A formative research as the groundwork for designing evidence-based adherence promotion campaigns for patients on peritoneal dialysis

References

• National Institutes of Health. Treatment methods for kidney failure: peritoneal dialysis. 2006 [cited 2014 August 15]. Available from: http://kidney.niddk.nih.gov/kudiseases/pubs/peritoneal/.
   Google Scholar
• Schieppati A, Remuzzi G. Chronic renal diseases as a public health problem: epidemiology, social, and economic implications. Kidney Int 2005;68(S98):S7–S10. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.09801.x
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Projections of mortality and causes of death. 2014 [cited 2014 August 15]. Available from: http://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/projections/en/.
   Google Scholar
• Centre for Health Protection. Death rates by leading causes of death, 2001–2012. 2014 [cited 2014 August 15]. Available from: http://www.chp.gov.hk/en/data/4/10/27/117.html.
   Google Scholar
• Yu AWY, Chau KF, Ho YW, Li PKT. Development of the “peritoneal dialysis first” model in Hong Kong. Perit Dial Int 2007;27(S2):S53–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho YW, Chau KF, Choy BY, Fung KS, Cheng YL, Kwan TH, et al. Hong Kong renal registry report 2012. Hong Kong J Nephrol 2013;15(1):28–43. doi: 10.1016/j.hkjn.2013.03.005
   Google Scholar
• Stuart S, Booth TC, Cash CJ, Hameeduddin A, Goode JA, Harvey C, et al. Complications of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Radiographics 2009;29(2):441–60. doi: 10.1148/rg.292085136
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen AJ, Benotsch EG, Smith TW. Determinants of regimen adherence in renal dialysis. In: Gochman DS, (ed.) Handbook of health behavior research II: provider determinants. New York, NY: Springer; 1997. p. 231–44.
   Google Scholar
• Li PKT, Szeto CC, Piraino B, Bernardini J, Figueiredo AE, Gupta A, et al. Peritoneal dialysis-related infections recommendations: 2010 update. Perit Dial Int 2010;30:393–423. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2010.00049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segal JH, Messana JM. Prevention of peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis. Semin Dial 2013;26:494–502. doi: 10.1111/sdi.12114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mawar S, Gupta S, Mahajan S. Non-compliance to the continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis procedure increases the risk of peritonitis. Int Urol Nephrol 2012;44:1243–9. doi: 10.1007/s11255-011-0079-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang CH, Chen JB, Liao SC, Chuang FR, Hsu KT, Lee CT. Home visit in peritoneal dialysis patients. Acta Nephrol 2006;20:183–8.
   Google Scholar
• Dong J, Chen Y. Impact of the bag exchange procedure on risk of peritonitis. Perit Dial Int 2010;30:440–7. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2009.00117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griva K, Lai AY, Lim HA, Yu Z, Foo MWY. Newman SP. Non-adherence in patients on peritoneal dialysis: a systematic review. PLoS ONE 2014;9(2):e89001. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam LW, Twinn SF, Chan SW. Self-reported adherence to a therapeutic regimen among patients undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. J Adv Nurs 2010;66:763–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.05235.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkin C, Freimuth V. Formative evaluation research in campaign design. In: Rice R, Atkin C, (eds.) Public communication campaigns. 4th ed. Thousands Oak, CA: Sage; 2013. p. 53–68.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy A, Shaban RZ, Fairweather C. Compliance and peritoneal dialysis: lessons from the literature. Ren Soc Aust J 2010;6:55–66.
   Google Scholar
• Berg J, Evangelista L, Carruther D, Dunbar-Jacob J. Adherence. In: Lubkin I, Larsen P, (eds.) Chronic illness: impact and intervention. 8th ed. Burlington, MA: Jones & Barlett Learning; 2013. p. 207–43.
   Google Scholar
• Janz HK, Champion VL, Stretcher VJ. The health belief model. In: Glanz K, Rimer BK, Lewis FM, (eds.) Health behavior and health education: theory, research, & practice. 3rd ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2002. p. 45–66.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy ET, Shaban M, Boys J, Winch S. Compliance, normality, and the patient on peritoneal dialysis. Nephrol Nurs J 2010;37:243–50.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lok P. Stressors, coping mechanisms and quality of life among dialysis patients in Australia. J Adv Nurs 1996;23:873–81. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1996.00893.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aoki K, Muraoka K. Analysis of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) stressors in CAPD patients. Jpn J Nurs Res 1992;26(6):553–62.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura A. Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. Annu Rev Psychol 2001;52:1–26. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oka M, Chaboyer W. Influence of self-efficacy and other factors on dietary behaviours in Japanese haemodialysis patients. Int J Nurs Pract 2001;7:431–9. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-172X.2001.00334.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chow SKY, Wong FK. Health-related quality of life in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis: effects of a nurse-led case management program. J Adv Nurs 2010;66:1780–92. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05324.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luk WSC. Rehabilitation services for patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis in Hong Kong. Nurs Stand 2006;20(20):41–7. doi: 10.7748/ns2006.01.20.20.41.c4049
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilkinson S. Focus groups in health research. J Health Psychol 1998;3(3):329–48. doi: 10.1177/135910539800300304
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hennink MM. International focus group research: a handbook for the health and social sciences. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Lombard M, Snyder-Duch J, Bracken CC. Content analysis in mass communication: assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability. Hum Comm Res 2002;28(4):587–604. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00826.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao X, Liu J, Deng K. Assumptions behind intercoder reliability indices. In: Salmon C, (ed.) Communication yearbook 36. New York, NY: Routledge; 2013. p. 419–79.
   Google Scholar
• Witte K. Fear control and danger control: a test of the extended parallel process model (EPPM). Commun Monogr 1994;61:113–34. doi: 10.1080/03637759409376328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinstein ND. The precaution adoption process. Health Psychol 1988;7(4):355–86. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.7.4.355
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond MH. Beyond the Chinese face: insights from psychology. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Lam LW, Lee DTF, Shiu ATY. The dynamic process of adherence to a renal therapeutic regimen: perspectives of patients undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Int J Nurs Stud 2014;51(6):908–16. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.10.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinyard L, Kreuter MW. Using narrative communication as a tool for health behavior change: a conceptual, theoretical, and empirical overview. Health Educ Behav 2007;34(5):777–92. doi: 10.1177/1090198106291963
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green MC, Brock TC. In the mind's eye: transportation-imagery model of narrative persuasion. In: Green MC, Strange JJ, Brock TC, (eds.) Narrative impact: social and cognitive foundations. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 2002. p. 315–41.
   Google Scholar
• Bilandzic H, Busselle R. Narrative persuasion. In: Dillard J, Shen L, (eds.) The Sage handbook of persuasion. 2nd ed. Thousands Oak, CA: Sage; 2013. p. 200–19.
   Google Scholar
• Rothman AJ, Bartels RD, Wlaschin J, Salovey P. The strategic use of gain-and loss-framed messages to promote healthy behavior: how theory can inform practice. J Commun 2006;56:S202–20. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00290.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar