Mediatized governance in environmental disasters: self-organizing community rescue through collaborative online documents

References

• Abeele, M. V., Schouten, A. P., & Antheunis, M. L. (2017). Personal, editable, and always accessible: An affordance approach to the relationship between adolescents’ mobile messaging behavior and their friendship quality. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 34(6), 875–893. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407516660636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albris, K. (2018). The switchboard mechanism: How social media connected citizens during the 2013 floods in Dresden. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 26(3), 350–357. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity (Vol. 17). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boersma, K., Ferguson, J., Groenewegen, P., Wolbers, J. (2014). Beyond the myth of control: Toward network switching in disaster management. Proceedings of the 11th International ISCRAM Conference, 11, 123–127.
   Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T. (2007). Beyond engagement and participation: User and community coproduction of public services. Public Administration Review, 67(5), 846–860. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00773.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brudney, J. L., & England, R. E. (1983). Toward a definition of the coproduction concept. Public Administration Review, 43(1), 59–65. https://doi.org/10.2307/975300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, N. Y. I., & So, W. M. W. (2015). Environmental governance in Hong Kong–Moving towards multi-level participation. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 8(3), 297–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/17516234.2015.1010471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choksi, M., & Zaveri, M. A. (2019). Multiobjective based resource allocation and scheduling for postdisaster management using IoT. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2019(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6185806
   Google Scholar
• Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2013). Conceptualizing mediatization: Contexts, traditions, arguments. Communication Theory, 23(3), 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guangming Daily. (2021, July 23). “Jiùmìng wéndàng,” gōnggòng cānyù de xīn fāngshì [The “Rescue document,” a new mode of public participation]. https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/MPN2qidqG6yr3NDJkpxi5g.
   Google Scholar
• Hore, K., Gaillard, J. C., Davies, T., & Kearns, R. (2020). People’s participation in disaster-risk reduction: Recentering power. Natural Hazards Review, 21(2), 04020009. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.000035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hufty, M. (2011). Investigating policy processes: The governance analytical framework (GAF). In U. Wiesmann & H. Hurni (Eds.), Research for sustainable development: Foundations, experiences, and perspectives (pp. 403–424). Geographica Bernensia.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, H., Zhang, Y., Guo, W., Cheng, W., & Peng, J. (2022). Online collaborative documents as media logic: The mediatization of risk response in the post-pandemic era. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 892569. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.892569
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaur, A., & Sood, S. K. (2019). Analytical mapping of research on disaster management, types and role of ICT during 2011–2018. Environmental Hazards, 18(3), 266–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/17477891.2019.1567457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreiss, D., Finn, M., & Turner, F. (2011). The limits of peer production: Some reminders from Max Weber for the network society. New Media & Society, 13(2), 243–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810370951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lev-On, A. (2012). Communication, community, crisis: Mapping uses and gratifications in the contemporary media environment. New Media & Society, 14(1), 98–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444811410401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyu, S., Gao, G., Lee, C. H., Sun, L., Xu, N., & Qian, C. (2023). Collective rescue: Why the government can collaborate with the public during extreme precipitation. Water, 15(15), 2848. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15152848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijer, A. J. (2011). Networked coproduction of public services in virtual communities: From a government‐centric to a community approach to public service support. Public Administration Review, 71(4), 598–607. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02391.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mol, A. P. J. (2002). Political modernisation and environmental governance: Between delinking and linking. Europæa, 8(1–2), 169–86.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G. (2018). Governance: Ten thoughts about five propositions. International Social Science Journal, 68(227-228), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/issj.12181
   Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior research methods. 40(3), 879–891.
   Google Scholar
• Prigogine, I., & Stengers, I. (1984). Order out of chaos: Man’s new dialogue with nature. Bantam Books.
   Google Scholar
• Reese, S. D., & Chen, B. (2022). Emerging hybrid networks of verification, accountability, and institutional resilience: The U.S. Capitol Riot and the work of open-source investigation. Journal of Communication, 72(6), 633–646. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqac030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996). The new governance: Governing without government. Political Studies, 44(4), 652–667. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb01747.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rijshouwer, E., Uitermark, J., & de Koster, W. (2021). Wikipedia: A self-organizing bureaucracy. Information, Communication & Society, 26(7), 1285–1302. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1994633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schobert, M., Orru, K., Gabel, F., Nero, K., Windsheimer, P., Klaos, M., & Nævestad, T. O. (2023). The three A's of social capital in crises: Challenges with the availability, accessibility and activatability of social support. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 92, 103704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, A., & Hill, B. M. (2014). Laboratories of oligarchy? How the iron law extends to peer production. Journal of Communication, 64(2), 215–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoker, G. (1998). Governance as theory: Five propositions. International Social Science Journal, 50(155), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/issj.12189
   Google Scholar
• Tencent. (2021, July 21). Yìgè jìumìng wéndàng de 24 xiǎoshí [Twenty four hours of a rescue document]. https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/nxHrvg_mg7e7VRmolW0_Tg.
   Google Scholar
• Torfing, J., Peters, B. G., Pierre, J., & Sørensen, E. (2012). Interactive governance: Advancing the aradigm. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Treem, J. W., & Leonardi, P. M. (2013). Social media use in organizations: Exploring the affordances of visibility, editability, persistence, and association. Annals of the International Communication Association, 36(1), 143–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2013.11679130
   Google Scholar
• Tufekci, Z., & Wilson, C. (2012). Social media and the decision to participate in political protest: Observations from Tahrir Square. Journal of Communication, 62(2), 363–379. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01629.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, W., Pan, Z., & Wu, H. (2020). Méijièhuà zhìlǐ–Diànshì wènzhèng gèàn de bǐjiào fēnxī. [ A comparative case analylsis of television wenzheng shows]. Journalism & Communication, 27(11), 37–58.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, N., & Skoric, M. M. (2020). Getting their voice heard: Chinese environmental NGO’s Weibo activity and information sharing. Environmental Communication, 14(6), 844–858. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2020.1758184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar