Implementing a clinical decision-support system in practice: A qualitative analysis of influencing attitudes and characteristics among general practitioners

References

• Kaplan B. Evaluating informatics applications—clinical decision support systems literature review. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2001; 64: 15–37
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaushal R, Shojania K G, Bates D W. Effects of computerized physician order entry and clinical decision support systems on medication safety: a systematic review. Archives of Internal Medicine 2003; 163: 1409–1416
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balas E A, Austin S M, Mitchell J A, Ewigman B G, Bopp K D, Brown G D. The clinical value of computerized information services. A review of 98 randomized clinical trials. Archives of Family Medicine 1996; 5: 271–278
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Garg A X, Adhikari N K, McDonald H, et al. Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA 2005; 293: 1223–1238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt D L, Haynes R B, Hanna S E, Smith K. Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA 1998; 280: 1339–1346
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston M E, Langton K B, Haynes R B, Mathieu A. Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on clinician performance and patient outcome. A critical appraisal of research. Annals of Internal Medicine 1994; 120: 135–142
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiffman R N, Liaw Y, Brandt C A, Corb G J. Computer-based guideline implementation systems: a systematic review of functionality and effectiveness. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 1999; 6: 104–114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig J C, Irwig L M, Stockler M R. Evidence-based medicine: useful tools for decision making. Medical Journal of Australia 2001; 174: 248–253
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne T H. Computer decision support systems. Chest 2000; 118: 47S–52S
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Short D, Frischer M, Bashford J. Barriers to the adoption of computerised decision support systems in general practice consultations: a qualitative study of GPs' perspectives. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2004; 73: 357–362
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth N, Robinson P, Kohannejad J. Identification of high-quality consultation practice in primary care: the effects of computer use on doctor – patient rapport. Informatics in Primary Care 2004; 12: 75–83
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kaplan B. Evaluating informatics applications—some alternative approaches: theory, social interactionism, and call for methodological pluralism. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2001; 64: 39–56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ammenwerth E, Graber S, Herrmann G, Burkle T, Konig J. Evaluation of health information systems—problems and challenges. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2003; 71: 125–135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson M, Jenkings K N, Wilson R, Purves I. Multi-tasking in practice: coordinated activities in the computer supported doctor-patient consultation. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2005; 74: 425–436
   Google Scholar
• Ammenwerth E, Iller C, Mansmann U. Can evaluation studies benefit from triangulation? A case study. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2003; 70: 237–248
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson M, Bohlin J, Eklund P. Development and maintenance of guideline-based decision support for pharmacological treatment of hypertension. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 2000; 61: 209–219
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guidelines for the diagnosis of heart failure. The Task Force on Heart Failure of the European Society of Cardiology. European Heart Journal 1995; 16: 741–751
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• The treatment of heart failure. Task Force of the Working Group on Heart Failure of the European Society of Cardiology. European Heart Journal 1997; 18: 736–753
   Google Scholar
• Läkemedelsverket. Behandling av hjärtsvikt och asymtomatisk vänsterkammardysfunktion – rekommendationer [Treatment of heart failure and asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction – recommendations]. Information från Läkemedelsverket [Information from the Medical Product Agency] 2000;11:7 – 21.
   Google Scholar
• Berg B L. An introduction to content analysis. Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Allyn & Bacon, Boston 2006; 303–339
   Google Scholar
• Graneheim U H, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today 2004; 24: 105–112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon D R, Stewart M. Exploring information technology adoption by family physicians: survey instrument valuation. Proceedings, AMIA Annual Symposium. 2000, 185–189
   Google Scholar
• Valenta A L, Wigger U. Q-methodology: definition and application in health care informatics. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 1997; 4: 501–510
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis F D. User acceptance of information technology—system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. International Journal of Man – Machine Studies 1993; 38: 475–487
   Google Scholar
• Shengnan H. Individual adoption of information systems in organisations: a literature review of technology acceptance model. Turku Centre for Computer Science, TurkuFinland 2003
   Google Scholar
• Jerant A F, Lloyd A J. Applied medical informatics and computing skills of students, residents, and faculty. Family Medicine 2000; 32: 267–272
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chew F, Grant W, Tote R. Doctors on-line: using diffusion of innovations theory to understand internet use. Family Medicine 2004; 36: 645–650
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elson R B, Connelly D P. Computerized decision support systems in primary care. Primary Care 1995; 22: 365–384
   Google Scholar
• Adams A, Blandford A, Attfield S. Implementing digital resources for clinicians' and patients' varying needs. Medical Informatics and the Internet in Medicine 2005; 30: 107–122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coumou H C, Meijman F J. How do primary care physicians seek answers to clinical questions? A literature review. Journal of the Medical Library Association 2006; 94: 55–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman C P, Wyatt J C. Subjectivist approaches to evaluation. Evaluation methods in medical informatics, C P Friedman, J C Wyatt. Springer, New York 1997; 205–221
   Google Scholar
• Brown S H, Coney R D. Changes in physicians' computer anxiety and attitudes related to clinical information system use. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 1994; 1: 381–394
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chew-Graham C A, May C R, Perry M S. Qualitative research and the problem of judgement: lessons from interviewing fellow professionals. Family Practice 2002; 19: 285–289
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar