5,477
Views
33
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Social media use and democratic engagement: a comparative study of Hong Kong, Taiwan, and China

, &

References

  • BBC. (2014). Is Weibo on the way out? Retrieved from http://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-china-blog-31598865
  • Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768.
  • Bennett, W. L., Wells, C., & Freelon, D. (2011). Communicating civic engagement: Contrasting models of citizenship in the youth web sphere. Journal of Communication, 61(5), 835–856.
  • Bode, L., Vraga, E. K., Borah, P., & Shah, D. V. (2014). A new space for political behavior: Political social networking and its democratic consequences. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(3), 414–429.
  • Boulianne, S. (2009). Does internet use affect engagement? A meta-analysis of research. Political Communication, 26(2), 193–211.
  • Chan, M., & Guo, J. (2013). The role of political efficacy on the relationship between Facebook use and participatory behaviors: A comparative study of young American and Chinese adults. Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking, 16(6), 460–463.
  • Chan, M., Wu, X., Hao, Y., Xi, R., & Jin, T. (2012). Microblogging, online expression, and political efficacy among young Chinese citizens: The moderating role of information and entertainment needs in the use of Weibo. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(7), 345–349.
  • Chen, H.-T., Sun, P., & Gan, C. (2015). Far from reach but near at hand: The role of social media for cross-national mobilization. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 443–451.
  • CNNIC. (2013). CNNIC released the 31st Statistical Report on Internet Development. Retrieved from http://www1.cnnic.cn/AU/SocialR/SocialNews/201301/t20130121_38607.htm
  • CNNIC. (2014). Statistical report on Internet development in China. http://www1.cnnic.cn
  • Conroy, M., Feezell, J. T., & Guerrero, M. (2012). Facebook and political engagement: A study of online political group membership and offline political engagement. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 1535–1546.
  • Dahlgren, P. (2009). Media and political engagement: Citizens, communication, and democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Delli Carpini, M. X. (2000). In search of the informed citizen: What Americans know about politics and why it matters. The Communication Review, 4(1), 129–164.
  • Eveland, W. P., Jr (2004). The effect of political discussion in producing informed citizens: The roles of information, motivation, and elaboration. Political Communication, 21(2), 177–193.
  • Eveland Jr., W. P., & Hively, M. H. (2009). Political discussion frequency, network size, and “heterogeneity” of discussion as predictors of political knowledge and participation. Journal of Communication, 59(2), 205–224.
  • Gil de Zúñiga, H., Bachmann, I., Hsu, S.-H., & Brundidge, J. (2013). Expressive versus consumptive blog use: Implications for interpersonal discussion and political participation. International Journal of Communication, 7, 1538–1559.
  • Gil de Zúñiga, H., Jung, N., & Valenzuela, S. (2012). Social media use for news and individuals’ social capital, civic engagement and political participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17, 319–336.
  • Hassid, J. (2012). Safety valve or pressure cooker? Blogs in Chinese political life. Journal of Communication, 62(2), 212–230.
  • Hoffman, L. H. (2006). Is Internet content different after all? A content analysis of mobilizing information in online and print newspapers. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 83(1), 58–76.
  • Howard, P. N., & Parks, M. R. (2012). Social media and political change: Capacity, constraint, and consequence. Journal of Communication, 62(2), 359–362.
  • Huckfeldt, R., Mendez, J. M., & Osborn, T. (2004). Disagreement, ambivalence, and engagement: The political consequences of heterogeneous networks. Political Psychology, 25(1), 65–95.
  • Internet World Stats. (2014). Internet usage in Asia. Retrieved from http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats3.htm
  • Johnson, T. J., & Perlumutter, D. D. (Eds.). (2011). New media, campaigning and the 2008 Facebook election. New York: Routledge.
  • Kim, Y., Chen, H.-T., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2013). Stumbling upon news on the Internet: Effects of incidental news exposure and relative entertainment use on political engagement. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2607–2614.
  • Kushin, M. J., & Yamamoto, M. (2010). Did social media really matter? College students' use of online media and political decision making in the 2008 election. Mass Communication & Society, 13(5), 608–630.
  • Landman, T. (2008). Issues and methods in comparative politics: An introduction (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.
  • Lemert, J. (1981). Does mass communication change public opinion after all?. Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
  • Lee, F. L. F., & Chan, J. M. (2011). Media, social mobilization and mass protests in post-colonial Hong Kong. London: Routledge.
  • Lee, F. L. F., & Chan, J. M. (2016). Digital media activities and mode of participation in a protest campaign: A study of the Umbrella Movement. Information, Communication & Society, 19(1), 4–22.
  • Lee, W., Detenber, B. H., Willnat, L., Aday, S., & Graf, J. (2004). Cross-cultural test of the spiral of silence theory in Singapore and the United States. Asian Journal of Communication, 14(2), 205–226.
  • Li, Y. (2013). Number of gov’t Weibo accounts soars: Huge growth in official microblogging accounts in 2012 as government seeks better communication with public. Retrieved from http://english.caixin.com/2013-03-28/100507640.html
  • Matthes, J., Hayes, A. F., Rojas, H., Min, S.-J., & Dylko, I. B. (2012). Exemplifying a dispositional approach to cross-cultural spiral of silence research: Fear of social isolation and the inclination to self-censor. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 24(3), 287–305.
  • Moeller, J., Vreese, C. d., Esser, F., & Kunz, R. (2014). Path to political participation: The influence of online and offline news media on internal efficacy and turnout of first-time voters. American Behavioral Scientist, 58(5), 689–700.
  • Mossberger, K., Tolbert, C. J., & McNeal, R. S. (2007). Digital citizenship: The Internet, society, and participation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Mutz, D. C. (2002). The consequences of cross-cutting networks for political participation. American Journal of Political Science, 46(4), 838–855.
  • Ostman, J. (2012). Information, expression, participation: How involvement in user-generated content relates to democratic engagement among young people. New Media & Society, 14(6), 1004–1021.
  • Putnam, R. D. (1995). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65–78.
  • Shah, D., McLeod, J. M., & Yoon, S.-H. (2001). Communication, context, and community: An exploration of print, broadcast, and Internet influences. Communication Research, 28, 464–506.
  • Shah, D. V., Cho, J., Eveland, W. P., Jr, & Kwak, N. (2005). Information and expression in a digital age: Modeling Internet effects on civic participation. Communication Research, 32(5), 531–565.
  • Shah, D. V., Cho, J., Nah, S., Gotlieb, M. R., Hwang, H., Lee, N.-J., Scholl, R. M., & McLeod, D. M. (2007). Campaign ads, online messaging, and participation: Extending the communication mediation model. Journal of Communication, 57(4), 676–703.
  • Smith, A. (2009). The Internet’s role in campaign 2008. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2009/6–The-Internets-Role-in-Campaign-2008.aspx
  • Sullivan, J. (2014). China’s Weibo: Is faster different? New Media & Society, 16(1), 24–37.
  • Tang, G., & Lee, F. L. F. (2013). Facebook use and political participation: The impact of exposure to shared political information, connections with public political actors, and network structural heterogeneity. Social Science Computer Review, 31(6), 763–773.
  • Tong, J., & Zuo, L. (2014). Weibo communication and government legitimacy in China: A computer-assisted analysis of Weibo messages on two ‘mass incidents’. Information, Communication & Society, 17(1), 66–85.
  • Tufekci, Z. (2013). "Not this one": Social movements, the attention economy, and microcelebrity networked activism. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(7), 848–870.
  • Valenzuela, S. (2013). Unpacking the use of social media for protest behavior: The roles of Information, opinion expression, and activism. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(7), 920–942.
  • Wang, S. I. (2007). Political use of the Internet, political attitudes and political participation. Asian Journal of Communication, 17(4), 381–395.
  • Willnat, L., & Aw, A. (Eds.). (2014). Social media, culture and politics in Asia. New York: Peter Lang.
  • Xenos, M., Vromen, A., & Loader, B. D. (2014). The great equalizer? Patterns of social media use and youth political engagement in three advanced democracies. Information, Communication & Society, 17(2), 151–167.
  • Yamamoto, M., Kushin, M. J., & Dalisay, F. (2015). Social media and mobiles as political mobilization forces for young adults: Examining the moderating role of online political expression in political participation. New Media & Society, 17(6), 880–898.
  • Yang, G. (2009). The power of the Internet in China: Citizen activism online. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Yung, B., & Leung, L. Y.-M. (2014). Diverse roles of alternative media in Hong Kong civil society: From public discourse initiation to social activism. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 7(1), 83–101.
  • Zhang, W., Johnson, T. J., Seltzer, T., & Bichard, S. L. (2010). The revolution will be networked: The influence of social networking sites on political attitudes and behavior. Social Science Computer Review, 28(1), 75–92.
  • Zhang, W., Seltzer, T., & Bichard, S. L. (2013). Two sides of the coin: Assessing the influence of social network site use during the 2012 US presidential campaign. Social Science Computer Review, 31(5), 542–551.
  • Zukin, C., Keeter, S., Andolina, M., Jenkins, K., & Delli Carpini, M. X. (2006). A new engagement? Political participation, civic life, and the changing American citizen. New York: Oxford University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.