447
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Special section

(Non)-lethality and war: tear gas as a weapon of governmental intervention

Pages 522-540 | Received 05 Feb 2016, Accepted 23 Apr 2016, Published online: 16 Jun 2016

References

  • Anais, S. 2011. “Ethical Interventions: Non-Lethal Weapons and the Governance of Insecurity.” Security Dialogue 42 (6): 537–552. doi:10.1177/0967010611425367.
  • Brophy, L. P., W. D. Miles, and R. C. Cochrane. 1988. The Chemical Warfare Service: From Laboratory to Field. Washington D.C.: Center of Military History, United States Army.
  • Bulley, D. 2016. “Occupy Differently: Space, Community and Urban Counter-Conduct.” Global Society 30 (2): 238–257. doi:10.1080/13600826.2015.1133567.
  • Callwell, C. E. 1906. Small Wars: Their Principles and Practice. 3rd ed. London: Harrison and Sons.
  • Caygill, H. 2001. “Perpetual Police? Kosovo and the Elision of Police and Military Violence.” European Journal of Social Theory 4 (1): 73–80. doi:10.1177/13684310122225000.
  • Churchill, W. 1919. War Office Departmental Minute (1919-05-12). Churchill Papers 16/16. Cambridge: Churchill Archives Center.
  • Crampton, J. 2011. “Cartographic Calculations of Territory.” Progress in Human Geography 35 (1): 92–103. doi:10.1177/0309132509358474.
  • Davidson, N. 2006. “The Early History of ‘Non-Lethal’ Weapons.” Bradford Non-Lethal Research Project Occasional Paper No.1. University of Bradford.
  • de Larrinaga, M. 2016. “Tear Gas.” In Making Things International 2: Catalysts and Reactions, edited by M. Salter. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Death, C. 2010. “Counter-conducts: A Foucauldian Analytics of Protest.” Social Movement Studies 9 (3): 235–251. doi:10.1080/14742837.2010.493655.
  • Duffield, M. 2007. “Development, Territories and People: Consolidating the External Sovereign Frontier.” Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 32: 225–246. doi:10.1177/030437540703200204.
  • Elden, S. 2002. “The War of Races and the Constitution of the State: Foucault's 'Il faut défendre la société' and the Politics of Calculation.” Boundary 2 29 (1): 125–151.
  • Elden, S. 2007. “Rethinking Governmentality.“ Political Geography 26: 29–33.
  • Enemark, C. 2008. “‘Non-Lethal’ Weapons and the Occupation of Iraq: Technology, Ethics and Law.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 21 (2): 199–215. doi:10.1080/09557570802020974.
  • Fidler, D. 2002. “‘Non-Lethal’ Weapons and International Law: Three Perspectives on the Future.” In The Future of Non-Lethal Weapons: Technologies, Operations, Ethics and Law, edited by N. Lewer. London: Frank Cass.
  • Foucault, M. 1979. The History of Sexuality. Vol. 1: An Introduction. Translated and edited by Robert Hurley. London: Allen Lane.
  • Foucault, M. 1991. “Governmentality.” In The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, edited by G. Burchell, C. Gordon, and P. Miller. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Foucault, M. 1994. “The Subject and Power.” In Power, edited by J. D. Faubion. New York: The New Press.
  • Foucault, M. 2003. Society Must Be Defended: Lectures at the Collège de France 1975–76. New York, NY: Picador.
  • Foucault, M. 2004. Sécurité, territoire, population, Cours au collège de France (1977–1978). Paris: Gallimard Seuil.
  • Gillham, Patrick F., B. Edwards, and J. A. Noakes. 2013. “Strategic Incapacitation and the Policing of Occupy Wall Street Protests in New York City, 2011.” Policing and Society 23 (1): 81–102. doi:10.1080/10439463.2012.727607.
  • Gillham Patrick, F., and J. A. Noakes. 2007. “‘More than a March in a Circle’: Transgressive Protests and the Limits of Negotiated Management.” Mobilization: An International Journal 12 (4): 341–357.
  • Herbert, S. 2007. “The ‘Battle of Seattle’ Revisited: Or, Seven Views of a Protest-Zoning State.” Political Geography 26 (5): 601–619. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2007.04.004.
  • Jabri, V. 2006. “War, Security and the Liberal State.” Security Dialogue 37 (1): 47–64. doi:10.1177/0967010606064136.
  • Jabri, V. 2007. “Michel Foucault’s Analytics of War: The Social, the International and the Racial.” International Political Sociology 1 (1): 67–81. doi:10.1111/j.1749-5687.2007.00005.x.
  • Jackson, K. E., and M. A. Jackson. 1935. “Lachrymators.” Chemical Reviews 16: 195–242. doi:10.1021/cr60054a003.
  • Jones, D. P. 1978. “From Military to Civilian Technology: The Introduction of Tear Gas for Civil Riot Control.” Technology and Culture 19 (2): 151–168. doi:10.2307/3103718.
  • Kolodner, M. 2001. Eyewitness in Quebec, International Socialist Review, 18. Chicago, IL: Haymarket Books.
  • Martin, D., and B. Miller. 2003. “Space and Contentious Politics.” Mobilization: An International Journal 8 (2): 143–156.
  • Muller, B., T. N. Cooke, M. de Larrinaga, P. M. Frowd, D. Iossifova, D. Johannes, C. E. Mutlu, and A. Nowek. 2016. “Collective Discussion – Ferocious Architecture: Sovereign Spaces/Places by Design.” International Political Sociology 10 (1): 75–96. doi:10.1093/ips/olv002.
  • Neal, A. W. 2004. “Cutting Off the King's Head: Foucault's Society Must Be Defended and the Problem of Sovereignty.“ Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 29: 373–398.
  • Nieuwenhuis, M. 2013. “Terror in the Air in Istanbul.” Society and Space. https://societyandspace.com/material/discussion-forum/forum-on-turkey/nieuwenhuis/
  • Physicians for Human Rights. 2012. Weaponizing Tear Gas: Bahrain’s Unprecedented Use of Toxic Chemical Agents Against Civilians. Washington, DC: Physicians for Human Rights.
  • Pile, S. 1997. Geographies of Resistance, eds M. Keith. London: Routledge.
  • Price, R. 1995. “A Genealogy of the Chemical Weapons Taboo.” International Organization 49 (1): 73–103. doi:10.1017/S0020818300001582.
  • Price, R. 1997. The Chemical Weapons Taboo. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Rappert, B. 2004. “A Framework for the Assessment of Non-Lethal Weapons.” Medicine, Conflict and Survival 20: 35–54. doi:10.1080/13623690412331302284.
  • Routledge, P. 1993. Terrains of Resistance: Nonviolent Social Movements and the Contestation of Place in India. Westport CT: Praeger.
  • Schmidt, S. J., and C. Babits. 2014. “Occupy Wall Street as a Curriculum of Space.” The Journal of Social Studies Research 38: 79–89. doi:10.1016/j.jssr.2013.08.004.
  • Scott, D. 1995. “Colonial Governmentality.” Social Text 43: 191–220. doi:10.2307/466631.
  • Sewell, W. H. 2001. “Space in Contentious Politics.” In Silence and Voice in the Study of Contentious Politics, edited by R. R. Aminzade, J. A. Goldstone, E. J. Doug McAdam, W. H. Perry, S. T. Sewell, and T. Charles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Shoul, S. 2008. “British Tear Gas Doctrine between the World Wars.” War in History 15 (2): 168–190. doi:10.1177/0968344507087002.
  • SIPRI (Stockholm International Peace Institute). 1973. The Problem of Chemical and Biological Warfare. Volume II: CB Weapons Today. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiskell.
  • Sloterdijk, P. 2009. “Airquakes.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 27 (1): 41–57. doi:10.1068/dst1.
  • Spiers, E. M. 1983. “Gas and the North-West Frontier.” Journal of Strategic Studies 6 (4): 94–112. doi:10.1080/01402398308437170.
  • Theophanidis, P. 2013. “Caught in a Cloud: The Biopolitics of Tear Gas Warfare.” The Funambulist Papers 42.
  • Tilly, C. 2000. “Spaces of Contention.” Mobilization: An International Journal 5 (2): 135–159.
  • Waldren, M. 2013. Tear Gas and Empire. Police History Series. Chatteris: Police Firearms Officers Association (PFOA).
  • Weizman, E. 2007. Hollow Land: Israel’s Architecture of Occupation. London: Verso.
  • Wiard, S. 1935. “Chemical War Munitions for Law Enforcement Agencies.” Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 26 (3): 438–443.
  • Zajko, M., and D. Béland. 2008. “Space and Protest Policing at International Summits.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 26: 719–735. doi:10.1068/d0707.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.