References
- 2016. “AIR Worldwide Expands Its Terrorism Model Globally.” AIR Worldwide. Press Release. https://www.air-worldwide.com/news-and-events/press-releases/AIR-Worldwide-Expands-Its-Terrorism-Model-Globally/
- Aldrich, J. H., and D. W. Rohde. 2000. “The Republican Revolution and the House Appropriations Committee.” The Journal of Politics 62 (1): 1–33. doi:10.1111/0022-3816.00001.
- Aldrich, J. H., and D. W. Rohde. 2001. “The Logic of Conditional Party Government: Revisiting the Electoral Connection.” In Congress Reconsidered, edited by L. Dodd and B. Oppenheimer, 269–292. 7th ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
- Allen, J. 2007. “The Earmark Game: Manifest Disparity.” CQ Weekly, October 1, 2836–2850.
- Askoy, D. 2018. “Electoral and Partisan Cycles in Counterterrorism.” Journal of Politics 80 (4): 1239–1253. doi:10.1086/698847.
- Aziz, S. F. 2009. “Sticks and Stones, the Words that Hurt: Entrenched Stereotypes Eight Years after 9/11.” New York City Law Review 13: 33–72.
- Balla, S. J., E. D. Lawrence, F. Maltzman, and L. Sigelman. 2002. “Partisanship, Blame Avoidance, and the Distribution of Legislative Pork.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (3): 515–525. doi:10.2307/3088396.
- Berry, C. R., and A. Fowler. 2016. “Cardinals or Clerics? Congressional Committees and the Distribution of Pork.” American Journal of Political Science 60 (3): 692–708. doi:10.1111/ajps.12192.
- Berry, W. D., E. J. Ringquist, R. C. Fording, and R. L. Hanson. 1998. “Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the American States, 1960–93.” American Journal of Political Science 42 (1): 327–348. doi:10.2307/2991759.
- Binder, S. 2008. “Lend Me Your Earmarks.” The Monkey Cage, February 20. https://themonkeycage.org/2008/02/lend_me_your_earmarks_1/
- Bloom, P., and C. Veres. 1999. “The Perceived Intentionality of Groups.” Cognition 71 (1): 1–9. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00014-1.
- Boyle, S., S. Malinowski, and M. Gannon. 2002. “AIR Worldwide Releases Terrorism Loss Estimation Model to Analyze Financial Impact of Terrorist Attacks on Insurers, Reinsurers, and Corporations.” AIR Worldwide. Press Release. Accessed 13 April 2021. https://www.verisk.com/archived/2002/air-worldwide-releases-terrorism-loss-estimation-model-to-analyze-financial-impact-of-terrorist-atta/
- Budge, I., and R. Hofferbert. 1990. “Mandates and Policy Outputs: US Party Platforms and Federal Expenditures.” American Political Science Review 84 (1): 111–131. doi:10.2307/1963632.
- Bueno de Mesquita, E. 2007. “Politics and the Suboptimal Provision of Counterterror.” International Organization 61 (1): 9–36. doi:10.1017/S0020818307070087.
- Campbell, A., P. E. Converse, W. E. Miller, and D. E. Stokes. 1960. The American Voter. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- Carson, J. V., and M. Suppenbach. 2018. “The Global Jihadist Movement: The Most Lethal Ideology?” Homicide Studies 22 (1): 8–44. doi:10.1177/1088767917733783.
- Coats, R. M., G. Karahan, and R. D. Tollison. 2006. “Terrorism and Pork-Barrel Spending.” Public Choice 128 (1/2): 275–287. doi:10.1007/s11127-006-9054-8.
- Corbin, C. M. 2017. “Terrorists are Always Muslim but Never White: At the Intersection of Critical Race Theory and Propaganda.” Fordham Law Review 86 (2): 455–485.
- Cox, G. W., and M. D. McCubbins. 1993. Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
- Cox, G. W., and M. D. McCubbins. 2005. Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the US House of Representatives. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Crenshaw, M. 2001. “Counterterrorism Policy and the Political Process.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 24 (5): 329–337. doi:10.1080/105761001750434204.
- Davis, D. W., and B. D. Silver. 2004. “Civil Liberties Vs. Security: Public Opinion in the Context of the Terrorist Attacks on America.” American Journal of Political Science 48 (1): 28–46. doi:10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00054.x.
- de Rugy, V. 2005. “What Does Homeland Security Spending Buy?” American Enterprise Institute. Working paper #107.
- Department of Homeland Security. 2020. “DHS Announces Grant Allocations for Fiscal Year 2020 Preparedness Grants.” https://www.dhs.gov/news/2020/06/30/dhs-announces-grant-allocations-fiscal-year-2020-preparedness-grants
- Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2006. 2005. H.R. 2360, 109th Cong. 109–90.
- Earle, G. 2004 “Homeland Security Funding Part I — Money Not Flowing to the Places in Danger.„ The Hill, April 15. http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2004/4/14/163610.shtml
- r, Hilal.2012 “Racializing Islam Before and After 9/11: From Melting Pot to Islamophobia.” Transnational and Contemporary Problems 21: 119-172.
- European Parliament Think Tank. 2016. “Counter-Terrorism Funding in the EU Budget.” https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document.html?reference=EPRS_BRI(2016)580904
- Evans, D. 1994. “Policy and Pork: The Use of Pork Barrel Projects to Build Policy Coalitions in the House of Representatives.” American Journal of Political Science 38 (4): 894–917. doi:10.2307/2111726.
- Federal Emergency Management Agency. 2021. “Homeland Security Grants Programme.” https://www.fema.gov/grants/preparedness/homeland-security
- Fordham, B. 1998. “Partisanship, Macroeconomic Policy and the US Use of Force, 1949–1994.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 42 (4): 418–439. doi:10.1177/0022002798042004002.
- Friedman, B. 2005. “Think Again: Homeland Security.” Foreign Policy July-August: 22–25.
- Friedman, B. 2011. “Managing Fear: The Politics of Homeland Security.” Political Science Quarterly 126 (1): 77–106. doi:10.1002/j.1538-165X.2011.tb00695.x.
- Gimpel, J. G., F. E. Lee, and R. U. Thorpe. 2009. “Geographic Distribution of the Federal Stimulus of 2009.” Political Science Quarterly 127 (4): 567–595. doi:10.1002/j.1538-165X.2012.tb01128.x.
- Global Terrorism Database. 2017. Codebook: Inclusion Criteria and Variables. College Park, MD: University of Maryland.
- Global Terrorism Database. 2021. (National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism [START]); Accessed 13 April 2021. https://www.start.umd.edu/gtd
- Haner, M., M. M. Sloan, and F. T. Cullen. 2019. “Public Concern about Terrorism: Fear, Worry, and Support for Anti-Muslim Policies.” Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World 5. doi:10.1177/2378023119856825.
- Hess, G., and A. Orphanides. 1995. “War Politics: An Economic, Rational Voter Framework.” American Economic Review 85 (4): 828–847.
- Holsti, O. 2004. Public Opinion and American Foreign Policy. Revised Edition. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
- Holsti, O., and J. Rosenau. 1988. “The Domestic and Foreign Policy Beliefs of American Leaders.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 32 (2): 248–294. doi:10.1177/0022002788032002002.
- Homeland Security Act of 2002. 2002. H.R. 5005, 107th Cong. 107–296.
- Immenkamp, B., G. Sgueo, S. Voronova, and A. Dobreva. 2020. “The Fight Against Terrorism.” European Parliament. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2019/635561/EPRS_BRI(2019)635561_EN.pdf
- Jacoby, W. G. 1994. “Public Attitudes toward Government Spending.” American Journal of Political Science 38 (2): 336–361. doi:10.2307/2111407.
- Jacoby, W. G. 2000. “Issue Framing and Public Opinion on Government Spending.” American Journal of Political Science 44 (4): 750–767. doi:10.2307/2669279.
- Jacoby, W. G. 2008. “Comment: The Dimensionality of Public Attitudes toward Government Spending.” American Journal of Political Science 61 (1): 158–161.
- Jervis, R. 1976. Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Jordan, J., M. E. Kosal, and L. Rubin. 2016. “The Strategic Illogic of Counterterrorism Policy.” The Washington Quarterly 39 (4): 181–192. doi:10.1080/0163660X.2016.1261564.
- Kaplan, F. 2006. “Hog Heaven.” Slate, January 4. https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2006/01/the-homeland-security-budget-is-still-full-of-pork.html
- Kattelman, K. T. 2016. “Party Structure, Information, and Coalition Durability: The Relevance of NATO in the Global War on Terror.” Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 39 (9): 803–818. doi:10.1080/1057610X.2015.1131030.
- Kiewiet, R., and M. Mathew. 1991. The Logic of Delegation: Congressional Parties and Appropriations Process. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- Lazarus, J. 2009. “Party, Electoral Vulnerability, and Earmarks in the US House of Representatives.” Journal of Politics 71 (3): 1050–1061. doi:10.1017/S0022381609090872.
- Lazarus, J. 2010. “Giving the People What They Want? The Distribution of Earmarks in the US House of Representatives.” American Journal of Political Science 54 (2): 338–353. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00434.x.
- Lee, F. E. 2003. “Geographic Politics in the US House of Representatives: Coalition Building and Distribution of Benefits.” American Journal of Political Science 47 (4): 714–728. doi:10.1111/1540-5907.00050.
- Lewis, J. B., K. Poole, H. Rosenthal, A. Boche, A. Rudkin, and L. Sonnet. 2021. Voteview: Congressional Roll-Call Votes Database. Accessed 13 April 2021. https://voteview.com/
- Lipton, E. 2004. “Big Cities Will Get More in Antiterrorism Grants.” The New York Times, December 22. https://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/22/politics/big-cities-will-get-more-in-antiterrorism-grants.html
- Lodge, M., and R. Hamill. 1986. “A Partisan Schema for Political Information Processing.” American Political Science Review 80 (2): 505–520. doi:10.2307/1958271.
- Lonardo, L. D. 2019. “The Partisan Politics of Counterterrorism: Reputations, Policy Transparency, and Electoral Outcomes.” Political Science Research and Methods 7 (2): 253–269. doi:10.1017/psrm.2017.19.
- MacDonald, J. A., and R. J. McGrath. 2016. “Retrospective Congressional Oversight and the Dynamics of Legislative Influence over the Bureaucracy.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 41 (4): 899–934. doi:10.1111/lsq.12138.
- Marinov, N., W. G. Nomikos, and J. Robbins. 2015. “Does Electoral Proximity Affect Security Policy?” Journal of Politics 77 (3): 762–773. doi:10.1086/681240.
- Miller, G. D. 2007. “Confronting Terrorisms: Group Motivation and Successful State Policies.” Terrorism and Political Violence 19 (3): 331–350. doi:10.1080/09546550701424059.
- Mueller, J., and M. G. Stewart. 2012 “The Terrorism Delusion: America's Overwrought Response to September 11.” International Security 38 (1): 81-110.
- Nanes, M. 2017. “Political Violence Cycles: Electoral Incentives and the Provision of Counterterrorism.” Comparative Political Studies 50 (2): 171–199. doi:10.1177/0010414016635198.
- Newman, R. 2021. “Why Congress Is Bringing Back ‘Pork.’” Yahoo!Finance, March 16. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/why-congress-is-bringing-back-pork-184519151.html
- Office of the Inspector General. 2005. “Review of the Port Security Grant Programme.” Department of Homeland Security. https://www.oig.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/assets/Mgmt/OIG_05-10_Jan05.pdf
- Oldendick, R. W., and L. B. Hendren. 2018. “Party Differences in Support for Government Spending, 1973–2014.” American Politics Research 46 (3): 499–533. doi:10.1177/1532673X17719718.
- Patel, T. G. 2017. “It’s Not about Security, It’s about Racism: Counter-Terror Strategies, Civilizing Processes and the Post-Race Fiction.” Palgrave Communications 3 (1). doi:10.1057/palcomms.2017.31.
- Perliger, A. 2012. “How Democracies Respond to Terrorism: Regime Characteristics, Symbolic Power and Counterterrorism.” Security Studies 21 (3): 490–528. doi:10.1080/09636412.2012.706505.
- Pew. 2016a. “15 Years after 9/11, a Sharp Partisan Divide on Ability of Terrorists to Strike U.S.” https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2016/09/07/15-years-after-911-a-sharp-partisan-divide-on-ability-of-terrorists-to-strike-u-s/
- Pew 2016b. “How Closely are State Economies Tied to Spending?” https://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/articles/2016/03/22/how-closely-are-state-economies-tied-to-federal-spending
- Pew. 2017. “With Budget Debate Looming, Growing Share of Public Prefers Bigger Government.” https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2017/04/24/with-budget-debate-looming-growing-share-of-public-prefers-bigger-government/#where-partisans-differ-and-mostly-agree-on-federal-spending
- Piazza, J. A. 2020. “White Demographic Anxiety and Support for Torture of Terrorism Suspects.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 1–29. doi:10.1080/1057610x.2020.1792733.
- Prante, T., and A. K. Bohara. 2008. “What Determines Homeland Security Spending? An Econometric Analysis of the Homeland Security Grant Programme.” The Policy Studies Journal 36 (2): 243–256.
- Rees, W., and R. J. Aldrich. 2009. “Contending Cultures of Counterterrorism: Transatlantic Divergence or Convergence?” International Affairs 81 (5): 905–923. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2346.2005.00494.x.
- Reese, S. 2004. “Fiscal Year 2005 Homeland Security Grant Programme: State Allocations and Issues for Congressional Oversight.” CRS Report for Congress, RL32696.
- Ripley, A. 2004. “How We Got Homeland Security Wrong.” Time Magazine, March 22. http://content.time.com/time/subscriber/article/0,33009,993684,00.html
- Roberts, Ed. 2020. “House Panel Seeks Restoration of Homeland Security Grants.” Homeland Preparedness News. https://homelandprepnews.com/countermeasures/42329-house-panel-seeks-restoration-of-homeland-security-grants/?amp
- Rotella, S. 2021. “Domestic Terrorism: A More Urgent Threat, But Weaker Laws.” Propublica, January 10. https://ctmirror.org/2021/01/10/domestic-terrorism-a-more-urgent-threat-but-weaker-laws/
- Russett, B. 1990. “Doves, Hawks and US Public Opinion.” Political Science Quarterly 105 (4): 515–539. doi:10.2307/2150933.
- Schneider, C. J. 2013. “Globalizing Electoral Politics: Political Competence and Distributional Bargaining in the European Union.” World Politics 65 (3): 452–490. doi:10.1017/S0043887113000129.
- Smith, A. 1996. “Diversionary Foreign Policy in Democratic Systems.” International Studies Quarterly 40 (1): 133–153. doi:10.2307/2600934.
- Sunstein, C. R., and R. J. Zeckhauser. 2008. “Overreaction to Fearsome Risks.” Harvard Law School Programme on Risk Regulation Research Paper No. 08–17.
- Thorpe, R. U. 2010. “The Role of Economic Reliance in Defense Procurement Contracting.” American Politics Research 38 (4): 636–675. doi:10.1177/1532673X09337107.
- Thorpe, R. U. 2014. The American Warfare State: The Domestic Politics of Military Spending. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- US Census Bureau. 2020. “Decennial Census Datasets.” https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/decennial-census/data/datasets.html
- US Department of Homeland Security. 2005. “National and Federal Laboratories and Research Centers.” https://www.dhs.gov/science-and-technology/national-federal-laboratories-research-centers
- US Department of Homeland Security. 2009. Fiscal Year 2004 Homeland Security Grant Programme. https://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/grant-program-overview-fy2009.pdf
- US Department of State. 2020. Country Reports on Terrorism. Washington, DC: US Department of State.
- US Department of State. 2002. Patterns of Global Terrorism 2001. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of State.
- US Government Accountability Office. 2008. “DHS Risk-Based Grant Methodology Is Reasonable, but Current Version’s Measure of Vulnerability Is Limited.” https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-08-852.pdf
- Whidden, M. J. 2001. Unequal Justice: Arabs in American and the United States Antiterrorism Legislation, 69 Fordham L. Review 2825, 2849.
- Willis, H. H., A. R. Morral, T. K. Kelly, and J. J. Medby. 2005. Estimating Terrorism Risk. RAND: Center for Terrorism Risk Management Policy.