Conceptualising “dose” in paediatric language interventions: Current findings and future directions

References

• Ambridge, B., Theakston, A.L., Lieven, E.V., & Tomasello, M. (2006). The distributed learning effect for children’s acquisition of an abstract syntactic construction. Cognitive Development, 21, 174–193. doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2005.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA, n.d.). Fact sheet: Does treatment time affect SLP outcomes in preschoolers? Retrieved from http://www.asha.org/uploadedFiles/ASHA/NOMS/PreK-NOMS-Treatment-Time.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. (2007). Why “what works” won’t work: Evidence‐based practice and the democratic deficit in educational research. Educational Theory, 57, 1–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-5446.2006.00241.x
   Google Scholar
• Brandel, J., & Loeb, D.F. (2011). Program intensity and service delivery models in the schools: SLP survey results. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 42, 461–490. doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2011/10-0019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cepeda, N.J., Pashler, H., Vul, E., Wixted, J.T., & Rohrer, D. (2006). Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 354. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.354
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cepeda, N.J., Vul, E., Rohrer, D., Wixted, J.T., & Pashler, H. (2008). Spacing effects in learning: A temporal ridgeline of optimal retention. Psychological Science, 19, 1095–1102. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02209.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desmottes, L., Meulemans, T., Patinec, M.A., & Maillart, C. (2017). Distributed training enhances implicit sequence acquisition in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60, 2636–2647. doi:10.1044/2017_JSLHR-L-16-0146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassink, J.M., & Leonard, L.B. (2010). Within-treatment factors as predictors of outcomes following conversational recasting. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 19, 213–224. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2010/09-0083)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Justice, L.M., Logan, J., Jiang, H., & Schmitt, M.B. (2017). Algorithm-driven dosage decisions (AD3): Optimizing treatment for children with language impairment. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 26, 57–68. doi:10.1044/2016_AJSLP-15-0058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Justice, L.M., Logan, J., Schmitt, M.B., & Jiang, H. (2016). Designing effective speech-language interventions for children in the public schools: Leverage the spacing effect. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 85–91. doi:10.1177/2372732215624705
   Google Scholar
• Language and Reading Research Consortium, Arthur, A.M., & Davis, D.L. (2016). A pilot study of the impact of double-dose robust vocabulary instruction on children’s vocabulary growth. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 9, 173–200. doi:10.1080/19345747.2015.1126875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGinty, A.S., Breit-Smith, A., Fan, X., Justice, L.M., & Kaderavek, J.N. (2011). Does intensity matter? Preschoolers’ print knowledge development within a classroom-based intervention. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 26, 255–267. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2011.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proctor-Williams, K., & Fey, M.E. (2007). Recast density and acquisition of novel irregular past tense verbs. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50, 1029–1047. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2007/072)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruggero, L., McCabe, P., Ballard, K.J., & Munro, N. (2012). Paediatric speech-language pathology service delivery: An exploratory survey of Australian parents. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 14, 338–350. doi:10.3109/17549507.2011.650213
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, M.B., Justice, L.M., & Logan, J.A. (2017). Intensity of language treatment: Contribution to children’s language outcomes. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 52, 155–167. doi:10.1111/1460-6984.12254
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, S.F., Fey, M.E., & Yoder, P. (2007). Differential treatment intensity research: A missing link to creating optimally effective communication interventions. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 13, 70–77. doi:10.1002/mrdd.20139
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Williams, A.L. (2012). Intensity in phonological intervention: Is there a prescribed amount? International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 14, 456–461. doi:10.3109/17549507.2012.688866
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoder, P., Woynaroski, T., Fey, M., & Warren, S. (2014). Effects of dose frequency of early communication intervention in young children with and without Down syndrome. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 119, 17–32. doi:10.1352/1944-7558-119.1.17
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yoder, P., Woynaroski, T., Fey, M.E., Warren, S.F., & Gardner, E. (2015). Why dose frequency affects spoken vocabulary in preschoolers with Down syndrome. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 120, 302–314. doi:10.1352/1944-7558-120.4.302
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zietman, A.L., DeSilvio, M.L., Slater, J.D., Rossi, C.J., Miller, D.W., Adams, J.A., & Shipley, W.U. (2005). Comparison of conventional-dose vs high-dose conformal radiation therapy in clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate. A Randomized Controlled Trial. JAMA, 294, 1233–1239. doi:10.1001/jama.294.10.1233
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar