112
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Design Highs and Policy Lows in the Making of New Public Space in Mexico City

& ORCID Icon
Received 26 Jan 2022, Accepted 14 Nov 2022, Published online: 01 Dec 2022

References

  • Aguilar, A. G. 1999. “Mexico City Growth and Regional Dispersal: The Expansion of Largest Cities and New Spatial Forms.” Habitat International 23 (3): 391–412. doi:10.1016/S0197-3975(99)00014-4.
  • Anderson, J., K. Ruggeri, K. Steemers, and F. Huppert. 2017. “Lively Social Space, Well-Being Activity, and Urban Design: Findings from a Low-Cost Community-Led Public Space Intervention.” Environment and Behavior 49 (6): 685–716. doi:10.1177/0013916516659108.
  • Bazant, J. 2001. “Lineamientos para el ordenamiento territorial de las periferias urbanas de la ciudad de México.” Papeles de Población 7 (27): 223–239.
  • Bonilla, M. H. (2005). “Mejoramiento del espacio público en las colonias populares de México Caso de estudio de Xalapa-Veracruz.” Revista INVI, 20(53). https://revistadematematicas.uchile.cl/index.php/INVI/article/view/8824
  • Borja, J. 2014. “La urbanización contra la ciudad: La crisis del espacio público.” In Las disputas por la ciudad: Espacio social y espacio público en contextos urbanos de Latinoamérica y Europa, edited by P. Ramírez Kuri, 538–569. Mexico City: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
  • Brain, D. 2019. “Reconstituting the Urban Commons: Public Space, Social Capital and the Project of Urbanism.” Urban Planning 4 (2): 169–182. doi:10.17645/up.v4i2.2018.
  • Brudell, P., and K. Attuyer. 2014. “Neoliberal ‘Regeneration’ and the Myth of Community Participation.” In Neoliberal Urban Policy and the Transformation of the City: Reshaping Dublin, edited by A. MacLaran and S. Kelly, 203–218. Palgrave Macmillan UK. doi:10.1057/9781137377050_13.
  • Burian, E. R. 1998. Modernidad y arquitectura en México. Barcelona, Spain: Gustavo Gili.
  • Carmona, M. 2015. “Re-Theorising Contemporary Public Space: A New Narrative and a New Normative.” Journal of Urbanism International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability 8 (4): 373–405. doi:10.1080/17549175.2014.909518.
  • Carmona, M. 2016. “Design Governance: Theorizing an Urban Design Sub-Field.” Journal of Urban Design 21 (6): 705–730. doi:10.1080/13574809.2016.1234337.
  • Carmona, M. 2019. “Principles for Public Space Design, Planning to Do Better.” Urban Design International 24 (1): 47–59. doi:10.1057/s41289-018-0070-3.
  • CDHDF. 2013. Informe especial sobre el derecho a la movilidad en el Distrito Federal 2011-2012. Distrito Federal: Comisión de Derechos Humanos.
  • Coleman, R. 2011. Measuring the Economic Impact of Park and Recreation Services. Ashburn, VA: National Recreation and Park Association. 10.1080/13606719.2011.604950
  • Conteh, C. 2011. “Policy Implementation in Multilevel Environments: Economic Development in Northern Ontario.” Canadian Public Administration 54 (1): 121–142. doi:10.1111/j.1754-7121.2011.00163.x.
  • CTS EMBARQ México. (2014, July 27). “Seis beneficios de la nueva Ley de Movilidad del DF.” Forbes México. https://www.forbes.com.mx/seis-beneficios-de-la-nueva-ley-de-movilidad-del-df/
  • Cuthbert, A. 2011. “Urban design and spatial political economy.” In Companion to Urban Design, edited by T. Banerjee and A. Loukaitou-Sideris, 103–115. New York: Routledge.
  • Davis, M. 1990. City of Quartz. London: Vintage.
  • de Espacio Publico, Autoridad. 2018. Autoridad del Espacio Público: Presente, Padado, y Futuro. Ciudad de México: Gobierno de la Ciudad de México.
  • Delgadillo, V. 2018. “Diez años de políticas de espacio público: La construcción de nuevas desigualdades en la ciudad de México.” Quid 16 (9): 168–183.
  • de Prensa, Boletín. (2013a). Se inaugura el primer Parque Público de Bolsillo en la Plaza de la Constitución (SIID-035-2013). http://www.data.seduvi.cdmx.gob.mx/portal/index.php/comunicacion-social/comunicados/206-se-inaugura-el-primer-parque-publico-de-bolsillo-en-la-plaza-de-la-constitucion
  • de Prensa, Boletín. (2013b). Inaugura AEP Parque Público de Bolsillo en la Condesa (SIID-074-2013). http://data.seduvi.cdmx.gob.mx/portal/index.php/comunicacion-social/comunicados/326-inaugura-aep-parque-publico-de-bolsillo-en-la-condesa
  • Fernández, M. del S. P.-R. 2020. “Feminismo popular contra la desposesión y la transformación urbana neoliberal: La experiencia del Pedregal de Santo Domingo de la Ciudad de México.” Ciudades 23: Article 23. doi:10.24197/ciudades.23.2020.185-205.
  • Fernández-Álvarez, R. 2017. “Inequitable Distribution of Green Public Space in the Mexico City: An Environmental Injustice Case.” Economía Sociedad y Territorio 17 (54): 399–428. doi:10.22136/est002017697.
  • Gaffikin, F., M. Mceldowney, and K. Sterrett. 2010. “Creating Shared Public Space in the Contested City: The Role of Urban Design.” Journal of Urban Design 15 (4): 493–513. doi:10.1080/13574809.2010.502338.
  • García, A. G. 2016. Transparency in Mexico: An Overview of Access to Information Regulations and Their Effectiveness at the Federal and State Level, 27. Washington, DC: Wilson Center Mexico Institute.
  • Garde, A. M. 2008. “Innovations in Urban Design and Urban Form: The Making of Paradigms and the Implications for Public Policy.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 28 (1): 61–72. doi:10.1177/0739456X08321733.
  • Gomez, J. (2014, September 29). “Inaugura Mancera Parque de Bolsillo en Azcapotzalco.” Infrastructura y Desarrollo En México. http://www.revistainfraestructura.com.mx/inaugura-mancera-parque-de-bolsillo-en-azcapotzalco/
  • González, Conde, and F. J. ed. 2016. El trabajo informal en el espacio público de la Ciudad de México: Una análisis desde la perspectiva de derechos humanos. Distrito Federal, Mexico: Comisión de Derechos Humanos del Distrito Federal.
  • Graham, S., and A. Aurigi. 1997. “Virtual Cities, Social Polarization, and the Crisis in Urban Public Space.” Journal of Urban Technology 4 (1): 19–52. doi:10.1080/10630739708724546.
  • Hall, T. 2007. Turning a Town Around: A Proactive Approach to Urban Design. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Harnik, P., and B. Welle. 2009. Measuring the Economic Value of a City Park System. San Francisco, CA: Trust for Public Land.
  • Hillier, B. 2007. ”Cities as Movement Economies.” In Urban Design Reader, edited by S. Tiesdell and M. Carmona. New York: Routledge
  • Holzner, C. A. 2007. “The Poverty of Democracy: Neoliberal Reforms and Political Participation of the Poor in Mexico.” Latin American Politics and Society 49 (2): 87–122. doi:10.1111/j.1548-2456.2007.tb00408.x.
  • Hudson, B., D. Hunter, and S. Peckham. 2019. “Policy Failure and the Policy-Implementation Gap: Can Policy Support Programs Help?” Policy Design and Practice 2 (1): 1–14. doi:10.1080/25741292.2018.1540378.
  • Imperial, M. T. 2021. ”Implementation Structures: The Use of Top-Down and Bottom-Up Approaches to Policy Implementation.” Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. 10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1750. June 28.
  • Inam, A. 2002. “Meaningful Urban Design: Teleological/Catalytic/Relevant.” Journal of Urban Design 7 (1): 35–58. doi:10.1080/13574800220129222.
  • Iracheta Cenecorta, A. 2003. “Gobernabilidad en la Zona Metropolitana del Valle de México.” Papeles de Población 9 (36): 211–239.
  • Jefatura de Gobierno del Distrito Federal. 2010. Coordinacion de Planeacion del Desarrollo Territorial, Unidad Territorial: 12-091-1. Distrito Federal, Mexico: Pedregal de Las Aguilas.
  • La Gaceta Oficial Del Distrito Federal. 2008. Acuerdo Por El Que Se Crea El Órgano De Apoyo De Las Actividades De La Jefatura De Gobierno Para La Gestión Integral De Los Espacios Públicos De La Ciudad De México, Denominado Autoridad Del Espacio Público Del Distrito Federal. Distrito Federal, Mexico: Gobierno del Distrito Federal.
  • La Gaceta Oficial Del Distrito Federal. 2010. Decreto por el que se reforman la fracción II del artículo 7°; los artículos 49, 50, 50 A, 50 B; se adicionan los artículos 50 C; la denominación de la Sección II BIS del Capítulo VI del Título Tercero y los artículo 198 A, 198 B, 198 C y 198 D del Reglamento Interior de la Administración Pública del Distrito Federal (No. 872). Distrito Federal, Mexico: Gobierno del Distrito Federal.
  • La Gaceta Oficial Del Distrito Federal. 2016. Aviso por el que se da a conocer el programa institucional de la Autoridad del Espacio Público de la Ciudad de México 2013-2018. Distrito Federal, Mexico: Gobierno del Distrito Federal.
  • La Gaceta Oficial Del Distrito Federal. 2018. Acuerdo por el que se extingue el órgano desconcentrado denominado Autoridad del Espacio Público adscrito a la Secretaría de Desarrollo Urbano y Vivienda. Distrito Federal, Mexico: Gobierno del Distrito Federal.
  • Lesnikowski, A., R. Biesbroek, J. D. Ford, and L. Berrang-Ford. 2021. “Policy Implementation Styles and Local Governments: The Case of Climate Change Adaptation.” Environmental Politics 30 (5): 753–790. doi:10.1080/09644016.2020.1814045.
  • Lindquist, E. 2006. “Organizing for Policy Implementation: The Emergence and Role of Implementation Units in Policy Design and Oversight.” Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 8 (4): 311–324. doi:10.1080/13876980600970864.
  • Lombard, M. 2013. “Citizen Participation in Urban Governance in the Context of Democratization: Evidence from Low-Income Neighbourhoods in Mexico.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 37 (1): 135–150. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01175.x.
  • López, R. P. 2015. “De la flânerie al tránsito peatonal: La negación del derecho a la ciudad.” Cybergeo : European Journal of Geography. doi:10.4000/cybergeo.26991.
  • López-García, D., and J. Heathcott. 2022. “Showcase Politics: The Production and Distribution of New Public Space in Mexico City.” Journal of Urban Affairs 1–19. doi:10.1080/07352166.2022.2102987.
  • Loukaitou-Sideris, A. 2012. “Addressing the Challenges of Urban Landscapes: Normative Goals for Urban Design.” Journal of Urban Design 17 (4): 467–484. doi:10.1080/13574809.2012.706601.
  • Loukaitou-Sideris, A., and R. Ehrenfeucht. 2009. Sidewalks: Conflict and Negotiation Over Public Space. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Madanipour, A. 2006. “Roles and Challenges of Urban Design.” Journal of Urban Design 11 (2): 173–193. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13574800600644035.
  • Matland, R. E. 1995. “Synthesizing the Implementation Literature: The Ambiguity-Conflict Model of Policy Implementation.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 5 (2): 145–174. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a037242.
  • Mehta, V. 2014. “Evaluating Public Space.” Journal of Urban Design 19 (1): 53–88. doi:10.1080/13574809.2013.854698.
  • Mitchell, D. 1995. “The End of Public Space? People’s Park, Definitions of the Public, and Democracy.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 85 (1): 108–133. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.1995.tb01797.xa.
  • Nakamura, R. T., and F. Smallwood. 1980. Politics of Policy Implementation. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
  • Navarrete-Hernandez, P., A. Vetro, and P. Concha. 2021. “Building Safer Public Spaces: Exploring Gender Difference in the Perception of Safety in Public Space Through Urban Design Interventions.” Landscape and Urban Planning 214: 104–180. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104180.
  • O’Rourke, K. E. 2017. Modern Architecture in Mexico City: History, Representation, and the Shaping of a Capital. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
  • O’Toole, L. J., Jr. 2000. “Research on Policy Implementation: Assessment and Prospects.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 10 (2): 263–288. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024270.
  • Pérez, M., and J. Froilán. 2005. “El sector informal en México.” El Cotidiano 130: 31–45.
  • Planning Advisory Service. (1967). Vest Pocket Parks (Information Report No. 229; pp. 15). 15). American Society of Planning Officials. https://www.planning.org/pas/reports/report229/
  • Rangel, R. L. 1993. La planificación y la ciudad de México, 1900-1940. Distrito Federal, Mexico: Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, División de Ciencias y Artes para el Diseño.
  • Renn, O., A. Klinke, and M. van Asselt. 2011. “Coping with Complexity, Uncertainty and Ambiguity in Risk Governance: A Synthesis.” AMBIO 40 (2): 231–246. doi:10.1007/s13280-010-0134-0.
  • Sabatier, P., and D. Mazmanian. 1979. “The Conditions of Effective Implementation: A Guide to Accomplishing Policy Objectives.” Policy Analysis 5 (4): 481–504.
  • Sabatier, P., and D. Mazmanian. 1980. “The Implementation of Public Policy: A Framework of Analysis*.” Policy Studies Journal 8 (4): 538–560. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.1980.tb01266.x.
  • Sachs, J. 2012. Innovation Through Institutional Design: Mexico City’s Autoridad Del Espacio Público. Cambridge, MA: Graduate School of Design, Harvard University.
  • SEDUVI. 2013. Se inaugura parque público de bolsillo en Coyoacán. CDMX Press Release). SIID-047-2013 http://www.data.seduvi.cdmx.gob.mx/portal/index.php/comunicacion-social/comunicados/242-se-inaugura-parque-publico-de-bolsillo-en-coyoacan
  • SEDUVI. 2014. Lineamientos para el diseño e implementación de parques públicos de bolsillo. Distrito Federal, Mexico: Gobierno del Distrito Federal.
  • Seymour, W. N. 1969. Small Urban Spaces: The Philosophy, Design, Sociology, and Politics of Vest-Pocket Parks and Other Small Urban Open Spaces. illustrated edition edition ed. New York: New York University Press.
  • Sorkin, M. 1992. Variations on a Theme Park: The New American City and the End of Public Space. New York: Hill and Wang.
  • Talen, E. 2009. Urban Design Reclaimed. New York: Routledge.
  • Villanueva, M. M. 2015. “The Quality of Public Space in Mexico City: Current State and Trends International Journal of Civil, Environmental, Structural, Construction and Architectural Engineering.” 9 (9): 399–428.
  • Ward, P. 1990. Mexico City: The Production and Reproduction of an Urban Environment. Boston, MA: G K Hall.
  • White, J. T. 2015. “Future Directions in Urban Design as Public Policy: Reassessing Best Practice Principles for Design Review and Development Management.” Journal of Urban Design 20 (3): 325–348. doi:10.1080/13574809.2015.1031212.
  • Whyte, W.H. 1980. The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces. Washington, DC: The Conservation Foundation.
  • Wood, B. D., and R. W. Waterman. 1991. “The Dynamics of Political Control of the Bureaucracy.” The American Political Science Review 85 (3): 801–828. doi:10.2307/1963851.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.