The personal use of Facebook by public health professionals in Canada: Implications for public health practice

References

• Wadsworth J. Canadians are the most active Facebook users in the world. Adweek. Available from: http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/canadians-still-the-most-active-facebook-users-in-the-world/295589. Published August 23, 2013 (Accessed August 9, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Aquisti A, Gross R. Imagined communities: awareness, information sharing, and privacy on the Facebook [Internet]. Privacy enhancing technologies workshop. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Griffith R, Tengnah C. District nurses' use of social networking sites: caution required. Br J Community Nurs 2011;16(9):455–7. doi:10.12968/bjcn.2011.16.9.455.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cruess S. Professionalism and medicine's social contract with society. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006;449(449):170–6. doi:10.1097/01.blo.0000229275.66570.97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weijs C, Coe J, Muise A, Christofides E, Desmarais S. Reputation management on Facebook: awareness is key to protecting yourself, your practice, and the veterinary profession. J Am AnimHosp Assoc 2014;50(4):227–36. doi:10.5326/jaaha-ms-6069.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chretien K, Kind T. Social media and clinical care: ethical, professional, and social implications. Circulation 2013;127(13):1413–21. doi:10.1161/circulationaha.112.128017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mechanic, D. Changing medical organization and the erosion of trust. Milbank Q 1996;74(2):171–89. doi:10.2307/3350245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald J, Sohn S, Ellis P. Privacy, professionalism and Facebook: a dilemma for young doctors. Med Educ 2010;44(8):805–13. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03720.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weijs CA, Coe JB, Christofides E, Muise A, Desmarais S. Facebook use among early-career veterinarians in Ontario, Canada (March to May 2010). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2013;242(8):1083–90. doi:10.2460/javma.242.8.1083.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christofides E, Muise A, Desmarais S. Information disclosure and control on Facebook: are they two sides of the same coin or two different processes? Cyberpsychol Behav 2009;12(3):341–5. doi:10.1089/cpb.2008.0226.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Christofides E, Muise A, Desmarais S. Hey Mom, what's on your Facebook? Comparing Facebook disclosure and privacy in adolescents and adults. Soc Psychol Pers Sci 2011;3(1):48–54. doi:10.1177/1948550611408619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couch LL, Jones WH. Measuring levels of trust. J Res Personal 1997;31:319–36. doi:10.1006/jrpe.1997.2186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellison NB, Steinfeld C, Lampe C. The benefits of Facebook ‘friends': social capital and college students' use of online social network sites. J Comput Mediat Commun 2007;12:1143–68. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santor DA, Messervey D, Kusumakar V. Measuring peer pressure, popularity and conformity in adolescent boys and girls: predicting school performance, school attitudes and substance abuse. J Youth Adolesc 2000;29:163–82. doi:10.1023/A:1005152515264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams K, Hean S, Sturgis P, MacLeod Clark J. Investigating the factors influencing professional identity of first-year health and social care students. Learn Health Soc Care 2006;5:55–68. doi:10.1111/j.1473-6861.2006.00119.x.
   Google Scholar
• Doohoo I, Martin W, Stryhn H. Confounding: detection and control. In: Doohoo I, Martin W, Stryhn H, (eds.) Methods in epidemiologic research. Charlottetown: MER Inc 2013; 2015. Chap. 13, p. 322–328.
   Google Scholar
• Bosslet GT, Torke AM, Hickman SE, Terry CL, Helft PR. The patient–doctor relationship and online social networks: results of a national survey. J Gen Intern Med 2011;26(10):1168–74. doi:10.1007/s11606-011-1761-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bankston K. Facebook's new privacy changes: the good, the bad, and the ugly. Electronic Frontier Foundation. Available from: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/12/facebooks-new-privacy-changes-good-bad-and-ugly (Accessed June 20, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Stutzman F, Gross R, Acquisti A. Silent listeners: the evolution of privacy and disclosure on Facebook. J Privacy Confidentiality 2013;4(2). Available from: http://repository.cmu.edu/jpc/vol4/iss2/2 (Accessed June 20, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Utz S, Tanis M, Vermeulen I. It is all about being popular: the effects of need for popularity on social network site use. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 2012;15(1):37–42. doi:10.1089/cyber.2010.0651.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Medical Association. Social media and the medical profession. A guide to online professionalism for medical practitioners and medical students. Available from: http://www.amawa.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Social-Media-and-the-Medical-Profession_FINAL-with-links.pdf (Accessed June 20, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• New Zealand Nurses Organization. NZNO National Student Unit, Nurse Educators in the Tertiary Sector. Social media and the nursing profession. Available from: http://nurseducation.org.nz/content/download/436/1728/file/Social%20Media%20and%20the%20Nursing%20Profession%20FINAL.pdf (Accessed June 21, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Tazghini S, Siedlecki K. A mixed method approach to examining Facebook use and its relationship to self-esteem. Comput Hum Behav 2013;29(3):827–32. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.11.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaucher D, Wood J, Stinson D, Forest A, Holmes J, Logel C. Perceived regard explains self-esteem differences in expressivity. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 2012;38(9):1144–56. doi:10.1177/0146167212445790.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hew K. Students' and teachers' use of Facebook. Comput Hum Behav 2011;27(2):662–76. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.11.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• boyd D, Hargittai E. Facebook privacy settings: who cares? First Monday 2010;15(8). doi:10.5210/fm.v15i8.3086.
   Google Scholar
• Manago A, Taylor T, Greenfield P. Me and my 400 friends: the anatomy of college students' Facebook networks, their communication patterns, and well-being. Dev Psychol 2012;48(2):369–80. doi:10.1037/a0026338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinfield C, Ellison N, Lampe C. Social capital, self-esteem, and use of online social network sites: a longitudinal analysis. J Appl Dev Psychol 2008;29(6):434–45. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2008.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hampton KN, Goulet L, Rainie L, Purcell K. Social networking sites and our lives. Available from: http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/Technology-and-social-networks/Summary.aspx (Acccessed July 14, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Walther J, Van Der Heide B, Hamel L, Shulman H. Self-generated versus other-generated statements and impressions in computer-mediated communication: a test of warranting theory using Facebook. Commun Res 2009;36(2):229–53. doi:10.1177/0093650208330251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowman N, Westerman D, Claus C. How demanding is social media: understanding social media diets as a function of perceived costs and benefits – a rational actor perspective. Comput Hum Behav 2012;28(6):2298–305. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.06.037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee H, Park H, Kim J. Why do people share their context information on social network services? A qualitative study and an experimental study on users' behavior of balancing perceived benefit and risk. Int J Hum-Comput St 2013;71(9):862–77. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2013.01.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petronio S. Boundaries of privacy: dialects of disclosure. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Lange P. Commenting on YouTube rants: perceptions of inappropriateness or civic engagement? J Pragmat 2014;73:53–65. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.07.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar