Making a “difference” with digital media? The evaluation perspectives, practices, and challenges of Chinese NGOs

References

• Chen, J. (2012). Transnational civil society in China v. Intrusion and impact. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, S. (2015). Tool of emancipation or domination? Debating the contentious nature of China’s online environmental activism. China Media Research, 11(4), 16–27.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, W., & Reese, S. D. (Eds.). (2015). Networked China: Global dynamics of digital media and civic engagement. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Couldry, N. (2012). Media, society, world: Social theory and digital media practice. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Deng, G. (2010). The hidden rules governing China’s unregistered NGOs: Management and consequences. The China Review, 10(1), 183–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Collective rationality and institutional isomorphism in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutta, M. J. (2005). Civil society and public relations: Not so civil after all. Journal of Public Relations Research, 17(3), 267–289.
   Google Scholar
• Eade, D. (1997). Capacity building: An approach to people-centred development. Oxford: Oxfam.
   Google Scholar
• Ebrahim, A. (2003). Accountability in practice: Mechanisms for NGOs. World Development, 31(5), 813–829.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebrahim, A. (2010). The many faces of nonprofit accountability. In D. O. Renz (Ed.), The Jossey-Bass handbook of nonprofit leadership and management (pp. 110–121). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Ebrahim, A., & Weisband, E. (Eds.). (2007). Global accountabilities: Participation, pluralism, and public ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Esarey, A., & Xiao, Q. (2011). Digital communication and political change in China. International Journal of Communication, 5, 298–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, M., & Hulme, D. (1996). Too close for comfort? The impact of official aid on nongovernmental organizations, World Development, 24(6), 961–973.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, J. (1998). Nongovernment: NGOs and the political development of the third world. West Hartford, CT: Kumarian Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. L. (2001). Social networks, civil society, and the prospects for consolidating Russia’s democratic transition. American Journal of Political Science, 45(1), 51–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gifford, R. (2014, April 12). China’s future: Enter the Chinese NGO. The Economist. Retrieved from http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21600683-communist-party-giving-more-freedom-revolutionary-idea-enter-chinese-ngo
   Google Scholar
• Hasmath, R., & Hsu, J. (2008). NGOs in China: Issues of good governance and accountability. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 30(1), 29–39.
   Google Scholar
• Hauser, G. A. (1998). Civil society and the principle of the public sphere. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 31(1), 19–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ICNL. (2015, May). NGO law monitor: China. The International Center for Not-for-Profit Law. Retrieved from http://www.icnl.org/research/monitor/china.html
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, A. (1999). The developing of capacity. Community Development Resource Association, 1–32. Retrieved from http://institutofonte.org.br/sites/default/files/Kaplan%20A_The%20Developing%20Of%20Capacity.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Khan, M. A. (1998). Evaluation capacity building: An overview of current status, issues and options. Evaluation, 4(3), 310–328.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, B. (2008). Regulation, evaluation, and certification of NGOs in the PR China. Journal of Current Chinese Affairs-China Aktuell, 37(4), 147–164.
   Google Scholar
• Kuset, J. K., & Rist, R. C. (2004). Ten steps to a results-based monitoring and evaluation system. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S. N., So, C. Y. K., & Leung, L. (2015). Social media and Umbrella Movement: Insurgent public sphere in formation. Chinese Journal of Communication, 8(4), 356–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lennie, J., & Tacchi, J. (2013). Evaluating communication for development: A framework for social change. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lindlof, T. R., & Taylor, B. C. (2010). Qualitative communication research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, J. (2011). Picturing a green virtual public space for social change: A study of Internet activism and Web-based environmental collective actions in China. Chinese Journal of Communication, 4(2), 137–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, Y. (2007). The autonomy of Chinese NGOs: A new perspective. China: An International Journal, 5(02), 173–203.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, M. (1995). Guan shang zhijian: shehui jubian zhong de jidai shenshang [Between government and merchants: Modern gentry-merchants during social transition]. Tianjin: Tianjin People’s Publishing House.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, Q. (2002). Defining Chinese nongovernmental organizations. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 13(2), 113–130.
   Google Scholar
• McPherson, E. (2015). Advocacy organizations’ evaluation of social media information for NGO journalism: The evidence and engagement models. American Behavioral Scientist, 59(1), 124–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Fundamentals of qualitative data analysis (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (2003). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, S. (2015, August 21). NGOs in China: Pummelling the little platoons. The Economist. Retrieved from http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21661665-communist-party-wants-squeeze-civil-society-would-be-unwise-well
   Google Scholar
• Schuh, R. G., & Leviton, L. C. (2006). A framework to assess the development and capacity of non-profit agencies. Evaluation and Program Planning, 29(2), 171–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, S. (2013). The use of Web 2.0 style technologies among Chinese civil society organizations. Telematics and Informatics, 30(4), 346–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shao, G., Lu, J., & Wu, J. (2012). New media and civic engagement in China: The case of the Xiamen PX event. China Media Research, 8(2), 76–82.
   Google Scholar
• Sima, Y. (2011). Grassroots environmental activism and the Internet: Constructing a green public sphere in China. Asian Studies Review, 35(4), 477–497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobeck, J., & Agius, E. (2007). Organizational capacity building: Addressing a research and practice gap. Evaluation and Program Planning, 30(3), 237–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spires, A. J. (2011). Contingent symbiosis and civil society in an authoritarian state: Understanding the survival of China’s grassroots NGOs. American Journal of Sociology, 117(1), 1–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spires, A. J. (2012). Lessons from abroad: Foreign influences on China's emerging civil society. China Journal, 68, 125–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spires, A. J., Tao, L., & Chan, K. M. (2014). Societal support for China’s grass-roots NGOs: evidence from Yunnan, Guangdong and Beijing. China Journal, 71, 65–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, J., & Xie, L. (2009). Environmental activism, social networks and the internet. The China Quarterly, 198, 422–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, L., & Li, H. (2009). Corporate social responsibility communication of Chinese and global corporations in China. Public Relations Review, 35(3), 199–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teets, J. C. (2014). Civil society under authoritarianism: The China model. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wakeman, F., Jr (1993). The civil society and public sphere debate: Western reflection on Chinese political culture. Modern China, 19(2), 108–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witktorowizcz, Q. (2002). The political limits to nongovernmental organizations in Jordan. World Development, 30(1), 77–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, F. (2003). Environmental GONGO autonomy: Unintended consequences of state strategies in China. The Good Society, 12(1), 35–45.
   Google Scholar
• Xiong, S. (2015. May 29). “Springtime” for third-party evaluation of Chinese NGOs. China Development Brief. Retrieved from http://chinadevelopmentbrief.cn/news/springtime-for-third-party-evaluation-of-chinese-ngos/
   Google Scholar
• Yang, A. (2016). New media, environmental NGOs, and online-based collective actions in China. In S. Rust, S. Monani, & S. Cubitt (Eds.), Ecomedia: Key issues (pp. 213–227). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, A., & Taylor, M. (2010). Relationship building by Chinese ENGOs’ websites: Education, not activation. Public Relations Review, 36, 342–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, G. (2007). How do Chinese civic associations respond to the internet? Findings from a survey. The China Quarterly, 189, 122–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, B. (2015). Internet use, socio-geographic context, and citizenship engagement: A multilevel model on the democratizing effects of the Internet in China. In W. Chen & S. D. Reese (Eds.), Networked China: Global dynamics of digital media and civic engagement (pp. 19–36). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, H. (2015). Mapping the level of development of grassroots NPOs in China. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 1–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, H., & Pan, Q. (2016). Information, community, and action on Sina-Weibo: How Chinese philanthropic NGOs use social media. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar