Urban, suburban or rural? Understanding preferences for the residential environment

References

• Aero, T. 2006. “Residential Choice from a Lifestyle Perspective.” Housing, Theory and Society 23 (2): 109–130. doi:10.1080/14036090600773139.
   Google Scholar
• Amerigo, M., and J. I. Aragones. 1997. “A Theoretical and Methodological Approach to the Study of Residential Satisfaction.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 17 (1): 47–57. doi:10.1006/jevp.1996.0038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barcus, H. R. 2004. “Urban-rural Migration in the USA: An Analysis of Residential Satisfaction.” Regional Studies 38: 643–657. doi:10.1080/003434042000240950.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berndgen-Kaiser, A., T. Köhler, M. Wiechert, S. Netsch, C. Ruelle, and A. F. Marique. 2018. “Approaches to Handling Future Use of the Single-family Housing Stock: Evidence Form Belgium, Germany and the Netherlands.” Open House International 43 (3): 69–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brun, J., and J. Fagnani. 1994. “Life-styles and Locational Choices - Trade-offs and Compromises - A Case-study of Middle-class Couples Living in the Ile-De-France Region.” Urban Studies 31: 921–934. doi:10.1080/00420989420080751.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buzar, S., P. Ogden, R. Hall, A. Haase, S. Kabisch, and A. Steinfuhrer. 2007. “Splintering Urban Populations: Emergent Landscapes of Reurbanisation in Four European Cities.” Urban Studies 44 (4): 651–677. doi:10.1080/00420980601185544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, J., and D. Wang. 2016. “Environmental Correlates of Residential Satisfaction: An Exploration of Mismatched Neighborhood Characteristics in the Twin Cities.” Landscape and Urban Planning 150: 26–35. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.02.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, G. H., and D. A. Rodriquez. 2014. “The Influence of Residential Dissonance on Physical Activity and Walking: Evidence from the Montgomery County, MD, and Twin Cities, MN, Areas.” Journal of Transport Geography 41: 259–267. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.06.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coolen, H. C. C. H. 2008. “The Meaning of Dwelling Features. Conceptual and Methodological Issues.” Sustainable Urban Areas (24), IOS Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S., and D. Stead. 2002. “Urban-Rural Relationships: An Introduction and a Brief History.” Built Environment 28 (4): 269–277.
   Google Scholar
• De Vos, J., B. Derudder, V. Van Acker, and F. Witlox. 2012. “Reducing Car Use: Changing Attitudes or Relocating? the Influence of Residential Dissonance on Travel Behavior.” Journal of Transport Geography 22: 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.11.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vos, J., P. L. Mokhtarian, T. Schwanen, V. Van Acker, and F. Witlox. 2016b. “Travel Mode Choice and Travel Satisfaction: Bridging the Gap between Decision Utility and Experienced Utility.” Transportation 43 (5): 771–796. doi:10.1007/s11116-015-9619-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vos, J., V. Van Acker, and F. Witlox. 2016a. “Urban Sprawl: Neighborhood Dissatisfaction and Urban Preferences. Some Evidence from Flanders.” Urban Geography 37 (6): 839–862. doi:10.1080/02723638.2015.1118955.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deurloo, M. C., W. A. V. Clark, and F. M. Dieleman. 1990. “Choice of Residential Environment in the Randstad.” Urban Studies 27: 335–351. doi:10.1080/00420989020080311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dieleman, F. M., and C. H. Mulder. 2002. “The Geography of Residential Choice.” In Residential Environments. Choice, Satisfaction and Behaviour, edited by J. I. Aragonés, G. Francescato, and T. Gärling, 35–54. Westport, Connecticut: Bergin & Garvey.
   Google Scholar
• Feijten, P., P. Hooimeijer, and C. H. Mulder. 2008. “Residential Experience and Residential Environment Choice over the Life-course.” Urban Studies 45: 141–162. doi:10.1177/0042098007085105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, R. M. 1990. “Settlement-identity - Psychological Bonds with Home Places in a Mobile Society.” Environment and Behavior 22: 183–229. doi:10.1177/0013916590222002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heins, S. 2004. “Rural Living in City and Countryside: Demand and Supply in the Netherlands.” Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 19: 391–408. doi:10.1007/s10901-004-3042-4.
   Google Scholar
• Howley, P., M. Scott, and D. Redmond. 2009. “An Examination of Residential Preferences for Less Sustainable Housing: Exploring Future Mobility among Dublin Central City Residents.” Cities 26: 1–8. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2008.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen, S. J. T., H. C. C. H. Coolen, and R. W. Goetgeluk. 2011. “Discussion and Directions for Future Research.” In The Measurement and Analysis of Housing Preference and Choice, edited by S. J. T. Jansen, H. C. C. H. Coolen, and R. W. Goetgeluk, 253–264. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jansen, S. J. T. 2012. “What Is the Worth of Values in Guiding Residential Preferences and Choices?” Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 27 (3): 273–300. doi:10.1007/s10901-012-9270-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen, S. J. T. 2014. “Why Is Housing Always Satisfactory? A Study into the Impact of Cognitive Restructuring and Future Perspectives on Housing Appreciation.” Social Indicators Research 116 (2): 353–371. doi:10.1007/s11205-013-0303-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kajosaari, A., K. Hasanzadeh, and M. Kytta. 2019. “Residential Dissonance and Walking for Transport.” Journal of Transport Geography 7: 134–144. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.11.012.
   Google Scholar
• Kamruzzaman, M. D., D. Baker, S. Washington, and G. Turrell. 2013. “Residential Dissonance and Mode Choice.” Journal of Transport Geography 33: 12–28. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.09.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karsten, L. 2007. “Housing as a Way of Life: Towards an Understanding of Middle-class Families’ Preference for an Urban Residential Location.” Housing Studies 22: 83–98. doi:10.1080/02673030601024630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, P. P., C. R. Sekhar, and M. Parida. 2018. “Residential Dissonance in TO Neighborhoods.” Journal of Transport Geography 72: 166–177. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.09.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindberg, E., T. Hartig, J. Garvill, and T. Garling. 1992. “Residential-location Preferences across the Life-span.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 12 (2): 187–198. doi:10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80070-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovejoy, K., S. Handy, and P. Mokhtarian. 2010. “Neighborhood Satisfaction in Suburban Vesus Traditional Environments: An Evaluation of Contributing Characteristics in Eigh California Neighborhoods.” Landscape and Urban Planning 97: 37–48. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.04.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luckey, K. S., W. E. Marshall, C. Durso, and C. Atkinson-Palombo. 2018. “Residential Preferences, Transit Accessibility and Social Equity: Insights from the Denver Region.” Journal of Urbanism 11 (2): 149–174.
   Google Scholar
• McCrea, R., T. K. Shyy, and R. J. Stimson. 2014. “Satisfied Residents in Different Types of Local Areas: Measuring What’s Most Important.” Social Indicators Research 118: 87–101. doi:10.1007/s11205-013-0406-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meesters, J. 2009. “The Meaning of Activities in the Dwelling and the Residential Environment. A Structural Approach in People-environment Relations.” Sustainable Urban Areas (27), IOS Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Mohamed, R. 2008. “Who Would Pay for Rural Open Space Preservation and Inner-city Redevelopment? Identifying Support for Policies that Can Contribute to Regional Land Use Governance.” Urban Studies 45 (13): 2783–2803. doi:10.1177/0042098008098206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouratidis, K. 2018. “Rethinking How Built Environments Influence Subjective Well-being: A New Conceptual Framework.” Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability 11 (1): 24–40.
   Google Scholar
• Muhammad, S., H. F. L. Ottens, D. Ettema, and T. de Jong. 2007. “Telecommuting and Residential Locational Preferences: A Case Study of the Netherlands.” Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 22: 339–358. doi:10.1007/s10901-007-9088-3.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, D., and E. Gearin. 2001. “Current Preferences and Future Demand for Denser Residential Environments.” Housing Policy Debate 12 (4): 633–659. doi:10.1080/10511482.2001.9521422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeiffer, D., G. Pearthree, and M. M. Ehlenz. 2019. “Inventing What Milennials Want Downtown: Housing the Urban Generation in Low-density Metropolitan Regions.” Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability. doi:10.1080/17549175.2019.1626267.
   Google Scholar
• Rietdijk, N., L. Meijers, H. J. F. M. Boumeester, & A. A. A. Marien. 2012. Huizenkopers in Profiel 2012. Voorburg: NVB-Bouw.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, P. H. 1955. Why Families Move: A Study in the Social Psychology of Urban Residential Mobility. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sabagh, G., M. D. Vanarsdol, and E. W. Butler. 1969. “Some Deteriminants of Intrametropolitan Residential Mobility - Conceptual Considerations.” Social Forces 48: 88–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwanen, T., and P. L. Mokhtarian. 2004. “The Extent and Determinants of Dissonance between Actual and Preferred Residential Neighbourhood Type.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 31: 759–784. doi:10.1068/b3039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigelman, L., and J. R. Henig. 2001. “Crossing the Great Divide. Race and Preferences for Living in the City versus the Suburbs.” Urban Affairs Review 37 (1): 3–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talen, E. 2001. “Traditional Urbanism Meets Residential Affluence: An Analysis of the Variability of Suburban Preference.” Journal of the American Planning Association 67 (2): 199–216. doi:10.1080/01944360108976229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dam, F., S. Heins, and B. S. Elbersen. 2002. “Lay Discourses of the Rural and Stated and Revealed Preferences for Rural Living. Some Evidence of the Existence of a Rural Idyll in the Netherlands.” Journal of Rural Studies 18: 461–476. doi:10.1016/S0743-0167(02)00035-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Oostrom, M. 2001. “What People Want, Where People Live”: New Housing Policy in the Netherlands.” Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 16: 307–308. doi:10.1023/A:1012593716604.
   Google Scholar
• Vasanen, A. 2012. “Beyond Stated and Revealed Preferences: The Relationship between Residential Preferences and Housing Choices in the Urban Region of Turku, Finland.” Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 27: 301–315. doi:10.1007/s10901-012-9267-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Y., and K. O’Neill. 2014. “Understanding Factors Affecting People’s Attitudes toward Living in Compact and Mixed Environments: A Case Study of A New Urbanist Project in Eugene, Oregon, USA.” Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability 7 (1): 1–22.
   Google Scholar