Influence of motivational orientations on consumers’ adoption of virtual fitting rooms (VFRs): moderating effects of fashion leadership and technology visibility

References

• Cho, S., & Workman, J. (2015). College students’ frequency of use of information sources by fashion leadership and style of information processing. Fashion & Textiles, 2(25), 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, H., Im, K., & Kim, J. (2014). A comparative study of the motivational orientation type on users’ behavior: Focusing on ubiquitous computing services. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 68(2), 321–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, N., & Chen, F. (2020). The effects of goal orientation consciousness versus unconsciousness on consumers’ choice tendency. Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, 11(1), 7–17.
   Google Scholar
• Chuah, S., Rauschnabel, P., Krey, N., Nguyen, B., Ramayah, T., & Lade, S. (2016). Wearable technologies: The role of usefulness and visibility in smartwatch adoption. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 276–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, F., Bagozzi, R., & Warshaw, P. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to Use computers in the Workplace1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(14), 1111–1132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domina, T., Lee, S., & MacGillivray, M. (2012). Understanding factors affecting consumer intention to shop in a virtual world. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 19, 613–620.
   Google Scholar
• Dweck, C., & Leggett, E. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles, J., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkelstien, M. (2009). Intrinsic vs. extrinsic motivational orientations and the volunteer process. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 653–658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, C., & Kumar, A. (2005). Explaining consumer acceptance of handheld internet devices. Journal of Business Research, 58(5), 553–558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grand View Research. (2021). Virtual fitting room market size 2021-2028. Retrieved from https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/virtual-fitting-room-market
   Google Scholar
• Hassenzahl, M., Schobel, M., & Trautmann, T. (2008). How motivational orientation influences the evaluation and choice of hedonic and pragmatic interactive products: The role of regulatory focus. Interacting with Computers, 20(4-5), 473–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, N., & Qin, G. (2011). A study of online virtual fitting room adoption based on UTAUT. In International conference on E-Business and E-Government (pp. 1–4). Shanghai, China: IEEE. doi:10.1109/ICEBEG.2011.5881681
   Google Scholar
• Huang, T., & Liao, S. (2017). Creating e-shopping multisensory flow experience through augmented-reality interactive technology. Internet Research, 27(2), 449–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, J., & Park-Poaps, H. (2010). Hedonic and utilitarian shopping motivations of fashion leadership. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 14(2), 312–328.
   Google Scholar
• Keong, Y., & Hirst, G. (2010). An empirical integration of goal orientation and the theory of planned behavior: Predicting innovation adoption behavior. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 11(1), 5–18.
   Google Scholar
• Khalifa, M., & Cheng, S. (2002). Adoption of mobile commerce: Role of exposure. In Proceedings of the 35th hawaii international conference on system sciences in Big Island (pp. 1–7). Hawaii: IEEE Computer Society.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, H., & Hong, H. (2011). Fashion leadership and hedonic shopping motivations of female consumers. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 29(4), 314–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. (2011). A study on factor of acceptance for mobile fashion application (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Kookmin University, Seoul, Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Koo, D. (2009). The moderating role of locus of control on the links between experiential motives and intention to play online games. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 466–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, H. (2021). Fashion consumers’ perception and adoption of virtual fitting rooms (VFRs): A perspective of regulatory focus and shopping involvement (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). NC State University, Raleigh, NC.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, H., & Xu, Y. (2019). Classification of virtual fitting room technologies in the fashion industry: From the perspective of consumer experience. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 13(1), 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, H., Xu, Y., & Li, A. (2020). Technology visibility and consumer adoption of virtual fitting rooms (VFRs): a cross-cultural comparison of Chinese and Korean consumers. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 24(2), 175–194.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, H., Xu, Y., & Porterfield, A. (2021). Antecedents and moderators of consumer adoption toward AR-enhanced virtual try-on technology: A stimulus-organism-response approach. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 1–20. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10. 1111/ijcs.12760
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, A., & Xu, Y. (2020). A study of Chinese consumers’ adoption behaviour toward virtual fitting rooms. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 13(2), 140–149.
   Google Scholar
• Michon, R., Yu, H., Smith, D., & Chebat, J. (2007). The shopping experience of female fashion leaders. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 35(6), 488–501.
   Google Scholar
• Molino, M., Cortese, C., & Ghislieri, C. (2020). The promotion of technology acceptance and work engagement in industry 4.0: From personal resources to information and training. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17, 2438–2415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon, S. (2009). Basic concepts and applications of structural equation modelling with AMOS 17.0. Seoul, Korea: Hakjisa.
   Google Scholar
• Ngafeeson, M., & Sun, J. (2015). The effects of technology innovativeness and system exposure on student acceptance of e-textbooks. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 14, 055–071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikou, S., & Economides, A. (2017). Mobile-based assessment: Integrating acceptance and motivational factors into a combined model of self-determination theory and technology acceptance. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 83–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overby, J., & Lee, E. (2006). The effects of utilitarian and hedonic online shopping value on consumer preference and intentions. Journal of Business Research, 59, 1160–1166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkins, J., Rollins, C., Anders, S., & Comeau, L. (2018). Predicting intention to adopt solar technology in Canada: The role of knowledge, public engagement, and visibility. Energy Policy, 114, 114–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radovan, M., & Makovec, D. (2015). Relations between students’ motivation, and perceptions of the learning environment. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 5(2), 115–138.
   Google Scholar
• Research and Markets. (2019). Global virtual fitting room market 2019-2024. www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/global-virtualfitting-room-market-2019-2024—increasing-adoption-of-advanced-technologies-such-asar-and-vr-to-offer-better-shopping-experience-to-customers-300841773.html
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, G., Switzer, G., Cohen, E., Primack, B., Kapoor, W., Seltzer, D., & Rubio, D. (2014). Shortening the work preference inventory for use with physician scientists: WPI-10. Clinical and Translational Science, 7(4), 324–328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R., & Deci, E. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabah, N. (2016). Exploring students’ awareness and perceptions: Influencing factors and individual differences driving m-learning adoption. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 9–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, J., & Qu, H. (2019). How does consumer regulatory focus impact perceived value and consumption emotions? International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 31(1), 285–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, Y., & Gao, F. (2019). An investigation of the influence of intrinsic motivation on students’ intention to use mobile devices in language learning. Educational Technology Research & Development, 68, 1181–1198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, T., Whang, W., Cao, L., & Wang, Y. (2019). The role of virtual try-on technology in online purchase decision from consumers’ aspect. Internet Research, 29(3), 529–551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar