Toward a multilateral framework for identifying national security threats posed by foreign acquisitions: with special reference to Chinese acquisitions in the United States, Canada, and Australia

References

• 3Com Corporation. 2008. Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Washington, DC: United States Securities and Exchange Commission, January 24.
   Google Scholar
• An Act to Enhance the Competitiveness of American Industry, and for Other Purposes, Hr 4848 100th Congress (1988).
   Google Scholar
• Beverage, J. 2009. “Rio Tinto Deal Leaves a List of Winners and Losers.” Herald Sun, June 6.
   Google Scholar
• Drysdale, P., and C. Findlay. 2009. “Chinese Foreign Direct Investment in the Australian Resource Sector.” In China’s New Place in a World in Crisis, edited by G. Ross, S. Ligang, and W. Thye Woo, 349–388. Canberra: ANU E-Press. http://epress.anu.edu.au/titles/china-update-series/china_new_place_citation
   Google Scholar
• European Union. 2008. “European Commission’s Directorate-General for Competition (EU DG Competition).” European Union, January. Accessed June 30, 2013. http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/general_info/h_en.html
   Google Scholar
• Foreign Investment and National Security Act of 2007, HR 556 110th Congress, Public Law No: 110–49 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Graham, E. M., and D. M. Marchick. 2006. US National Security and Foreign Direct Investment. Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics.
   Google Scholar
• House of Representatives. 1991. National Security Takeovers and Technology Preservation: Hearings before the Subcommittee on Commerce, Consumer Protection, and Competitiveness of the Committee on Energy and Commerce. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office. February 26 and June 12.
   Google Scholar
• Kotschwar, B., T. H. Moran, and J. Muir. 2012. Chinese Investment in Latin American Resources: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly. Working Paper 12-3. Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Medeiros, E. S., R. Cliff, K. Crane, and J. C. Mulvenon. 2005. A New Direction for China’s Defense Industry. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation. http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG334
   Google Scholar
• Moran, T. H. 1992. Materials Prepared for the Subcommittee on Defense Industry and Technology, Senate Armed Services Committee. April 30. Unpublished, Confidential.
   Google Scholar
• Moran, T. H. 2009. Three Threats: An Analytical Framework for the CFIUS Process. Policy Analysis in International Economics No. 89. Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics. August.
   Google Scholar
• Moran, T. H. 2010. China’s Strategy to Secure Natural Resources: Risks, Dangers, and Opportunities. Policy Analysis in International Economics No. 92. Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Moran, T. H. 2013. Materials Prepared for the Canadian Council of Chief Executives and the Canadian Security Intelligence Service. Unpublished, Confidential.
   Google Scholar
• Moran, T. H., and L. Oldenski. 2013. Foreign Direct Investment in the United States: Benefits, Suspicions, and Risks with Special Attention to FDI from China. Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics. 
   Google Scholar
• OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development). 2008. Guidelines for Recipient Country Investment Policies Relating to National Security. OECD. Accessed June 30, 2013. http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/investment-policy/41807723.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Oster, S., and P. Carew. 2009. “China Inc.’s Top Deal Maker Provokes a Backlash Abroad.” Wall Street Journal, April 16.
   Google Scholar
• Regulations Pertaining to Mergers, Acquisitions, and Takeovers by Foreign Persons, Final Rule. 31 Cfr Part 800. Federal Register/Vol. 73, No. 226/(2008).
   Google Scholar
• Rio Tinto Plc. 2008. Annual Report and Financial Statements. Rio Tinto. Accessed June 30, 2013. http://www.riotinto.com
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, M., and D. Ruppersberger. 2012. Investigative Report on the U.S. National Security Issues Posed by Chinese Telecommunications Companies Huawei and ZTE. Report by the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. US House of Representatives (112th Congress). October 8. http://intelligence.house.gov/sites/intelligence.house.gov/files/documents/Huawei-ZTE%20Investigative%20Report%20%28FINAL%29.pdf
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Justice, and Federal Trade Commission. 2006. Commentary on the Horizontal Merger Guidelines. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, March. www.usdoj.gov/atr/public/guidelines/215247.htm
   Google Scholar
• Wells, L. T., Jr. 1993. “Minerals: Eroding Oligopolies.” In Beyond Free Trade: Firms, Governments, and Global Competition, edited by D. B. Yoffie, 335–384. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wines, M. 2009. “Australia, Nourishing China’s Economic Engine, Questions Ties.” New York Times ,June 3.
   Google Scholar