Students’ attitude towards distance teaching of studio-based and virtual reality-based fashion design courses

References

• Abildgaard, S. J. J. (2019). Studio-based learning in the nordics. Nordics.Info. https://nordics.info/show/artikel/studio-based-learning-in-the-nordics/
   Google Scholar
• Adams, M., & Alexander, L. (2019). Technology and studio classes: Teaching flat pattern in a digital world. The International Journal of Design Education, 13(2), 21–27.
   Google Scholar
• Agarwal, R., Sambamurthy, V., & Stair, R. M. (2000). Research report: The evolving relationship between general and specific computer self-efficacy—An empirical assessment. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 418–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alsabawy, A. Y., Cater-Steel, A., & Soar, J. (2016). Determinants of perceived usefulness of e-learning systems. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 843–858.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baytar, F. (2018). Apparel CAD patternmaking with 3D simulations: Impact of recurrent use of virtual prototypes on Students’ skill development. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 11(2), 187–195.
   Google Scholar
• Boorady, L. M., & Hawley, J. M. (2008). The wonders of technology. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 26(2), 131–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celikoz, N., & Gursoy, F. (2014). The effect of distance education applications based on smart board on students’ achievement and skills in pattern preparation techniques. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 15(3), 254–267.
   Google Scholar
• Cennamo, K., Brandt, C., Scott, B., Douglas, S., Mcgrath, M., Reimer, Y., & Vernon, M. (2011). Managing the complexity of design problems through studio-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 5.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, Y. (2014). 3D-CAD effects on creative design performance of different spatial abilities students. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30(5), 397–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou, T.-C. R. (2014). A scale of university students’ attitudes toward e-learning on the Moodle system. International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design, 4(3), 49–65.
   Google Scholar
• Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 189–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixson, M. D. (2015). Measuring student engagement in the online course: The Online Student Engagement scale (OSE). Online Learning Journal, 19(4), 143.
   Google Scholar
• Ekstrom, R. B. (1976). Manual for kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests. Princeton, N.J.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrer, J., Ringer, A., Saville, K., Parris, M. A., & Kashi, K. (2022). Students’ motivation and engagement in higher education: The importance of attitude to online learning. Higher Education, 83, 317–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrer-Torregrosa, J., Torralba, J., Jimenez, M. A., García, S., & Barcia, J. M. (2015). Arbook: Development and assessment of a tool based on augmented reality for anatomy. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(1), 119–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, K., & Finn, A. (2015). Sustainable fashion design education: Designing virtual online teaching resources for flexible delivery. International Journal of Designed Objects, 9(1), 19–27.
   Google Scholar
• Gault, A. (2017). e-Learning and software for education. The 13th International Scientific Conference ELearning and Software for Education, 423–430.
   Google Scholar
• Gu, L., & Liu, X. (2019). Online fashion design education supported by digital three dimensions technologies. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 286(Seiem 2018), 575–577.
   Google Scholar
• Häkkilä, J., Colley, A., Väyrynen, J., & Yliharju, A.-J. (2018). Introducing virtual reality technologies to design education. Seminar.Net, 14(1), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2012). PROCESS: A Versatile Computational Tool for Observed Variable Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Modeling 1. http://www.afhayes.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2013). Chapter 1: Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, C., Ghalachyan, A., & Song, S. (2023). Exploring student experiences with a virtual learning environment in an apparel and textiles curriculum during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education.
   Google Scholar
• Inoue, Y. (2012). Virtual reality learning environments. In N. M. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning (pp. 3407–3410). Springer US.
   Google Scholar
• Ioan-Marginean, A. (2016). e-Learning in fashion design at the national university of arts of Bucharest. The 12th International Scientific Conference ELearning and Software for Education, 380–386.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, J. A., Silva, P. A., & Prelath, R. (2020). Implementing studio-based learning for design education: A study on the perception and challenges of Malaysian undergraduates. International Journal of Technology and Design Education.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshalsey, L. (2021). Talking to Art and design students at home: Evaluating the differences in student engagement online. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 40, 702–713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learning Journal, 22(1), 205–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGee, M. (1979). Human spatial abilities: Sources of sex differences. Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Min, S., & Chang, H. J. (2019). Exploring clinical Use of apparel design activities: Enhancing spatial ability through virtual apparel pattern-making. International Textile and Apparel Association (ITAA) Annual Conference Proceedings, 3–5. https://www.iastatedigitalpress.com/itaa/article/id/12257/.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, B., & Mercer, E. (2020, May). 2020 Grads ‘Pushing the Industry to Go Virtual.’ Women’s Wear Daily (WWD), 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Newmann, F. M., Wehlage, G. G., & Lamborn, S. D. (1992). The significance and sources of student engagement. In Student Engagement and Achievement in American Secondary Schools (pp. 12.
   Google Scholar
• Park, J., Kim, D. E., & Sohn, M. (2011). 3D simulation technology as an effective instructional tool for enhancing spatial visualization skills in apparel design. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 21(4), 505–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pober, E., & Cook, M. (2019). Thinking in virtual spaces. International Journal of Virtual and Augmented Reality, 3(2), 23–40.
   Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(1), 185–227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, J., Kopot, C., & Medvedev, K. (2023). Student perceptions of asynchronous learning in an introductory online fashion course. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 16(1), 79–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starkey, S., Alotaibi, S., Striebel, H., Tejeda, J., Francisco, K., & Rudolph, N. (2021). Fashion inspiration and technology: Virtual reality in an experimental apparel design classroom. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 14(1), 12–20.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, S. (2008). Effects of computer self-efficacy and spatial visualization ability on student perceptions of 2D/3D CAD virtual prototype simulations for apparel design [Masters]. Iowa State University.
   Google Scholar
• Teo, T., & Zhou, M. (2014). Explaining the intention to use technology among university students: A structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 26(2), 124–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaid, M. (2020). COVID-19 pushes fashion design schools into an increasingly digital future. Fashionista. https://fashionista.com/2020/03/coronavirus-fashion-design-education?utm_source=site&utm_campaign=related.
   Google Scholar
• Yick, K. l., Yip, J., Au, S. C., Lai, Y. y., & Yu, A. (2019). Effectiveness of blended learning in the first year of fashion education. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 12(2), 178–188.
   Google Scholar
• Zaimmudin Mohd Zain, M., Mohd Zain, R., Hassan, H., Hazlin Zainal Amri, N., Hafiz Drahman, M., Wahida Hasbullah, S., … Campus, B. (2021). Distance education: The challenges and effects of the COVID-19 pandemic among fashion students in Malaysia. Palarch’s Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/ Egyptology, 18(6), 110–125. https://archives.palarch.nl/index.php/jae/article/view/7644.
   Google Scholar
• Zarraonandia, T., Aedo, I., Díaz, P., & Montero, A. (2013). An augmented lecture feedback system to support learner and teacher communication. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(4), 616–628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar