Semantic typing of linked geoprocessing workflows

References

• Allen, D. W. 2011. Getting to Know ArcGIS ModelBuilder. Redlands, CA: Esri Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alper, P., K. Belhajjame, C. A. Goble, and P. Karagoz. 2015. “LabelFlow: Exploiting Workflow Provenance to Surface Scientific Data Provenance.” Paper presented at provenance and annotation of data and processes: 5th international provenance and annotation workshop, IPAW 2014, Cologne, Germany, June 9–13. Revised Selected Papers, edited by B. Ludäscher and B. Plale, 84–96. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Anselin, L., S. J. Rey, and W. Li. 2014. “Metadata and Provenance for Spatial Analysis: The Case of Spatial Weights.” International Journal of Geographical Information Science 28 (11): 2261–2280. doi: 10.1080/13658816.2014.917313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Athanasis, N., K. Kalabokidis, M. Vaitis, and N. Soulakellis. 2009. “Towards a Semantics-Based Approach in the Development of Geographic Portals.” Computers & Geosciences 35 (2): 301–308. doi: 10.1016/j.cageo.2008.01.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belhajjame, K., J. Zhao, D. Garijo, M. Gamble, K. Hettne, R. Palma, E. Mina, O. Corcho, J. M. Gómez-Pérez, S. Bechhofer, G. Klyne, and C. Goble. 2015. “Using a Suite of Ontologies for Preserving Workflow-Centric Research Objects.” Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web 32: 16–42. doi: 10.1016/j.websem.2015.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brauner, J. 2015. “Formalizations for Geooperators – Geoprocessing in Spatial Data Infrastructures.” Ph.D. thesis. TU Dresden. Dresden, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Burrough, P. A., R. A. McDonnell, R. McDonnell, and C. D Lloyd. 2015. Principles of Geographical Information Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Closa, G., J. Masó, B. Proß, and X. Pons. 2017. “W3C PROV to Describe Provenance at the Dataset, Feature and Attribute Levels in a Distributed Environment.” Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 64: 103–117. doi: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2017.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daga, E., M. d'Aquin, A. Gangemi, and E. Motta. 2014. “Describing Semantic Web Applications through Relations between Data Nodes.” Technical report. Milton Keynes: Knowledge Media Institute, The Open University.
   Google Scholar
• Drummond, C.. 2009. “Replicability is Not Reproducibility: Nor is it Good Science.” Paper presented at the evaluation methods for machine learning workshop at the 26th ICML, Montreal, Canada, Ottawa, Canada: National Research Council of Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzner, D., J. Hoffmann, and E. Klien. 2011. “Functional Description of Geoprocessing Services as Conjunctive Datalog Queries.” GeoInformatica 15 (1): 191–221. doi: 10.1007/s10707-009-0093-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gangemi, A., and V. Presutti. 2009. “Ontology Design Patterns.” In Handbook on Ontologies, edited by S. Staab and R. Studer, 2nd ed., 221–243. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Geertman, S., T. de Jong, and C. Wessels. 2003. “Flowmap: A Support Tool for Strategic Network Analysis.” In Planning Support Systems in Practice, edited by S. Geertman and J. Stillwell, 155–175. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gil, Y., E. Deelman, M. Ellisman, T. Fahringer, G. Fox, D. Gannon, C. Goble, M. Livny, L. Moreau, and J. Myers. 2007. “Examining the Challenges of Scientific Workflows.” IEEE Computer 40 (12): 26–34. doi: 10.1109/MC.2007.421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grosof, B. N., I. Horrocks, R. Volz, and S. Decker. 2003. “Description Logic Programs: Combining Logic Programs with Description Logic.” Paper presented at proceedings of the 12th international conference on the World Wide Web, 48–57. New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Guttag, J. V., and J. J. Horning. 1978. “The Algebraic Specification of Abstract Data Types.” Acta Informatica 10 (1): 27–52. doi: 10.1007/BF00260922
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinsen, K. 2014. “Computational Science: Shifting the Focus from Tools to Models.” F1000Research 3 (101). doi:10.12688/f1000research.3978.2
   Google Scholar
• Hofer, B. 2015. “Uses of Online Geoprocessing Technology in Analyses and Case Studies: A Systematic Analysis of Literature.” International Journal of Digital Earth 8 (11): 901–917. doi: 10.1080/17538947.2014.962632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofer, B., S. Mäs, J. Brauner, and L Bernard. 2017. “Towards a Knowledge Base to Support Geoprocessing Workflow Development.” International Journal of Geographical Information Science 31 (4): 694–716. doi: 10.1080/13658816.2016.1227441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janowicz, K., F. van Harmelen, J. A. Hendler, and P. Hitzler. 2015. “Why the Data Train Needs Semantic Rails.” AI Magazine 36 (1): 5–14. doi: 10.1609/aimag.v36i1.2560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, W. 2012. “Core Concepts of Spatial Information for Transdisciplinary Research.” International Journal of Geographical Information Science 26 (12): 2267–2276. doi: 10.1080/13658816.2012.722637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, W., and A. Ballatore. 2015. “Designing a Language for Spatial Computing.” In AGILE 2015: Geographic Information Science as an Enabler of Smarter Cities and Communities, edited by F. Bacao, M. Y. Santos, and M. Painho, 309–326. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, W., T. Kauppinen, and K. Janowicz. 2014. “Linked Data: A Paradigm Shift for Geographic Information Science.” In Geographic Information Science, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 8728, edited by M. Duckham, E. Pebesma, K. Stewart, and A. U. Frank, 173–186. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lemmens, R., A. Wytzisk, R. By, C. Granell, M. Gould, and P. van Oosterom. 2006. “Integrating Semantic and Syntactic Descriptions to Chain Geographic Services.” IEEE Internet Computing 10 (5): 42–52. doi: 10.1109/MIC.2006.106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowe, M. 2014. “Night Lights and ArcGIS: A Brief Guide.” [Online; accessed Jun-2016] http://economics.mit.edu/files/8945.
   Google Scholar
• Ludäscher, B., K. Lin, S. Bowers, E. Jaeger-Frank, B. Brodaric, and C. Baru. 2006. “Managing Scientific Data: From Data Integration to Scientific Workflows.” Geological Society of America Special Papers 397: 109–129.
   Google Scholar
• Lutz, M. 2007. “Ontology-Based Descriptions for Semantic Discovery and Composition of Geoprocessing Services.” GeoInformatica 11 (1): 1–36. doi: 10.1007/s10707-006-7635-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreau, L., and P. Groth. 2013. “Provenance: An Introduction to prov.” Synthesis Lectures on the Semantic Web: Theory and Technology 3 (4): 1–129. doi: 10.2200/S00528ED1V01Y201308WBE007
   Google Scholar
• Müller, M. 2015. “Hierarchical Profiling of Geoprocessing Services.” Computers & Geosciences 82: 68–77. doi: 10.1016/j.cageo.2015.05.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, M., L. Bernard, and D. Kadner. 2013. “Moving Code–Sharing Geoprocessing Logic on the Web.” ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 83: 193–203. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2013.02.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Probst, F. 2008. “Observations, Measurements and Semantic Reference Spaces.” Applied Ontology 3 (1–2): 63–89.
   Google Scholar
• Randell, D. A., Z. Cui, and A. G. Cohn. 1992. “A Spatial Logic Based on Regions and Connection.” In Paper presented at 3rd international conference on knowledge representation and reasoning, Cambridge, MA, vol. 92, 165–176.
   Google Scholar
• Rey, S. J. 2009. “Show me the Code: Spatial Analysis and Open Source.” Journal of Geographical Systems 11 (2): 191–207. doi: 10.1007/s10109-009-0086-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheider, S., A. Degbelo, R. Lemmens, C. vanElzakker, P. Zimmerhof, N. Kostic, J. Jones, and G. Banhatti. 2017. “Exploratory Querying of SPARQL Endpoints in Space and Time.” Semantic Web 8 (1): 65–86. doi: 10.3233/SW-150211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheider, S., B. Gräler, C. Stasch, and E. Pebesma. 2016. “Modeling Spatiotemporal Information Generation.” International Journal of Geographical Information Science 30 (10): 1980–2008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheider, S., and M. Tomko. 2016. “Knowing Whether Spatio-Temporal Analysis Procedures Are Applicable to Datasets.” Paper presented at formal ontology in information systems – proceedings of the 9th international conference, FOIS 2016, Annecy, France, July 6–9, 2016, edited by R. Ferrario and W. Kuhn, 67–80.
   Google Scholar
• Singleton, A. D., S. Spielman, and C. Brunsdon. 2016. “Establishing a Framework for Open Geographic Information science.” International Journal of Geographical Information Science 30 (8): 1507–1521. doi: 10.1080/13658816.2015.1137579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinton, D. F. 1978. “The Inherent Structure of Information as a Constraint to Analysis: Mapped Thematic Data as a Case Study.” In Harvard Papers on Geographic Information Systems, vol. 6 edited by G. Dutton, 1–17. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Stasch, C., S. Scheider, E. Pebesma, and W. Kuhn. 2014. “Meaningful Spatial Prediction and Aggregation.” Environmental Modelling & Software 51: 149–165. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomlin, C. D. 1990. A Map Algebra. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Graduate School of Design.
   Google Scholar
• Tomlin, C. D. 2013. GIS and Cartographic Modeling. Vol. 324. Redlands, CA: Esri Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vahedi, B., W. Kuhn, and A. Ballatore. 2016. “Question-Based Spatial Computing–A Case Study.” In Geospatial Data in a Changing World, edited by T. Sarjakoski, Y. M. Santos, and T. L. Sarjakoski, 37–50. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Visser, U., H. Stuckenschmidt, G. Schuster, and T. Vogele. 2002. “Ontologies for Geographic Information Processing.” Computers & Geosciences 28: 103–117. doi: 10.1016/S0098-3004(01)00019-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yue, P., L. Di, W. Yang, G. Yu, and P. Zhao. 2007. “Semantics-Based Automatic Composition of Geospatial Web Service Chains.” Computers & Geosciences 33 (5): 649–665. doi: 10.1016/j.cageo.2006.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, P., T. Foerster, and P. Yue. 2012. “The Geoprocessing Web.” Computers & Geosciences 47: 3–12. doi: 10.1016/j.cageo.2012.04.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar