How sympathy and fear mediate the interplay between benefit and scarcity appeal organ donation messages

References

• Klarenbach SW, Tonelli M, Chui B, Manns BJ. Economic evaluation of dialysis therapies. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2014;10(11):644–652. doi:10.1038/nrneph.2014.145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao J, Chao T, Tuan T, Kong C, Chen S. Long-term outcome in patients receiving permanent pacemaker implantation for atrioventricular block. Medicine. 2016;95(35):e4668. doi:10.1097/md.0000000000004668.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Citerio G, Cypel M, Dobb GJ, Dominguez-Gil B, Frontera JA, Greer DM, et al. Organ donation in adults: a critical care perspective. Intensive Care Med. 2016;42(3):305–315. doi:10.1007/s00134-015-4191-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dalen HP, Henkens K. Comparing the effects of defaults in organ donation systems. Soc Sci Med. 2014;106:137–142. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.01.052.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organ donation statistics. (2020 Jun 16). Organ donor. https://www.organdonor.gov/statistics-stories/statistics.html.
   Google Scholar
• Hirschberger G, Ein-Dor T, Almakias S. The self-protective altruist: terror management and the ambivalent nature of prosocial behavior. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008;34(5):666–678. doi:10.1177/0146167207313933.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan SE, Stephenson MT, Harrison TR, Afifi WA, Long SD. Facts versus `feelings’. J Health Psychol. 2008;13(5):644–658. doi:10.1177/1359105308090936.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parisi N, Katz I. Attitudes toward posthumous organ donation and commitment to donate. Health Psychology. 1986;5(6):565–580. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.5.6.565.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen EL, Hoffner C. Gifts of giving: The role of empathy and perceived benefits to others and self in young adults’ decisions to become organ donors. J Health Psychol. 2012;18(1):128–138. doi:10.1177/1359105311433910.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan S, Miller J. Communicating about gifts of life: the effect of knowledge, attitudes, and altruism on behavior and behavioral intentions regarding organ donation. J Appl Commun Res. 2002;30(2):163–178. doi:10.1080/00909880216580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mani A, Mullainathan S, Shafir E, Zhao J. Poverty impedes cognitive function. Science. 2013;341(6149):976–980. doi:10.1126/science.1238041.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brock TC. Implications of commodity theory for value change. In: AG Grecnwald, TC Brock, TM Ostrom, editors. Psychological foundations of altitudes. New York: Academic Press; 1968. p. 243–275.
   Google Scholar
• Van Lange PA. Beyond self-interest: A set of propositions relevant to interpersonal orientations. Eur Rev Soc Psychol. 2000;11(1):297–331. doi:10.1080/14792772043000068.
   Google Scholar
• Frimer JA, Walker LJ, Dunlop WL, Lee BH, Riches A. The integration of agency and communion in moral personality: evidence of enlightened self-interest. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011;101(1):149–163. doi:10.1037/a0023780.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong S, Lee Y. How perceived similarity moderates sympathy and pride appeal in organ donation messages. Transplantation Proceedings. 2021;53 (7):2105–2111. doi:10.1016/j.transproceed.2021.07.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner JS, Keltner D. Beyond valence: toward a model of emotion-specific influences on judgement and choice. Cogn Emot. 2000;14(4):473–493. doi:10.1080/026999300402763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sander D, Grafman J, Zalla T. The human amygdala: an evolved system for relevance detection. Rev Neurosci. 2003;14(4). doi:10.1515/revneuro.2003.14.4.303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyde MK, White KM. Undefined. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2009;39(4):880–900. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00464.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis MH. EMPATHY : a social psychological approach. New York: Routledge; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• De Dreu CK, Nauta A. Self-interest and other-orientation in organizational behavior: implications for job performance, prosocial behavior, and personal initiative. J Appl Psychol. 2009;94(4):913–926. doi:10.1037/a0014494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cialdini RB, Brown SL, Lewis BP, Luce C, Neuberg SL. Reinterpreting the empathy–altruism relationship: when one into one equals oneness. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1997;73(3):481–494. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.3.481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White K, Peloza J. Self-benefit versus other-benefit marketing appeals: their effectiveness in generating charitable support. J Mark. 2009;73(4):109–124. doi:10.1509/jmkg.73.4.109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brug J, Vugt MV, Van Den Borne B, Brouwers A, Hooff HV. Predictors of willingness to register as an organ donor among Dutch adolescents. Psychol Health. 2000;15(3):357–368. doi:10.1080/08870440008401998.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clemens KK, Thiessen-Philbrook H, Parikh CR, Yang RC, Karley ML, Boudville N, et al. Psychosocial health of living kidney donors: a systematic review. Am J Transplant. 2006;6(12):2965–2977. doi:10.1111/j.1600-6143.2006.01567.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Berg H, Manstead AS, Van der Pligt J, Wigboldus DH. The role of affect in attitudes toward organ donation and donor-relevant decisions. Psychol Health. 2005;20(6):789–802. doi:10.1080/14768320500161786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X. Predictors of organ donation-related cognitions and intentions in China: communication variables and cultural values. Commun Q. 2020;68(4):438–456. doi:10.1080/01463373.2020.1821734.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristofferson K, McFerran B, Morales AC, Dahl DW. The dark side of scarcity promotions: how exposure to limited-quantity promotions can induce aggression. J Consum Res. 2016; doi:10.1093/jcr/ucw056.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salerno A, Sevilla J. Scarce foods are perceived as having more calories. J Consum Psychol. 2019;29(3):472–482. doi:10.1002/jcpy.1090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levontin L, Ein-Gar D, Lee AY. Acts of emptying promote self-focus: a perceived resource deficiency perspective. J Consum Psychol. 2015;25(2):257–267. doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2014.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraus MW, Piff PK, Mendoza-Denton R, Rheinschmidt ML, Keltner D. Social class, solipsism, and contextualism: how the rich are different from the poor. Psychol Rev. 2012;119(3):546–572. doi:10.1037/a0028756.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piff PK, Kraus MW, Côté S, Cheng BH, Keltner D. Having less, giving more: the influence of social class on prosocial behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010;99(5):771–784. doi:10.1037/a0020092.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roux C, Goldsmith K, Bonezzi A. On the psychology of scarcity: when reminders of resource scarcity promote selfish (and generous) behavior. J Consum Res. 2015; doi:10.1093/jcr/ucv048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batson CD. Altruism and prosocial behavior. In: DT Gilbert, ST Fiske, G Lindzey, editor. The handbook of social psychology. Vol. 2. Boston: McGraw-Hill; 1998. p. 282–316.
   Google Scholar
• Leach CW, Snider N, Iyer A. “Poisoning the consciences of the fortunate”: The experience of relative advantage and support for social equality. In: I Walker, HJ Smith, editors. Relative deprivation: specification, development, and integration. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2002. p. 136–163.
   Google Scholar
• Kitayama S, Mesquita B, Karasawa M. Cultural affordances and emotional experience: socially engaging and disengaging emotions in Japan and the United States. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006;91(5):890–903. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.5.890.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wispé L. The distinction between sympathy and empathy: to call forth a concept, a word is needed. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986;50(2):314–321. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Underwood B, Moore B. Perspective-taking and altruism. Psychol Bull. 1982;91(1):143–173. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.91.1.143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mead GH. Mind, self and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1934.
   Google Scholar
• Reniers RL, Corcoran R, Drake R, Shryane NM, Völlm BA. The QCAE: a questionnaire of cognitive and affective empathy. J Pers Assess. 2011;93(1):84–95. doi:10.1080/00223891.2010.528484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massi Lindsey LL, Ah Yun K. The relationship between narrative content variation, affective and cognitive reactions, and a person's willingness to sign an organ donor card. Commun Res Rep. 2005;22(4):253–263. doi:10.1080/00036810500317441.
   Google Scholar
• Lench H, Levine L. Effects of fear on risk and control judgements and memory: implications for health promotion messages. Cogn Emot. 2005;19(7):1049–1069. doi:10.1080/02699930500203112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yzer MC, Southwell BG, Stephenson MT. Inducing fear as a public communication campaign strategy. Public Commun Campaigns. 2012: 163–176. doi:10.4135/9781544308449.n11.
   Google Scholar
• Smith CA, Ellsworth PC. Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1985;48(4):813–838. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.48.4.813.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frijda NH. The emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Lazarus RS. Progress on a cognitive-motivational-relational theory of emotion. Am Psychol. 1991;46(8):819–834. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.46.8.819.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain P, Ellithorpe ME. Mortality salience influences attitudes and information-seeking behavior related to organ donation. J Commun Healthc. 2016;9(2):126–134. doi:10.1080/17538068.2016.1183937.
   Google Scholar
• Clary EG, Snyder M, Ridge RD, Copeland J, Stukas AA, Haugen J, et al. Understanding and assessing the motivations of volunteers: A functional approach. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998;74(6):1516–1530. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy R, Sharma P. Scarcity appeal in advertising: exploring the moderating roles of need for uniqueness and message framing. J Advert. 2015;44(4):349–359. doi:10.1080/00913367.2015.1018459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feeley TH, Servoss TJ. Examining college students’ intentions to become organ donors. J Health Commun. 2005;10(3):237–249. doi:10.1080/10810730590934262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chun JW, Lee MJ. Increasing individuals’ involvement and WOM intention on social networking sites: content matters!. Comput Human Behav. 2016;60:223–232. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair J, Anderson R, Black B, Babin B. Multivariate data analysis. New York: Pearson Higher Ed; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Smith R, Quinlan D, Schwartz GE, Sanova A, Alkozei A, Lane RD. Developmental contributions to emotional awareness. J Pers Assess. 2019;101(2):150–158. doi:10.1080/00223891.2017.1411917.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes AF. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach. 2nd ed. New York: The Guilford Press; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Batson CD, Lishner DA, Stocks EL. The empathy–altruism hypothesis. Oxford Handb Prosocial Behav. 2015; doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195399813.013.023.
   Google Scholar
• Berinsky AJ, Huber GA, Lenz GS. Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com’s mechanical turk. Polit Anal. 2012;20(3):351–368. doi:10.1093/pan/mpr057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levay KE, Freese J, Druckman JN. The demographic and political composition of mechanical turk samples. Sage Open. 2016;6(1). 2158244016636433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zizzo DJ. Experimenter demand effects in economic experiments. Exp Econ. 2010;13(1):75–98. doi:10.1007/s10683-009-9230-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feeley TH, Harris KE, Yang JZ. Measuring attitudes toward organ donation. Prog Transplant. 2020;30(2):182–183. doi:10.1177/1526924820913519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar