Towards knowledge-based geovisualisation using Semantic Web technologies: a knowledge representation approach coupling ontologies and rules

References

• Andersson, M., and M. Eklöf. 2017. “Stilsättning av geografiska data.” Master thesis in Geographic Information Technology at Lund University, Sweden. https://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/search/publication/8914527.
   Google Scholar
• Bassiliades, N. 2018. “SWRL2SPIN: Converting SWRL to SPIN.” Proceedings of the Doctoral Consortium and Challenge at RuleML+RR 2018 Hosted by 2nd International Joint Conference on Rules and Reasoning, edited by W. Faber, P. Fodor, G. D. Gasperis, A. Giurca, and K. Teymourian, Vol. 2204, CEUR.
   Google Scholar
• Berners-Lee, T. 2009. “Linked Data: Design Issues.” http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.
   Google Scholar
• Carral, D., S. Scheider, K. Janowicz, C. Vardeman, A. A. Krisnadhi, and P. Hitzler. 2013. “An Ontology Design Pattern for Cartographic Map Scaling.” In The Semantic Web: Semantics and Big Data, edited by P. Cimiano, O. Corcho, V. Presutti, L. Hollink, and S. Rudolph, 76–93. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dadzie, A., and M. Rowe. 2011. “Approaches to Visualising Linked Data: A Survey.” Semantic Web 2 (2): 89–124. doi:10.3233/SW-2011-0037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decker, S., S. Melnik, F. V. Harmelen, D. Fensel, M. Klein, J. Broekstra, M. Erdmann, and I. Horrocks. 2000. “The Semantic Web: The Roles of XML and RDF.” IEEE Internet Computing 4 (5): 63–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duckham M., L. Arnold, K. Armstrong, D. McMeekin, and D. Mottolini. 2017. “Towards a Spatial Knowledge Infrastructure.” https://www.crcsi.com.au/assets/Program-3/CRCSI-Towards-Spatial-Knowledge-Whitepaper-web-May2017.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Falquet, G., C. Metral, S. Ozainne, and G. Giuliani. 2018. “An Abstract Specification Technique for the Publication of Linked Geospatial Data.” 21th AGILE conference on Geographic Information Science, Lund, Sweden, June 12–15.
   Google Scholar
• Fellah, S. 2015. “OGC Testbed-11 Symbology Mediation Engineering.” Open Geospatial Consortium. https://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=64385.
   Google Scholar
• Fellah, S. 2017. “Testbed-12 Semantic Portrayal, Registry and Mediation Engineering Report.” Open Geospatial Consortium. http://docs.opengeospatial.org/per/16-059.html.
   Google Scholar
• Fellah, S. 2018. “OGC Testbed-13: Portrayal Engineering Report.” Open Geospatial Consortium. http://docs.opengeospatial.org/per/17-045.html.
   Google Scholar
• Goodchild, M. F., H. Guo, A. Annoni, L. Bian, K. de Bie, F. Campbell, M. Craglia, et al. 2012. “Next-generation Digital Earth.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109 (28): 11088–11094. doi:10.1073/pnas.1202383109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodchild, M. F., and J. Proctor. 1997. “Scale in a Digital Geographic World.” Geographical and Environmental Modelling 1: 5–24.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, J., C. Dolbear, and G. Hart. 2008. “Geographical Linked Data: The Administrative Geography of Great Britain on the Semantic Web.” Transactions in GIS 12 (s1): 19–30. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9671.2008.01133.x.
   Google Scholar
• Gould, N., and W. Mackaness. 2016. “From Taxonomies to Ontologies: Formalizing Generalization Knowledge for On-demand Mapping.” Cartography and Geographic Information Science 43 (3): 208–222. doi:10.1080/15230406.2015.1072737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimm, S., P. Hitzler, and A. Abecker. 2007. “Knowledge Representation and Ontologies.” In Semantic Web Services: Concepts, Technology and Applications, edited by R. Studer, S. Grimm, and A. Abecker, 51–106. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hahmann, S., and D. Burghardt. 2010. “Linked Data-a Multiple Representation Database at Web Scale?” Proceedings of the 13th ICA workshop on generalisation and multiple representation, Zürich, Switzerland, September 12–13.
   Google Scholar
• Hitzler, P., and B. Parsia. 2009. “Ontologies and Rules.” In Handbook on Ontologies, 111–132. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hofer, B., S. Mäs, J. Brauner, and L. Bernard. 2017. “Towards a Knowledge Base to Support Geoprocessing Workflow Development.” International Journal of Geographical Information Science 31 (4): 694–716. doi:10.1080/13658816.2016.1227441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horrocks, I. 2008. “Ontologies and the Semantic Web.” Communications of the ACM 51 (12): 58–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horrocks, I., B. Parsia, P. Patel-Schneider, and J. Hendler. 2005. “Semantic Web Architecture: Tack or Two Towers?” Principles and Practice of Semantic Web Reasoning, Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, W., A. Mansourian, E. Abdolmajidi, H. Xu, and L. Harrie. 2018. “Synchronising Geometric Representations for Map Mashups Using Relative Positioning and Linked Data.” International Journal of Geographical Information Science 32 (6): 1117–1137. doi:10.1080/13658816.2018.1441416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• INSPIRE. 2017. “Linking INSPIRE Data: Draft Guidelines and Pilots.” https://inspire.ec.europa.eu/news/linking-inspire-data-draft-guidelines-and-pilots.
   Google Scholar
• Iosifescu-Enescu, I., and L. Hurni. 2007. “Towards Cartographic Ontologies or” How Computers Learn Cartography.” Proceedings 23rd International Cartographic Conference, Moscow, Russia, August 4–10.
   Google Scholar
• ISO. 2012. ISO 19117:2012 – Geographic Information – Portrayal. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• ISO/TC211. 2009. ISO/DIS 19143: Geographic Information – Filter Encoding. Geneva: International Standards Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Janowicz, K., S. Schade, A. Bröring, C. Keßler, P. Maué, and C. Stasch. 2010. “Semantic Enablement for Spatial Data Infrastructures.” Transactions in GIS 14 (2): 111–129. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9671.2010.01186.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, C. B., D. B. Kidner, L. Q. Luo, G. L. I. Bundy, and J. M. Ware. 1996. “Database Design for a Multi-Scale Spatial Information System.” International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 10 (8): 901–920. doi:10.1080/02693799608902116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, J., W. Kuhn, C. Keßler, and S. Scheider. 2014. “Making the Web of Data Available Via Web Feature Services.” Connecting a Digital Europe Through Location and Place, 341–361, Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Karam, R., F. Favetta, R. Kilany, and R. Laurini. 2011. “Location and Cartographic Integration for Multi-providers Location Based Services.” In Advances in Cartography and GIScience, 1 vol., 365–383. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kavouras, M., and M. Kokla. 2008. Theories of Geographic Concepts: Ontological Approaches to Semantic Integration. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keßler, C., M. Raubal, and C. Wosniok. 2009. “Semantic Rules for Context-aware Geographical Information Retrieval.” European Conference on Smart Sensing and Context, 77–92, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Knublauch, H. 2011. “Spin-modeling vocabulary.” W3C Member Submission. https://www.w3.org/Submission/spin-modeling/.
   Google Scholar
• Lauriault, Tracey P., Barbara L. Craig, D. R. Fraser Taylor, and Peter L. Pulsifer. 2007. “Today’s Data are Part of Tomorrow’s Research: Archival Issues in the Sciences.” Archivaria 64: 123–179.
   Google Scholar
• Leon, A. D., F. Wisniewki, B. Villazón-Terrazas, and O. Corcho. 2012. “Map4rdf-Faceted Browser for Geospatial Datasets.” Proceedings of the First Workshop on Using Open Ddata, W3C, Brussels, Belgium, June 19–20.
   Google Scholar
• Lupp M. 2007. “OGC Implementation Specification 05-078r4: Styled Layer Descriptor Profile of the Web Map Service Implementation Specification.” Open Geospatial Consortium. http://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=22364.
   Google Scholar
• MacEachren, A. M. 2004. How Maps Work: Representation, Visualization, and Design. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, M. 2006. “Symbology Encoding Implementation Specification 05-077r4.” Open Geospatial Consortium. http://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=16700.
   Google Scholar
• Nikolaou, C., K. Kyzirakos, K. Bereta, K. Dogani, S. Giannakopoulou, P. Smeros, G. Schwarz, et al. 2014. “Improving Knowledge Discovery from Synthetic Aperture Radar Images Using the Linked Open Data Cloud and Sextant.” Proceedings of ESA-EUSC-JRC 2014-9th Conference on Image Information Mining Conference: The Sentinels Era, 63–66.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, M., and J. Herring. 2012. “OGC GeoSPARQL – A Geographic Query Language for RDF Data.” Open Geospatial Consortium. https://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=47664.
   Google Scholar
• Regalia, B, K. Janowicz, G. Mai, D. Varanka, and E. L. Usery. 2018. “GNIS-LD: Serving and Visualizing the Geographic Names Information System Gazetteer as Linked Data.” European Semantic Web Conference, 528–540, Springer, Cham.
   Google Scholar
• Schade, S., and P. Smits. 2012. “Why Linked Data Should not Lead to Next Generation SDI.” Geoscience and remote sensing symposium (IGARSS), 2894–2897, IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Scheider, S., Andrea Ballatore, and R. Lemmens. 2018. “Finding and Sharing GIS Methods Based on the Questions They Answer.” International Journal of Digital Earth. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/17538947.2018.1470688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, R. A. 2010. “Designing a Cartographic Ontology for Use with Expert Systems.” Proceedings of A Special Joint Symposium of ISORS Technical Commission IV & AutoCarto in Conjunction with ASPRS/CaGIS 2010 Fall Specialty Conference, Orlando, FL, November 15–19.
   Google Scholar
• Stadler, C., J. Lehmann, K. Höffner, and S. Auer. 2012. “Linkedgeodata: A Core for a Web of Spatial Open Data.” Semantic Web 3 (4): 333–354. doi:10.3233/SW-2011-0052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varanka, Dalia E., and E. Lynn Usery. 2018. “The Map as Knowledge Base.” International Journal of Cartography 4 (2): 201–223. doi:10.1080/23729333.2017.1421004.
   Google Scholar
• Vilches-Blázquez, Luis M., Boris Villazón-Terrazas, Oscar Corcho, and Asunción Gómez-Pérez. 2014. “Integrating Geographical Information in the Linked Digital Earth.” International Journal of Digital Earth 7 (7): 554–575. doi:10.1080/17538947.2013.783127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W3C. 2007. “RDF Data Access WG Charter.” World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). https://www.w3.org/2003/12/swa/dawg-charter.
   Google Scholar
• W3C. 2013. “W3C Semantic Web Activity.” World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). https://www.w3.org/2001/sw/.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Q., Z. Mao, B. Wang, and L. Guo. 2017. “Knowledge Graph Embedding: A Survey of Approaches and Applications.” IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 29 (12): 2724–2743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., T. Ai, J. Stoter, and X. Zhao. 2014. “Data Matching of Building Polygons at Multiple Map Scales Improved by Contextual Information and Relaxation.” ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 92: 147–163. doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2014.03.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, T., C. Zhang, and W. Li. 2017. “Adaptive and Optimized RDF Query Interface for Distributed WFS Data.” ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 6 (4): 108. doi:10.3390/ijgi6040108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, Y., A. X. Zhu, J. Song, J. Yang, M. Feng, K. Sun, J. Zhang, Z. Hou, and H. Zhao. 2017. “Multidimensional and Quantitative Interlinking Approach for Linked Geospatial Data.” International Journal of Digital Earth 10 (9): 923–943. doi:10.1080/17538947.2016.1266041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar