References
- Baack, S. (2015). Datafication and empowerment: How the open data movement re-articulates notions of democracy, participation, and journalism. Big Data & Society, 2(2), 205395171559463–205395171559411. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715594634
- Baack, S. (2018). Practically engaged: The entanglements between data journalism and civic tech. Digital Journalism, 6(6), 673–692. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1375382
- Beraldo, D., & Milan, S. (2019). From data politics to the contentious politics of data. Big Data & Society, 6(2), 205395171988596–205395171988511. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951719885967
- Chan, K. (2005). The development of NGOs under a post-totalitarian regime: The case of China. In R. P. Weller (Ed.), Civil life, globalization, and political change in Asia: Organizing between family and state (pp. 20–41). Routledge.
- Choudry, A., & Kapoor, D. (2013). Introduction. In A. Choudry & D. Kapoor (Eds.), NGOization: Complicity, contradictions and prospects (pp. 1–23). Zed Books.
- Currie, M., Paris, B., Pasquetto, I., & Pierre, J. (2016). The conundrum of police officer-involved homicides: Counter-data in Los Angeles County. Big Data & Society, 3(2), 205395171666356–205395171666314. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716663566
- Dryzek, J. S. (1996). Political inclusion and the dynamics of democratization. American Political Science Review, 90(3), 475–487. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2082603
- Gabrys, J., Pritchard, H., & Barratt, B. (2016). Just good enough data: Figuring data citizenships through air pollution sensing and data stories. Big Data & Society, 3(2), 205395171667967–205395171667914. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716679677
- Han, R. (2015). Defending the authoritarian regime online: China’s “voluntary fifty-cent army. The China Quarterly, 224, 1006–1025. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741015001216
- Hipsher, P. L. (1998). Democratic transitions as protest cycles: Social movement dynamics in democratizing Latin America. In D. S. Meyer & S. Tarrow (Eds.), The social movement society: Contentious politics for a new century (pp. 153–172). Rowman & Littlefield.
- Ho, P. (2001). Greening without conflict? Environmentalism, NGOs and civil society in China. Development and Change, 32(5), 893–921. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7660.00231
- Ho, P., & Edmonds, R. L. (2007). Perspectives of time and change: Rethinking embedded environmental activism in China. China Information, 21(2), 331–344. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0920203X07079649
- Horgan, L., & Dourish, P. (2018). Ambiguity, ambivalence, and activism: Data organizing inside the institution. Krisis: The Journal for Contemporary Philosophy, 1, 1–16.
- Hsu, J. Y. (2017). State of exchange: Migrant NGOs and the Chinese government. UBC Press.
- Hsu, A., Weinfurter, A., Yan, C. D., & Cheng, Y. P. (2017, January 23). From citizens to satellites: Third-wave data approaches in China. Data-Driven EnviroLab. https://datadrivenlab.org/china-sights/third-wave-data-approaches-in-china/
- Huang, V. G. (2016). Speaking out: Testimonial narratives of Chinese cyberpetitioners under networked authoritarianism. Discourse, Context & Media, 14, 18–27. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2016.09.002
- Huang, V. G. (2018a). Floating control: Examining factors affecting the management of the civil society sector in authoritarian China. Social Movement Studies, 17(4), 378–392. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2018.1460264
- Huang, V. G. (2018b). Organisational change, ideologies and mega discourses: “De-SMOisation” of the third sector in authoritarian. Journal of Language and Politics, 17(1), 70–91. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17015.hua
- Jinping, X. (2019, January 31). Moving China’s process of ecological civilization to a new stage. Qiushi. http://www.qstheory.cn/dukan/qs/2019-01/31/c_1124054331.htm
- Kennedy, H., Poell, T., & van Dijck, J. (2015). Data and agency. Big Data & Society, 2(2), 205395171562156–205395171562157. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715621569
- King, G., Pan, J., & Roberts, M. E. (2013). How censorship in China allows government criticism but silences collective expression. American Political Science Review, 107(2), 326–343. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055413000014
- Kubik, J. (1998). Institutionalization of protest during democratic consolidation in Central Europe. In D. S. Meyer & S. Tarrow (Eds.), The social movement society: Contentious politics for a new century (pp. 131–152). Rowman & Littlefield.
- Lang, S. (2012). NGOs, civil society, and the public sphere. Cambridge University Press.
- Lewis, S. C. (2012). The tension between professional control and open participation: Journalism and its boundaries. Information, Communication & Society, 15(6), 836–866. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.674150
- Mattoni, A. (2020). The grounded theory method to study data-enabled activism against corruption: Between global communicative infrastructures and local activists’ experiences of big data. European Journal of Communication, 35(3), 265–277. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323120922086
- Maxigas, P. (2012). Hacklabs and hackerspaces: Tracing two genealogies. Journal of Peer Production, 2. http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-2/peer-reviewed-papers/hacklabs-and-hackerspaces/
- McAdam, D. (1982). Political process and the development of black insurgency, 1930–1970. University of Chicago Press.
- Meyer, D. S., & Tarrow, S. (1998). A social movement society. In D. S. Meyer & S. Tarrow (Eds.), The social movement society: Contentious politics for a new century (pp. 1–28). Rowman & Littlefield.
- Milan, S., & Gutiérrez, M. (2018). Technopolitics in the age of Big Data. In F. S. Caballero & T. Gravante (Eds.), Networks, movements and technopolitics in Latin America: Critical analysis and current challenges (pp. 95–109). Palgrave Macmillan.
- Milan, S., & Treré, E. (2019). Big data from the south (s): Beyond data universalism. Television & New Media, 20(4), 319–335. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476419837739
- Milan, S., & van der Velden, L. (2016). The alternative epistemologies of data activism. Digital Culture & Society, 2(2), 57–74. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14361/dcs-2016-0205
- Nogueira, A. S. (2017). Lulism and the institutionalization of social movements in Brazil: Strengthening democratic inclusion and perpetuating hegemony. Tempo Social, 29(3), 229–260. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.11606/0103-2070.ts.2017.118722
- Repnikova, M., & Fang, K. (2018). Authoritarian participatory persuasion 2.0: Netizens as thought work collaborators in China. Journal of Contemporary China, 27(113), 763–779. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2018.1458063
- Ruppert, E. (2015). Doing the transparent state: Open government data as performance indicators. In R. Rottenburg, S. E. Merry, S.-J. Park, & J. Mugler (Eds.), A world of indicators: The making of governmental knowledge through quantification (pp. 127–150). Cambridge University Press.
- Schrock, A. R. (2016). Civic hacking as data activism and advocacy: A history from publicity to open government data. New Media & Society, 18(4), 581–599. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816629469
- Soule, S., & Earl, J. (2005). A movement society evaluated: Collective protest in the United States, 1960–1986. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 10(3), 345–364. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17813/maiq.10.3.730350353753l022
- Spires, A. J. (2011). Contingent symbiosis and civil society in an authoritarian state: Understanding the survival of China’s grassroots NGOs. American Journal of Sociology, 117(1), 1–45. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/660741
- Staggenborg, S. (2013). Institutionalization of social movements. In D. A. Snow, D. della Porta, B. Klandemans, & D. McAdam (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell encyclopedia of social and political movements. Blackwell. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9780470674871.wbespm113
- Stalley, P., & Yang, D. (2006). An emerging environmental movement in China? The China Quarterly, 186, 333–356. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S030574100600018X
- Sun, Y., Graham, T., & Broersma, M. (2020). Informing the government or fostering public debate? How Chinese discussion forums open up spaces for deliberation. Journal of Language and Politics. Advance Online Publication, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.19104.sun.
- Sun, Y., Graham, T., & Broersma, M. (2021). Complaining and sharing personal concerns as political acts: How everyday talk about childcare and parenting on online forums increases public deliberation and civic engagement in China. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2021.1950096
- Sun, Y., & Yan, W. (2020). The power of data from the Global South: Environmental civic tech and data activism in China. International Journal of Communication, 14, 2144–2162.
- Tarrow, S. G. (2011). Power in movement: Social movements and contentious politics (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
- Teets, J. C. (2014). Civil society under authoritarianism. Cambridge University Press.
- Tilly, C., & Tarrow, S. G. (2015). Contentious politics (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
- Xie, L., & van Der Heijden, H. A. (2010). Environmental movements and political opportunities: The case of China. Social Movement Studies, 9(1), 51–68. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14742830903442527
- Yang, G. (2018). Demobilizing the emotions of online activism in China: A civilizing process. International Journal of Communication, 12, 1945–1965.
- Yang, G., & Calhoun, C. (2007). Media, civil society, and the rise of a green public sphere in China. China Information, 21(2), 211–236. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0920203X07079644
- Zeng, F., Dai, J., & Jiang, W. (2019). Authoritarian cooptation of urban protests in China: Normative, cognitive, and regulatory controls through the media. Chinese Journal of Communication, 12(2), 127–146. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2018.1533482
- Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. PublicAffairs.