Portugal: The Case of Porto.” Planning Practice and Research 29 (5): 525–542. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2014.973685.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, A., F. Ferreira, and R. Dias. 2019. “A Cidade (Euro)governável: Políticas e Instrumentos de Governação Urbana no Portugal 2020.” In Ativar Cidades. Modelos de Políticas de Cidades, edited by P. C. Seixas, 39–53. Lisboa: Caleidoscópio.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, C., and I. Breda-Vázquez. 2011. “Territorial Governance in Portugal: Institutional Change or Institutional Resilience?” disP - the Planning Review 47 (186): 64–76. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2011.10557145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira, C., and I. Breda-Vázquez. 2012. “Europeanisation of Territorial Policies in Portugal and Italy: A Cross-national Comparison.” Policy & Politics 40 (1): 87–103. doi:https://doi.org/10.1332/030557310X520261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira, V., A. Martins, and S. S. Cruz. 2013. “Evaluating Urban Policies from a Resilience Perspective: The Case of Oporto.” In Resilience Thinking in Urban Planning, edited by A. Eraydin and T. Taşan-kok, 161–178. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, J. 2002. “The Many Faces of Europeanization.” Journal of Common Market Studies 40 (5): 921–952. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkinson, M., F. Bianchini, J. Dawson, R. Evans, and A. Harding, eds. 1992. Regional Development. Studies. Urbanization and the Functions of Cities in the European Community. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• Piattoni, S., and L. Polverari, eds. 2016. Handbook on Cohesion Policy in the EU. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Pinho, A. 2009. Conceitos e Políticas Europeias de Reabilitação Urbana. Análise da experiência portuguesa dos Gabinetes Técnicos Locais. Lisboa: Universidade Técnica de Lisboa.
   Google Scholar
• Queirós, J. 2007. “Estratégias e discursos políticos em torno da reabilitação de centros urbanos: Considerações exploratórias a partir do caso do Porto.” Sociologia, Problemas e Praticas 55 (1966): 91–116.
   Google Scholar
• Queirós, J. 2013. “Precariedade habitacional, vida quotidiana e relação com o Estado no centro histórico do Porto na transição da ditadura para a democracia.” Análise Social XLVIII (206): 102–133.
   Google Scholar
• Queirós, M. 2014. “Desarrollo urbano sostenible en la agenda de cohesión territorial europea: Política de Ciudades Polis XXI, Portugal.” Perspectiva Geográfica 18 (2): 303. doi:https://doi.org/10.19053/01233769.2680.
   Google Scholar
• Queirós, M., and M. Vale. 2005. “Ambiente Urbano e Intervenção Pública: O Programa POLIS.” In Comunicações do X Colóquio Ibérico de Geografia: A Geografia Ibérica no Contexto Europeu, 22 a 24 de Setembro, 1–16. Évora: Universidade de Évora.
   Google Scholar
• Radaelli, C. 2003. “The Europeanization of Public Policy.” In The Politics of Europeanization, edited by K. Featherstone and C. M. Radaelli, 27–56. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsden, P., and L. Colini, eds. 2013. Urban Development in the EU: 50 Projects Supported by the European Regional Development Fund during the 2007-13 Period. Brussels: European Commission, Directorate General for Regional and Urban Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Rio Fernandes, J. 2011. “Area-based Initiatives and Urban Dynamics. The Case of the Porto City Centre.” Urban Research & Practice 4 (3): 285–307. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2011.616747.
   Google Scholar
• Rio Fernandes, J., F. Teles, P. Chamusca, and J. Seixas. 2020. “The Power of the Cities and the Power in the Cities: A Multiscale Perspective from Portugal.” Boletín de la Asociación de Geógrafos Españole, no. 87. doi:https://doi.org/10.21138/bage.2978.
   Google Scholar
• Rosa, F., 2018. O Desenvolvimento Urbano Sustentável na Política de Coesão. Working Paper No. 2. Coleção Política e Territórios. Lisboa: Agência para o Desenvolvimento e Coesão, No. WP02.
   Google Scholar
• Santos, Á., and M. Branco-Teixeira. 2020. “The Contribution of Tourism to the Renegeration of Cities: A Route for Change.” Worldwide Hospitality and Tourism Themes 12 (6): 753–760. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/WHATT-07-2020-0074.
   Google Scholar
• Seixas, P. C. 2008. Entre Manchester e Los Angeles. Ilhas e novos condomínios no Porto: paradigmas sócio-espaciais, políticas da diferença e estruturas antropológicas urbanas. Porto: Edições Universidade Fernando Pessoa.
   Google Scholar
• Sequeira, J. P. 2011. “Ruptura(s) e Continuidade(s): A Reabilitação da Baixa e Centro Histórico do Porto.” In Diálogo Cultural entre Iberoamérica y Europa – Patrimonio Urbanístico Ilustrado: Experiencias y Proyectos en Brasil, Cuba, Guatemala, Portugal y España, 63–73. Valencia: Associação Internacional de Cidades e Entidades do Iluminismo.
   Google Scholar
• Sousa, S., and P. Pinho. 2016. “O planeamento de cidades em contração: o caso do Porto.” Boletim Regional, Urbano e Ambiental, no. 14: 93–106.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, M. 1994. “Towards a European Urban Policy.” Local Economy 9 (3): 266–277. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02690949408726240.
   Google Scholar
• Tofarides, M. 2003. Urban Policy in the European Union: A Multi-Level Gatekeeper System. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Tosics, I. 2016. “Integrated Territorial Investment. A Missed Opportunity?” In EU Cohesion Policy: Reassessing Performance and Direction, edited by J. Bachtler, P. Berkowitz, S. Hardy, and T. Muravska, 284–296. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• van den Berg, L., E. Braun, and J. van der Meer, eds. 2007. National Policy Responses to Urban Challenges in Europe. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Vinci, I. 2019. “How the EU Regional Policy Can Shape Urban Change in Southern Europe: Learning from Different Planning Processes in Palermo.” Urban Research & Practice 1–26. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2019.1672083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zerbinati, S. 2004. “Europeanization and EU Funding in Italy and England. A Comparative Local Perspective.” Journal of European Public Policy 11 (6): 1000–1019. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1350176042000298075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar