The moderating effect of imagery ability on perceived vividness: the case of HPV vaccine advertising in China

References

• Adaval, R., & Wyer, R. S. (1998). The role of narratives in consumer information processing. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 7(2), 207–245.
   Google Scholar
• Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. R., & Reder, L. M. (1979). Levels of processing in human memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Bensafi, M., & Rouby, C. (2007). Individual differences in odor imaging ability reflect differences in olfactory and emotional perception. Chemical Senses, 32(3), 237–244. doi:10.1093/chemse/bjl051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bower, G. (1972). Mental imagery and associative learning. In L. Gregg (Ed.), Cognition in learning and memory (pp. 51–88). New York, NY: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Brosius, H. B., & Bathelt, A. (1994). The utility of exemplars in persuasive communications. Communication Research, 21, 48–78. doi:10.1177/009365094021001004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bugelski, B. R. (1983). Imagery and the thought processes. In A. Sheikh (Ed.), Imagery: Current theory, research and application (pp. 72–95). New York, NY: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, M. (1998). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Bywaters, M., Andrade, J., & Turpin, G. (2004). Determinants of the vividness of visual imagery: The effects of delayed recall, stimulus affect and individual differences. Memory (Hove), 12(4), 479–488.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calder, B. J., Lynn, W. P., & Tybout, A. M. (1981). Designing research for application. Journal of Consumer Research, 8, 197–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campos, A., Chiva, M., & Moreau, M. (2000). Alexithymia and mental imagery. Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 787–791. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00231-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaiken, S. (1987). The heuristic model of persuasion. In M. P. Zanna, J. M. Olson, & C. P. Herman (Eds.), Social influence: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 5, pp. 3–39). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, C. T., & Lee, Y. K. (2010). Effects of message framing, vividness congruency and statistical framing on responses to charity advertising. International Journal of Advertising, 29(2), 195–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, T. Y., Pan, X. H., & Cui, Z. W. (2007). Examining the influences of telepresence and vividness of visual imagery on online learning efficiency. Retrieved from: http://nhuir.nhu.edu.tw:8085/ir/retrieve/7800/3095000206.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Chien, Y., & Chang, C. (2012). Exploring the impact of animation-based questionnaire on conducting a web-based educational survey and its association with vividness of respondents’ visual images. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(3), 81–85. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01287.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coyle, J. R., & Thorson, E. (2001). The effects of progressive levels of interactivity and vividness in Web marketing sites. Journal of Advertising, 30(3), 65–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dan, V., & Ihlen, O. (2011, May). Towards the empirical assessment of complex frames: A method for combining analysis of verbal and visual element, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, J. F. (2014). Moderation in management research: What, why, when and how. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29, 1–19. doi:10.1007/s10869-013-9308-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dempsey, A. F., Abraham, L. M., & Dalton, V. (2009). Understanding the reasons why mothers do or do not have their adolescent daughters vaccinated against human papillomavirus. Annals of Epidemiology, 19, 531–538. doi:10.1016/j.annepidem.2009.03.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillard, A. J., & Main, J. L. (2013). Using a health message with a testimonial to motivate colon cancer screening: Associations with perceived identification and vividness. Health Education & Behavior, 40(6), 673–682. doi:10.1177/1090198112473111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. (2007). Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods, 12, 1–22. 10.1037/1082-989X.12.1.1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng, S. W., Xu, X. F., Jin, Y., & Yao, X. Y. (2012). Women's knowledge of human papillomavirus (HPV) and their attitudes toward HPV vaccine: Preparing for HPV vaccination in China. Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Health, 24(3), 522–531. doi:10.1177/1010539511415838.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiske, S., & Taylor, S. (1984). Social cognition. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, K. P., & Eagly, A. H. (1993). Vividness can undermine the persuasiveness of messages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(1), 32–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, A., & Shepeard, H. (2007). Exploring the knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and communication preferences of the general public regarding HPV: Findings from CDC focus group research and implications for practice. Health Education & Behavior, 34(3), 471–485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houston, M. J., Childers, T. L., & Heckler, S. E. (1987). Picture-word consistency and the elaborative processing of advertisements. Journal of Marketing Research, 24(2), 359–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, Y., & Wyer, R. S. (2009). The role of visual perspective in information processing. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 486–495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph, S. A., & Thompson, T. L. (2004). The effect of vividness on the memorability and persuasiveness of a sermon: A test of the elaboration likelihood model. Journal of Communication and Religion, 27, 217–244.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, A. (2000). The limited capacity model of mediated message processing. Journal of Communication, 50(1), 46–70. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02833.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leventhal, H. (1971). Fear appeals and persuasion: The differentiation of a motivational construct. American Journal of Public Health, 61(6), 1208–1224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Licht, A. S., Murphy, J. M., Hyland, A. J., Fix, B. V., Hawk, L. W., & Mahoney, M. C. (2010). Is use of the human papillomavirus vaccine among female college students related to human papillomavirus knowledge and risk perception? Sexually Transmitted Infections, 86(1), 74–78. doi:10.1136/sti.2009.037705.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutz, K. A., & Lutz, R. J. (1978). Imagery-eliciting strategies: Review and implications of research. Advances in Consumer Research, 5, 611–620.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1972). Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 430–454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5(2), 207–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, P. A., & Block, L. G. (1997). Vividness effects: A resource-matching perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(3), 295–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kisielius, J., & Sternthal, B. (1984). Detecting and explaining vividness effects in attitudinal judgments. Journal of Marketing Research, 21(1), 54–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krieger, J. L., & Sarge, M. A. (2013). A serial mediation model of message framing on intentions to receive the human papillomavirus vaccine (HPV): Revisiting the role of threat and efficacy perceptions. Health Communication, 28(1), 5–19. doi:10.1080/10410236.2012.734914.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnamurthy, P., & Sujan, M. (1999). Retrospection versus anticipation: The role of the ad under retrospective and anticipatory self-referencing. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(1), 55–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacInnis, J. D., & Price, L. L. (1987). The role of imagery in information processing: Review and Extensions. Journal of Consumer Research, 13(4), 474–491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, D. F. (1973). Visual imagery differences in the recall of pictures. British Journal of Psychology, 64, 17–24. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1973.tb01322.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, B., Sherrard, M., & Wentzel, D. (2005). The role of sensation seeking and need for cognition on Web-site evaluations: A resource-matching perspective. Psychology & Marketing, 22(2), 109–126. doi:10.1002/mar.20050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcavinue, L. P., & Robertson, I. H. (2007). Measuring visual imagery ability: A review. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 26(3), 191–211. doi:10.2190/3515-8169-24J8-7157.
   Google Scholar
• McGill, A. L., & Anand, P. (1989). The effect of vivid attributes on the evaluation of alternatives: The role of differential attention and cognitive elaboration. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(2), 188–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moorman, M., Willemsen, L. M., Neijens, P. C., & Smit, E. G. (2012). Program involvement effects on the processing of embedded and successive advertising. Journal of Advertising, 41(2), 25–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nan, X. L., & Madden, K. (2012). HPV vaccine information in the blogosphere: How positive and negative blogs influence vaccine-related risk perceptions, attitudes, and behavioral Intentions. Health Communication, 27(8), 829–836. doi:10.1080/10410236.2012.661348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neisser, U., & Kerr, N. (1973). Spatial and mnemonic properties of visual images. Cognitive Psychology, 5(2), 138–150. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(73)90030-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisbett, R. E., & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Nouchi, R. (2011). Individual differences of visual imagery ability in the benefit of a survival judgment task. Japanese Psychological Research, 53(3), 319–326. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5884.2011.00479.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paivio, A., & Csapo, K. (1973). Picture superiority in free recall: Imagery or dual coding? Cognitive Psychology, 5(2), 176–206. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(73)90032-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Percy, L., & Rossiter, J. R. (1997). A theory-based approach to pretesting advertising. In W. D. Wells (Ed.), Measuring advertising effectiveness (pp. 267–385). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Petrova, P. K., & Cialdini, R. B. (2005, December). Fluency of consumption imagery and the backfire effects of imagery appeals. Journal of Consumer Research, 32, 442–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piira, T., Hayes, B., Goodenough, B., & von Baeyer, C. L. (2006). Effects of attentional direction, age, and coping style on cold-pressor pain in children. Behavior Research and Therapy, 44(6), 835–848. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2005.03.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. T. E. (1991). Gender differences in imagery, cognition and memory. In R. H. Logie & M. Denis (Eds.), Mental images in human cognition (pp. 1329–1362). The Netherlands: Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar
• Rigney, J. W., & Lutz, K. A. (1976). Effect of graphic analogies of concepts in chemistry on learning and attitude. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68(3), 305–311. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.68.3.305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchey, G. H. (1980). Picture superiority in free recall: The effects of organization and elaboration. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 29(3), 460–474. doi:10.1016/0022-0965(80)90107-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roelofs, A., Piai, V., & Schriefers, H. (2012). Context effects and selective attention in picture naming and word reading: Competition versus response exclusion. Language and Cognitive Process, 28(5), 655–671. doi:10.1080/01690965.2011.615663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossiter, J. R., & Percy, L. (1978). Visual imaging ability as a mediator of advertising response. Advances in Consumer Research, 5, 621–629.
   Google Scholar
• Salomon, G. (1972). Can we affect cognitive skills through visual media? An hypothesis and initial findings. AV Communication Review, 20(4), 401–422.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, V. I., Healy, A. F., & Steinhart, D. J. (1996). Searching for target letters in memory: Individual preferences and instructions for text representation. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 3(3), 352–356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, Y., Gong, J. M., Li, Y. Q., Gong, Y. M., Lei, D. M., Cheng, G. M., & Li, X. F. (2013). Epidemiology and genotype distribution of human papillomavirus (HPV) in women of Henan Province, China. Clinica Chimica Acta, 415, 297–302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepard, R. N. (1967). Recognition memory for words, sentences and pictures. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6, 156–163. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(67)80067-7.
   Google Scholar
• Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84, 127–190. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Small, D. A., & Loewenstein, G. (2003). Helping a victim or helping the victim: Altruism and identifiability. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 26, 5–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, S. M., & Shaffer, D. R. (2000). Vividness can undermine or enhance message processing: The moderating role of vividness congruency. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(7), 769–779. doi:10.1177/0146167200269003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stafford, M. R., & Faber, R. J. (2005). Advertising, promotion, and new media. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Swann, W. B., & Miller, L. C. (1982). Why never forgetting a face matters: Visual imagery and social memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(3), 475–480. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.43.3.475.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. E., & Thompson, S. C. (1982). Stalking the elusive “vividness” effect. Psychological Review, 89(2), 155–181. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.89.2.155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tukachinsky, R., Mastro, D., & King, A. (2011). Is a picture worth a thousand words? The effect of race-related visual and verbal exemplars on attitudes and support for social policies. Mass Communication and Society, 14(6), 720–742. doi:10.1080/15205436.2010.530385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5(2), 207–232. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unnava, H. R., & Burnkrant, R. (1991). The effect of repeating varied and same executions on brand name memory. Journal of Marketing Research, 28, 406–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weert, J., Noort, G., Bol, N., van Dijk, L., Tates, K., & Jansen, J. (2011). Tailored information for cancer patients on the Internet: Effects of visual cues and language complexity on information recall and satisfaction. Patient Education and Counseling, 84(3), 368–378. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2011.04.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyer, R. S., Huang, I. W., & Jiang, Y. W. (2008). Visual and verbal processing strategies in comprehension and judgment. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 18(4), 244–257. doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2008.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, X. L. (2014). Cervical cancer: The last defense line. Economy and Nation Weekly. Retrieved from: http://www.ennweekly.com/2013/0817/11836.html [In Chinese].
   Google Scholar