References
- Alessandrini, A. 2016. CITYMOBIL2 (Cities demonstrating cybernetic mobility), Grant agreement ID: 314190. https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/314190/reporting.
- Bansal, P., K. M. Kockelman, and A. Singh. 2016. “Assessing Public Opinions of and Interest in New Vehicle Technologies: An Austin Perspective.” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 67: 1–14. doi:10.1016/j.trc.2016.01.019.
- Daziano, R. A., M. Sarrias, and B. Leard. 2017. “Are Consumers Willing to Let Their Cars Drive for Them? Analyzing Responses to Autonomous Vehicles.” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 78: 150–164. doi:10.1016/j.trc.2017.03.003.
- Eden, G., B. Nanchen, R. Ramseyer, and F. Evéquoz 2017. On the Road with an Autonomous Passenger Shuttle: Integration in Public Spaces. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1569–1576). Denver, CO.
- Frétigny, J. B. 2021. (In)visibilité et variabilité du rapport aux altermobilités dans le périurbain. Didier Desponds; Claire Fonticelli. Les Mutations du périurbain. De l’espace décrié aux territoires désirables ?, Le Manuscrit, pp.151–172. ffhal-03298820f
- Gorris, T., M. De Kievit, A. Solar, J. Katgerman, and S. Bekhor. 2011. “CityMobil: Towards Advanced Transport for the Urban Environment.” Deliverable D5.4.1Assessment of Automated Road Transport Systems contribution to Urban Sustainability.
- Hasiak, S. 2022. “La peur de la contamination à la COVID-19 est-elle responsable de la désaffection des réseaux de transports publics? La Covid : un bouleversement dans le monde des mobilités?” May 19, 2022 Webinar.
- Liljamo, T., H. Liimatainen, and M. Pöllänen. 2018. “Attitudes and Concerns on Automated Vehicles.” Transportation Research Part F, Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 59: 24–44. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2018.08.010.
- MACIF-Vedecom. (2022). 2eme édition du baromètre VEDECOM/MACIF : 3 Français sur 4 plébiscitent le véhicule autonome, qui pourrait jouer un rôle décisif en zone rurale. https://presse.macif.fr/actualites/2eme-edition-du-barometre-vedecom-macif-3-francais-sur-4-plebiscitent-le-vehicule-autonome-qui-pourrait-jouer-un-role-decisif-en-zone-rurale-50af-821df.html. Consulted 18/04/2023.
- Meneger, F. 2018. “Conception d’un service de transport par navettes autonomes acceptable et sécurisé : approche ergonomique par l’analyse des expériences vécues et des valeurs en acte.” Education. Université Clermont Auvergne. Français. NNT: 2018CLFAL010. tel–02066935.
- Nordhoff, S., J. de Winter, R. Madigan, N. Merat, B. Van Arem, and R. Happee. 2018. “User Acceptance of Automated Shuttles in Berlin-Schoneberg: A Questionnaire Study.” Transportation Research Part F 58: 843–854. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2018.06.024.
- Nordhoff, S., J. de Winter, W. Payre, B. van Arem, and R. Happee. 2019. “What Impressions Do Users Have After a Ride in an Automated Shuttle? An Interview Study.” Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 63 (may 2019): 252–269. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2019.04.009.
- Portouli, E., G. Karaseitanidis, P. Lytrivis, A. Amditis, O. Raptis, and C. Karaberi 2017. “Public Attitudes Towards Autonomous Mini Buses Operating in Real Conditions in a Hellenic City.” Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE intelligent vehicles symposium, (pp. 571–576). Los Angeles, CA.
- Shen, Y., H. Zhang, and J. Zhao. 2018. “Integrating Shared Autonomous Vehicle in Public Transportation System: A Supply-Side Simulation of the First-Mile Service in Singapore.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy & Practice 113: 125–136. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2018.04.004.