Virtual earth cloud: a multi-cloud framework for enabling geosciences digital ecosystems

References

• An, B., J. Ma, D. Cao, and G. Huang. 2017. “Towards Efficient Resource Management in Virtual Clouds.” 2017 IEEE 37th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops (ICDCSW), 320–324. doi:10.1109/ICDCSW.2017.72.
   Google Scholar
• Bigagli, L., M. Santoro, P. Mazzetti, and S. Nativi. 2015. “Architecture of a Process Broker for Interoperable Geospatial Modeling on the Web.” ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 4 (2). doi:10.3390/ijgi4020647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blew, R. D. 1996. “On the Definition of Ecosystem.” The Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 77 (3): 171–173. doi:10.2307/20168067.
   Google Scholar
• Chauhan, S. S., E. S. Pilli, R. C. Joshi, G. Singh, and M. C. Govil. 2019. “Brokering in Interconnected Cloud Computing Environments: A Survey.” Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing 133: 193–209. doi:10.1016/j.jpdc.2018.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craglia, M., J. Hradec, S. Nativi, and M. Santoro. 2017. “Exploring the Depths of the Global Earth Observation System of Systems.” Big Earth Data 1 (1–2): 21–46. doi:10.1080/20964471.2017.1401284.
   Google Scholar
• Craglia, M., S. Nativi, M. Santoro, L. Vaccari, and C. Fugazza. 2011. “Inter-disciplinary Interoperability for Global Sustainability Research.” GeoSpatial Semantics, 1–15. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-20630-6_1.
   Google Scholar
• Docker Inc. 2021. Empowering App Development for Developers | Docker. https://www.docker.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Fowley, F., C. Pahl, P. Jamshidi, D. Fang, and X. Liu. 2018. “A Classification and Comparison Framework for Cloud Service Brokerage Architectures.” IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing 6 (2): 358–371. doi:10.1109/TCC.2016.2537333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowley, F., Pahl, C., & Zhang, L. (2014). A Comparison Framework and Review of Service Brokerage Solutions for Cloud Architectures. In A. R. Lomuscio, S. Nepal, F. Patrizi, B. Benatallah, & I. Brandić (Eds.), Service-Oriented Computing – ICSOC 2013 Workshops (Vol. 8377, pp. 137–149). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Giuliani, G., B. Chatenoux, A. Benvenuti, P. Lacroix, M. Santoro, and P. Mazzetti. 2020. “Monitoring Land Degradation at National Level Using Satellite Earth Observation Time-Series Data to Support SDG15 – Exploring the Potential of Data Cube.” Big Earth Data 4 (1): 3–22. doi:10.1080/20964471.2020.1711633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez-Roglich, M., A. Zvoleff, M. Noon, H. Liniger, R. Fleiner, N. Harari, and C. Garcia. 2019. “Synergizing Global Tools to Monitor Progress Towards Land Degradation Neutrality: Trends.Earth and the World Overview of Conservation Approaches and Technologies Sustainable Land Management Database.” Environmental Science & Policy 93: 34–42. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2018.12.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Google. 2022. Google Earth Engine. https://earthengine.google.com.
   Google Scholar
• Gore, A. 1998. The Digital Earth: Understanding our planet in the 21st Century. http://www.christinafriedle.com/uploads/1/8/4/7/1847486/the_digital_earth_understanding_our_planet_in_the_21st_century.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Gorelick, N., M. Hancher, M. Dixon, S. Ilyushchenko, D. Thau, and R. Moore. 2017. “Google Earth Engine: Planetary-Scale Geospatial Analysis for Everyone.” Remote Sensing of Environment 202: 18–27. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grozev, N., and R. Buyya. 2014. “Inter-Cloud Architectures and Application Brokering: Taxonomy and Survey.” Software: Practice and Experience 44 (3): 369–390. doi:10.1002/spe.2168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, H., S. Nativi, D. Liang, M. Craglia, L. Wang, S. Schade, C. Corban, et al. 2020. “Big Earth Data Science: An Information Framework for a Sustainable Planet.” International Journal of Digital Earth 13 (7): 743–767. doi:10.1080/17538947.2020.1743785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann, R., V. Halmschlager, M. Koller, G. Scharinger-Urschitz, F. Birkelbach, and H. Walter. 2019. “Comparison of a Physical and a Data-Driven Model of a Packed Bed Regenerator for Industrial Applications.” Journal of Energy Storage 23: 558–578. doi:10.1016/j.est.2019.04.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBM. 2020. What is a Web Service? https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/cics-ts/5.2?topic = services-what-is-web-service.
   Google Scholar
• IGI Global. 2022. What is Enterprise Systems | IGI Global. https://www.igi-global.com/dictionary/building-situational-applications-for-virtual-enterprises/10003.
   Google Scholar
• International Science Council. 2021. CODATA, The Committee on Data for Science and Technology. CODATA, The Committee on Data for Science and Technology. https://codata.org/.
   Google Scholar
• ISDE. 2019. “The 11th International Symposium on Digital Earth, Florence DECLARATION by the International Society for Digital Earth.” International Journal of Digital Earth 12 (12): 1465–1466. doi:10.1080/17538947.2019.1681645.
   Google Scholar
• Jamshidi, M. 2008. System of Systems Engineering d Innovations for the 21st Century. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Karmel, A., R. Chandramouli, and M. Iorga. 2016. NIST Definition of Microservices, Application Containers and System Virtual Machines. https://csrc.nist.gov/CSRC/media/Publications/sp/800-180/draft/documents/sp800-180_draft.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kubernetes. 2021a. Autoscaler/Cluster-Autoscaler at Master Kubernetes/Autoscaler. GitHub. https://github.com/kubernetes/autoscaler.
   Google Scholar
• Kubernetes. 2021b. Introduction—The Cluster API Book. https://cluster-api.sigs.k8s.io/.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J., B. Bagheri, and H. Kao. (2015). A Cyber-Physical Systems Architecture for Industry 4.0-Based Manufacturing Systems. Manufacturing Letters, 3, 18–23. doi:10.1016/j.mfglet.2014.12.001.
   Google Scholar
• Linux Foundation. 2021. Production-Grade Container Orchestration. Kubernetes. https://kubernetes.io/.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, F., J. Tong, J. Mao, R. Bohn, J. Messina, L. Badger, and D. Leaf. 2011. NIST Cloud Computing Reference Architecture. 35.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, R., and A. Mitchell. 2017. “Integrated Land Cover and Change Classifications.” In The Roles of Remote Sensing in Nature Conservation: A Practical Guide and Case Studies, edited by R. Díaz-Delgado, R. Lucas, and C. Hurford, 295–308. Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-64332-8_15
   Google Scholar
• Mazzetti, P., S. Nativi, M. Santoro, G. Giuliani, D. Rodila, A. Folino, S. Caruso, G. Aracri, and A. Lehmann. 2022. “Knowledge Formalization for Earth Science Informed Decision-Making: The GEOEssential Knowledge Base.” Environmental Science & Policy 131: 93–104. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2021.12.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mell, P., and T. Grance. 2011. The NIST Definition of Cloud Computing. 7.
   Google Scholar
• Microsoft. 2022. Microsoft Planetary Computer. https://planetarycomputer.microsoft.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Muench, S., E. Stoermer, and K. Jensen, et al. 2022. Towards a green & digital future: Key requirements for successful twin transitions in the European Union. Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2760/977331.
   Google Scholar
• Nativi, S., and M. Craglia. 2021. Destination Earth: Ecosystem Architecture Ddescription. Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.276008093
   Google Scholar
• Nativi, S., M. Craglia, and J. Pearlman. 2013. “Earth Science Infrastructures Interoperability: The Brokering Approach.” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing 6 (3): 1118–1129. doi:10.1109/JSTARS.2013.2243113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nativi, S., and P. Mazzetti. 2020. “Geosciences Digital Ecosystems.” In Encyclopedia of Mathematical Geosciences, edited by B. S. Daya Sagar, Q. Cheng, J. McKinley, and F. Agterberg, 1–6. Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-26050-7_458-1
   Google Scholar
• Nativi, S., P. Mazzetti, and M. Craglia. 2021. “Digital Ecosystems for Developing Digital Twins of the Earth: The Destination Earth Case.” Remote Sensing 13 (11): 2119. doi:10.3390/rs13112119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nativi, S., P. Mazzetti, M. Santoro, F. Papeschi, M. Craglia, and O. Ochiai. 2015. “Big Data Challenges in Building the Global Earth Observation System of Systems.” Environmental Modelling & Software 68: 1–2126. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.01.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nativi, S., M. Santoro, G. Giuliani, and P. Mazzetti. 2020. “Towards a Knowledge Base to Support Global Change Policy Goals.” International Journal of Digital Earth 13 (2): 188–216. doi:10.1080/17538947.2018.1559367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, S. 2015. Building Microservices: Designing Fine-Grained Systems. 1st ed. O’Reilly Media.
   Google Scholar
• Nisbet, R., J. Elder, and G. Miner. 2009. Handbook of Statistical Analysis and Data Mining Applications. Academic Press/Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• OASIS. 2006. Reference Model for Service Oriented Architecture v1.0. http://docs.oasis-open.org/soa-rm/v1.0/soa-rm.html.
   Google Scholar
• Overdick, H. 2007. The Resource-Oriented Architecture. 2007 IEEE Congress on Services (Services 2007), 340–347. doi:10.1109/SERVICES.2007.66.
   Google Scholar
• Prada, C. D., D. Hose, G. Gutierrez, and J. Pitarch. 2018. “Developing Grey-box Dynamic Process Models.” IFAC-PapersOnLine 51 (2): 523–528. doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.03.088.
   Google Scholar
• Red Hat. 2021a. Ansible is Simple IT Automation. https://www.ansible.com.
   Google Scholar
• Red Hat. 2021b. What is Container Orchestration? https://www.redhat.com/en/topics/containers/what-is-container-orchestration.
   Google Scholar
• Red Hat. 2021c. What is Orchestration? https://www.redhat.com/en/topics/automation/what-is-orchestration.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, M. 2015. Software Architecture Patterns. O’Reilly Media, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Rockström, J., X. Bai, and B. deVries. 2018. “Global Sustainability: The Challenge Ahead.” Global Sustainability 1, e6: 1–3. doi:10.1017/sus.2018.8.
   Google Scholar
• Santoro, M., V. Andres, S. Jirka, T. Koike, U. Looser, S. Nativi, F. Pappenberger, et al. 2018. “Interoperability Challenges in River Discharge Modelling: A Cross Domain Application Scenario.” Computers & Geosciences 115: 66–74. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2018.03.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santoro, M., P. Mazzetti, and S. Nativi. 2020. “The VLab Framework: An Orchestrator Component to Support Data to Knowledge Transition.” Remote Sensing 12 (11), Article 11.doi:10.3390/rs12111795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santoro, M., S. Nativi, and P. Mazzetti. 2016. “Contributing to the GEO Model Web Implementation: A Brokering Service for Business Processes.” Environmental Modelling & Software 84: 18–34. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.06.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santoro, M., and M. Rovera. 2021. “Analysis of Conceptual and Technological Solutions for Heterogeneous Analytical Software Execution in a Multi-Cloud Environemt.” Final Report of the Study Funded by the DG JRC of the European Commission, Under Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Santoro, M., L. Vaccari, D. Mavridis, R. Smith, M. Posada, and D. Gattwinkel. 2019. Web Application Programming Interfaces (APIs): General Purpose Standards, Terms and European Commission Initiatives : APIs4DGov Study — Digital Government APIs: The Road to Value Added Open API Driven Services. Publications Office. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.276085021.
   Google Scholar
• Shnier, M. 1996. Dictionary of PC Hardware and Data Communications Terms. O’Reilly Media, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Soltesz, S., H. Pötzl, M. E. Fiuczynski, A. Bavier, and L. Peterson. 2007. “Container-based Operating System Virtualization: A Scalable, High-Performance Alternative to Hypervisors.” Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGOPS/EuroSys European Conference on Computer Systems 2007, 275–287. doi:10.1145/1272996.1273025.
   Google Scholar
• Vaccari, L., M. Posada, M. Boyd, and M. Santoro. 2021. “APIS for EU Governments: A Landscape Analysis on Policy Instruments, Standards, Strategies and Best Practices.” Data 6 (6): 59. doi:10.3390/data6060059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, Ij. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., Blomberg, N., Boiten, J.-W., da Silva Santos, L. B., Bourne, P. E., Bouwman, J., Brookes, A. J., Clark, T., Crosas, M., Dillo, I., Dumon, O., Edmunds, S., Evelo, C. T., Finkers, R., … Mons, B. (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for Scientific Data Management and Stewardship. Scientific Data, 3(1), Article 1. doi:10.1038/sdata.2016.18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WMO. 2021. WMO Hydrological Observing System (WHOS). https://public.wmo.int/en/our-mandate/water/whos.
   Google Scholar