Designing With or Against Institutions? Dilemmas of Participatory Design in Contested Cities

References

• Arthurson, Kathy, Iris Levin, and Anna Ziersch. 2015. “What Is the Meaning of ‘Social Mix’? Shifting Perspectives in Planning and Implementing Public Housing Estate Redevelopment.” Australian Geographer 46 (4): 491–505. doi:10.1080/00049182.2015.1075270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Björgvinsson, Erling, Pelle Ehn, and Per-Anders Hillgren. 2012. “Agonistic Participatory Design: Working with Marginalised Social Movements.” CoDesign 8 (2-3): 127–144. doi:10.1080/15710882.2012.672577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner, Neil, and Nik Theodore. 2002. “Cities and the Geographies of ‘Actually Existing Neoliberalism.” Antipode 34 (3): 349–379. doi:10.1111/1467-8330.00246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cumbers, Andrew. 2015. “Constructing a Global Commons in, against and beyond the State.” Space and Polity 19 (1): 62–75. doi:10.1080/13562576.2014.995465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Disalvo, Carl. 2012. Adversarial Design. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, James. 1990. The anti-Politics Machine: “Development,” Depoliticization, and Bureaucratic Power in Lesotho. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel. 1980. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972-1977. Edited by Colin Gordon. Brighton: Harvester Press.
   Google Scholar
• Franquesa, Jaume. 2013. Urbanismo Neoliberal, Negocio Inmobiliario y Vida Vecinal. El Caso de Palma [Neoliberal Urbanism, Real Estate Business and Neighborhood Life. The Palma Case]. Barcelona: Icaria – Institut català d’Antropologia.
   Google Scholar
• Hackworth, Jason. 2013. The Neoliberal City: Governance, Ideology, and Development in American Urbanism. London: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huybrechts, Liesbeth, Cristiano Storni, Yanki Lee, Selina Schepers, Jessica Schoffelen, and Katrien Dreessen. 2014. Participation is Risky. Approaches to Joint Creative Processes. Amsterdam: Valiz.
   Google Scholar
• Huybrechts, Liesbeth, Henric Benesch, and Jon Geib. 2017. “Institutioning: Participatory Design, Co-Design and the Public Realm.” CoDesign 13 (3): 148–159. doi:10.1080/15710882.2017.1355006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaethler, Michael, Seppe De Blust, and Tim Devos. 2017. “Ambiguity as Agency: Critical Opportunists in the Neoliberal City.” CoDesign 13 (3): 175–186. doi:10.1080/15710882.2017.1355002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelty, Christopher M. 2019. The Participant: A Century of Participation in Four Stories. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kothari, Uma. 2001. “Power Knowledge and Social Control in Participatory Development.” In Participation: The New Tyranny? edited by Bill Cooke and Uma Kothari, 139–152. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. 1993. We Have Never Been Modern. Edited by Catherine Porter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, Julie, Hal Pawson, Laurence Troy, and Ryan van den Nouwelant. 2018. “Australia Needs to Triple Its Social Housing by 2036. This Is the Best Way to Do It.” The Conversation, November 14. https://theconversation.com/australia-needs-to-triple-its-social-housing-by-2036-this-is-the-best-way-to-do-it-105960
   Google Scholar
• Lenskjold, Tau Ulv, Sissel Olander, and Joachim Halse. 2015. “Minor Design Activism: Prompting Change from Within.” Design Issues 31 (4): 67–78. doi:10.1162/DESI_a_00352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Tania Murray. 1999. “Compromising Power: Development, Culture, and Rule in Indonesia.” Cultural Anthropology 14 (3): 295–322. doi:10.1525/can.1999.14.3.295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Tania Murray. 2007. The Will to Improve: Governmentality, Development, and the Practice of Politics. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lodato, Thomas, and Carl Disalvo. 2018. “Institutional Constraints: The Forms and Limits of Participatory Design in the Public Realm.” In Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference, Vol. 1, 1–12. PDC ’18. ACM. Hasselt and Genk Belgium. doi:10.1145/3210586.3210595.[Mismatch
   Google Scholar
• Mares, Peter. 2020. “When the Market Is the Policy, Housing Fails.” Inside Story.
   Google Scholar
• Miessen, Markus. 2010. The Nightmare of Participation. Berlin: Sternberg Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, Chantal. 2005. On the Political. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nader, Laura. 1990. Harmony Ideology: Justice and Control in a Zapotec Mountain Village. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• NSW Department of Communities and Justice. 2019. “Expected Waiting Times.” https://www.facs.nsw.gov.au/housing/help/applying-assistance/expected-waiting-times
   Google Scholar
• NSW Government. 2016. “Future Directions for Social Housing in NSW.” Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Palmås, Karl, and Otto Von Busch. 2015. “Quasi-Quisling: Co-Design and the Assembly of Collaborateurs.” CoDesign 11 (3-4): 236–249. doi:10.1080/15710882.2015.1081247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parra-Agudelo, Leonardo, Jaz Hee-jeong Choi, Marcus Foth, and Carlos Estrada. 2018. “Creativity and Design to Articulate Difference in the Conflicted City: Collective Intelligence in Bogota’s Grassroots Organisations.” AI & SOCIETY 33 (1): 147–158. doi:10.1007/s00146-017-0716-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poulantzas, Nicos. 2000. State, Power, Socialism. London: Verson.
   Google Scholar
• Raco, Mike, Emma Street, and Sonia Freire-Trigo. 2016. “The New Localism, anti-Political Development Machines, and the Role of Planning Consultants: Lessons from London’s South Bank.” Territory, Politics, Governance 4 (2): 216–240. doi:10.1080/21622671.2015.1036912.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, Dallas, and Michael Darcy. 2020. “Public Housing ‘Renewal’ Likely to Drive Shift to Private Renters, Not Owners, in Sydney.” The Conversation, July 7. https://theconversation.com/public-housing-renewal-likely-to-drive-shift-to-private-renters-not-owners-in-sydney-133352
   Google Scholar
• Scott, James C. 1998. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, Wendy S. 2007. Cities of Whiteness. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, Erik. 2010. “Post-Democratic Cities: For Whom and for What?” Paper Presented at Regional Studies Association Annual Conference, Budapest, May 26.
   Google Scholar
• Sydney Metro. 2018. “Waterloo Integrated Station Development.” Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Waterloo Redevelopment Group. 2019. “Motion to the Waterloo Redevelopment Group.” Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Wynne, Laura, Jenna Condie, Alistair Sisson, and Pratichi Chatterjee. 2018. “We Still Live Here: Public Housing Tenants Fight for Their Place in the City.” The Conversation, November 20. https://theconversation.com/we-still-live-here-public-housing-tenants-fight-for-their-place-in-the-city-107188
   Google Scholar