2,625
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Predicting online feminist engagement after MeToo: a study combining resource mobilization and integrative social identity paradigms

&
Pages 351-369 | Received 19 Oct 2019, Accepted 08 Jan 2020, Published online: 11 Feb 2020

References

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  • Alberici, A. I., & Milesi, P. (2013). The influence of the internet on the psychosocial predictors of collective action. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 23(5), 373–388. doi:10.1002/casp.2131
  • Baer, H. (2016). Redoing feminism: Digital activism, body politics, and neoliberalism. Feminist Media Studies, 16(1), 17–34. doi:10.1080/14680777.2015.1093070
  • Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2(1), 21–41. doi:10.1111/1467-839X.00024
  • Bandura, A. (2000). Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(3), 75–78. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00064
  • Barker-Plummer, B., & Barker-Plummer, D. (2018). Twitter as a feminist resource: #YesAllWomen, digital platforms, and discursive social change. In J. Earl & D. A. Rohlinger (Eds.), Social movements and media (pp. 91–118). Bingley: Emerald.
  • Bonilla, Y., & Rosa, J. (2015). #Ferguson: Digital protest, hashtag ethnography, and the racial politics of social media in the United States. American Ethnologist, 42(1), 4–17.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
  • Campbell, A., Gurin, G., & Miller, W. E. (1954). The voter decides. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson & Company.
  • Clark, R. (2016). “Hope in a hashtag”: The discursive activism of #WhyIStayed. Feminist Media Studies, 16(5), 788–804. doi:10.1080/14680777.2016.1138235
  • Collins, P. H. (1991). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Couldry, N. (2014). The myth of “us”: Digital networks, political change and the production of collectivity. Information, Communication & Society, 18(6), 608–626. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2014.979216
  • Craig, S. C. (1979). Efficacy, trust, and political behavior: An attempt to resolve a lingering conceptual dilemma. American Politics Quarterly, 7(2), 225–239. doi:10.1177/1532673X7900700207
  • De Zúñiga, H. G., Veenstra, A. S., Vraga, E. K., Wang, M., DeShano, C. L., Perlmutter, D. D., & Shah, D. V. (2007, August). Online and offline activism: Communication mediation and political messaging among blog readers. Paper presented at the annual convention of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Washington, DC.
  • Dixon, R. (2018, September 14). How China’s feminists launched #MeToo in a country where protest is barely possible. The Los Angeles Times. Retrieved from https://www.latimes.com/world/la-fg-china-metoo-09142018-story.html
  • Drury, J., & Reicher, S. (2005). Explaining enduring empowerment: A comparative study of collective action and psychological outcomes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35(1), 35–58. doi:10.1002/ejsp.231
  • Eveland, W. P., Jr. (2001). The cognitive mediation model of learning from the news: Evidence from nonelection, off-year election, and presidential election contexts. Communication Research, 28(5), 571–601. doi:10.1177/009365001028005001
  • Ferree, M. M., & Miller, F. D. (1985). Mobilization and meaning: Toward an integration of social psychological and resource perspectives on social movements. Sociological Inquiry, 55(1), 38–61. doi:10.1111/j.1475-682X.1985.tb00850.x
  • Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text, 25/26, 56–80. doi:10.2307/466240
  • Gamson, W. A. (1995). Constructing social protest. In H. Johnston & B. Klandermans (Eds.), Social movements and culture (pp. 85–106). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Gamson, W. A., & Wolfsfeld, G. (1993). Movements and media as interacting systems. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 528, 114–125. doi:10.1177/0002716293528001009
  • Han, X. (2018). Searching for an online space for feminism? The Chinese feminist group Gender Watch Women’s Voice and its changing approaches to online misogyny. Feminist Media Studies, 18(4), 734–749. doi:10.1080/14680777.2018.1447430
  • Harwit, E., & Clark, D. (2001). Shaping the internet in China: Evolution of political control over network infrastructure and content. Asian Survey, 41(3), 377–408. doi:10.1525/as.2001.41.3.377
  • Hemmings, C. (2012). Affective solidarity: Feminist reflexivity and political transformation. Feminist Theory, 13(2), 147–161. doi:10.1177/1464700112442643
  • Hercus, C. (1999). Identity, emotion, and feminist collective action. Gender & Society, 13(1), 34–55. doi:10.1177/089124399013001003
  • Ho, P., & Edmonds, R. L. (2007). China’s embedded activism: Opportunities and constraints of a social movement. London: Routledge.
  • Hoffman, L. H., & Schechter, A. L. (2016). Technical skills required: How technological efficacy influences online political behavior. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 60(3), 484–502. doi:10.1080/08838151.2016.1203321
  • Horeck, T. (2014). #AskThicke: “Blurred lines,” rape culture, and the feminist hashtag takeover. Feminist Media Studies, 14(6), 1105–1107. doi:10.1080/14680777.2014.975450
  • Huang, Y. (2016). War on women: Interlocking conflicts within The Vagina Monologues in China. Asian Journal of Communication, 26(5), 466–484. doi:10.1080/01292986.2016.1202988
  • Jouët, J. (2018). Digital feminism: Questioning the renewal of activism. Journal of Research in Gender Studies, 8(1), 133–157.
  • Kawakami, K., & Dion, K. L. (1995). Social identity and affect as determinants of collective action: Toward an integration of relative deprivation and social identity theories. Theory & Psychology, 5(4), 551–577. doi:10.1177/0959354395054005
  • Keller, J. M. (2012). Virtual feminisms: Girls’ blogging communities, feminist activism, and participatory politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15(3), 429–447. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2011.642890
  • Khoja-Moolji, S. (2015). Becoming an “intimate publics”: Exploring the affective intensities of hashtag feminism. Feminist Media Studies, 15(2), 347–350. doi:10.1080/14680777.2015.1008747
  • Kim, Y.-C., & Ball-Rokeach, S. J. (2006). Civic engagement from a communication infrastructure perspective. Communication Theory, 16(2), 173–197. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00267.x
  • Klandermans, B. (1984). Mobilization and participation: Social-psychological expansions of resource mobilization theory. American Sociological Review, 49(5), 583–600. doi:10.2307/2095417
  • Kuo, L. (2018, July 30). #MeToo in China: movement gathers pace amid wave of accusations. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/jul/31/metoo-in-china-movement-gathers-pace-amid-wave-of-accusations
  • Lee, F. L. F. (2005). Collective efficacy, support for democratization, and political participation in Hong Kong. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 18(3), 297–317. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edh105
  • Li, J., & Li, X. (2017). Media as a core political resource: The young feminist movements in China. Chinese Journal of Communication, 10(1), 54–71. doi:10.1080/17544750.2016.1274265
  • Mazer, D. B., & Percival, E. F. (1989). Ideology or experience? The relationships among perceptions, attitudes, and experiences of sexual harassment in university students. Sex Roles, 20(3-4), 135–147. doi:10.1007/BF00287987
  • McCarthy, J. D., & Zald, M. N. (1977). Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. American Journal of Sociology, 82(6), 1212–1241. doi:10.1086/226464
  • Milwertz, C., & Bu, W. (2009). Non-governmental feminist organizing in the People’s Republic of China: Communicating oppositional gender equality knowledge. In K. E. Kuah-Pearce & G. Guiheux (Eds.), Social movements in China and Hong Kong (pp. 227–244). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
  • Morgan, B. L. (1996). Putting the feminism into feminism scales: Introduction of a liberal feminist attitude and ideology scale (LFAIS). Sex Roles, 34(5/6), 359–390.
  • Niemi, R. G., Craig, S. C., & Mattei, F. (1991). Measuring internal political efficacy in the 1988 national election study. American Political Science Review, 85(4), 1407–1413. doi:10.2307/1963953
  • Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Affective publics: Sentiment, technology, and politics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 123–205). New York, NY: Academic.
  • Pollock, P. H., III. (1983). The participatory consequences of internal and external political efficacy: A research note. Political Research Quarterly, 36(3), 400–409. doi:10.1177/106591298303600306
  • Postmes, T., & Brunsting, S. (2002). Collective action in the age of the internet: Mass communication and online mobilization. Social Science Computer Review, 20(3), 290–301. doi:10.1177/089443930202000306
  • Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(4), 717–731. doi:10.3758/BF03206553
  • Rentschler, C. A. (2014). Rape culture and the feminist politics of social media. Girlhood Studies, 7(1), 65–82. doi:10.3167/ghs.2014.070106
  • Salter, M. (2013). Justice and revenge in online counter-publics: Emerging responses to sexual violence in the age of social media. Crime, Media, Culture: An International Journal, 9(3), 225–242. doi:10.1177/1741659013493918
  • Schaffer, K., & Song, X. (2007). Unruly spaces: Gender, women’s writing and indigenous feminism in China. Journal of Gender Studies, 16(1), 17–30. doi:10.1080/09589230601116125
  • Shah, D. V., Cho, J., Eveland, W. P., Jr., & Kwak, N. (2005). Information and expression in a digital age: Modelling internet effects on civic participation. Communication Research, 32(5), 531–565. doi:10.1177/0093650205279209
  • Shen, F., Wang, N., Guo, Z., & Guo, L. (2009). Online network size, efficacy, and opinion expression: Assessing the impacts of internet use in China. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 21(4), 451–476. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edp046
  • Sills, S., Pickens, C., Beach, K., Jones, L., Calder-Dawe, O., Benton-Greig, P., & Gavey, N. (2016). Rape culture and social media: Young critics and a feminist counterpublic. Feminist Media Studies, 16(6), 935–951. doi:10.1080/14680777.2015.1137962
  • Simon, B., Loewy, M., Stürmer, S., Weber, U., Freytag, P., Habig, C., … Spahlinger, P. (1998). Collective identification and social movement participation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(3), 646–658. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.646
  • Smith, H. J., & Ortiz, D. J. (2002). Is it just me? The different consequences of personal and group relative deprivation. In I. Walker & H. J. Smith (Eds.), Relative deprivation: Specification, development, and integration (pp. 91–115). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Smith, H. J., Pettigrew, T. F., Pippin, G. M., & Bialosiewicz, S. (2012). Relative deprivation: A theoretical and meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(3), 203–232. doi:10.1177/1088868311430825
  • Snow, D. A., Rochford, E. B., Jr., Worden, S. K., & Benford, R. D. (1986). Frame alignment processes, micro mobilization, and movement participation. American Sociological Review, 51(4), 464–481. doi:10.2307/2095581
  • Stürmer, S., & Simon, B. (2004). Collective action: Towards a dual-pathway model. European Review of Social Psychology, 15(1), 59–99. doi:10.1080/10463280340000117
  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
  • Tan, J. (2017). Digital masquerading: Feminist media activism in China. Crime, Media, Culture: An International Journal, 13(2), 171–186. doi:10.1177/1741659017710063
  • Thrift, S. C. (2014). #YesAllWomen as feminist meme event. Feminist Media Studies, 14(6), 1090–1092.
  • Van Zomeren, M., Leach, C. W., & Spears, R. (2012). Protesters as “passionate economists”: A dynamic dual pathway model of approach coping with collective disadvantage. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(2), 180–199. doi:10.1177/1088868311430835
  • Van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 504–535. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504
  • Van Zomeren, M., Spears, R., Fischer, A. H., & Leach, C. W. (2004). Put your money where your mouth is! Explaining collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(5), 649–664. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.649
  • Wang, Q. (2018). From “non-governmental organizing” to “outer-system”: Feminism and feminist resistance in post-2000 China. Nora - Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 26(4), 260–277. doi:10.1080/08038740.2018.1531058
  • Xu, F. (2009). Chinese feminisms encounter international feminisms: Identity, power and knowledge production. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 11(2), 196–215. doi:10.1080/14616740902789567
  • Zhang, H. (2018, October 10). One year of #MeToo: How the movement eludes government surveillance in China. The New Yorker. Retrieved from https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/one-year-of-metoo-how-the-movement-eludes-government-surveillance-in-china

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.