Impact of communication partner familiarity and speech accuracy on parents’ ratings of their child for the Intelligibility in Context Scale: Dutch

References

• Barrozo, T., Pagan-Neves, L.O., Pinheiro da Silva, J., & Wertzner, H. (2017). Sensitivity and specificity of the percentage of consonants correct-revised in the identification of speech sound disorder. Communication Disorders, Audiology and Swallowing, 29, doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20172016038.
   Google Scholar
• Baudonck, N.L.H., Buekers, R., Gillebert, S., & Van Lierde, K.M. (2009). Speech intelligibility of Flemish children as judged by their parents. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 61, 288–295. doi: 10.1159/000235994
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brancalioni, A., Magnago, K., & Keske Soares, M. (2012). Proposal for classifying the severity of speech disorder using a fuzzy model in accordance with the implicational model of feature complexity. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 26, 774–790. doi: 10.3109/02699206.2012.701263
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunnegård, K., Lohmander, A., & van Doorn, J. (2009). Untrained listeners’ ratings of speech disorders in a group with cleft palate: A comparison with speech and language pathologists’ ratings. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 44, 656–674. doi: 10.1080/13682820802295203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connolly, J.H. (1986). Intelligibility: A linguistic view. British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 21, 371–376. doi: 10.3109/13682828609019848
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dobinson, C. (2007). An investigation into the use of computers for conducting home practice of speech exercises for people with dysarthria (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK).
   Google Scholar
• Dobinson, C.F. (2013). Nederlandse intelligibility ratings (IR) (J.C. Van Doornik‐van der Zee & H.R. Terband, Trans.). Utrecht, the Netherlands: Utrecht Institute of Linguistics OTS.
   Google Scholar
• Donicht, G., Pagliarin, K., Mota, H., & Keske Soares, M. (2009). Intelligibility of phonological disorder assessed by three groups of judges. Pró-Fono Revista de Atualização Científica, 21, 213–218. doi: 10.1590/S0104-56872009000300006
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Flipsen, P. (1995). Speaker-listener familiarity: Parents as judges of delayed speech intelligibility. Journal of Communication Disorders, 28, 3–19. doi: 10.1016/0021-9924(94)00015-R
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flipsen, P., Hammer, J., & Yost, K. (2005). Measuring severity of involvement in speech delay: Segmental and whole-word measures. American Journal of Speech–Language Pathology, 14, 298–312. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2005/029)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon-Brannan, M., & Hodson, B.W. (2000). Intelligibility/severity measurements of prekindergarten children’s speech. American Journal of Speech–Language Pathology, 9, 141–150. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360.0902.141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopf, S.C., McLeod, S., & McDonagh, S.H. (2017). Validation of the Intelligibility in Context Scale for school students in Fiji. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 31, 487–502. doi: 10.1080/02699206.2016.1268208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huttunen, K., & Sorri, M. (2004). Methodological aspects of assessing speech intelligibility among children with impaired hearing. Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 124, 490–494. doi: 10.1080/00016480310000557
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBM Corp. (2016). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 24.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
   Google Scholar
• Ingram, D. (2002). The measurement of whole-word productions. Journal of Child Language, 29, 713–733. doi:10.1017/S0305000902005275
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingram, D., & Ingram, K. (2001). A whole-word approach to phonological analysis and intervention. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 32, 271–283. doi: 10.1044/0161-1461(2001/024)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Expert Panel on Multilingual Children’s Speech, (IEPMCS). (2012). Multilingual children with speech sound disorders: Position paper. Bathurst, Australia: Charles Sturt University Retrieved from http://www.csu.edu.au/research/multilingual-speech/position-paper
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, C.A., Weston, A.D., & Bain, B.A. (2004). An objective and time-efficient method for determining severity of childhood speech delay. American Journal of Speech–Language Pathology, 13, 55–65. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2004/007)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, H., Grigos, M., McAllister Byun, T., & Davidson, L. (2012). The relationship between inexperienced listeners’ perceptions and acoustic correlates of children’s /r /productions. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 26, 628–645. doi: 10.3109/02699206.2012.682695
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lousada, M., Jesus, L.M., Hall, A., & Joffe, V. (2014). Intelligibility as a clinical outcome measure following intervention with children with phonologically based speech-sound disorders. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 49, 584–601. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12095
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maassen, B., van Haaften, L., Diepeveen, S., van den Engel-Hoek, L., Nijland, L., Terband, H., & De Swart, B. (2017). Het Computer Articulatie Instrument (CAI). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Boom Testuitgevers.
   Google Scholar
• Markham, C., Van Laar, D., Gibbard, D., & Dean, T. (2009). Children with speech, language and communication needs: Their perceptions of their quality of life. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 44, 748–768. doi: 10.1080/13682820802359892
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCormack, J., Baker, E., & Crowe, K. (2018). The human right to communicate and our need to listen: Learning from people with a history of childhood communication disorder. International Journal of Speech–Language Pathology, 20, 142–151. doi: 10.1080/17549507.2018.1397747
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCormack, J., McLeod, S., McAllister, L., & Harrison, L.J. (2010). My speech problem, your listening problem, and my frustration: The experience of living with childhood speech impairment. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 41, 379–392. doi: 10.1044/0161-1461(2009/08-0129)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod, S., Crowe, K., & Shahaeian, A. (2015). Intelligibility in Context Scale: Normative and validation data for English-speaking preschoolers. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 46, 266–276. doi: 10.1044/2015_LSHSS-14-0120
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod, S., Daniel, G., Barr, J. (2013). “When he’s around his brothers … he’s not so quiet”: The private and public worlds of school-aged children with speech sound disorder. Journal of Communication Disorders, 46, 70–83. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2012.08.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod, S., Harrison, L.J., & McCormack, J. (2012a). Intelligibility in Context Scale. Bathurst, Australia: Charles Sturt University. Retrieved from http://www.csu.edu.au/research/multilingual-speech/ics
   Google Scholar
• McLeod, S., Harrison, L.J., & McCormack, J. (2012b). The Intelligibility in Context Scale: Validity and reliability of a subjective rating measure. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55, 648–656. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2011/10-0130)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod, S., Harrison, L.J., & McCormack, J. (2013). Schaal voor verstaanbaarheid in de context: Nederlands [Intelligibility in Context Scale: Dutch] (J.C. Van Doornik‐van der Zee & H.R. Terband, Trans.). Bathurst, Australia: Charles Sturt University. Retrieved from http://www.csu.edu.au/research/multilingual‐speech/ics.
   Google Scholar
• McLeod, S., & McCormack, J. (2007). Application of the ICF and ICF-Children and Youth in children with speech impairment. Seminars in Speech and Language, 28, 254–264. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-986522
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Munson, B., Johnson, J.M., & Edwards, J. (2012). The role of experience in the perception of phonetic detail in children’s speech: A comparison between speech–language pathologists and clinically untrained listeners. American Journal of Speech–Language Pathology, 21, 124–139. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2011/11-0009)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann, S., Rietz, C., & Stenneken, P. (2017). The German Intelligibility in Context Scale (ICS-G): Reliability and validity evidence. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 52, 585–594. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, K.Y., To, C.K.S., & McLeod, S. (2014). Validation of the Intelligibility in Context Scale as a screening tool for preschoolers in Hong Kong. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 28, 316–328. doi: 10.3109/02699206.2013.865789
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phȧm, B., McLeod, S., & Harrison, L.J. (2017). Validation and norming of the Intelligibility in Context Scale in Northern Viet Nam. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 31, 665–681. doi: 10.1080/02699206.2017.1306110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shriberg, L.D., Austin, D., Lewis, B.A., McSweeny, J.L., & Wilson, D.L. (1997). The percentage of consonants correct (PCC) metric: Extensions and reliability data. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40, 708–722. doi: 10.1044/jslhr.4004.708
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shriberg, L.D., & Kwiatkowski, J. (1982). Phonological disorders III: A procedure for assessing severity of involvement. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 47, 256–270. doi: 10.1044/jshd.4703.256
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sprunt, B., & Marella, M. (2018). Measurement accuracy: Enabling human rights for Fijian students with speech difficulties. International Journal of Speech–Language Pathology, 20, 89–97. doi: 10.1080/17549507.2018.1428685
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stes, R. (2001). Articulatiestoornissen: Fenomenen, oorzaken en behandeling [Articulation disorders: Phenomena, causes and treatment] (3rd ed.). Leuven, Belgium: Acco.
   Google Scholar
• Van Doornik, A., Gerrits, E., McLeod, S., & Terband, H.R. (2015). SPEECH – Speech Production Disorders And Severity Of The Communicative Handicap (Doctoral dissertation research project). Research group Speech and Language Therapy: Participation through communication, HU University of Applied Sciences and Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Veenker, T.J.G. (2014). The Zep Experiment Control Application (Version 1.10) [Computer software]. Utrecht Institute of Linguistics OTS, Utrecht University. Retrieved from http://www.hum.uu.nl/uilots/lab/zep/
   Google Scholar
• Veenker, T.J.G. (2017). The Zep Experiment Control Application (Version 1.14) [Computer software]. Beexy Behavioral Experiment Software. Retrieved from http://www.beexy.org/zep/
   Google Scholar
• Washington, K.N., McDonald, M.M., McLeod, S., Crowe, K., & Devonish, H. (2017). Validation of the Intelligibility in Context Scale for Jamaican Creole-speaking preschoolers. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 26, 750–761. doi: 10.1044/2016_AJSLP-15-0103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weismer, G. (2008). Speech intelligibility. In M. J. Ball, M.R. Perkins, N. Müller, & S. Howard (Eds.), The handbook of clinical linguistics (pp. 568–582). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2001). International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar