Power relations and local agency: a comparative study of European mining towns

References

• Bækkelund, N. G. 2021. “Change Agency and Reproductive Agency in the Course of Industrial Path Evolution.” Regional Studies 55 (4): 757–768. doi:10.1080/00343404.2021.1893291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baeten, G., E. Swyngedouw, and L. Albrechts. 1999. “Politics, Institutions and Regional Restructuring Processes: From Managed Growth to Planned Fragmentation in the Reconversion of Belgium’s Last Coal Mining Region.” Regional Studies 33 (3): 247–258. doi:10.1080/00343409950082436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birch, K., D. MacKinnon, and A. Cumbers. 2010. “Old Industrial Regions in Europe: A Comparative Assessment of Economic Performance.” Regional Studies 44 (1): 35–53. doi:10.1080/00343400802195147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjørgo, F., and A. Røiseland. 2018. “Taming Wickedness: Industrial Megaprojects and Local Governance Strategies.” Urban Research & Practice 11 (1): 37–52. doi:10.1080/17535069.2017.1291717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. A. 1997. “New Industries and Windows of Locational Opportunity: A Long-Term Analysis of Belgium.” Erdkunde 51 (1): 12–22. doi:10.3112/erdkunde.1997.01.02.
   Google Scholar
• Boschma, R., L. Coenen, K. Frenken, and B. Truffer. 2017. “Towards a Theory of Regional Diversification: Combining Insights from Evolutionary Economic Geography and Transition Studies.” Regional Studies 51 (1): 31–45. doi:10.1080/00343404.2016.1258460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner, N. 2004. New State Spaces: Urban Governance and the Rescaling of Statehood. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N. 2009. “Open Questions on State Rescaling.” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 2 (1): 123–139. doi:10.1093/cjres/rsp002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und nukleare Sicherheit (BMU). 2016. “Klimaschutzplan 2050.” Klimaschutzpolitische Grundsätze und Ziele der Bundesregierung. Berlin. https://www.bmu.de/fileadmin/Daten_BMU/Download_PDF/Klimaschutz/klimaschutzplan_2050_bf.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Coe, N. M., and D. C. Jordhus–Lier. 2011. “Constrained Agency? Re–evaluating the Geographies of Labour.” Progress in Human Geography 35 (2): 211–233. doi:10.1177/0309132510366746. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132510366746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Commission of the European Communities (EC). 2008. “Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council: The Raw Materials Initiative — Meeting Our Critical Needs for Growth and Jobs in Europe.” Commission of the European communities. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52008DC0699&from=SV
   Google Scholar
• Crevoisier, O. 2001. “Der Ansatz des Kreativen Milieus: Bestandsaufnahme und Forschungsperspektiven am Beispiel Urbaner Milieus.” Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsgeographie 45: 246–256.
   Google Scholar
• Cruickshank, J., W. Ellingsen, and K. Hidle. 2016. “A Crisis of Definition: Culture versus Industry in Odda, Norway.” Geografiska annaler. Series B, Human geography 95 (2): 147–161. doi:10.1111/geob.12014.
   Google Scholar
• Dale, B. 2002. “An Institutionalist Approach to Local Restructuring: The Case of Four Norwegian Mining Towns.” European Urban and Regional Studies 9 (1): 5–20. doi:10.1177/096977640200900101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emirbayer, M., and A. Mische. 1998. “What Is Agency?” The American Journal of Sociology 103 (4): 962–1023. doi:10.1086/231294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission (EC). 2018. “A Clean Planet for All. A European Strategic Long-term Vision for A Prosperous, Modern, Competitive and Climate Neutral Economy.” COM(2018) 773. Brussels. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52018DC0773
   Google Scholar
• European Union (EU). 2008. “Consolidated Version of the Treaty ON the Functioning of the European UNION - PART THREE: UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS - TITLE VII: COMMON RULES ON COMPETITION. TAXATION AND APPROXIMATION OF LAWS - Chapter 1: Rules on competition - Section 2: Aids granted by States - Article 107.” Brussels. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A12008E107
   Google Scholar
• Fitjar, R. D., and A. Rodríguez-Pose. 2011. “When Local Interaction Does Not Suffice: Sources of Firm Innovation in Urban Norway.” Environment & Planning A 43 (6): 1248–1267. doi:10.1068/a43516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garud, R., and P. Karnøe. 2001. Path Creation as a Process of Mindful Deviation, eds. P. Dependence, R. G. Creation, and P. Karnøe., 1–38. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Gherhes, C., T. Vorley, and C. Brooks. 2020. “Making Sense of Industrial Decline: How Legacies of the past Influence the Development of Entrepreneurship Cultures in Formerly Industrialized Places.” Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 32 (9–10): 899–921. doi:10.1080/08985626.2020.1842914.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gherhes, C., T. Vorley, and N. Williams. 2018. “Entrepreneurship and Local Economic Resilience: The Impact of Institutional Hysteresis in Peripheral Places.” Small Business Economics 51 (3): 577–590. doi:10.1007/s11187-017-9946-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Görmar, F., and J. Harfst. 2019. “Path Renewal or Path Dependence? The Role of Industrial Culture in Regional Restructuring.” Urban Science 3 (4): 106. doi:10.3390/urbansci3040106.
   Google Scholar
• Götze, S., and A. Joeres. 2021. “Kohleausstieg: Das Milliardengrab der Lausitz.” https://correctiv.org/aktuelles/klimawandel/2021/06/29/kohleausstieg-das-milliardengrab-der-lausitz-folgekosten-des-kohlebergbaus-milliardenausgaben-fuer-steuerzahler ( last check: 19/07/2021)
   Google Scholar
• Grabher, G. 1993. “The Weakness of Strong Ties. The Lock-in of Regional Development in the Ruhr Area.” In The Embedded Firm: On the Socioeconomic of Industrial Networks, edited by G. Grabher, 255–277. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, L. 2012. “Where Is Power in Governance? Why Geography Matters in the Theory of Governance.” Political Studies Review 10 (2): 208–220. doi:10.1111/j.1478-9302.2012.00260.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M. 2019. “Following or Breaking Regional Development Paths: On the Role and Capability of the Innovative Entrepreneur.” Regional Studies 53 (5): 681–691. doi:10.1080/00343404.2018.1463436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., J. V. Rekers, and M. Sotarauta. 2021. “Investigating Agency: Methodological and Empirical Challenges.” In Handbook on City and Regional Leadership, edited by M. Sotarauta and A. Beer, 302–323. London: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., J. V. Rekers, and M. Sotarauta. 2019. “Trinity of Change Agency: Connecting Agency and Structure in Studies of Regional Development (No. 2019/12).” Lund: Lund University, CIRCLE–Center for Innovation, Research and Competences in the Learning Economy.
   Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., and M. Sotarauta. 2020. “Trinity of Change Agency, Regional Development Paths and Opportunity Spaces.” Progress in Human Geography 44 (4): 704–723. doi:10.1177/0309132519853870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunko, M., N. Kinossian, G. Pivovar, K. Averkieva, and E. Batunova. 2021. Exploring Agency of Change in Small Industrial Towns through Urban Renewal Initiatives. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography. doi:10.1080/04353684.2020.1868947.
   Google Scholar
• Gwosdz, K., B. Domański, and E. Bilska-Wodecka. 2020. “Localised Capabilities as an Intermediating Factor in the Transition from an Old to a New Development Path: The Case of Post-socialist Industrial Towns.” Moravian Geographical Reports 28 (2): 123–135. doi:10.2478/mgr-2020-0010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harfst, J. 2021. “Framework Conditions and Development Potentials of (Old) Industrialised Towns and Regions in Central Europe.” PhD thesis. Leibniz University Hannover. https://www.repo.uni-hannover.de/bitstream/handle/123456789/11098/Dissertation%20Harfst%2C%20J%C3%B6rn.pdf?sequence=3&isAllowed=y
   Google Scholar
• Hassink, R. 2010. “Locked in Decline? On the Role of Regional Lock-ins in Old Industrial Areas.” In The Handbook of Evolutionary Economic Geography, edited by R. Boschma and R. Martin, 450–468. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Hodson, M. 2008. “Old Industrial Regions, Technology, and Innovation: Tensions of Obduracy and Transformation.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 40 (5): 1057–1075. doi:10.1068/a39103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson, R. 1992. Institutional Change, Cultural Transformation and Economic Regeneration: Myths and Realities from Europe’s Old Industrial Areas. Vol. 26. Durham: University of Durham, Department of Geography.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, R. 2005. “Rethinking Change in Old Industrial Regions: Reflecting on the Experiences of North East England.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 37 (4): 581–596. doi:10.1068/a36274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson, R. 2008. “Cultural Political Economy Meets Global Production Networks: A Productive Meeting?” Journal of Economic Geography 8 (3): 421–440. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbn005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson, R. 2016. “Rising Powers and the Drivers of Uneven Global Development.” Area Development and Policy 1 (3): 279–294. doi:10.1080/23792949.2016.1227271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A., S.-E. Jakobsen, R. Njøs, and R. Normann. 2019. “Regional Industrial Restructuring Resulting from Individual and System Agency.” Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 32 (1): 48–65. doi:10.1080/13511610.2018.1496322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. 2001. “Institutional Re(turns) and the Strategic – Relational Approach.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 33 (7): 1213–1235. doi:10.1068/a32183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. 2005. “Critical Realism and the Strategic-Relational Approach.” New Formations: A Journal of Culture, Theory and Politics 56: 40–53.
   Google Scholar
• Jolly, S., M. Grillitsch, and T. Hansen. 2020. “Agency and Actors in Regional Industrial Path Development. A Framework and Longitudinal Analysis.” Geoforum 111: 176–188. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.02.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, J., and T. Virág. 2021. “A Drop in the Sea or Catalyst for Change: Diverse Effects of the Place-based Approach in Europe.”European Planning Studies. 1–19. online first. doi:10.1080/09654313.2021.1928047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiruna kommun. 2002. “Översiktsplan för Kiruna kommun.” Del 1: Förutsättningar för sektorsövergripande utvecklingsplanering, Kiruna: Kiruna kommun.
   Google Scholar
• Kiss, É., and T. Tiner. 2012. “Depending on Motorways - Transport Connections of Hungarian Industrial Parks and Their Enterprises.” Hungarian Geographical Bulletin 61 (2): 131–153. https://ojs.mtak.hu/index.php/hungeobull/article/view/2999Kronenberg J. (2013). Linking Ecological Economics and Political Ecology to Study Mining, Glaciers and Global Warming Environmental Policy and Governance23, 75–90 (2013) Published online in Wiley Online Library
   Google Scholar
• Kronenberg, J. 2013. Linking Ecological Economics and Political Ecology to Study Mining, Glaciers and Global Warming. Envinronmental Policy and Governance 23: 75–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1605
   Google Scholar
• Lagendijk, A. 2007. “The Accident of the Region: A Strategic Relational Perspective on the Construction of the Region’s Significance.” Regional Studies 41 (9): 1193–1208. doi:10.1080/00343400701675579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lashitew, A., M. L. Ross, and E. Werker. 2020. What Drives Successful Economic Diversification in Resource-Rich Countries? Manchester: Effective States and Inclusive Development Research Centre, The University of Manchester.
   Google Scholar
• Laurence, D. C. 2006. “Why Do Mines Close?.” In Proceedings of the First International Seminar on Mine Closure, Perth (p. 83–94). Australian Centre for Geomechanics.
   Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D., A. Cumbers, A. Pike, K. Birch, and R. McMaster. 2009. “Evolution in Economic Geography: Institutions.” Political Economy, and Adaptation 85 (2): 129–150. doi:10.1111/j.1944-8287.2009.01017.x.
   Google Scholar
• Macleod G, Goodwin M.1999. ”Space, scale and state strategy: rethinking urban and regional governance.” Progress in Human Geography 23 (4): 503–527. doi:10.1191/030913299669861026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marot, N., and J. Harfst. 2012. “Post-Mining Potentials and Redevelopment of Former Mining Regions in Central Europe – Case Studies from Germany and Slovenia.” Acta geographica Slovenica 52 (1): 99–119. doi:10.3986/AGS52104.
   Google Scholar
• Massey, D. 1993. “Power-geometry and a Progressive Sense of Place.” In Mapping the Futures, edited by J. Bird, B. Curtis, T. Putnam, G. Robertson, and L. Tickner, 59–69. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Massey, D. 2005. For Space, 232. London: Open University.
   Google Scholar
• Miörner, J. 2020. “Contextualizing Agency in New Path Development: How System Selectivity Shapes Regional Reconfiguration Capacity.” Regional Studies 1–13. doi:10.1080/00343404.2020.1854713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, R. 2016. “Exploring How Fishermen Respond to the Challenges Facing the Fishing Industry: A Case Study of Diversification in the English Channel Fishery.” Regional Studies 50 (10): 1755–1768. doi:10.1080/00343404.2015.1057892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paasi, A. 2002. “Place and Region: Regional Worlds and Words.” Progress in Human Geography 26 (6): 802–811. doi:10.1191/0309132502ph404pr.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavlínek, P. 1998. ”Privatisation and the Regional Restructuring of Coal Mining in the Czech Republic After the Collapse of State Socialism.” In: Pickles, J. and A. Smith (eds.). Theorizing Transition: The Political Economy of Post-Communist Transformations. 207–227.
   Google Scholar
• Pavlínek, P. 2005. “Privatisation and the Regional Restructuring of Coal Mining in the Czech Republic after the Collapse of State Socialism.” In Theorizing Transition, edited by J. Pickles and A. Smith, 227–247. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pemberton, S., and M. Goodwin. 2010. “Rethinking the Changing Structures of Rural Local Government – State Power, Rural Politics and Local Political Strategies?” Journal of Rural Studies 26 (3): 272–283. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2009.12.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potluka, O., J. Kalman, I. Musiałkowska, and P. Idczak. 2018. “Civic Engagement in Local Politics in Central Europe.“ In Kerley, R., Liddle, J., Dunning, P. eds. The Routledge Handbook of International Local Government, 344–360. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rechnitzer, J. 2002. “A városhálózat az átmenetben, a kilencvenes évek változási irányai.” Tér és Társadalom 16 (3): 165–183. doi:10.17649/TET.16.3.1986.
   Google Scholar
• Regeringskansliet. 2013. Sveriges mineralstrategi. Näringsdepartementet.
   Google Scholar
• Riksrevisionen. 2017. Omvandlingen av Kiruna och Malmberget - bristande underlag hos regeringen ( RIR 2017:34).
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A. 2018. “The Revenge of the Places that Don’t Matter (And What to Do about It.” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 11 (1): 189–209. doi:10.1093/cjres/rsx024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmalz, S., I. Singe, and A. Hasenohr. 2021. “Political Discontent and Labour in A Post-growth Region: A View from East Germany.” Anthropological Theory 21 (3): 364–385. doi:10.1177/1463499620982784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, N. 2000. The restructuring of spatial scale and the new global geography of uneven development. Japanese Journal of Human Geography, 28: 51–66.
   Google Scholar
• Sotarauta, M., H. Kurikka, and J. Kolehmainen. 2021. “Patterns of Place Leadership: Institutional Change and Path Development in Peripheral Regions.” In Handbook on City and Regional Leadership, edited by M. Sotarauta and A. Beer, 203–225, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Sotarauta, M., and N. Mustikkamäki. 2014. “Institutional Entrepreneurship, Power, and Knowledge in Innovation Systems: Institutionalization of Regenerative Medicine in Tampere, Finland.” Environment and Planning. C, Government & Policy 33 (2): 342–357. doi:10.1068/c12297r. https://doi.org/10.1068/c12297r.
   Google Scholar
• Sotarauta, M., and N. Suvinen. 2018. “Institutional Agency and Path Creation.” In New Avenues for Regional Innovation Systems - Theoretical Advances, Empirical Cases and Policy Lessons, edited by A. Isaksen, R. Martin, and M. Trippl, 85–104. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Strambach, S. 2010. “Path Dependence and Path Plasticity: The Co-evolution of Institutions and Innovation–the German Customized Business Software Industry.” In The Handbook of Evolutionary Economic Geography, edited by R. Boschma and R. Martin, 406–429. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Suvinen, N. 2014. “Individual Actors Building an Innovation Network.” In The Social Dynamics of Innovation Networks, edited by R. Rutten, P. Benneworth, D. Irawati, and F. Boekema, 140–156. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Szirmai, V. A., A. Gergely, G. Baráth, B. Molnár, and Á. Szépvölgyi. 2002. Verseny és/vagy együttműködés? Budapest- Székesfehérvár: MTA Szociológiai Kutatóintézet, MTA RKK NYUTI.
   Google Scholar
• Uyarra, E., K. Flanagan, E. Magro, J. R. Wilson, and M. Sotarauta. 2017. “Understanding Regional Innovation Policy Dynamics.” Actors, Agency and Learning 35 (4): 559–568. doi:10.1177/2399654417705914.
   Google Scholar
• van Heur, B. 2010. “Beyond Regulation: Towards a Cultural Political Economy of Complexity and Emergence.” New Political Economy 15 (3): 421–444. doi:10.1080/13563460903290938.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venables, A. J. 2016. “Using Natural Resources for Development: Why Has It Proven so Difficult?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 30 (1): 161–184. doi:10.1257/jep.30.1.161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wirth, P., B. Cernic-Mali, and W. Fischer. 2012. Post-Mining Regions in Central Europe – Problems, Potentials, Possibilities, 272. München: oekom.
   Google Scholar
• Yeung, H. W. 2005. “Rethinking Relational Economic Geography.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 30 (1): 37–51. doi:10.1111/j.1475-5661.2005.00150.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar