Understanding public perceptions of genetically modified organisms in China: The role that heuristics play during digital media exposure

References

• Bohner, G., Moskowitz, G. B., & Chaiken, S. (1995). The interplay of heuristic and systematic processing of social information. European Review of Social Psychology, 6(1), 33–68. doi:10.1080/14792779443000003
   Google Scholar
• Cao, C. (2018). GMO China: How global debates transformed China’s agricultural biotechnology policies. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chaiken, S., & Trope, Y. (Eds.). (1999). Dual-process theories in social psychology. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, D., Cheng, C., & Urpelainen, J. (2016). Support for renewable energy in China: A survey experiment with Internet users. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112(5), 3750–3758. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.109
   Google Scholar
• CNNIC. (2019). The 43rd Statistical Report on Internet Development in China. Retrieved from http://www.cnnic.net.cn/hlwfzyj/hlwxzbg/hlwtjbg/201902/P020190318523029756345.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Corburn, J. (2003). Bringing local knowledge into environmental decision making: Improving urban planning for communities at risk. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 22(4), 420–433. doi:10.1177/0739456X03022004008
   Google Scholar
• Cui, B., & Ma, Z. (2013). The influence of interpersonal communication on risk perception: A case study of genetically modified food. Journalism & Communication, 9, 5–20. (In Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Cummings, L. (2014). The “trust” heuristic: Arguments from authority in public health. Health Communication, 29(10), 1043–1056. doi:10.1080/10410236.2013.831685
   Google Scholar
• Dai, J., Zeng, F., & Guo, Q. (2015). Dependence on experts in risk communication: An analysis on reports of genetic modification technology. Journalism & Communication, 22(5), 32–45. (In Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• De Vreese, C. H., & Boomgaarden, H. (2006). News, political knowledge and participation: The differential effects of news media exposure on political knowledge and participation. Acta Politica, 41(4), 317–341. doi:10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500164
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, G. N. (2016). Negative affect as a mechanism of exemplification effects: An experiment on two-sided risk argument recall and risk perception. Communication Research, 43(6), 761–784. doi:10.1177/0093650215579222
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, M. (2003). Purity and danger: An analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Elsbach, K. D. (2004). Managing images of trustworthiness in organizations. In M. K. Roderick & S. C. Karen (Eds.), Trust and distrust in organizations: Dilemmas and approaches (pp. 275–292). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Finucane, M. L., Alhakami, A., Slovic, P., & Johnson, S. M. (2000). The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13(1), 1–17. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(200001/03)13:1<1::AID-BDM333>3.0.CO;2-S
   Google Scholar
• George, S., Kaptan, G., Lee, J., & Frewer, L. (2014). Awareness of adverse effects of nanotechnology increases negative perception among the public: Survey study from Singapore. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 16(12), 2751. doi:10.1007/s11051-014-2751-1
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, R. J., Dunwoody, S., & Yang, Z. J. (2012). Testing the robustness of a risk information processing model. Annals of the International Communication Association, 36, 323–362. doi:10.1080/23808985.2013.11679138
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, S. S., Scheufele, D. A., & Corley, E. A. (2013). Factors influencing public risk–benefit considerations of nanotechnology: Assessing the effects of mass media, interpersonal communication, and elaborative processing. Public Understanding of Science, 22(5), 606–623. doi:10.1177/0963662511417936
   Google Scholar
• Houston, J. B., Hawthorne, J., Perreault, M. F., Park, E. H., Goldstein Hode, M., Halliwell, M. R., … Griffith, S. A. (2015). Social media and disasters: a functional framework for social media use in disaster planning, response, and research. Disasters, 39(1), 1–22. doi:10.1111/disa.12092
   Google Scholar
• Huang, Q. (2018). Public trust in local governments and environmental risks in China: The effects of media use, perceived dread, and perceived inequality. Chinese Journal of Communication, 11(1), 88–104. doi:10.1080/17544750.2017.1328452
   Google Scholar
• Huang, R., & Sun, X. (2016). Dynamic preference revelation and expression of personal frames: how Weibo is used in an anti-nuclear protest in China. Chinese Journal of Communication, 9(4), 385–402. doi:10.1080/17544750.2016.1206030
   Google Scholar
• Jia, H., Wang, D., Miao, W., & Zhu, H. (2017). Encountered but not engaged: Examining the use of social media for science–communication by Chinese scientists. Science Communication, 39(5), 646–672.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, B. B. (2005). Testing and expanding a model of cognitive processing of risk information. Risk Analysis, 25(3), 631–650. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00609.x
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., Slovic, S. P., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (Eds.). (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, C., Siegrist, M., & Gutscher, H. (2006). The role of the affect and availability heuristics in risk communication. Risk Analysis: An Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 26(3), 631–639. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00773.x
   Google Scholar
• King, G., Pan, J., & Roberts, M. E. (2014). Reverse-engineering censorship in China: Randomized experimentation and participant observation. Science, 345(6199), 1251722. doi:10.1126/science.1251722
   Google Scholar
• Lachlan, K., & Spence, P. R. (2010). Communicating risks: Examining hazard and outrage in multiple contexts. Risk Analysis, 30(12), 1872–1886. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01511.x
   Google Scholar
• Lau, R. R., & Redlawsk, D. P. (2001). Advantages and disadvantages of cognitive heuristics in political decision making. American Journal of Political Science, 45(4), 951–971. doi:10.2307/2669334
   Google Scholar
• Lee, C.-J., Scheufele, D. A., & Lewenstein, B. V. (2005). Public attitudes toward emerging technologies: Examining the interactive effects of cognition and affect on public attitudes toward nanotechnology. Science Communication, 27(2), 240–267. doi:10.1177/1075547005281474
   Google Scholar
• Li, Q., Chen, X., Ma, Z., Wang, B., Sun, J., & Liu, T. (2016). A report on civic scientific literacy in China (2015–2016). Retrieved from http://www.cssn.cn/dybg/dyba_wh/201602/t20160204_2859362.shtml (In Chinese)
   Google Scholar
• Lien, C. H., & Cao, Y. (2014). Examining WeChat users’ motivations, trust, attitudes, and positive word-of-mouth: Evidence from China. Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 104–111. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.08.013
   Google Scholar
• Liu, P., Yang, R., & Xu, Z. (2019). Public acceptance of fully automated driving: Effects of social trust and risk/benefit perceptions. Risk Analysis, 39(2), 326–341. doi:10.1111/risa.13143
   Google Scholar
• Marques, M. D., Critchley, C. R., & Walshe, J. (2015). Attitudes to genetically modified food over time: How trust in organizations and the media cycle predict support. Public Understanding of Science, 24(5), 601–618.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. C., & Davis, J. H. (1999). The effect of the performance appraisal system on trust for management: A field quasi-experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(1), 123–136. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.84.1.123
   Google Scholar
• Meffert, M. F., Chung, S., Joiner, A. J., Waks, L., & Garst, J. (2006). The effects of negativity and motivated information processing during a political campaign. Journal of Communication, 56(1), 27–51. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00003.x
   Google Scholar
• Mou, Y., & Lin, C. A. (2014). Communicating food safety via the social media: The role of knowledge and emotions on risk perception and prevention. Science Communication, 36(5), 593–616. doi:10.1177/1075547014549480
   Google Scholar
• Myers, C. D., & Tingley, D. (2016). The influence of emotion on trust. Political Analysis, 24(4), 492–500. doi:10.1093/pan/mpw026
   Google Scholar
• Olofsson, A., & Rashid, S. (2011). The white (male) effect and risk perception: Can equality make a difference? Risk Analysis: An Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 31(6), 1016–1032. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01566.x
   Google Scholar
• Paivio, S. C., & Laurent, C. (2001). Empathy and emotion regulation: Reprocessing memories of childhood abuse. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 57(2), 213–226. doi:10.1002/1097-4679(200102)57:2<213::AID-JCLP7>3.3.CO;2-2
   Google Scholar
• Poortinga, W., & Pidgeon, N. F. (2005). Trust in risk regulation: Cause or consequence of the acceptability of GM food? Risk Analysis: An Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 25(1), 199–209. doi:10.1111/j.0272-4332.2005.00579.x
   Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(1), 185–227. doi:10.1080/00273170701341316
   Google Scholar
• Qiu, H., Weng, S., & Du, K. (2018). Nuclear risk perception, political efficacy, and Internet use for civic engagement in China. Chinese Journal of Communication, 11(2), 218–235. doi:10.1080/17544750.2017.1416536
   Google Scholar
• Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393–404. doi:10.5465/amr.1998.926617
   Google Scholar
• Siegrist, M., Cvetkovich, G., & Roth, C. (2000). Salient value similarity, social trust, and risk/benefit perception. Risk Analysis, 20(3), 353–362. doi:10.1111/0272-4332.203034
   Google Scholar
• Sjöberg, L. (1998). Worry and risk perception. Risk Analysis: An Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 18(1), 85–93.
   Google Scholar
• Sjöberg, L. (2000). Factors in risk perception. Risk Analysis, 20(1), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of risk. Science (New York, N.Y.), 236(4799), 280–285. doi:10.1126/science.3563507
   Google Scholar
• Slovic, P. (1999). Trust, emotion, sex, politics, and science: Surveying the risk‐assessment battlefield. Risk Analysis, 19(4), 689–701. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1999.tb00439.x
   Google Scholar
• Tang, Z., & Fu, C. (2017). Patterns of public opinion evolution on new media sites: A case study of the public opinions genetically modified food on Weibo. Contemporary Communication, (5), 104–106. (In Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Tao, X., & Chen, M. (2016). The changes in Internet users’ comprehension of the science debate on genetically modified food between Fang Zhouzi and Cui Yongyuan: A content analysis of Tencent micro-blog. Studies in Science of Science, 34(4), 496–502. (In Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Todorov, A., Chaiken, S., & Henderson, M. D. (2002). The heuristic-systematic model of social information processing. In J. P. Dillard & M. Pfau (Eds.), The persuasion handbook: Developments in theory and practice (pp. 195–211). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Trumbo, C. W. (2002). Information processing and risk perception: An adaptation of the heuristic-systematic model. Journal of Communication, 52(2), 367–382. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2002.tb02550.x
   Google Scholar
• Tsfati, Y., & Cappella, J. N. (2003). Do people watch what they do not trust? Exploring the association between news media skepticism and exposure. Communication Research, 30(5), 504–529.
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131.
   Google Scholar
• Visschers, V. H., & Siegrist, M. (2008). Exploring the triangular relationship between trust, affect, and risk perception: A review of the literature. Risk Management, 10(3), 156–167.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, W., & Qiao, X. (2019). Transgenic technology in social media images: Media representation of controversial technologies and public feedback. Modern Communication Journal of Communication University of China, 4, 69–75. (In Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Wynne, B. (2013). Social identities and public uptake of science: Chernobyl, Sellafield, and environmental radioactivity sciences. Radioactivity in the Environment, 19, 283–309.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, X., Chen, L., & Feng, Q. (2016). Risk perception of food safety issues on social media. Chinese Journal of Communication, 9(2), 124–138.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Z. J., Aloe, A. M., & Feeley, T. H. (2014). Risk information seeking and processing model: A meta-analysis. Journal of Communication, 64(1), 20–41.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, L., Xu, L., & Zhang, W. (2017). Social media as amplification station: Factors that influence the speed of online public response to health emergencies. Asian Journal of Communication, 27(3), 322–338.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, Z., Wu, J. P., Zhang, Q., & Xu, S. (2013). Transforming visitors into members of online brand communities: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Research, 66(12), 2438–2443.
   Google Scholar