Aesthetic experiences and design creativity: an ethnographic study of a wool felting design workshop

References

• Ahuvia, A. (2005). Beyond the extended self: Loved objects and consumers’ identity narratives. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(1), 171–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity and innovation in organizations. Harvard: Harvard Business School.
   Google Scholar
• Ames, A. (2008). Fashion design for a projected future. Clothing & Textiles Research Journal, 26(2), 103–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 139–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1998). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Button, G. (2000). The ethnographic tradition and design. Design Studies, 21(4), 319–332.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, N. (2001). Beyond aesthetics: Philosophical essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, K. H. (2018). Eco-tech fashion project: Collaborative design process using problem-based learning. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 12(1), 105–117.
   Google Scholar
• Crabtree, A., & Rodden, T. (2002). Ethnography and design? In Proceedings of the International Workshop on “Interpretive” Approaches to Information Systems and Computing Research (pp. 70–74). London: Association of Information Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, N. (1984). Developments in design methodology. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity, flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• de Wet, A. J. C., & Tselepis, T. J. (2020). Towards enterprising design: A creativity framework supporting the fluency, flexibility and flow of student fashion designers. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 13(3), 352–363.
   Google Scholar
• Downton, P. (2003). Design research. Melbourne, VIC: RMIT Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education Work, 14(1), 133–156.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gully, R. (2009). Cognition and process vs. design artifact in fashion design pedagogy. In H. Edquist, K. Friedman, S. Langdon, & J. Maciak (Eds.), Cumulus 38° south (pp. 1–11). Aalto: Swinburne University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, T. J., Culley, S. J., & Dekoninck, E. (2008). Describing the creative design process by the integration of engineering design and cognitive psychology literature. Design Studies, 29(2), 160–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, T. (2021). Idea exchange in the pleats – The pleating workshop as a research method. Journal of Textile Science & Fashion Technology, 7, 4. doi:https://doi.org/10.33552/JTSFT.2021.07.000667
   Google Scholar
• Jones, R. (2008). Experience models: Where ethnography and design meet. Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference Proceedings, 1, 82–93.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, I. (1952). The Critique of judgment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karpova, E., Marcketti, S., & Barker, J. (2011). Putting the puzzle together: Apparel professionals’ perspective on creativity. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 4(2), 103–113.
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. (2011). Principles of design and a trajectory of artificiality. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(3), 411–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaBat, K. L., & Sokolowski, S. L. (1999). A three-stage design process applied to an industry-university textile product design project. Clothing & Textiles Research Journal, 17(1), 11–20.
   Google Scholar
• Lam, M., Li, E., Liu, W. S., & Lam, Y. N. (2020). Introducing participatory action research to vocational fashion education: Theories, practices, and implication. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2020.1765844
   Google Scholar
• Lam, M., Liu, W. S., & Lam, Y. N. (2016). The aesthetic experience of product design: A case study of the consumption of earphones in Hong Kong. The Design Journal, 19(3), 429–449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamb, J. M., & Kallal, M. J. (1992). A conceptual framework for apparel design. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 10(2), 42–47.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. S., & Danko, S. (2017). Revealing the design process: Inventing a meta-analysis method for documenting the fashion design process. The Design Journal, 20(5), 659–682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y., Wang, J., Li, X., & Zhao, W. (2007). Design creativity in product innovation. International Journal of Manufacturing Technology, 33, 213–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löbler, H. (2020). How meaning can inform fashion design – The semantic turn. Journal of Textile Science & Fashion Technology, 6, 5. doi:https://doi.org/10.33552/JTSFT.2020.06.000649
   Google Scholar
• Orzada, B., & Cobb, K. (2011). Ethical fashion project: Partnering with industry. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 4(3), 173–185.
   Google Scholar
• Reason, P. (2004). Critical design ethnography as action research. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 35(2), 269–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reason, P., & Torbert, W. (2001). The action turn: Toward a transformational social science. Concepts and Transformation, 6(1), 1–37.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, C., & Mishra, P. (2018). Learning environments that support student creativity: Developing the SCALE. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 27, 45–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. R., Workman, J. E., & Freeburg, B. W. (2019). Creativity and tolerance of ambiguity in fashion design students. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 12(1), 96–104.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, P. R., & Wensveen, S. (2010). Designing behaviour in interaction: Using aesthetic experience as a mechanism of design. International Journal of Design, 4(2), 3–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A. (2004). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 657–687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawyer, R. K. (2006). Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Schooler, J. W., & Melcher, J. (1995). The ineffability of insight. In S. M. Smith, T. B. Ward, & F. A. Finke (Eds.), The creative cognition approach (pp. 97–133). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (1988). The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives. University Press: Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Stokes, B., & Black, C. (2012). Application of the functional, expressive and aesthetic consumer needs model: Assessing the clothing needs of adolescent girls with disabilities. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 5(3), 179–186.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. J., & Haytko, D. L. (1997). Speaking of fashion: Consumers’ uses of fashion discourses and the appropriation of countervailing cultural meanings. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(1), 15–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiwari, S., & Dhakad, D. (2020). Design intervention & craft revival with reference to Pichwai painting: A contemporize approach. Journal of Textile Science & Fashion Technology, 6, 1. doi:https://doi.org/10.33552/JTSFT.2020.06.000628
   Google Scholar
• Townsend, D. (1997). An introduction to aesthetics. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Tselepis, T. J. (2018). When clothing designers become business people: A design centred training methodology for empowerment incubation. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 11(3), 299–309.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, A., Joy, A., Sherry, J. F., & Deschenes, J. (2010). The aesthetics of luxury fashion, body and identity formation. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20(4), 459–470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, A., & Meamber, L. A. (2008). The aesthetics of consumption and the consumer as an aesthetic subject. Consumption Market & Culture, 11(1), 45–70.
   Google Scholar
• Vyas, D. (2009). Artful surfaces in design Creative practices. In” CHI ‘09 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Vyas, D., van dee Veer, G., & Nijhot, A. (2013). Creative practices in the design studio culture: Collaboration and communication. Cognition, Technology & Work, 15, 415–443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, S. (2009). After taste – The power and prejudice of product appearance. The Design Journal, 12(1), 25–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasson, C. (2000). Ethnography in the field of design. Human Organization, 59(4), 377–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yick, K. L., Yip, J., Au, S. C., Lai, Y. Y., & Yu, A. (2018). Effectiveness of blended learning in the first year of fashion education. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 12(2), 178–188.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, C. Y., & Wang, P. C. (2018). Aesthetic experience anchors ego identity formation. Sustainability, 10(8), 2596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar