How ideas work: memes and institutional material in the first 100 years of the neighborhood unit

References

• Abercrombie, P. 1944. Greater London Plan. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Adams, T. 1934. The Design of Residential Areas: Basic Considerations, Principles, and Methods. London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Adams, T., and E. M. Bassett. 1929. “Problems of Planning Unbuilt Areas”. Regional Survey of New York and Its Environs. (Vol. 7 1974. Reprint edition published by Arno Press). New York: Committee on the Regional Plan of New York and Its Environs.
   Google Scholar
• Banerjee, T., and W. C. Baer. 1984. Beyond the Neighborhood Unit: Residential Environments and Public Policy. New York: Plenum Press.10.1007/978-1-4757-9418-2
   Google Scholar
• Barley, S. R., and P. S. Tolbert. 1997. “Institutionalization and Structuration: Studying the Links between Action and Institution.” Organization Studies 18 (1): 93–117.10.1177/017084069701800106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bateson, G. 1972. Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution, and Epistemology. San Francisco: Chandler.
   Google Scholar
• Birch, E. L. 1980. “Radburn and the American Planning Movement the Persistence of an Idea.” Journal of the American Planning Association 46 (4): 424–439.10.1080/01944368008977075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyer, M. C. 1983. Dreaming the Rational City. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brody, J. 2013. “The Neighborhood Unit Concept and the Shaping of Land Planning in the United States 1912–1968.” Journal of Urban Design 18 (3): 340–362.10.1080/13574809.2013.800453
   Google Scholar
• Corbusier, Le. 1973. The Athens Charter. Translated by A. Eardley. New York: Grossman.
   Google Scholar
• Dahir, J. 1947. The Neighborhood Unit Plan – Its Spread and Acceptance: A Selected Bibliography with Interpretative Comments. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Domhardt, K. M. 2012. “The Garden City Idea in the CIAM Discourse on Urbanism: A Path to Comprehensive Planning.” Planning Perspectives 27 (2): 173–197.10.1080/02665433.2012.646768
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duany, A., and E. Plater-Zyberk. 1994. “The Neighborhood, the District, and the Corridor.” In The New Urbanism: Toward an Architecture of Community, edited by P. Katz, xvii–xx. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Duany, A., E. Plater-Zyberk, and J. Speck. 2000. Suburban Nation: The Rise of Sprawl and the Decline of the American Dream. New York: North Point Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. 1995. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Farr, D. 2008. Sustainable Urbanism: Urban Design with Nature. Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Housing Administration. 1938. Planning Profitable Neighborhoods (Technical Bulletin no. 7). Washington: Federal Housing Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Forshaw, J. H., and P. Abercrombie. 1943. County of London Plan. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1977. “Nietzsche, Genealogy, History.” In Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews, edited by D. F. Bouchard, 139–164. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glass, R. 1945. “Social Aspects of Town Planning.” Architectural Review 97: 67–71.
   Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. 1973. “The Strength of Weak Ties.” American Journal of Sociology 78: 1360–1380.10.1086/ajs.1973.78.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gries, J. M., and J. Ford, eds. 1932. Planning for Residential Districts Vol. 1. Washington: President's Conference on Home Building and Home Ownership.
   Google Scholar
• Gropius, W. 1945. Rebuilding Our Communities. Chicago, IL: P. Theobald.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. 1992. Urban and Regional Planning. 3rd ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. 1999. “Institutionalist Analysis, Communicative Planning, and Shaping Places.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 19: 111–121.10.1177/0739456X9901900201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. 2010. “Introduction: The Transformational Flow of Knowledge and Expertise in the Planning Field.” In Crossing Borders: International Exchange and Planning Practices Healey and Upton, edited by Patsy Healey and Robert Upton, 1–26. RTPI Library 19. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P., and R. Upton, eds. 2010. Crossing Borders: International Exchange and Planning Practices. RTPI Library 19. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Heydecker, W. D., and E. P. Goodrich. 1929. “Sunlight and Daylight for Urban Areas”. Regional Survey of New York and Its Environs, (Vol. 7, 1974. Reprint edition published by Arno Press). New York: Committee on the Regional Plan of New York and Its Environs.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, E. 1902. Garden Cities of to-Morrow. London: S. Sonnenschein & Co., Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Isaacs, R. 1948. “The Neighborhood Theory: An Analysis of Its Adequacy.” Journal of the American Institute of Planners 14: 15–23.10.1080/01944364808978605
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. 1961. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Keeble, L. 1983. Town Planning Made Plain. London: Construction Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, S. 1968. The Urban Neighborhood: A Sociological Perspective. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, H. J. 2011. School-Community Relations, Social Capital, and Children’s Walking to School Behaviors. PhD diss., Texas A&M University.
   Google Scholar
• Lawhon, L. L. 2009. “The Neighborhood Unit: Physical Design or Physical Determinism?” Journal of Planning History 8 (2): 111–132.10.1177/1538513208327072
   Google Scholar
• Leccese, M., and K. McCormick, eds. 1999. Charter of the New Urbanism. New York: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, Duanfang. 2006. “Travelling Urban Form: The Neighborhood Unit in China.” Planning Perspectives 21 (4): 369–392.10.1080/02665430600892138
   Google Scholar
• Mehaffy, M. W., S. Porta, and O. Romice. 2014. “The ‘Neighborhood Unit’ on Trial: A Case Study in the Impacts of Urban Morphology.” Journal of Urbanism 8 (2): 199–217. doi: 10.1080/17549175.2014.908786.
   Google Scholar
• Mumford, E. 2000. The CIAM Discourse on Urbanism, 1928–1960. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Osborn, F. J., and A. Whittick. 1963. The New Towns: The Answer to Megalopolis. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrowski, W. 1970. Contemporary Town Planning: From the Origins to the Athens Charter. The Hague: International Federation for Housing and Planning and Centre De Recherche D’Urbanisme.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, C. A. 1929. “The Neighborhood Unit, a Scheme of Arrangement for the Family-Life Community.” In Regional Survey of New York and Its Environs. Vol. 7, 2–140. New York: Committee on the Regional Plan of New York and Its Environs.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, C. A. 1933. The Rebuilding of Blighted Areas: A Study of the Neighborhood Unit in Replanning and Plot Assemblage. New York: Regional Plan Association.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, N., T. B. Lawrence, and C. Hardy. 2004. “Discourse and Institutions.” Academy of Management Review 29 (4): 635–652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodwin, L. 1956. The British New Towns Policy: Problems and Implications. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674420526
   Google Scholar
• Sanyal, B., L. J. Vale, and C. D. Rosan, eds. 2012. Planning Ideas That Matter: Livability, Territoriality, Governance, and Reflective Practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schon, D. A., and M. Rein. 1994. Frame Reflection: Toward the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Silver, C. 1985. “Neighborhood Planning in Historical Perspective.” Journal of the American Planning Association 51 (2): 161–174.10.1080/01944368508976207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, M. 1985. Thomas Adams and the Modern Planning Movement: Britain, Canada and the United States, 1900–1940. Oxford, UK: Alexandrine Press.
   Google Scholar
• Solow, A. A., and A. Copperman. 1948. Planning the Neighborhood. Chicago, IL: American Public Health Association.
   Google Scholar
• Solow, A. A., C. C. Ham, and E. O. Donnelly. 1969. The Concept of the Neighborhood Unit: Its Emergence and Influence on Residential Environmental Planning and Development. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public and International Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Somer, K. 2007. The Functional City: CIAM and Cornelis Van Eesteren, 1928–1960. Rotterdam: NAi Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Star, S. L., and J. R. Griesemer. 1989. “Institutional Ecology, ‘translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology.” Social Studies of Science 19 (3): 387–420.10.1177/030631289019003001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyrwhitt, J., J. L. Sert, and E. N. Rogers, eds. 1952. The Heart of the City: Towards the Humanisation of Urban Life. International Congresses for Modern Architecture. New York: Pellegrini and Cudahy.
   Google Scholar
• Unwin, R. 1918. Nothing Gained by Overcrowding!: How the Garden City Type Development May Benefit Both Owner and Occupier. London: Garden Cities and Town Planning Association.
   Google Scholar
• Unwin, R. 1922. “The Overgrown City.” Survey 49: 85–86.
   Google Scholar
• Urban Land Institute. 1968. The Community Builders Handbook. Anniversary Edition, edited by J. R. McKeever. Washington, DC: Urban Land Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Urban Land Institute. 1947. The Community Builders Handbook, edited by S. H. Mott and M. S. Wehrly. Washington, DC: Urban Land Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Urban Land Institute. 1950. Home Builders Manual for Land Development. Washington: National Association of Home Builders.
   Google Scholar
• Verma, N., ed. 2007. Institutions and Planning. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Vidyarthi, S. 2010. “Inappropriately Appropriated or Innovatively Indigenized: Neighborhood Unit in Post-Independence India.” Journal of Planning History 9: 2–50.
   Google Scholar
• Webber, M. 1963. “Order in Diversity: Community without Propinquity.” Cities and Space: The Future Use of Urban Land. J. Lowdon Wingo, Ed. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, M. A. 1987. The Rise of the Community Builders: The American Real Estate Industry and Urban Land Planning. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Worley, W. S. 1990. J.C. Nichols and the Shaping of Kansas City: Innovation in Planned Residential Communities. Columbia, MO: University of Missouri Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yeomans, A. B. 1916. City Residential Land Development. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zadorin, D. 2009. “Microrayon Handbook.” Volume (Amsterdam, Netherlands) 21: 27–35.
   Google Scholar
• Zucker, P., ed. 1944. New Architecture and City Planning. New York: Philosophical Library.
   Google Scholar