Social movement as civic education: communication activities and understanding of civil disobedience in the Umbrella Movement

References

• Alexander, J. (2005). The civil sphere. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Allam, N. (2014). Blesses and curses: Virtual dissidence as a contentious performance in the Arab Spring's repertoire of contention. International Journal of Communication, 8, 853–870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, J. C., & Morris, J. S. (2010). My FaceTube politics: Social networking web sites and political engagement of young adults. Social Science Computer Review, 28(1), 24–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2013). The logic of connective action. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, M. (2013). How repertoires evolve: The diffusion of suicide protest in the twentieth century. Mobilization, 18(4), 407–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boudreau, C., & Lupia, A. (2011). Political knowledge. In J. N. Druckman, D. P. Green, J. H. Kuklinski, & A. Lupia (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of experimental political science (pp. 171–186). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chaim, G. (1992). Philosophical anarchism and political disobedience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, J. M., & Lee, F. L. F. (2015). Media and social mobilisation in Hong Kong. In G. Rawnsley & M. Y. Rawnsley (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Chinese Media (pp. 145–160). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., & Arato, A. (1992). Civil society and political theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Fazio, G. (2012). Legal opportunity structure and social movement strategy in Northern Ireland and Southern United States. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 53(1), 3–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delli Carpini, M. X., & Keeter, S. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Earl, J., & Kimport (2011). Digitally enabled social change. Harvard, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ekiert, G., & Kubik, J. (1998). Collective protest in post-communist Poland, 1989-1993: A research report. Communist and Post-communist Studies, 31(2), 91–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eveland, Jr, W. P. (2004). The effect of political discussion in producing informed citizens: The roles of information, motivation, and elaboration. Political Communication, 21, 177–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraile, M. (2013). Do information-rich contexts reduce knowledge inequalities? The contextual determinants of political knowledge in Europe. Acta Politica, 48(2), 119–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamson, W. A., & Herzog, H. (1999). Living with contradictions: The taken-for-granted in Israeli political discourse. Political Psychology, 20(2), 247–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), 1–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gil de Zúñiga, H., Jung, N., & Valenzuela, S. (2012). Social media use for news and individuals’ social capital, civic engagement and political participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17, 319–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, G. (2005). Vulnerability and disobedience: New repertoires in French environmental protests. Environmental Politics, 15(5), 821–838.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S. (1990). Shortcuts to political knowledge: Selective attention and the accessibility bias. In J. Ferejohn & J. Kuklinski (Eds.), Information and the democratic process (pp. 160–185). Champaign: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, J. C., & Wallace, M. (1996). The generalized action potential of protest movements: The new class, social trends, and political exclusion explanations. Sociological Forum, 11(2), 183–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johann, D. (2012). Specific political knowledge and citizens’ participation: Evidence from Germany. Acta Politica, 47(1), 42–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufhold, K., Valenzuela, S., & de Zuniga, H. G. (2010). Citizen journalism and democracy: How user-generated news use relates to political knowledge and participation. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 87(3–4), 515–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. M. (2009). Issue publics in the new information environment: Selectivity, domain specificity, and extremity. Communication Research, 36(2), 254–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ku, A. S. (2004). Negotiating the space of civil autonomy in Hong Kong: Power, discourses and dramaturgical representations. China Quarterly, 179, 647–664.
   Google Scholar
• Ku, A. S. (2007). Constructing and contesting the “order” imagery in media discourse: Implications for civil society in Hong Kong. Asian Journal of Communication, 17(2), 186–200.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, F. L. F. (2008). Local press meets transnational activism: News dynamics in an anti-WTO protest. Chinese Journal of Communication, 1(1), 57–78.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, F. L. F. (2009). The impact of political discussion in a democratizing society: The moderating role of disagreement and support for democracy. Communication Research, 36(3), 379–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, F. L. F. (2015). International alternative media use and oppositional knowledge. International Journal of Public Opinion Research. Online first: 10.1093/ijpor/edu040.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, F. L. F., & Chan, J. M. (2011). Media, social mobilization, and mass protests in post-colonial Hong Kong. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Leung, L. (2009). Mediated violence as “global news”: Co-opted “performance” in the framing of the WTO. Media, Culture & Society, 31(2), 251–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, J. (2001). Constructing public opinion. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lui, T. L., & Chiu, S. W. K. (Eds.). (2000). The dynamics of social movements in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luskin, R. (1990). Explaining political sophistication. Political Behavior, 12(4), 331–361.
   Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, J. (2001). The making of oppositional consciousness. In J. Mansbridge & A. Morris (Eds.), Oppositional consciousness (pp. 1–19). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCausland, C., O'Sullivan, S., & Brenton, S. (2013). Trespass, animals and democratic engagement. Res Publica, 19, 205–221.
   Google Scholar
• Meirick, P. C. (2013). Motivated misperception? Party, education, partisan news, and belief in “death panels.”. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 90(1), 39–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutz, D. (2006). Hearing the other side. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, P. (2000). A virtuous circle. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ollis, T. (2011). Learning in social action: The informal and social learning dimensions of circumstantial and lifelong activists. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 51(2), 248–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostman, J. (2012). Information, expression, participation: How involvement in user-generated content relates to democratic engagement among young people. New Media & Society, 14(6), 1004–1021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, V., & Zaller, J. (1993). Who gets the news? Alternative measures of news reception and their implications for research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 57(2), 133–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quill, L. (2009). Civil disobedience. New York, NY: Palgrave McMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, J. (1996). Applied multivariate analysis for the social sciences. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
   Google Scholar
• Strange, M. (2011). “Act now and sign our joint statement!” What role do online global group petitions play in transnational movement networks? Media, Culture & Society, 33(8), 1236–1253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tai, B. Y. T. (2013, January 16). The most lethal weapon of civil disobedience. Hong Kong Economic Journal, A16.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, G. K. Y., & Lee, F. L. F. (2013). Facebook use and political participation: The impact of exposure to shared political information, connections with public political actors, and network structural heterogeneity. Social Science Computer Review, 31(6), 763–773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilly, C. (1995). Popular contention in Great Britain, 1758-1834. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tilly, C. (2008). Contentious performances. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tworzecki, H., & Markowski, R. (2014). Knowledge and partisan bias: An uneasy relationship. East European Politics and Societies, 28(4), 836–862.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wada, T. (2012). Modularity and transferability of repertoires of contention. Social Problems, 59(4), 544–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, D. J., & Soule, S. A. (2012). Social movement organizational collaboration: Networks of learning and the diffusion of protest tactics, 1960-1995. American Journal of Sociology, 117(6), 1674–1722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wicks, R. H., Wicks, J. L., & Morimoto, S. A. (2014). Partisan media selective exposure during the 2012 presidential election. American Behavioral Scientist, 58(9), 1131–1143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar